Loading…

Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians

Individuals commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for care after violence and many are also at risk for subsequent self or other-directed violence. Screening for violence risk represents an important part of ED care, but is challenging to implement effectively. Feedback from ED providers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hospital practice (1995) 2022-08, Vol.50 (4), p.289-297
Main Authors: Roaten, Kimberly, Browne, Sabrina, Pollio, David E., Khan, Fuad, North, Carol S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2da964d94f276cf6a62c3c720b807daedf7816ef18808f835ba003eff126b2593
container_end_page 297
container_issue 4
container_start_page 289
container_title Hospital practice (1995)
container_volume 50
creator Roaten, Kimberly
Browne, Sabrina
Pollio, David E.
Khan, Fuad
North, Carol S.
description Individuals commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for care after violence and many are also at risk for subsequent self or other-directed violence. Screening for violence risk represents an important part of ED care, but is challenging to implement effectively. Feedback from ED providers is needed to characterize differences across provider types in order to facilitate implementation of enhanced screening practices. This qualitative focus group study examined the experiences of 6 psychiatric social workers, 16 emergency medicine physicians, and 15 psychiatric providers in conducting violence risk screening to elicit ideas about solutions and barriers. Eight themes emerged: Approach to Patient Assessment, High-Yield Clinical Data in Risk Assessment, Suicide Risk Screen, ED Clinician Resources, Analysis of Professional Risk, Affective Response of Clinician, ED Role and Scope, and Clinical Management. All clinician types discussed the themes from their professional perspectives and generated important knowledge of violence risk screening practices. The findings affirm the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in addressing violence risk in the ED and emphasize the need for ongoing clinical education and feedback as well as the importance of optimizing efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/21548331.2022.2108272
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2696864661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2696864661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2da964d94f276cf6a62c3c720b807daedf7816ef18808f835ba003eff126b2593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpJyBlySbFj8R2dqCKl1SJTVlbrjOuDIkd7BTo3-OoZctqZu6cOxpdhK4JXhIs8S0ldSUZI0uKKV3SrFFBz9CMMiFKgjE7z31mygm6RIuU3nFWGa4ZEzO0WYV-0NGl4Itgiy8XOvAGiqx8FMlEAO_8roCfAaKbNmnCoIe4y9OhaCG7xx78WJjOeWec9ukKXVjdJVic6hy9PT5sVs_l-vXpZXW_Lg3FfCxpqxtetU1lqeDGcs2pYUZQvJVYtBpaKyThYImUWFrJ6q3On4O1hPItrRs2RzfHu0MMn3tIo-pdMtB12kPYJ0V5wyWvOCcZrY-oiSGlCFYN0fU6HhTBagpS_QWppiDVKcjsuzv6nLch9vo7xK5Voz50IdqovXFJsf9P_ALLKXqq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696864661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Roaten, Kimberly ; Browne, Sabrina ; Pollio, David E. ; Khan, Fuad ; North, Carol S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roaten, Kimberly ; Browne, Sabrina ; Pollio, David E. ; Khan, Fuad ; North, Carol S.</creatorcontrib><description>Individuals commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for care after violence and many are also at risk for subsequent self or other-directed violence. Screening for violence risk represents an important part of ED care, but is challenging to implement effectively. Feedback from ED providers is needed to characterize differences across provider types in order to facilitate implementation of enhanced screening practices. This qualitative focus group study examined the experiences of 6 psychiatric social workers, 16 emergency medicine physicians, and 15 psychiatric providers in conducting violence risk screening to elicit ideas about solutions and barriers. Eight themes emerged: Approach to Patient Assessment, High-Yield Clinical Data in Risk Assessment, Suicide Risk Screen, ED Clinician Resources, Analysis of Professional Risk, Affective Response of Clinician, ED Role and Scope, and Clinical Management. All clinician types discussed the themes from their professional perspectives and generated important knowledge of violence risk screening practices. The findings affirm the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in addressing violence risk in the ED and emphasize the need for ongoing clinical education and feedback as well as the importance of optimizing efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2154-8331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2377-1003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2022.2108272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>emergency departments ; emergency medicine ; psychiatry ; screening ; social work ; Suicide ; violence</subject><ispartof>Hospital practice (1995), 2022-08, Vol.50 (4), p.289-297</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2da964d94f276cf6a62c3c720b807daedf7816ef18808f835ba003eff126b2593</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9117-6041 ; 0000-0002-7453-0448 ; 0000-0001-6032-5323 ; 0000-0003-0671-4867 ; 0000-0002-4695-8498</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roaten, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollio, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Fuad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>North, Carol S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians</title><title>Hospital practice (1995)</title><description>Individuals commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for care after violence and many are also at risk for subsequent self or other-directed violence. Screening for violence risk represents an important part of ED care, but is challenging to implement effectively. Feedback from ED providers is needed to characterize differences across provider types in order to facilitate implementation of enhanced screening practices. This qualitative focus group study examined the experiences of 6 psychiatric social workers, 16 emergency medicine physicians, and 15 psychiatric providers in conducting violence risk screening to elicit ideas about solutions and barriers. Eight themes emerged: Approach to Patient Assessment, High-Yield Clinical Data in Risk Assessment, Suicide Risk Screen, ED Clinician Resources, Analysis of Professional Risk, Affective Response of Clinician, ED Role and Scope, and Clinical Management. All clinician types discussed the themes from their professional perspectives and generated important knowledge of violence risk screening practices. The findings affirm the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in addressing violence risk in the ED and emphasize the need for ongoing clinical education and feedback as well as the importance of optimizing efficiency.</description><subject>emergency departments</subject><subject>emergency medicine</subject><subject>psychiatry</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>social work</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>violence</subject><issn>2154-8331</issn><issn>2377-1003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpJyBlySbFj8R2dqCKl1SJTVlbrjOuDIkd7BTo3-OoZctqZu6cOxpdhK4JXhIs8S0ldSUZI0uKKV3SrFFBz9CMMiFKgjE7z31mygm6RIuU3nFWGa4ZEzO0WYV-0NGl4Itgiy8XOvAGiqx8FMlEAO_8roCfAaKbNmnCoIe4y9OhaCG7xx78WJjOeWec9ukKXVjdJVic6hy9PT5sVs_l-vXpZXW_Lg3FfCxpqxtetU1lqeDGcs2pYUZQvJVYtBpaKyThYImUWFrJ6q3On4O1hPItrRs2RzfHu0MMn3tIo-pdMtB12kPYJ0V5wyWvOCcZrY-oiSGlCFYN0fU6HhTBagpS_QWppiDVKcjsuzv6nLch9vo7xK5Voz50IdqovXFJsf9P_ALLKXqq</recordid><startdate>20220808</startdate><enddate>20220808</enddate><creator>Roaten, Kimberly</creator><creator>Browne, Sabrina</creator><creator>Pollio, David E.</creator><creator>Khan, Fuad</creator><creator>North, Carol S.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-6041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7453-0448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-5323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0671-4867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4695-8498</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220808</creationdate><title>Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians</title><author>Roaten, Kimberly ; Browne, Sabrina ; Pollio, David E. ; Khan, Fuad ; North, Carol S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2da964d94f276cf6a62c3c720b807daedf7816ef18808f835ba003eff126b2593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>emergency departments</topic><topic>emergency medicine</topic><topic>psychiatry</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>social work</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roaten, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollio, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Fuad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>North, Carol S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hospital practice (1995)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roaten, Kimberly</au><au>Browne, Sabrina</au><au>Pollio, David E.</au><au>Khan, Fuad</au><au>North, Carol S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians</atitle><jtitle>Hospital practice (1995)</jtitle><date>2022-08-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>289-297</pages><issn>2154-8331</issn><eissn>2377-1003</eissn><abstract>Individuals commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for care after violence and many are also at risk for subsequent self or other-directed violence. Screening for violence risk represents an important part of ED care, but is challenging to implement effectively. Feedback from ED providers is needed to characterize differences across provider types in order to facilitate implementation of enhanced screening practices. This qualitative focus group study examined the experiences of 6 psychiatric social workers, 16 emergency medicine physicians, and 15 psychiatric providers in conducting violence risk screening to elicit ideas about solutions and barriers. Eight themes emerged: Approach to Patient Assessment, High-Yield Clinical Data in Risk Assessment, Suicide Risk Screen, ED Clinician Resources, Analysis of Professional Risk, Affective Response of Clinician, ED Role and Scope, and Clinical Management. All clinician types discussed the themes from their professional perspectives and generated important knowledge of violence risk screening practices. The findings affirm the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in addressing violence risk in the ED and emphasize the need for ongoing clinical education and feedback as well as the importance of optimizing efficiency.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/21548331.2022.2108272</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-6041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7453-0448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-5323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0671-4867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4695-8498</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2154-8331
ispartof Hospital practice (1995), 2022-08, Vol.50 (4), p.289-297
issn 2154-8331
2377-1003
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2696864661
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects emergency departments
emergency medicine
psychiatry
screening
social work
Suicide
violence
title Comparison of violence risk screening experiences of emergency department clinicians
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A18%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20violence%20risk%20screening%20experiences%20of%20emergency%20department%20clinicians&rft.jtitle=Hospital%20practice%20(1995)&rft.au=Roaten,%20Kimberly&rft.date=2022-08-08&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=289-297&rft.issn=2154-8331&rft.eissn=2377-1003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21548331.2022.2108272&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2696864661%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2da964d94f276cf6a62c3c720b807daedf7816ef18808f835ba003eff126b2593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696864661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true