Sagittal Growth Restriction of the Midface Following Isolated Cleft Lip Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2024-01, Vol.61 (1), p.20-32
• Main Authors: Celie, Karel-Bart, Wlodarczyk, Jordan, Naidu, Priyanka, Tapia, Maria Fernanda, Nagengast, Eric, Yao, Caroline, Magee, William
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cephalometry - methods; Cleft Lip - pathology; Cleft Lip - surgery; Cleft Palate - pathology; Cleft Palate - surgery; Face; Female; Humans; Male; Maxilla; Meta-analysis; Systematic review
• ISSN: 1055-6656; 1545-1569
• DOI: 10.1177/10556656221116005

Objective Midface hypoplasia (MFH) is a long-term sequela of cleft lip and palate repair, and is poorly understood. No study has examined the aggregate data on sagittal growth restriction of the midface following repair of the lip, but not palate, in these patients. Methods A systematic review of 3780 articles was performed. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria and 11 reported cephalometric measurements amenable to meta-analysis. Patients with Veau class I-III palatal clefts were included so long as they had undergone only lip repair. Groups were compared against both noncleft and unrepaired controls. Results Cephalometrics were reported for 326 patients (31.3% female). Noncleft controls had an average SNA angle of 81.25° ± 3.12°. The only patients demonstrating hypoplastic SNA angles were those with unilateral CLP with isolated lip repair (77.4° ± 4.22°). Patients with repaired CL had SNA angles similar to noncleft controls (81.4° ± 4.02°). Patients with unrepaired CLP and CL tended toward more protruding maxillae, with SNA angles of 83.3° ± 4.04° and 87.9° ± 3.11°, respectively. Notably, when comparing SNA angles between groups, patients with CLP with isolated lip repair had significantly more hypoplastic angles compared to those with repaired CL (P