Loading…
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing perioperative outcomes of emergency appendectomy performed by trainee vs trained surgeon
Appendectomy is a benchmark operation for trainee progression, but this should be weighed against patient safety and perioperative outcomes. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes of appendectomy performed by trainees versus trained surgeons. Of 2086 articles screened, 29...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 2023-01, Vol.225 (1), p.168-179 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Appendectomy is a benchmark operation for trainee progression, but this should be weighed against patient safety and perioperative outcomes.
Systematic literature review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes of appendectomy performed by trainees versus trained surgeons.
Of 2086 articles screened, 29 studies reporting on 135,358 participants were analyzed. There was no difference in mortality (Odds ratio [OR] 1.08, P = 0.830), overall complications (OR 0.93, P = 0.51), or major complications (OR 0.56, P = 0.16). There was no difference in conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery (OR 0.81, P = 0.12) and in intraoperative blood loss (Mean Difference [MD] 5.58 mL, P = 0.25). Trainees had longer operating time (MD 7.61 min, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.07.006 |