Accuracy of virtual non-contrast images with different algorithms in dual-energy computed tomography

• Published in: Radiological physics and technology 2022-09, Vol.15 (3), p.234-244
• Main Authors: Takane, Yumi, Sato, Kazuhiro, Kageyama, Ryota, Takano, Hirokazu, Kayano, Shingo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Attenuation coefficients; Computed tomography; Contrast agents; Decomposition; Image contrast; Imaging; Mathematical analysis; Medical and Radiation Physics; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nuclear Medicine; Parameters; Radiology; Radiotherapy; Research Article; Tomography
• ISSN: 1865-0333; 1865-0341
• DOI: 10.1007/s12194-022-00668-0

We investigated the accuracy of the computed tomography (CT) numbers of virtual non-contrast (VNC) images for two different material decomposition algorithms using the same image data for different diluted contrast agent concentrations. A container filled with contrast agents was inserted into a cylindrical phantom and scanned with dual-energy protocols (80/Sn140 kV, 100/Sn140 kV) using a dual-source CT. VNC images were generated by the 2-material decomposition (MD) algorithm using the energy of each tube voltage and the linear attenuation coefficient, calculated from the theoretical spectral curve of the agent and the CT number of the image, respectively. Furthermore, VNC images using 3-material decomposition (3-MD) algorithm were produced by applying LiverVNC, an analysis parameter implemented in the scanner. The robustness of both the algorithms was verified by investigating the CT numbers of the agents in the VNC. The closer the CT number is to 0 HU, the more robust the algorithm. Without beam-hardening correction, the CT numbers increased with an increase in concentration in both the algorithms, maximal at 50 mg/ml concentration, with CT numbers of 38 HU for 2-MD, 86 HU for 3-MD. With correction, CT numbers were ± 10 HU or less for both the algorithms up to 30 mg/ml concentration, whereas, for concentrations above 40 mg/ml, the maximal averaged CT number was 12 HU for 2-MD, 22 HU for 3-MD. For both the algorithms, the accuracy of the CT numbers was maintained in the low-concentration range; parameter adjustment was necessary to maintain the accuracy at concentrations higher than clinically expected.