Loading…

Seismic response interaction between subsurface geology and selected facilities at the University of Mississippi

Analyses of the responses of a dormitory building and a highway bridge on the University of Mississippi's main campus to simulated earthquake conditions are presented. Interaction between the facility structural models and subsurface geology models has been computed using the ABAQUS three-dimen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Engineering geology 2001-10, Vol.62 (1-3), p.223-250
Main Authors: Mullen, Christopher L., Swann, Charles T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a253t-f99c45f1978ae2f3d559ce53024dafe1f903a4a0241164d325cfd534808dd46e3
container_end_page 250
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 223
container_title Engineering geology
container_volume 62
creator Mullen, Christopher L.
Swann, Charles T.
description Analyses of the responses of a dormitory building and a highway bridge on the University of Mississippi's main campus to simulated earthquake conditions are presented. Interaction between the facility structural models and subsurface geology models has been computed using the ABAQUS three-dimensional, nonlinear dynamic finite element code. Facility structural modeling has been supported by geological investigations including stratigraphic, boring, and shear-wave velocity measurements performed at a variety of sites on the campus. Seismic potential has been investigated through field studies of faulting in surrounding counties. Acceleration records for shaking the interaction models have been generated using a combination of recorded motions and ground motion models. Three earthquakes have been examined, one with an epicenter at Charleston, Mississippi, and the other two at Marked Tree, Arkansas. Characteristic events of light, moderate, and severe intensities, with nominal moment magnitudes of 5.0, 6.5, and 8.0, respectively, have been simulated, enabling a vulnerability assessment over a range of likely facility response. A contour map of fundamental periods of the subsurface geology has been constructed from surface motions calculated using the WESHAKE 5 program which accounts for propagation through the soil column. Such a map provides a quick guide to the tendency for interaction with facility structures at any site on campus. Eigenvalue and time history analyses of the facility structural/subsurface geology interaction models provide insight into the influence the subsurface geology has on the response behavior and damage that occurs in the facility structures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00063-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26970510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26970510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a253t-f99c45f1978ae2f3d559ce53024dafe1f903a4a0241164d325cfd534808dd46e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhnNQsFZ_gpCT6GF1stnsdo9S_IKKh9pzSLOTGtlu1kxW6b-3a0UYeHk_mMPD2IWAGwGivF0CCJlVtcqvQFwDQCkzccQm__EJOyX6GC1ANWH9Ej1tveURqQ8dIfddwmhs8qHja0zfiB2nYU1DdMYi32Bow2bHTddwwhZtwobvG9_65JG4STy9I191_gsj-bTjwfEXTzRe3_szduxMS3j-p1O2erh_mz9li9fH5_ndIjO5kilzdW0L5URdzQzmTjZK1RaVhLxojEPhapCmMHsrRFk0MlfWNUoWM5g1TVGinLLLw98-hs8BKemtJ4ttazoMA-m8rCtQAvZDdRjaGIgiOt1HvzVxpwXokan-ZapHeBqE_mWqhfwBl79uow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26970510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic response interaction between subsurface geology and selected facilities at the University of Mississippi</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Mullen, Christopher L. ; Swann, Charles T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Christopher L. ; Swann, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><description>Analyses of the responses of a dormitory building and a highway bridge on the University of Mississippi's main campus to simulated earthquake conditions are presented. Interaction between the facility structural models and subsurface geology models has been computed using the ABAQUS three-dimensional, nonlinear dynamic finite element code. Facility structural modeling has been supported by geological investigations including stratigraphic, boring, and shear-wave velocity measurements performed at a variety of sites on the campus. Seismic potential has been investigated through field studies of faulting in surrounding counties. Acceleration records for shaking the interaction models have been generated using a combination of recorded motions and ground motion models. Three earthquakes have been examined, one with an epicenter at Charleston, Mississippi, and the other two at Marked Tree, Arkansas. Characteristic events of light, moderate, and severe intensities, with nominal moment magnitudes of 5.0, 6.5, and 8.0, respectively, have been simulated, enabling a vulnerability assessment over a range of likely facility response. A contour map of fundamental periods of the subsurface geology has been constructed from surface motions calculated using the WESHAKE 5 program which accounts for propagation through the soil column. Such a map provides a quick guide to the tendency for interaction with facility structures at any site on campus. Eigenvalue and time history analyses of the facility structural/subsurface geology interaction models provide insight into the influence the subsurface geology has on the response behavior and damage that occurs in the facility structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-7952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00063-1</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Engineering geology, 2001-10, Vol.62 (1-3), p.223-250</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a253t-f99c45f1978ae2f3d559ce53024dafe1f903a4a0241164d325cfd534808dd46e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swann, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic response interaction between subsurface geology and selected facilities at the University of Mississippi</title><title>Engineering geology</title><description>Analyses of the responses of a dormitory building and a highway bridge on the University of Mississippi's main campus to simulated earthquake conditions are presented. Interaction between the facility structural models and subsurface geology models has been computed using the ABAQUS three-dimensional, nonlinear dynamic finite element code. Facility structural modeling has been supported by geological investigations including stratigraphic, boring, and shear-wave velocity measurements performed at a variety of sites on the campus. Seismic potential has been investigated through field studies of faulting in surrounding counties. Acceleration records for shaking the interaction models have been generated using a combination of recorded motions and ground motion models. Three earthquakes have been examined, one with an epicenter at Charleston, Mississippi, and the other two at Marked Tree, Arkansas. Characteristic events of light, moderate, and severe intensities, with nominal moment magnitudes of 5.0, 6.5, and 8.0, respectively, have been simulated, enabling a vulnerability assessment over a range of likely facility response. A contour map of fundamental periods of the subsurface geology has been constructed from surface motions calculated using the WESHAKE 5 program which accounts for propagation through the soil column. Such a map provides a quick guide to the tendency for interaction with facility structures at any site on campus. Eigenvalue and time history analyses of the facility structural/subsurface geology interaction models provide insight into the influence the subsurface geology has on the response behavior and damage that occurs in the facility structures.</description><issn>0013-7952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhnNQsFZ_gpCT6GF1stnsdo9S_IKKh9pzSLOTGtlu1kxW6b-3a0UYeHk_mMPD2IWAGwGivF0CCJlVtcqvQFwDQCkzccQm__EJOyX6GC1ANWH9Ej1tveURqQ8dIfddwmhs8qHja0zfiB2nYU1DdMYi32Bow2bHTddwwhZtwobvG9_65JG4STy9I191_gsj-bTjwfEXTzRe3_szduxMS3j-p1O2erh_mz9li9fH5_ndIjO5kilzdW0L5URdzQzmTjZK1RaVhLxojEPhapCmMHsrRFk0MlfWNUoWM5g1TVGinLLLw98-hs8BKemtJ4ttazoMA-m8rCtQAvZDdRjaGIgiOt1HvzVxpwXokan-ZapHeBqE_mWqhfwBl79uow</recordid><startdate>200110</startdate><enddate>200110</enddate><creator>Mullen, Christopher L.</creator><creator>Swann, Charles T.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200110</creationdate><title>Seismic response interaction between subsurface geology and selected facilities at the University of Mississippi</title><author>Mullen, Christopher L. ; Swann, Charles T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a253t-f99c45f1978ae2f3d559ce53024dafe1f903a4a0241164d325cfd534808dd46e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swann, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Engineering geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mullen, Christopher L.</au><au>Swann, Charles T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic response interaction between subsurface geology and selected facilities at the University of Mississippi</atitle><jtitle>Engineering geology</jtitle><date>2001-10</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>223-250</pages><issn>0013-7952</issn><abstract>Analyses of the responses of a dormitory building and a highway bridge on the University of Mississippi's main campus to simulated earthquake conditions are presented. Interaction between the facility structural models and subsurface geology models has been computed using the ABAQUS three-dimensional, nonlinear dynamic finite element code. Facility structural modeling has been supported by geological investigations including stratigraphic, boring, and shear-wave velocity measurements performed at a variety of sites on the campus. Seismic potential has been investigated through field studies of faulting in surrounding counties. Acceleration records for shaking the interaction models have been generated using a combination of recorded motions and ground motion models. Three earthquakes have been examined, one with an epicenter at Charleston, Mississippi, and the other two at Marked Tree, Arkansas. Characteristic events of light, moderate, and severe intensities, with nominal moment magnitudes of 5.0, 6.5, and 8.0, respectively, have been simulated, enabling a vulnerability assessment over a range of likely facility response. A contour map of fundamental periods of the subsurface geology has been constructed from surface motions calculated using the WESHAKE 5 program which accounts for propagation through the soil column. Such a map provides a quick guide to the tendency for interaction with facility structures at any site on campus. Eigenvalue and time history analyses of the facility structural/subsurface geology interaction models provide insight into the influence the subsurface geology has on the response behavior and damage that occurs in the facility structures.</abstract><doi>10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00063-1</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-7952
ispartof Engineering geology, 2001-10, Vol.62 (1-3), p.223-250
issn 0013-7952
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26970510
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
title Seismic response interaction between subsurface geology and selected facilities at the University of Mississippi
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A41%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20response%20interaction%20between%20subsurface%20geology%20and%20selected%20facilities%20at%20the%20University%20of%20Mississippi&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20geology&rft.au=Mullen,%20Christopher%20L.&rft.date=2001-10&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=223-250&rft.issn=0013-7952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00063-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26970510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a253t-f99c45f1978ae2f3d559ce53024dafe1f903a4a0241164d325cfd534808dd46e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26970510&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true