Loading…

The energy balance theory is an inconsistent paradigm

•The enforcement of mathematical consistency on the energy balance framework leads to impossible body composition states.•Numerical reasoning shows that at weight stability mean energy intake is substantially distinct to mean energy expenditure.•Energy balance cannot occur as the necessary condition...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of theoretical biology 2022-10, Vol.550, p.111240-111240, Article 111240
Main Author: Arencibia-Albite, Francisco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The enforcement of mathematical consistency on the energy balance framework leads to impossible body composition states.•Numerical reasoning shows that at weight stability mean energy intake is substantially distinct to mean energy expenditure.•Energy balance cannot occur as the necessary conditions for such event do not allow for normal physiology. Metabolic physiology asserts that body weight stability is achieved when over time the average absorbed energy intake equals the average expended energy. This principle, known as energy balance, justifies the design of numerous investigations that aim to elucidate the biology of obesity. The present work provides a mathematical analysis that demonstrates, nonetheless, that weight stability must coexist with a constant energy imbalance, i.e., the average absorbed energy intake and the average expended energy are significantly different during steady weight periods. This analytical finding is not in contradiction with the First Law of Thermodynamics since open systems can manifest a stable mass in the absence of energy equilibrium. The effect of caloric imbalance on weight fluctuations is thus the result of its underlying net mass flux. The energy balance theory is, consequently, an inconsistent paradigm; and as such, the data analysis and interpretation that follows from its postulates is expected to be erroneous.
ISSN:0022-5193
1095-8541
DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111240