Loading…

Modular Fluted Tapered Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Excellent Results in 171 Cases

BACKGROUNDModular fluted tapered (MFT) stems have advanced treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures, but series to date have been limited with respect to cohort size and follow-up duration. The purpose of this study was to determine implant survivorship, radiographic results...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2022-07, Vol.104 (13), p.1188-1196
Main Authors: Hannon, Charles P., Sheehan, Kevin P., Duong, Stephanie Q., Yuan, Brandon J., Lewallen, David G., Berry, Daniel J., Abdel, Matthew P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2718-60f8794ef3e828ffbfe559ac05b4a1f0c752153ac6f472073945eefcb388bfdc3
container_end_page 1196
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1188
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 104
creator Hannon, Charles P.
Sheehan, Kevin P.
Duong, Stephanie Q.
Yuan, Brandon J.
Lewallen, David G.
Berry, Daniel J.
Abdel, Matthew P.
description BACKGROUNDModular fluted tapered (MFT) stems have advanced treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures, but series to date have been limited with respect to cohort size and follow-up duration. The purpose of this study was to determine implant survivorship, radiographic results, complications, and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems in a large series of patients. METHODSWe identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with an MFT stem between 2000 and 2018 using our institutional total joint registry. The mean age was 75 years, 50% were female, and the mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2. The median stem diameter was 18 mm and median stem length was 210 mm. The cumulative incidences of revision and reoperation with death as the competing risk were calculated, radiographs were reviewed, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris hip score (HHS). The mean follow-up was 5 years. RESULTSThe 10-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 10%. There were 17 revisions, of which only 3 were for the distal fluted portion of the MFT stem. Revision indications included periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 6) and dislocation (n = 11). The 10-year cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 15%. In addition to the above 17 revisions, there were 7 reoperations for superficial wound complications (n = 4), Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 1), vascular occlusion (n = 1), and acetabular cartilage degeneration requiring an acetabular component (n = 1). Radiographically, there was 1 fracture nonunion. All unrevised MFT stems were radiographically well fixed. Subsidence of ≥5 mm occurred in 11%, but all implants were stable at the most recent follow-up. The mean HHS was 75 at 2 years (n = 71). CONCLUSIONSIn this large series of 171 Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems, we found that such constructs were associated with a high rate of fracture healing and provided extremely reliable and durable implant fixation, with no revisions for aseptic loosening. Dislocation and PJI were the most common complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCETherapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.21.01168
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2686057653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2686057653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2718-60f8794ef3e828ffbfe559ac05b4a1f0c752153ac6f472073945eefcb388bfdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtPAyEUhYnRxPpYumfpZvQCA0PdaWN9pEbjY00ovaSjtFOBifrvZayrc3Lz5eacQ8gJgzPOQJ3fX92_FHcGjCm9Q0ZMClkxodUuGQFwVo2FlPvkIKV3AKhraEbEPnSLPthIp6HPuKCvdoOx6EvGVaK-i_QJY7uJXcpLzK2jU1x10QY6jdblPmK6oNffDkPAdabPmPqQE23XlDWMTmzCdET2vA0Jj__1kLxNr18nt9Xs8eZucjmrHG-YrhR43Yxr9AI1197PPUo5tg7kvLbMg2skL4WsU75uODRiXEtE7-ZC67lfOHFITrd_S9jPHlM2qzYNwewauz4ZrrQC2SgpClptUVd6pYjebGK7svHHMDDDlGaYsjjzN2Xh6y3_1YWMMX2E_gujWaINeWlgGFNxUXHgJRgoqIaTFr_SVHZl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686057653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modular Fluted Tapered Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Excellent Results in 171 Cases</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Hannon, Charles P. ; Sheehan, Kevin P. ; Duong, Stephanie Q. ; Yuan, Brandon J. ; Lewallen, David G. ; Berry, Daniel J. ; Abdel, Matthew P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hannon, Charles P. ; Sheehan, Kevin P. ; Duong, Stephanie Q. ; Yuan, Brandon J. ; Lewallen, David G. ; Berry, Daniel J. ; Abdel, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDModular fluted tapered (MFT) stems have advanced treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures, but series to date have been limited with respect to cohort size and follow-up duration. The purpose of this study was to determine implant survivorship, radiographic results, complications, and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems in a large series of patients. METHODSWe identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with an MFT stem between 2000 and 2018 using our institutional total joint registry. The mean age was 75 years, 50% were female, and the mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2. The median stem diameter was 18 mm and median stem length was 210 mm. The cumulative incidences of revision and reoperation with death as the competing risk were calculated, radiographs were reviewed, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris hip score (HHS). The mean follow-up was 5 years. RESULTSThe 10-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 10%. There were 17 revisions, of which only 3 were for the distal fluted portion of the MFT stem. Revision indications included periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 6) and dislocation (n = 11). The 10-year cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 15%. In addition to the above 17 revisions, there were 7 reoperations for superficial wound complications (n = 4), Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 1), vascular occlusion (n = 1), and acetabular cartilage degeneration requiring an acetabular component (n = 1). Radiographically, there was 1 fracture nonunion. All unrevised MFT stems were radiographically well fixed. Subsidence of ≥5 mm occurred in 11%, but all implants were stable at the most recent follow-up. The mean HHS was 75 at 2 years (n = 71). CONCLUSIONSIn this large series of 171 Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems, we found that such constructs were associated with a high rate of fracture healing and provided extremely reliable and durable implant fixation, with no revisions for aseptic loosening. Dislocation and PJI were the most common complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCETherapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01168</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2022-07, Vol.104 (13), p.1188-1196</ispartof><rights>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2718-60f8794ef3e828ffbfe559ac05b4a1f0c752153ac6f472073945eefcb388bfdc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1579-4953 ; 0000-0003-1422-0306 ; 0000-0002-2398-1724 ; 0000-0003-0175-1095 ; 0000-0002-9778-3747 ; 0000-0002-9001-0880 ; 0000-0003-3101-9129</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hannon, Charles P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duong, Stephanie Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Brandon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewallen, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><title>Modular Fluted Tapered Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Excellent Results in 171 Cases</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><description>BACKGROUNDModular fluted tapered (MFT) stems have advanced treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures, but series to date have been limited with respect to cohort size and follow-up duration. The purpose of this study was to determine implant survivorship, radiographic results, complications, and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems in a large series of patients. METHODSWe identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with an MFT stem between 2000 and 2018 using our institutional total joint registry. The mean age was 75 years, 50% were female, and the mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2. The median stem diameter was 18 mm and median stem length was 210 mm. The cumulative incidences of revision and reoperation with death as the competing risk were calculated, radiographs were reviewed, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris hip score (HHS). The mean follow-up was 5 years. RESULTSThe 10-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 10%. There were 17 revisions, of which only 3 were for the distal fluted portion of the MFT stem. Revision indications included periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 6) and dislocation (n = 11). The 10-year cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 15%. In addition to the above 17 revisions, there were 7 reoperations for superficial wound complications (n = 4), Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 1), vascular occlusion (n = 1), and acetabular cartilage degeneration requiring an acetabular component (n = 1). Radiographically, there was 1 fracture nonunion. All unrevised MFT stems were radiographically well fixed. Subsidence of ≥5 mm occurred in 11%, but all implants were stable at the most recent follow-up. The mean HHS was 75 at 2 years (n = 71). CONCLUSIONSIn this large series of 171 Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems, we found that such constructs were associated with a high rate of fracture healing and provided extremely reliable and durable implant fixation, with no revisions for aseptic loosening. Dislocation and PJI were the most common complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCETherapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtPAyEUhYnRxPpYumfpZvQCA0PdaWN9pEbjY00ovaSjtFOBifrvZayrc3Lz5eacQ8gJgzPOQJ3fX92_FHcGjCm9Q0ZMClkxodUuGQFwVo2FlPvkIKV3AKhraEbEPnSLPthIp6HPuKCvdoOx6EvGVaK-i_QJY7uJXcpLzK2jU1x10QY6jdblPmK6oNffDkPAdabPmPqQE23XlDWMTmzCdET2vA0Jj__1kLxNr18nt9Xs8eZucjmrHG-YrhR43Yxr9AI1197PPUo5tg7kvLbMg2skL4WsU75uODRiXEtE7-ZC67lfOHFITrd_S9jPHlM2qzYNwewauz4ZrrQC2SgpClptUVd6pYjebGK7svHHMDDDlGaYsjjzN2Xh6y3_1YWMMX2E_gujWaINeWlgGFNxUXHgJRgoqIaTFr_SVHZl</recordid><startdate>20220706</startdate><enddate>20220706</enddate><creator>Hannon, Charles P.</creator><creator>Sheehan, Kevin P.</creator><creator>Duong, Stephanie Q.</creator><creator>Yuan, Brandon J.</creator><creator>Lewallen, David G.</creator><creator>Berry, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Abdel, Matthew P.</creator><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1579-4953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-0306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-1724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-1095</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-3747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9001-0880</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-9129</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220706</creationdate><title>Modular Fluted Tapered Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Excellent Results in 171 Cases</title><author>Hannon, Charles P. ; Sheehan, Kevin P. ; Duong, Stephanie Q. ; Yuan, Brandon J. ; Lewallen, David G. ; Berry, Daniel J. ; Abdel, Matthew P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2718-60f8794ef3e828ffbfe559ac05b4a1f0c752153ac6f472073945eefcb388bfdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hannon, Charles P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duong, Stephanie Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Brandon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewallen, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hannon, Charles P.</au><au>Sheehan, Kevin P.</au><au>Duong, Stephanie Q.</au><au>Yuan, Brandon J.</au><au>Lewallen, David G.</au><au>Berry, Daniel J.</au><au>Abdel, Matthew P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modular Fluted Tapered Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Excellent Results in 171 Cases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><date>2022-07-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1188</spage><epage>1196</epage><pages>1188-1196</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDModular fluted tapered (MFT) stems have advanced treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures, but series to date have been limited with respect to cohort size and follow-up duration. The purpose of this study was to determine implant survivorship, radiographic results, complications, and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems in a large series of patients. METHODSWe identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with an MFT stem between 2000 and 2018 using our institutional total joint registry. The mean age was 75 years, 50% were female, and the mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2. The median stem diameter was 18 mm and median stem length was 210 mm. The cumulative incidences of revision and reoperation with death as the competing risk were calculated, radiographs were reviewed, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris hip score (HHS). The mean follow-up was 5 years. RESULTSThe 10-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 10%. There were 17 revisions, of which only 3 were for the distal fluted portion of the MFT stem. Revision indications included periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 6) and dislocation (n = 11). The 10-year cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 15%. In addition to the above 17 revisions, there were 7 reoperations for superficial wound complications (n = 4), Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 1), vascular occlusion (n = 1), and acetabular cartilage degeneration requiring an acetabular component (n = 1). Radiographically, there was 1 fracture nonunion. All unrevised MFT stems were radiographically well fixed. Subsidence of ≥5 mm occurred in 11%, but all implants were stable at the most recent follow-up. The mean HHS was 75 at 2 years (n = 71). CONCLUSIONSIn this large series of 171 Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems, we found that such constructs were associated with a high rate of fracture healing and provided extremely reliable and durable implant fixation, with no revisions for aseptic loosening. Dislocation and PJI were the most common complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCETherapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><pub>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><doi>10.2106/JBJS.21.01168</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1579-4953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-0306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-1724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-1095</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-3747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9001-0880</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-9129</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2022-07, Vol.104 (13), p.1188-1196
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2686057653
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
title Modular Fluted Tapered Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Excellent Results in 171 Cases
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modular%20Fluted%20Tapered%20Stems%20for%20Periprosthetic%20Femoral%20Fractures:%20Excellent%20Results%20in%20171%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Hannon,%20Charles%20P.&rft.date=2022-07-06&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1188&rft.epage=1196&rft.pages=1188-1196&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.21.01168&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2686057653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2718-60f8794ef3e828ffbfe559ac05b4a1f0c752153ac6f472073945eefcb388bfdc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686057653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true