Loading…

Comparison of high-concentration azo dye removal by long HRT in MSBRs’ bioaugmented with GAC and sponge media

The present study assessed the performance and fouling of adding granular activated carbon (GAC) and sponge (BioCube), as two different media, to a membrane sequencing batch reactor (MSBR) system in wastewater treatment containing Acid Red 18 (AR 18). Anaerobic phase, aerobic phase, and hydraulic re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science and pollution research international 2023, Vol.30 (1), p.1201-1215
Main Authors: Taheri, Mahsa, Fallah, Narges, Nasernejad, Bahram
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The present study assessed the performance and fouling of adding granular activated carbon (GAC) and sponge (BioCube), as two different media, to a membrane sequencing batch reactor (MSBR) system in wastewater treatment containing Acid Red 18 (AR 18). Anaerobic phase, aerobic phase, and hydraulic retention times ( HRT s) of 24 h, 12 h, and 72 h were considered for 500 mg/L AR 18 removal at a sludge retention time ( SRT ) of 20 days by separately adding up to 35% BioCube volume and 8 g/L GAC to the reactors. Based on the kinetic study, 63 mg/L (87% removal) and 115 mg/L (77% removal) remaining dye were reported in the GAC and BioCube membrane sequencing batch reactors (GAC-MSBR and BioCube-MSBR), respectively. A gradual oxidation-reduction potential decline toward −416 mV confirmed better dye removal in GAC-MSBR than BioCube-MSBR, observing a sudden drop to −354 mV. The morphology can explain better biological treatment in GAC-MSBR in addition to the adsorption process. Soluble microbial products (SMPs) of 126.92 mg/L and 395.18 mg/L were obtained for GAC-MSBR and BioCube-MSBR, respectively. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) and SMP indicated that the GAC-MSBR water quality is better than that of the other reactor. Graphical abstract
ISSN:0944-1344
1614-7499
DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22055-3