Loading…
Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians
Individuals commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for care after violence and many are also at risk for subsequent self or other-directed violence. Screening for violence risk represents an important part of ED care, but is challenging to implement effectively. Feedback from ED providers...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hospital practice (1995) 2022-08, Vol.50 (4), p.289-297 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2da964d94f276cf6a62c3c720b807daedf7816ef18808f835ba003eff126b2593 |
container_end_page | 297 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 289 |
container_title | Hospital practice (1995) |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Roaten, Kimberly Browne, Sabrina Pollio, David E. Khan, Fuad North, Carol S. |
description | Individuals commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for care after violence and many are also at risk for subsequent self or other-directed violence. Screening for violence risk represents an important part of ED care, but is challenging to implement effectively. Feedback from ED providers is needed to characterize differences across provider types in order to facilitate implementation of enhanced screening practices.
This qualitative focus group study examined the experiences of 6 psychiatric social workers, 16 emergency medicine physicians, and 15 psychiatric providers in conducting violence risk screening to elicit ideas about solutions and barriers.
Eight themes emerged: Approach to Patient Assessment, High-Yield Clinical Data in Risk Assessment, Suicide Risk Screen, ED Clinician Resources, Analysis of Professional Risk, Affective Response of Clinician, ED Role and Scope, and Clinical Management. All clinician types discussed the themes from their professional perspectives and generated important knowledge of violence risk screening practices.
The findings affirm the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in addressing violence risk in the ED and emphasize the need for ongoing clinical education and feedback as well as the importance of optimizing efficiency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/21548331.2022.2108272 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2696864661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2696864661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2da964d94f276cf6a62c3c720b807daedf7816ef18808f835ba003eff126b2593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpJyBlySbFj8R2dqCKl1SJTVlbrjOuDIkd7BTo3-OoZctqZu6cOxpdhK4JXhIs8S0ldSUZI0uKKV3SrFFBz9CMMiFKgjE7z31mygm6RIuU3nFWGa4ZEzO0WYV-0NGl4Itgiy8XOvAGiqx8FMlEAO_8roCfAaKbNmnCoIe4y9OhaCG7xx78WJjOeWec9ukKXVjdJVic6hy9PT5sVs_l-vXpZXW_Lg3FfCxpqxtetU1lqeDGcs2pYUZQvJVYtBpaKyThYImUWFrJ6q3On4O1hPItrRs2RzfHu0MMn3tIo-pdMtB12kPYJ0V5wyWvOCcZrY-oiSGlCFYN0fU6HhTBagpS_QWppiDVKcjsuzv6nLch9vo7xK5Voz50IdqovXFJsf9P_ALLKXqq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696864661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Roaten, Kimberly ; Browne, Sabrina ; Pollio, David E. ; Khan, Fuad ; North, Carol S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roaten, Kimberly ; Browne, Sabrina ; Pollio, David E. ; Khan, Fuad ; North, Carol S.</creatorcontrib><description>Individuals commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for care after violence and many are also at risk for subsequent self or other-directed violence. Screening for violence risk represents an important part of ED care, but is challenging to implement effectively. Feedback from ED providers is needed to characterize differences across provider types in order to facilitate implementation of enhanced screening practices.
This qualitative focus group study examined the experiences of 6 psychiatric social workers, 16 emergency medicine physicians, and 15 psychiatric providers in conducting violence risk screening to elicit ideas about solutions and barriers.
Eight themes emerged: Approach to Patient Assessment, High-Yield Clinical Data in Risk Assessment, Suicide Risk Screen, ED Clinician Resources, Analysis of Professional Risk, Affective Response of Clinician, ED Role and Scope, and Clinical Management. All clinician types discussed the themes from their professional perspectives and generated important knowledge of violence risk screening practices.
The findings affirm the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in addressing violence risk in the ED and emphasize the need for ongoing clinical education and feedback as well as the importance of optimizing efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2154-8331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2377-1003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2022.2108272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>emergency departments ; emergency medicine ; psychiatry ; screening ; social work ; Suicide ; violence</subject><ispartof>Hospital practice (1995), 2022-08, Vol.50 (4), p.289-297</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2da964d94f276cf6a62c3c720b807daedf7816ef18808f835ba003eff126b2593</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9117-6041 ; 0000-0002-7453-0448 ; 0000-0001-6032-5323 ; 0000-0003-0671-4867 ; 0000-0002-4695-8498</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roaten, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollio, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Fuad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>North, Carol S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians</title><title>Hospital practice (1995)</title><description>Individuals commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for care after violence and many are also at risk for subsequent self or other-directed violence. Screening for violence risk represents an important part of ED care, but is challenging to implement effectively. Feedback from ED providers is needed to characterize differences across provider types in order to facilitate implementation of enhanced screening practices.
This qualitative focus group study examined the experiences of 6 psychiatric social workers, 16 emergency medicine physicians, and 15 psychiatric providers in conducting violence risk screening to elicit ideas about solutions and barriers.
Eight themes emerged: Approach to Patient Assessment, High-Yield Clinical Data in Risk Assessment, Suicide Risk Screen, ED Clinician Resources, Analysis of Professional Risk, Affective Response of Clinician, ED Role and Scope, and Clinical Management. All clinician types discussed the themes from their professional perspectives and generated important knowledge of violence risk screening practices.
The findings affirm the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in addressing violence risk in the ED and emphasize the need for ongoing clinical education and feedback as well as the importance of optimizing efficiency.</description><subject>emergency departments</subject><subject>emergency medicine</subject><subject>psychiatry</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>social work</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>violence</subject><issn>2154-8331</issn><issn>2377-1003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpJyBlySbFj8R2dqCKl1SJTVlbrjOuDIkd7BTo3-OoZctqZu6cOxpdhK4JXhIs8S0ldSUZI0uKKV3SrFFBz9CMMiFKgjE7z31mygm6RIuU3nFWGa4ZEzO0WYV-0NGl4Itgiy8XOvAGiqx8FMlEAO_8roCfAaKbNmnCoIe4y9OhaCG7xx78WJjOeWec9ukKXVjdJVic6hy9PT5sVs_l-vXpZXW_Lg3FfCxpqxtetU1lqeDGcs2pYUZQvJVYtBpaKyThYImUWFrJ6q3On4O1hPItrRs2RzfHu0MMn3tIo-pdMtB12kPYJ0V5wyWvOCcZrY-oiSGlCFYN0fU6HhTBagpS_QWppiDVKcjsuzv6nLch9vo7xK5Voz50IdqovXFJsf9P_ALLKXqq</recordid><startdate>20220808</startdate><enddate>20220808</enddate><creator>Roaten, Kimberly</creator><creator>Browne, Sabrina</creator><creator>Pollio, David E.</creator><creator>Khan, Fuad</creator><creator>North, Carol S.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-6041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7453-0448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-5323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0671-4867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4695-8498</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220808</creationdate><title>Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians</title><author>Roaten, Kimberly ; Browne, Sabrina ; Pollio, David E. ; Khan, Fuad ; North, Carol S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2da964d94f276cf6a62c3c720b807daedf7816ef18808f835ba003eff126b2593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>emergency departments</topic><topic>emergency medicine</topic><topic>psychiatry</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>social work</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roaten, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollio, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Fuad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>North, Carol S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hospital practice (1995)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roaten, Kimberly</au><au>Browne, Sabrina</au><au>Pollio, David E.</au><au>Khan, Fuad</au><au>North, Carol S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians</atitle><jtitle>Hospital practice (1995)</jtitle><date>2022-08-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>289-297</pages><issn>2154-8331</issn><eissn>2377-1003</eissn><abstract>Individuals commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for care after violence and many are also at risk for subsequent self or other-directed violence. Screening for violence risk represents an important part of ED care, but is challenging to implement effectively. Feedback from ED providers is needed to characterize differences across provider types in order to facilitate implementation of enhanced screening practices.
This qualitative focus group study examined the experiences of 6 psychiatric social workers, 16 emergency medicine physicians, and 15 psychiatric providers in conducting violence risk screening to elicit ideas about solutions and barriers.
Eight themes emerged: Approach to Patient Assessment, High-Yield Clinical Data in Risk Assessment, Suicide Risk Screen, ED Clinician Resources, Analysis of Professional Risk, Affective Response of Clinician, ED Role and Scope, and Clinical Management. All clinician types discussed the themes from their professional perspectives and generated important knowledge of violence risk screening practices.
The findings affirm the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in addressing violence risk in the ED and emphasize the need for ongoing clinical education and feedback as well as the importance of optimizing efficiency.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/21548331.2022.2108272</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-6041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7453-0448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-5323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0671-4867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4695-8498</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2154-8331 |
ispartof | Hospital practice (1995), 2022-08, Vol.50 (4), p.289-297 |
issn | 2154-8331 2377-1003 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2696864661 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | emergency departments emergency medicine psychiatry screening social work Suicide violence |
title | Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A18%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20violence%20risk%20screening%20experiences%20of%20emergency%20department%20clinicians&rft.jtitle=Hospital%20practice%20(1995)&rft.au=Roaten,%20Kimberly&rft.date=2022-08-08&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=289-297&rft.issn=2154-8331&rft.eissn=2377-1003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21548331.2022.2108272&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2696864661%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2da964d94f276cf6a62c3c720b807daedf7816ef18808f835ba003eff126b2593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696864661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |