The tribology of nano-crystalline diamond

Nano-crystalline diamond is the hardest diamond-like carbon (DLC) with properties very close to true diamond. Among such properties is the low frictional coefficient and high wear resistance. Cemented WC disks were coated by nano-crystalline diamond deposited by cathodic arc. These disks were rubbed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials chemistry and physics 2001-11, Vol.72 (2), p.133-135
Main Authors: Luo, Shenq Y., Kuo, Jui-Kang, Yeh, Brian, Sung, James C., Dai, Chuang-Wen, Tsai, Tsung J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cross-disciplinary physics: materials science
rheology
Exact sciences and technology
Fullerenes and related materials
diamonds, graphite
Materials science
Nano-crystalline diamond
Physics
Specific materials
Tribology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nano-crystalline diamond is the hardest diamond-like carbon (DLC) with properties very close to true diamond. Among such properties is the low frictional coefficient and high wear resistance. Cemented WC disks were coated by nano-crystalline diamond deposited by cathodic arc. These disks were rubbed cyclically by pins made of aluminum–silicon alloy (4032), carbon steel (52100), and alumina ceramics (Al 2O 3). It was found that frictional coefficient, after the period of “break-in”, was significantly reduced when compared with that of uncoated carbides. However, the frictional coefficient (0.2) with steel was more than twice that with Al alloy (0.09) and alumina (0.08). This abnormal high frictional coefficient is possibly due to the chemical interaction between surface atoms of iron and carbon. The wear mechanisms include mechanical attrition, chemical adhesion, and fatigue. The wear loss was the highest for the softer Al alloy, and lowest for 52100 steel. However, the wear of nano-crystalline diamond was the highest when it was rubbed against Al alloy. It was postulated that diamond was worn down primarily by the hardened layers of Al alloy and oxygen formed in situ during the rubbing action.
ISSN:0254-0584
1879-3312
DOI:10.1016/S0254-0584(01)00422-9