Loading…
Predictive capabilities of the European registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support right-sided heart failure risk score after left ventricular assist device implantation
The prediction of right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains a challenge. Recently, risk scores were derived from analysis of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) data, the EUROMACS-RHF, and the modified pos...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2022-10, Vol.36 (10), p.3740-3746 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2a377af48cec0c4e269e6686ede2d20313e39c3af37f047d54129ae9376d7b533 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2a377af48cec0c4e269e6686ede2d20313e39c3af37f047d54129ae9376d7b533 |
container_end_page | 3746 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 3740 |
container_title | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Nicoara, Alina Wright, Mary Cooter Rosenkrans, Daniel Patel, Chetan B. Schroder, Jacob N. Cherry, Anne D. Hashmi, Nazish K. Pollak, Angela L. McCartney, Sharon L. Katz, Jason Milano, Carmelo A. Podgoreanu, Mihai V. |
description | The prediction of right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains a challenge. Recently, risk scores were derived from analysis of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) data, the EUROMACS-RHF, and the modified postoperative EUROMACS-RHF. The authors assessed the performance characteristics of these 2 risk score formulations in a continuous-flow LVAD cohort at their institution.
A retrospective, observational study.
At a tertiary-care academic medical center.
Adult patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation between 2015 and 2018.
None
Early post-LVAD RHF was defined as follows: (1) need for right ventricular assist device, or (2) inotropic or inhaled pulmonary vasodilator support for ≥14 postoperative days. The authors used logistic regression and examined receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the ability of the 2 risk scores to distinguish between outcome groups. A total of 207 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the patients, 16% developed RHF (33/207). The EUROMACS-RHF score was not predictive of RHF in the authors' cohort (odds ratio [OR] 1.25; 95% CI [0.99-1.60]; p = 0.06), but the postoperative EUROMACS-RHF CPB score was significantly associated (OR 1.38; 95% CI [1.03-1.89]; p = 0.03). The scores had similar ROC curves, with weak discriminatory performance: 0.601 (95% CI [0.509-0.692]) and 0.599 (95% CI [0.505-0.693]) for EUROMACS-RHF and postoperative EUROMACS-RHF, respectively.
In the authors' single-center retrospective analysis, the EUROMACS-RHF risk score did not predict early RHF. An optimized risk score for the prediction of RHF after LVAD implantation remains an urgent unmet need. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.06.022 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2693772922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053077022004645</els_id><sourcerecordid>2693772922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2a377af48cec0c4e269e6686ede2d20313e39c3af37f047d54129ae9376d7b533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO1TAMrRBIDAM_wCpLNi1p0setxAaNhoc0EixgHXlcZ-pLb1OctGj-jM8jl8ualS3nPByfonhd66rWrX17rI47QmW0MZXuqlyeFFd1a015aIx5mvuMKnXf6-fFixiPWtd12_ZXxe-vQiNj4p0Uwgr3PHNiiip4lSZSt5uElWBRQg8ckzwqH0StkDFLiuoXp0mdCCdYGGFWyILbDClkYNzWNUhSwg9TKiOPNKqJIE888LwJ5Zf4Q0UMuQWfSNRMPqk9KwufZURBjNlVjbQzkuLTOsOSsnlYXhbPPMyRXv2r18X3D7ffbj6Vd18-fr55f1eitTaVBmzfg28OSKixIdMN1HWHjkYyo9G2tmQHtOBt73XTj21TmwFosH039vettdfFm4vuKuHnRjG5E0ekOS9CYYsuC2YHMxiToeYCRQkxCnm3Cp9AHl2t3TkAd3TnmNw5Jqc7p_-S3l1IlD-xM4mLmG-LORUhTG4M_D_6H1PCob0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2693772922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictive capabilities of the European registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support right-sided heart failure risk score after left ventricular assist device implantation</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nicoara, Alina ; Wright, Mary Cooter ; Rosenkrans, Daniel ; Patel, Chetan B. ; Schroder, Jacob N. ; Cherry, Anne D. ; Hashmi, Nazish K. ; Pollak, Angela L. ; McCartney, Sharon L. ; Katz, Jason ; Milano, Carmelo A. ; Podgoreanu, Mihai V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicoara, Alina ; Wright, Mary Cooter ; Rosenkrans, Daniel ; Patel, Chetan B. ; Schroder, Jacob N. ; Cherry, Anne D. ; Hashmi, Nazish K. ; Pollak, Angela L. ; McCartney, Sharon L. ; Katz, Jason ; Milano, Carmelo A. ; Podgoreanu, Mihai V.</creatorcontrib><description>The prediction of right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains a challenge. Recently, risk scores were derived from analysis of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) data, the EUROMACS-RHF, and the modified postoperative EUROMACS-RHF. The authors assessed the performance characteristics of these 2 risk score formulations in a continuous-flow LVAD cohort at their institution.
A retrospective, observational study.
At a tertiary-care academic medical center.
Adult patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation between 2015 and 2018.
None
Early post-LVAD RHF was defined as follows: (1) need for right ventricular assist device, or (2) inotropic or inhaled pulmonary vasodilator support for ≥14 postoperative days. The authors used logistic regression and examined receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the ability of the 2 risk scores to distinguish between outcome groups. A total of 207 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the patients, 16% developed RHF (33/207). The EUROMACS-RHF score was not predictive of RHF in the authors' cohort (odds ratio [OR] 1.25; 95% CI [0.99-1.60]; p = 0.06), but the postoperative EUROMACS-RHF CPB score was significantly associated (OR 1.38; 95% CI [1.03-1.89]; p = 0.03). The scores had similar ROC curves, with weak discriminatory performance: 0.601 (95% CI [0.509-0.692]) and 0.599 (95% CI [0.505-0.693]) for EUROMACS-RHF and postoperative EUROMACS-RHF, respectively.
In the authors' single-center retrospective analysis, the EUROMACS-RHF risk score did not predict early RHF. An optimized risk score for the prediction of RHF after LVAD implantation remains an urgent unmet need.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.06.022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Left ventricular assist device ; Prediction ; Right heart failure ; Risk score</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2022-10, Vol.36 (10), p.3740-3746</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2a377af48cec0c4e269e6686ede2d20313e39c3af37f047d54129ae9376d7b533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2a377af48cec0c4e269e6686ede2d20313e39c3af37f047d54129ae9376d7b533</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8492-6158 ; 0000-0002-3814-6182</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicoara, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Mary Cooter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenkrans, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Chetan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroder, Jacob N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Anne D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashmi, Nazish K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollak, Angela L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartney, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milano, Carmelo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podgoreanu, Mihai V.</creatorcontrib><title>Predictive capabilities of the European registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support right-sided heart failure risk score after left ventricular assist device implantation</title><title>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</title><description>The prediction of right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains a challenge. Recently, risk scores were derived from analysis of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) data, the EUROMACS-RHF, and the modified postoperative EUROMACS-RHF. The authors assessed the performance characteristics of these 2 risk score formulations in a continuous-flow LVAD cohort at their institution.
A retrospective, observational study.
At a tertiary-care academic medical center.
Adult patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation between 2015 and 2018.
None
Early post-LVAD RHF was defined as follows: (1) need for right ventricular assist device, or (2) inotropic or inhaled pulmonary vasodilator support for ≥14 postoperative days. The authors used logistic regression and examined receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the ability of the 2 risk scores to distinguish between outcome groups. A total of 207 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the patients, 16% developed RHF (33/207). The EUROMACS-RHF score was not predictive of RHF in the authors' cohort (odds ratio [OR] 1.25; 95% CI [0.99-1.60]; p = 0.06), but the postoperative EUROMACS-RHF CPB score was significantly associated (OR 1.38; 95% CI [1.03-1.89]; p = 0.03). The scores had similar ROC curves, with weak discriminatory performance: 0.601 (95% CI [0.509-0.692]) and 0.599 (95% CI [0.505-0.693]) for EUROMACS-RHF and postoperative EUROMACS-RHF, respectively.
In the authors' single-center retrospective analysis, the EUROMACS-RHF risk score did not predict early RHF. An optimized risk score for the prediction of RHF after LVAD implantation remains an urgent unmet need.</description><subject>Left ventricular assist device</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Right heart failure</subject><subject>Risk score</subject><issn>1053-0770</issn><issn>1532-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcuO1TAMrRBIDAM_wCpLNi1p0setxAaNhoc0EixgHXlcZ-pLb1OctGj-jM8jl8ualS3nPByfonhd66rWrX17rI47QmW0MZXuqlyeFFd1a015aIx5mvuMKnXf6-fFixiPWtd12_ZXxe-vQiNj4p0Uwgr3PHNiiip4lSZSt5uElWBRQg8ckzwqH0StkDFLiuoXp0mdCCdYGGFWyILbDClkYNzWNUhSwg9TKiOPNKqJIE888LwJ5Zf4Q0UMuQWfSNRMPqk9KwufZURBjNlVjbQzkuLTOsOSsnlYXhbPPMyRXv2r18X3D7ffbj6Vd18-fr55f1eitTaVBmzfg28OSKixIdMN1HWHjkYyo9G2tmQHtOBt73XTj21TmwFosH039vettdfFm4vuKuHnRjG5E0ekOS9CYYsuC2YHMxiToeYCRQkxCnm3Cp9AHl2t3TkAd3TnmNw5Jqc7p_-S3l1IlD-xM4mLmG-LORUhTG4M_D_6H1PCob0</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Nicoara, Alina</creator><creator>Wright, Mary Cooter</creator><creator>Rosenkrans, Daniel</creator><creator>Patel, Chetan B.</creator><creator>Schroder, Jacob N.</creator><creator>Cherry, Anne D.</creator><creator>Hashmi, Nazish K.</creator><creator>Pollak, Angela L.</creator><creator>McCartney, Sharon L.</creator><creator>Katz, Jason</creator><creator>Milano, Carmelo A.</creator><creator>Podgoreanu, Mihai V.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8492-6158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3814-6182</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Predictive capabilities of the European registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support right-sided heart failure risk score after left ventricular assist device implantation</title><author>Nicoara, Alina ; Wright, Mary Cooter ; Rosenkrans, Daniel ; Patel, Chetan B. ; Schroder, Jacob N. ; Cherry, Anne D. ; Hashmi, Nazish K. ; Pollak, Angela L. ; McCartney, Sharon L. ; Katz, Jason ; Milano, Carmelo A. ; Podgoreanu, Mihai V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2a377af48cec0c4e269e6686ede2d20313e39c3af37f047d54129ae9376d7b533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Left ventricular assist device</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Right heart failure</topic><topic>Risk score</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicoara, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Mary Cooter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenkrans, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Chetan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroder, Jacob N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Anne D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashmi, Nazish K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollak, Angela L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartney, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milano, Carmelo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podgoreanu, Mihai V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicoara, Alina</au><au>Wright, Mary Cooter</au><au>Rosenkrans, Daniel</au><au>Patel, Chetan B.</au><au>Schroder, Jacob N.</au><au>Cherry, Anne D.</au><au>Hashmi, Nazish K.</au><au>Pollak, Angela L.</au><au>McCartney, Sharon L.</au><au>Katz, Jason</au><au>Milano, Carmelo A.</au><au>Podgoreanu, Mihai V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictive capabilities of the European registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support right-sided heart failure risk score after left ventricular assist device implantation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3740</spage><epage>3746</epage><pages>3740-3746</pages><issn>1053-0770</issn><eissn>1532-8422</eissn><abstract>The prediction of right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains a challenge. Recently, risk scores were derived from analysis of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) data, the EUROMACS-RHF, and the modified postoperative EUROMACS-RHF. The authors assessed the performance characteristics of these 2 risk score formulations in a continuous-flow LVAD cohort at their institution.
A retrospective, observational study.
At a tertiary-care academic medical center.
Adult patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation between 2015 and 2018.
None
Early post-LVAD RHF was defined as follows: (1) need for right ventricular assist device, or (2) inotropic or inhaled pulmonary vasodilator support for ≥14 postoperative days. The authors used logistic regression and examined receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the ability of the 2 risk scores to distinguish between outcome groups. A total of 207 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the patients, 16% developed RHF (33/207). The EUROMACS-RHF score was not predictive of RHF in the authors' cohort (odds ratio [OR] 1.25; 95% CI [0.99-1.60]; p = 0.06), but the postoperative EUROMACS-RHF CPB score was significantly associated (OR 1.38; 95% CI [1.03-1.89]; p = 0.03). The scores had similar ROC curves, with weak discriminatory performance: 0.601 (95% CI [0.509-0.692]) and 0.599 (95% CI [0.505-0.693]) for EUROMACS-RHF and postoperative EUROMACS-RHF, respectively.
In the authors' single-center retrospective analysis, the EUROMACS-RHF risk score did not predict early RHF. An optimized risk score for the prediction of RHF after LVAD implantation remains an urgent unmet need.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1053/j.jvca.2022.06.022</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8492-6158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3814-6182</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-0770 |
ispartof | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2022-10, Vol.36 (10), p.3740-3746 |
issn | 1053-0770 1532-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2693772922 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Left ventricular assist device Prediction Right heart failure Risk score |
title | Predictive capabilities of the European registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support right-sided heart failure risk score after left ventricular assist device implantation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A47%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictive%20capabilities%20of%20the%20European%20registry%20for%20patients%20with%20mechanical%20circulatory%20support%20right-sided%20heart%20failure%20risk%20score%20after%20left%20ventricular%20assist%20device%20implantation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiothoracic%20and%20vascular%20anesthesia&rft.au=Nicoara,%20Alina&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3740&rft.epage=3746&rft.pages=3740-3746&rft.issn=1053-0770&rft.eissn=1532-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jvca.2022.06.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2693772922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-2a377af48cec0c4e269e6686ede2d20313e39c3af37f047d54129ae9376d7b533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2693772922&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |