Loading…
In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch
Objectives Optical impressions of implants in the edentulous arch are challenged by the absence of distinct surface morphology between multiple implant scan bodies. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed scan aid in various designs and colors to improve the accuracy of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical oral implants research 2022-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1010-1020 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3 |
container_end_page | 1020 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1010 |
container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Kernen, Florian R. Recca, Mario Vach, Kirstin Nahles, Susanne Nelson, Katja Flügge, Tabea V. |
description | Objectives
Optical impressions of implants in the edentulous arch are challenged by the absence of distinct surface morphology between multiple implant scan bodies. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed scan aid in various designs and colors to improve the accuracy of multi‐implant scans.
Materials and Methods
A universal scan aid in three different designs (circular, square, irregular) and three different materials (colors: beige, gray, white) was applied to the implant scan bodies of a master model of six implants in an edentulous maxilla. Ten scans using an intra‐oral scanner of each scan aid were acquired. Reference scanning was performed using a desktop optical scanner. Alignment of scans was performed at the first scan body in a three‐dimensional modeling and inspection software and deviations for trueness and precision were calculated using the signed nearest‐neighbor method and then statistically analyzed (α = .05).
Results
Overall, the beige irregular scan aid had the highest trueness and showed significant differences compared to unsplinted scans. The precision showed more heterogenous results and decreased when using the scan aid. Ease of use was observed with the irregular gray scan aid due to its increased elongation at break.
Conclusions
The evaluated scan aid led to improved trueness when compared to unsplinted scans. Even though the irregular design in beige color showed highest trueness, the poor fracture strength of the tested material requires further improvement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.13982 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2692755590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2722639477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtbqwjcIuNHFtCeZZjJZSvFSKAiiOyEkmcSmzKUmM0rf3tRxJZjNIfCdw8-P0CWBGUlvbuowI7ko6RGakAIgAwbkGE1AAMs4KcgpOotxCwCFKMUEva1a_On70OFoVNv69h0rY4agzB4P8fCtvHM22LbHylcRuy7gZqh7v6st9s2uVm0fsW9xv7HYVskNdTdErILZnKMTp-poL37nFL3e370sH7P108NqebvOTF4wmmnGnVs4sEproisNeWkFlLmwWhVWM6MVV2ShCVUOKlDOMM2JMAU3tARn8im6Hu_uQvcx2NjLxkdj65TNpiySFoJyxpiARK_-0G03hDalk5RTWuRiwXlSN6MyoYsxWCd3wTcq7CUBeehZpp7lT8_Jzkf75Wu7_x_K5fp53PgGplWAjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2722639477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Kernen, Florian R. ; Recca, Mario ; Vach, Kirstin ; Nahles, Susanne ; Nelson, Katja ; Flügge, Tabea V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kernen, Florian R. ; Recca, Mario ; Vach, Kirstin ; Nahles, Susanne ; Nelson, Katja ; Flügge, Tabea V.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Optical impressions of implants in the edentulous arch are challenged by the absence of distinct surface morphology between multiple implant scan bodies. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed scan aid in various designs and colors to improve the accuracy of multi‐implant scans.
Materials and Methods
A universal scan aid in three different designs (circular, square, irregular) and three different materials (colors: beige, gray, white) was applied to the implant scan bodies of a master model of six implants in an edentulous maxilla. Ten scans using an intra‐oral scanner of each scan aid were acquired. Reference scanning was performed using a desktop optical scanner. Alignment of scans was performed at the first scan body in a three‐dimensional modeling and inspection software and deviations for trueness and precision were calculated using the signed nearest‐neighbor method and then statistically analyzed (α = .05).
Results
Overall, the beige irregular scan aid had the highest trueness and showed significant differences compared to unsplinted scans. The precision showed more heterogenous results and decreased when using the scan aid. Ease of use was observed with the irregular gray scan aid due to its increased elongation at break.
Conclusions
The evaluated scan aid led to improved trueness when compared to unsplinted scans. Even though the irregular design in beige color showed highest trueness, the poor fracture strength of the tested material requires further improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.13982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brussels: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; dental implant ; Dental implants ; dental impression ; digital dentistry ; digital impression ; Edentulous ; Elongation ; Fracture strength ; Implants ; Inspection ; intraoral scanner ; Maxilla ; Mechanical properties ; optical imaging ; Optical scanners ; scan body ; Scanning ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2022-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1010-1020</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3067-0756 ; 0000-0002-6362-4211 ; 0000-0001-9278-2203</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kernen, Florian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recca, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vach, Kirstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahles, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flügge, Tabea V.</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><description>Objectives
Optical impressions of implants in the edentulous arch are challenged by the absence of distinct surface morphology between multiple implant scan bodies. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed scan aid in various designs and colors to improve the accuracy of multi‐implant scans.
Materials and Methods
A universal scan aid in three different designs (circular, square, irregular) and three different materials (colors: beige, gray, white) was applied to the implant scan bodies of a master model of six implants in an edentulous maxilla. Ten scans using an intra‐oral scanner of each scan aid were acquired. Reference scanning was performed using a desktop optical scanner. Alignment of scans was performed at the first scan body in a three‐dimensional modeling and inspection software and deviations for trueness and precision were calculated using the signed nearest‐neighbor method and then statistically analyzed (α = .05).
Results
Overall, the beige irregular scan aid had the highest trueness and showed significant differences compared to unsplinted scans. The precision showed more heterogenous results and decreased when using the scan aid. Ease of use was observed with the irregular gray scan aid due to its increased elongation at break.
Conclusions
The evaluated scan aid led to improved trueness when compared to unsplinted scans. Even though the irregular design in beige color showed highest trueness, the poor fracture strength of the tested material requires further improvement.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>dental implant</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>dental impression</subject><subject>digital dentistry</subject><subject>digital impression</subject><subject>Edentulous</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Fracture strength</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>intraoral scanner</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>optical imaging</subject><subject>Optical scanners</subject><subject>scan body</subject><subject>Scanning</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtbqwjcIuNHFtCeZZjJZSvFSKAiiOyEkmcSmzKUmM0rf3tRxJZjNIfCdw8-P0CWBGUlvbuowI7ko6RGakAIgAwbkGE1AAMs4KcgpOotxCwCFKMUEva1a_On70OFoVNv69h0rY4agzB4P8fCtvHM22LbHylcRuy7gZqh7v6st9s2uVm0fsW9xv7HYVskNdTdErILZnKMTp-poL37nFL3e370sH7P108NqebvOTF4wmmnGnVs4sEproisNeWkFlLmwWhVWM6MVV2ShCVUOKlDOMM2JMAU3tARn8im6Hu_uQvcx2NjLxkdj65TNpiySFoJyxpiARK_-0G03hDalk5RTWuRiwXlSN6MyoYsxWCd3wTcq7CUBeehZpp7lT8_Jzkf75Wu7_x_K5fp53PgGplWAjQ</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Kernen, Florian R.</creator><creator>Recca, Mario</creator><creator>Vach, Kirstin</creator><creator>Nahles, Susanne</creator><creator>Nelson, Katja</creator><creator>Flügge, Tabea V.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3067-0756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-4211</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-2203</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch</title><author>Kernen, Florian R. ; Recca, Mario ; Vach, Kirstin ; Nahles, Susanne ; Nelson, Katja ; Flügge, Tabea V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>dental impression</topic><topic>digital dentistry</topic><topic>digital impression</topic><topic>Edentulous</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Fracture strength</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>intraoral scanner</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>optical imaging</topic><topic>Optical scanners</topic><topic>scan body</topic><topic>Scanning</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kernen, Florian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recca, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vach, Kirstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahles, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flügge, Tabea V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kernen, Florian R.</au><au>Recca, Mario</au><au>Vach, Kirstin</au><au>Nahles, Susanne</au><au>Nelson, Katja</au><au>Flügge, Tabea V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1010</spage><epage>1020</epage><pages>1010-1020</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Optical impressions of implants in the edentulous arch are challenged by the absence of distinct surface morphology between multiple implant scan bodies. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed scan aid in various designs and colors to improve the accuracy of multi‐implant scans.
Materials and Methods
A universal scan aid in three different designs (circular, square, irregular) and three different materials (colors: beige, gray, white) was applied to the implant scan bodies of a master model of six implants in an edentulous maxilla. Ten scans using an intra‐oral scanner of each scan aid were acquired. Reference scanning was performed using a desktop optical scanner. Alignment of scans was performed at the first scan body in a three‐dimensional modeling and inspection software and deviations for trueness and precision were calculated using the signed nearest‐neighbor method and then statistically analyzed (α = .05).
Results
Overall, the beige irregular scan aid had the highest trueness and showed significant differences compared to unsplinted scans. The precision showed more heterogenous results and decreased when using the scan aid. Ease of use was observed with the irregular gray scan aid due to its increased elongation at break.
Conclusions
The evaluated scan aid led to improved trueness when compared to unsplinted scans. Even though the irregular design in beige color showed highest trueness, the poor fracture strength of the tested material requires further improvement.</abstract><cop>Brussels</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/clr.13982</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3067-0756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-4211</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-2203</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2022-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1010-1020 |
issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2692755590 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Accuracy dental implant Dental implants dental impression digital dentistry digital impression Edentulous Elongation Fracture strength Implants Inspection intraoral scanner Maxilla Mechanical properties optical imaging Optical scanners scan body Scanning Transplants & implants |
title | In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T16%3A06%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20scanning%20accuracy%20using%20different%20aids%20for%20multiple%20implants%20in%20the%20edentulous%20arch&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Kernen,%20Florian%20R.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1010&rft.epage=1020&rft.pages=1010-1020&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.13982&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2722639477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2722639477&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |