Surface modifications of a vulcanized rubber using corona discharge and ultraviolet radiation treatments

Two different surface treatments have been applied to a synthetic vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber (R1): corona discharge and UV treatment. Corona discharge treatment has been carried out on R1 rubber by varying the electrode-sample distance (2–4 mm), the duration (1 to 11 sec) and several parame...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of materials science 2001-12, Vol.36 (24), p.5789-5799
Main Authors: ROMERO-SANCHEZ, M. D, PASTOR-BLAS, M. M, MARTIN-MARTINEZ, J. M, ZHDAN, P. A, WATTS, J. F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied sciences
Atomic beam spectroscopy
Atomic force microscopy
Butadiene
Coating, metallization, dyeing
Contact angle
Discharge
Exact sciences and technology
Infrared spectroscopy
Machinery and processing
Materials science
Microscopy
Migration
Morphology
Organic chemistry
Photoelectrons
Plastics
Polymer industry, paints, wood
Rubber
Scanning electron microscopy
Technology of polymers
Ultraviolet radiation
X ray photoelectron spectroscopy
Zinc stearate
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two different surface treatments have been applied to a synthetic vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber (R1): corona discharge and UV treatment. Corona discharge treatment has been carried out on R1 rubber by varying the electrode-sample distance (2–4 mm), the duration (1 to 11 sec) and several parameters in the treatment of R1 rubber with UV treatment (lamp-sample distance between 1 and 5 cm, the duration between 30 sec and 5 min). The effects on both treatments on the surface of R1 were analyzed using contact angle measurements, ATR-IR spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). A noticeable decrease in contact angles was observed on the R1 rubber by applying both treatments, although the modifications produced on the rubber surface were different. Corona discharge mainly affected the morphology of the R1 rubber surface whereas UV treatment mainly modified its chemistry. The migration of zinc stearate was only produced by UV treatment but not with corona discharge. Therefore, the UV treatment of R1 rubber was more aggressive, facilitating the migration of moieties from the bulk to the surface and producing oxygen moieties.
ISSN:0022-2461
1573-4803
DOI:10.1023/A:1012999820592