Reliability of radio-ulnar and carpal alignment measurements in the wrist between radiographs and 3D imaging

• Published in: European journal of radiology 2022-09, Vol.154, p.110417-110417, Article 110417
• Main Authors: Ferreira Branco, David, Bouvet, Cindy, Hamard, Marion, Beaulieu, Jean Yves, Poletti, Pierre Alexandre, Boudabbous, Sana
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cone beam CT; Kinematic; Radiographs; Wrist measurements; Wrist position
• ISSN: 0720-048X; 1872-7727
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110417

Conventional radiography is the first modality to investigate the radio-ulno-carpal joint in the event of trauma or instability. This study sought to determine the reliability of cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) and scout of view in evaluating carpal alignment compared with conventional radiographs in order to assess the influence of wrist kinematics on usual measurements. We prospectively recruited 305 patients who successively underwent plain radiography and CBCT. 51 patients with prior acute unilateral wrist trauma were eligible for entry into the study (mean age of 39 years). Three blinded readers performed the measurements separately. The axial method and bony axial lines defined previously in the literature were applied, with three categories of measurements performed, consisting of distal radio-ulnar, radiocarpal, and radio/carpometacarpal measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for paired t-test were calculated to assess inter- and intra-observer agreements. Inter-observer agreement was very high (>0.94) for all modalities. Intra-observer reliability between scout view and CBCT was almost perfect for all measurements. Intra-observer reliability between radiograph and scout view/CBCT was perfect for distal radio-ulnar measurements, substantial for radio-carpal, and moderate for radio/carpometacarpal measurements. In the absence of a strict position control between two imaging acquisitions, only distal radio-ulnar measurements were shown perfectly reliable when using these two imaging methods, which is suggestive of a minor relevance of ulnar/radial deviation. Excepting for some angles, the radio-carpal and radio-carpometacarpal measurements were shown to differ according to wrist position, being thus more sensitive to flexion/extension of the wrist.