Loading…
What Du Bois and I Know About Dignity of Risk
This article uses multiple interwoven personal narratives to explicate the relationships among several concepts crucial to bioethics brought into focus by Robert Perske's 1972 article on "The Dignity of Risk," including dignity, risk, paradox, disability, autonomy, uncertainty, diagno...
Saved in:
Published in: | Perspectives in biology and medicine 2022-03, Vol.65 (2), p.171-178 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 178 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | Perspectives in biology and medicine |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie |
description | This article uses multiple interwoven personal narratives to explicate the relationships among several concepts crucial to bioethics brought into focus by Robert Perske's 1972 article on "The Dignity of Risk," including dignity, risk, paradox, disability, autonomy, uncertainty, diagnosis, and prognosis. The use of personal narrative as a form of evidence and a knowledge-making method allows for the exploration of the meaning-making work of language and story and the introduction of humanities and social science concepts such as stigma management and dignity maintenance into Perske's concept of the dignity of risk. The personal narratives the article draws include Mark, a character in Perske's article; W. E. B. Du Bois; Frantz Fanon; and myself. Finally, the article calls for humility in medical science's predictive narratives for all patients, but particularly for people with disabilities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/pbm.2022.0012 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2699955926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811272383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-16861fb9feacff87465eadba34f3492d72b272f5ba6733876a9347a59621c9833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkLtPwzAQhy0EEqUwsltiYUmxz_FrLOUpKiHxEKPlpDakNHGJE6H-9zgUgcQtN9xP3919CB1TMqGMs7N1UU-AAEwIobCDRpSDzpTUfBeNCGE041rBPjqIcUlSScFHKHt5sx2-6PF5qCK2zQLf4rsmfOJpEfo0qF6bqtvg4PFDFd8P0Z63q-iOfvoYPV9dPs1usvn99e1sOs9K0LrLqFCC-kJ7Z0vvlcwFd3ZRWJZ7lmtYSChAgueFFZIxJYXVLJeWawG01IqxMTrdctdt-Ohd7ExdxdKtVrZxoY8GhNaacw0iRU_-RZehb5t0nQFFadrDvoHZNlW2IcbWebNuq9q2G0OJGeSZJM8M8swgL-XzX-rSlV3dR_cHTt9JoczjIHjwCwDJJ0j2BUDPbnc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811272383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Du Bois and I Know About Dignity of Risk</title><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><creator>Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie</creator><creatorcontrib>Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><description>This article uses multiple interwoven personal narratives to explicate the relationships among several concepts crucial to bioethics brought into focus by Robert Perske's 1972 article on "The Dignity of Risk," including dignity, risk, paradox, disability, autonomy, uncertainty, diagnosis, and prognosis. The use of personal narrative as a form of evidence and a knowledge-making method allows for the exploration of the meaning-making work of language and story and the introduction of humanities and social science concepts such as stigma management and dignity maintenance into Perske's concept of the dignity of risk. The personal narratives the article draws include Mark, a character in Perske's article; W. E. B. Du Bois; Frantz Fanon; and myself. Finally, the article calls for humility in medical science's predictive narratives for all patients, but particularly for people with disabilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-5982</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1529-8795</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-8795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2022.0012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US ; Bioethics ; Human rights ; Identity formation ; Intellectual disabilities ; Language ; People with disabilities ; Race ; Racial identity ; Social interaction ; Sociology ; Stigma</subject><ispartof>Perspectives in biology and medicine, 2022-03, Vol.65 (2), p.171-178</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Johns Hopkins University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Spring 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><title>What Du Bois and I Know About Dignity of Risk</title><title>Perspectives in biology and medicine</title><description>This article uses multiple interwoven personal narratives to explicate the relationships among several concepts crucial to bioethics brought into focus by Robert Perske's 1972 article on "The Dignity of Risk," including dignity, risk, paradox, disability, autonomy, uncertainty, diagnosis, and prognosis. The use of personal narrative as a form of evidence and a knowledge-making method allows for the exploration of the meaning-making work of language and story and the introduction of humanities and social science concepts such as stigma management and dignity maintenance into Perske's concept of the dignity of risk. The personal narratives the article draws include Mark, a character in Perske's article; W. E. B. Du Bois; Frantz Fanon; and myself. Finally, the article calls for humility in medical science's predictive narratives for all patients, but particularly for people with disabilities.</description><subject>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Identity formation</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial identity</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><issn>0031-5982</issn><issn>1529-8795</issn><issn>1529-8795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkLtPwzAQhy0EEqUwsltiYUmxz_FrLOUpKiHxEKPlpDakNHGJE6H-9zgUgcQtN9xP3919CB1TMqGMs7N1UU-AAEwIobCDRpSDzpTUfBeNCGE041rBPjqIcUlSScFHKHt5sx2-6PF5qCK2zQLf4rsmfOJpEfo0qF6bqtvg4PFDFd8P0Z63q-iOfvoYPV9dPs1usvn99e1sOs9K0LrLqFCC-kJ7Z0vvlcwFd3ZRWJZ7lmtYSChAgueFFZIxJYXVLJeWawG01IqxMTrdctdt-Ohd7ExdxdKtVrZxoY8GhNaacw0iRU_-RZehb5t0nQFFadrDvoHZNlW2IcbWebNuq9q2G0OJGeSZJM8M8swgL-XzX-rSlV3dR_cHTt9JoczjIHjwCwDJJ0j2BUDPbnc</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>What Du Bois and I Know About Dignity of Risk</title><author>Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-16861fb9feacff87465eadba34f3492d72b272f5ba6733876a9347a59621c9833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Identity formation</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial identity</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Perspectives in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Du Bois and I Know About Dignity of Risk</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives in biology and medicine</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>171-178</pages><issn>0031-5982</issn><issn>1529-8795</issn><eissn>1529-8795</eissn><abstract>This article uses multiple interwoven personal narratives to explicate the relationships among several concepts crucial to bioethics brought into focus by Robert Perske's 1972 article on "The Dignity of Risk," including dignity, risk, paradox, disability, autonomy, uncertainty, diagnosis, and prognosis. The use of personal narrative as a form of evidence and a knowledge-making method allows for the exploration of the meaning-making work of language and story and the introduction of humanities and social science concepts such as stigma management and dignity maintenance into Perske's concept of the dignity of risk. The personal narratives the article draws include Mark, a character in Perske's article; W. E. B. Du Bois; Frantz Fanon; and myself. Finally, the article calls for humility in medical science's predictive narratives for all patients, but particularly for people with disabilities.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/pbm.2022.0012</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-5982 |
ispartof | Perspectives in biology and medicine, 2022-03, Vol.65 (2), p.171-178 |
issn | 0031-5982 1529-8795 1529-8795 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2699955926 |
source | Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection |
subjects | Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US Bioethics Human rights Identity formation Intellectual disabilities Language People with disabilities Race Racial identity Social interaction Sociology Stigma |
title | What Du Bois and I Know About Dignity of Risk |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T09%3A03%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Du%20Bois%20and%20I%20Know%20About%20Dignity%20of%20Risk&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Garland-Thomson,%20Rosemarie&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=171-178&rft.issn=0031-5982&rft.eissn=1529-8795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/pbm.2022.0012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2811272383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-16861fb9feacff87465eadba34f3492d72b272f5ba6733876a9347a59621c9833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811272383&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |