Loading…

In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch

Objectives Optical impressions of implants in the edentulous arch are challenged by the absence of distinct surface morphology between multiple implant scan bodies. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed scan aid in various designs and colors to improve the accuracy of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical oral implants research 2022-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1010-1020
Main Authors: Kernen, Florian R., Recca, Mario, Vach, Kirstin, Nahles, Susanne, Nelson, Katja, Flügge, Tabea V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3
container_end_page 1020
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1010
container_title Clinical oral implants research
container_volume 33
creator Kernen, Florian R.
Recca, Mario
Vach, Kirstin
Nahles, Susanne
Nelson, Katja
Flügge, Tabea V.
description Objectives Optical impressions of implants in the edentulous arch are challenged by the absence of distinct surface morphology between multiple implant scan bodies. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed scan aid in various designs and colors to improve the accuracy of multi‐implant scans. Materials and Methods A universal scan aid in three different designs (circular, square, irregular) and three different materials (colors: beige, gray, white) was applied to the implant scan bodies of a master model of six implants in an edentulous maxilla. Ten scans using an intra‐oral scanner of each scan aid were acquired. Reference scanning was performed using a desktop optical scanner. Alignment of scans was performed at the first scan body in a three‐dimensional modeling and inspection software and deviations for trueness and precision were calculated using the signed nearest‐neighbor method and then statistically analyzed (α = .05). Results Overall, the beige irregular scan aid had the highest trueness and showed significant differences compared to unsplinted scans. The precision showed more heterogenous results and decreased when using the scan aid. Ease of use was observed with the irregular gray scan aid due to its increased elongation at break. Conclusions The evaluated scan aid led to improved trueness when compared to unsplinted scans. Even though the irregular design in beige color showed highest trueness, the poor fracture strength of the tested material requires further improvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/clr.13982
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2692755590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2722639477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtbqwjcIuNHFtCeZZjJZSvFSKAiiOyEkmcSmzKUmM0rf3tRxJZjNIfCdw8-P0CWBGUlvbuowI7ko6RGakAIgAwbkGE1AAMs4KcgpOotxCwCFKMUEva1a_On70OFoVNv69h0rY4agzB4P8fCtvHM22LbHylcRuy7gZqh7v6st9s2uVm0fsW9xv7HYVskNdTdErILZnKMTp-poL37nFL3e370sH7P108NqebvOTF4wmmnGnVs4sEproisNeWkFlLmwWhVWM6MVV2ShCVUOKlDOMM2JMAU3tARn8im6Hu_uQvcx2NjLxkdj65TNpiySFoJyxpiARK_-0G03hDalk5RTWuRiwXlSN6MyoYsxWCd3wTcq7CUBeehZpp7lT8_Jzkf75Wu7_x_K5fp53PgGplWAjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2722639477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Kernen, Florian R. ; Recca, Mario ; Vach, Kirstin ; Nahles, Susanne ; Nelson, Katja ; Flügge, Tabea V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kernen, Florian R. ; Recca, Mario ; Vach, Kirstin ; Nahles, Susanne ; Nelson, Katja ; Flügge, Tabea V.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Optical impressions of implants in the edentulous arch are challenged by the absence of distinct surface morphology between multiple implant scan bodies. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed scan aid in various designs and colors to improve the accuracy of multi‐implant scans. Materials and Methods A universal scan aid in three different designs (circular, square, irregular) and three different materials (colors: beige, gray, white) was applied to the implant scan bodies of a master model of six implants in an edentulous maxilla. Ten scans using an intra‐oral scanner of each scan aid were acquired. Reference scanning was performed using a desktop optical scanner. Alignment of scans was performed at the first scan body in a three‐dimensional modeling and inspection software and deviations for trueness and precision were calculated using the signed nearest‐neighbor method and then statistically analyzed (α = .05). Results Overall, the beige irregular scan aid had the highest trueness and showed significant differences compared to unsplinted scans. The precision showed more heterogenous results and decreased when using the scan aid. Ease of use was observed with the irregular gray scan aid due to its increased elongation at break. Conclusions The evaluated scan aid led to improved trueness when compared to unsplinted scans. Even though the irregular design in beige color showed highest trueness, the poor fracture strength of the tested material requires further improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.13982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brussels: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; dental implant ; Dental implants ; dental impression ; digital dentistry ; digital impression ; Edentulous ; Elongation ; Fracture strength ; Implants ; Inspection ; intraoral scanner ; Maxilla ; Mechanical properties ; optical imaging ; Optical scanners ; scan body ; Scanning ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2022-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1010-1020</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3067-0756 ; 0000-0002-6362-4211 ; 0000-0001-9278-2203</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kernen, Florian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recca, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vach, Kirstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahles, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flügge, Tabea V.</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><description>Objectives Optical impressions of implants in the edentulous arch are challenged by the absence of distinct surface morphology between multiple implant scan bodies. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed scan aid in various designs and colors to improve the accuracy of multi‐implant scans. Materials and Methods A universal scan aid in three different designs (circular, square, irregular) and three different materials (colors: beige, gray, white) was applied to the implant scan bodies of a master model of six implants in an edentulous maxilla. Ten scans using an intra‐oral scanner of each scan aid were acquired. Reference scanning was performed using a desktop optical scanner. Alignment of scans was performed at the first scan body in a three‐dimensional modeling and inspection software and deviations for trueness and precision were calculated using the signed nearest‐neighbor method and then statistically analyzed (α = .05). Results Overall, the beige irregular scan aid had the highest trueness and showed significant differences compared to unsplinted scans. The precision showed more heterogenous results and decreased when using the scan aid. Ease of use was observed with the irregular gray scan aid due to its increased elongation at break. Conclusions The evaluated scan aid led to improved trueness when compared to unsplinted scans. Even though the irregular design in beige color showed highest trueness, the poor fracture strength of the tested material requires further improvement.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>dental implant</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>dental impression</subject><subject>digital dentistry</subject><subject>digital impression</subject><subject>Edentulous</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Fracture strength</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>intraoral scanner</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>optical imaging</subject><subject>Optical scanners</subject><subject>scan body</subject><subject>Scanning</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtbqwjcIuNHFtCeZZjJZSvFSKAiiOyEkmcSmzKUmM0rf3tRxJZjNIfCdw8-P0CWBGUlvbuowI7ko6RGakAIgAwbkGE1AAMs4KcgpOotxCwCFKMUEva1a_On70OFoVNv69h0rY4agzB4P8fCtvHM22LbHylcRuy7gZqh7v6st9s2uVm0fsW9xv7HYVskNdTdErILZnKMTp-poL37nFL3e370sH7P108NqebvOTF4wmmnGnVs4sEproisNeWkFlLmwWhVWM6MVV2ShCVUOKlDOMM2JMAU3tARn8im6Hu_uQvcx2NjLxkdj65TNpiySFoJyxpiARK_-0G03hDalk5RTWuRiwXlSN6MyoYsxWCd3wTcq7CUBeehZpp7lT8_Jzkf75Wu7_x_K5fp53PgGplWAjQ</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Kernen, Florian R.</creator><creator>Recca, Mario</creator><creator>Vach, Kirstin</creator><creator>Nahles, Susanne</creator><creator>Nelson, Katja</creator><creator>Flügge, Tabea V.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3067-0756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-4211</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-2203</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch</title><author>Kernen, Florian R. ; Recca, Mario ; Vach, Kirstin ; Nahles, Susanne ; Nelson, Katja ; Flügge, Tabea V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>dental impression</topic><topic>digital dentistry</topic><topic>digital impression</topic><topic>Edentulous</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Fracture strength</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>intraoral scanner</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>optical imaging</topic><topic>Optical scanners</topic><topic>scan body</topic><topic>Scanning</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kernen, Florian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recca, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vach, Kirstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahles, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flügge, Tabea V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kernen, Florian R.</au><au>Recca, Mario</au><au>Vach, Kirstin</au><au>Nahles, Susanne</au><au>Nelson, Katja</au><au>Flügge, Tabea V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1010</spage><epage>1020</epage><pages>1010-1020</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives Optical impressions of implants in the edentulous arch are challenged by the absence of distinct surface morphology between multiple implant scan bodies. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed scan aid in various designs and colors to improve the accuracy of multi‐implant scans. Materials and Methods A universal scan aid in three different designs (circular, square, irregular) and three different materials (colors: beige, gray, white) was applied to the implant scan bodies of a master model of six implants in an edentulous maxilla. Ten scans using an intra‐oral scanner of each scan aid were acquired. Reference scanning was performed using a desktop optical scanner. Alignment of scans was performed at the first scan body in a three‐dimensional modeling and inspection software and deviations for trueness and precision were calculated using the signed nearest‐neighbor method and then statistically analyzed (α = .05). Results Overall, the beige irregular scan aid had the highest trueness and showed significant differences compared to unsplinted scans. The precision showed more heterogenous results and decreased when using the scan aid. Ease of use was observed with the irregular gray scan aid due to its increased elongation at break. Conclusions The evaluated scan aid led to improved trueness when compared to unsplinted scans. Even though the irregular design in beige color showed highest trueness, the poor fracture strength of the tested material requires further improvement.</abstract><cop>Brussels</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/clr.13982</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3067-0756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-4211</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-2203</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7161
ispartof Clinical oral implants research, 2022-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1010-1020
issn 0905-7161
1600-0501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2692755590
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Accuracy
dental implant
Dental implants
dental impression
digital dentistry
digital impression
Edentulous
Elongation
Fracture strength
Implants
Inspection
intraoral scanner
Maxilla
Mechanical properties
optical imaging
Optical scanners
scan body
Scanning
Transplants & implants
title In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T16%3A06%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20scanning%20accuracy%20using%20different%20aids%20for%20multiple%20implants%20in%20the%20edentulous%20arch&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Kernen,%20Florian%20R.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1010&rft.epage=1020&rft.pages=1010-1020&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.13982&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2722639477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-b57ff4f0eabb1bdb038e90839eba6eb5cba7a14b12af0d0afc5b719c67c280fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2722639477&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true