Loading…

ERP responses to sexual cues among young women attracted to men

Previous event‐related potential (ERP) studies reported larger N170, P3, and late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes to sexual than nonsexual stimuli. These ERPs may not be specifically sensitive to processing sexual cues, however, because the sexual stimuli included information beyond sexual cues...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychophysiology 2023-02, Vol.60 (2), p.e14162-n/a
Main Authors: Huberman, Jackie S., Mangardich, Haykaz, Sabbagh, Mark A., Chivers, Meredith L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b6c27c01457ca560089fdbff0f3969ab663eb42c4b970005cd949bb54ba30e2f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b6c27c01457ca560089fdbff0f3969ab663eb42c4b970005cd949bb54ba30e2f3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page e14162
container_title Psychophysiology
container_volume 60
creator Huberman, Jackie S.
Mangardich, Haykaz
Sabbagh, Mark A.
Chivers, Meredith L.
description Previous event‐related potential (ERP) studies reported larger N170, P3, and late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes to sexual than nonsexual stimuli. These ERPs may not be specifically sensitive to processing sexual cues, however, because the sexual stimuli included information beyond sexual cues (e.g., faces, bodies, social interaction) to a greater extent than comparison stimuli. We investigated ERPs to stimuli that focused on sexual and nonsexual body regions, in different states of readiness for activity, to elucidate neural responses involved in processing sexual cues. Forty cisgender, primarily white, undergraduate women who were attracted to men (Mage = 18.6, SD = 0.9) viewed images that varied by male body part (penis, arm) and activity state (rest, poised for activity). Participants viewed 40 images per category (flaccid penises, erect penises, outstretched arms, bent arms). Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded using a 128‐channel net, time‐locked to the onset of each image. Using a whole‐head cluster‐mass approach, we found that the P3 was sensitive to sexual readiness—P3 amplitudes were larger to erect than flaccid penises, but not to bent than outstretched arms. The N170 and LPP components did not show evidence of similarly specific responses to sexual readiness, revealing potential dissociation of different neural processes commonly elicited in response to more complex sexual stimuli. An additional novel finding was that an anterior N270‐400 was sensitive to sexual readiness. Findings clarify the brain's rapid responses to sexual stimuli, setting the stage for future research aimed at better understanding the neurocognitive processes that contribute to the coordination of sexual arousal. This study was the first to examine ERPs to constrained stimuli that specifically varied in a salient sexual cue—readiness for sexual activity. We tested whether previously identified ERPs were integrally involved in sexual processing among young women, and our whole‐head analysis revealed a novel ERP that was sensitive to sexual cues. Results provide insight into the brain's rapid detection of sexual cues and the fundamental neurocognitive processes involved in sexual response.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/psyp.14162
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2701072645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2701072645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b6c27c01457ca560089fdbff0f3969ab663eb42c4b970005cd949bb54ba30e2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMozji68QdIwY0IHZM0j2YlMowPGHDwsXBVkjSVGdqmJi1j_70ZO7pw4V3cy7l8HA4HgFMEpyjMVeP7ZooIYngPjBFhIk5FyvbBGEKSxpRzPAJH3q8hhAJhfAhGCRVEBDUG1_OnZeSMb2ztjY9aG3nz2cky0l2QsrL1e9TbLuyNrUwdybZ1Urcm36LhcQwOCll6c7K7E_B6O3-Z3ceLx7uH2c0i1gnlOFZMY64hIpRrSRmEqShyVRSwSAQTUjGWGEWwJkrwEJPqPARUihIlE2hwkUzAxeDbOPsRorVZtfLalKWsje18hjlEkGNGaEDP_6Br27k6pAsUFTTlBOFAXQ6UdtZ7Z4qscatKuj5DMNvWmm1rzb5rDfDZzrJTlcl_0Z8eA4AGYLMqTf-PVbZ8flsOpl-YIYFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2759587412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ERP responses to sexual cues among young women attracted to men</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Huberman, Jackie S. ; Mangardich, Haykaz ; Sabbagh, Mark A. ; Chivers, Meredith L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huberman, Jackie S. ; Mangardich, Haykaz ; Sabbagh, Mark A. ; Chivers, Meredith L.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous event‐related potential (ERP) studies reported larger N170, P3, and late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes to sexual than nonsexual stimuli. These ERPs may not be specifically sensitive to processing sexual cues, however, because the sexual stimuli included information beyond sexual cues (e.g., faces, bodies, social interaction) to a greater extent than comparison stimuli. We investigated ERPs to stimuli that focused on sexual and nonsexual body regions, in different states of readiness for activity, to elucidate neural responses involved in processing sexual cues. Forty cisgender, primarily white, undergraduate women who were attracted to men (Mage = 18.6, SD = 0.9) viewed images that varied by male body part (penis, arm) and activity state (rest, poised for activity). Participants viewed 40 images per category (flaccid penises, erect penises, outstretched arms, bent arms). Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded using a 128‐channel net, time‐locked to the onset of each image. Using a whole‐head cluster‐mass approach, we found that the P3 was sensitive to sexual readiness—P3 amplitudes were larger to erect than flaccid penises, but not to bent than outstretched arms. The N170 and LPP components did not show evidence of similarly specific responses to sexual readiness, revealing potential dissociation of different neural processes commonly elicited in response to more complex sexual stimuli. An additional novel finding was that an anterior N270‐400 was sensitive to sexual readiness. Findings clarify the brain's rapid responses to sexual stimuli, setting the stage for future research aimed at better understanding the neurocognitive processes that contribute to the coordination of sexual arousal. This study was the first to examine ERPs to constrained stimuli that specifically varied in a salient sexual cue—readiness for sexual activity. We tested whether previously identified ERPs were integrally involved in sexual processing among young women, and our whole‐head analysis revealed a novel ERP that was sensitive to sexual cues. Results provide insight into the brain's rapid detection of sexual cues and the fundamental neurocognitive processes involved in sexual response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14162</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35949009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Cognition ; Cues ; EEG ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Event-related potentials ; event‐related potential ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Information processing ; Male ; neural response ; Penis ; Photic Stimulation ; Sexual Behavior ; sexual processing ; sexual response</subject><ispartof>Psychophysiology, 2023-02, Vol.60 (2), p.e14162-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 Society for Psychophysiological Research.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Psychophysiological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b6c27c01457ca560089fdbff0f3969ab663eb42c4b970005cd949bb54ba30e2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b6c27c01457ca560089fdbff0f3969ab663eb42c4b970005cd949bb54ba30e2f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5495-9263 ; 0000-0002-0252-265X ; 0000-0003-1086-5545 ; 0000-0003-2938-6288</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949009$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huberman, Jackie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangardich, Haykaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabbagh, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, Meredith L.</creatorcontrib><title>ERP responses to sexual cues among young women attracted to men</title><title>Psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><description>Previous event‐related potential (ERP) studies reported larger N170, P3, and late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes to sexual than nonsexual stimuli. These ERPs may not be specifically sensitive to processing sexual cues, however, because the sexual stimuli included information beyond sexual cues (e.g., faces, bodies, social interaction) to a greater extent than comparison stimuli. We investigated ERPs to stimuli that focused on sexual and nonsexual body regions, in different states of readiness for activity, to elucidate neural responses involved in processing sexual cues. Forty cisgender, primarily white, undergraduate women who were attracted to men (Mage = 18.6, SD = 0.9) viewed images that varied by male body part (penis, arm) and activity state (rest, poised for activity). Participants viewed 40 images per category (flaccid penises, erect penises, outstretched arms, bent arms). Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded using a 128‐channel net, time‐locked to the onset of each image. Using a whole‐head cluster‐mass approach, we found that the P3 was sensitive to sexual readiness—P3 amplitudes were larger to erect than flaccid penises, but not to bent than outstretched arms. The N170 and LPP components did not show evidence of similarly specific responses to sexual readiness, revealing potential dissociation of different neural processes commonly elicited in response to more complex sexual stimuli. An additional novel finding was that an anterior N270‐400 was sensitive to sexual readiness. Findings clarify the brain's rapid responses to sexual stimuli, setting the stage for future research aimed at better understanding the neurocognitive processes that contribute to the coordination of sexual arousal. This study was the first to examine ERPs to constrained stimuli that specifically varied in a salient sexual cue—readiness for sexual activity. We tested whether previously identified ERPs were integrally involved in sexual processing among young women, and our whole‐head analysis revealed a novel ERP that was sensitive to sexual cues. Results provide insight into the brain's rapid detection of sexual cues and the fundamental neurocognitive processes involved in sexual response.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>event‐related potential</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>neural response</subject><subject>Penis</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>sexual processing</subject><subject>sexual response</subject><issn>0048-5772</issn><issn>1469-8986</issn><issn>1540-5958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMozji68QdIwY0IHZM0j2YlMowPGHDwsXBVkjSVGdqmJi1j_70ZO7pw4V3cy7l8HA4HgFMEpyjMVeP7ZooIYngPjBFhIk5FyvbBGEKSxpRzPAJH3q8hhAJhfAhGCRVEBDUG1_OnZeSMb2ztjY9aG3nz2cky0l2QsrL1e9TbLuyNrUwdybZ1Urcm36LhcQwOCll6c7K7E_B6O3-Z3ceLx7uH2c0i1gnlOFZMY64hIpRrSRmEqShyVRSwSAQTUjGWGEWwJkrwEJPqPARUihIlE2hwkUzAxeDbOPsRorVZtfLalKWsje18hjlEkGNGaEDP_6Br27k6pAsUFTTlBOFAXQ6UdtZ7Z4qscatKuj5DMNvWmm1rzb5rDfDZzrJTlcl_0Z8eA4AGYLMqTf-PVbZ8flsOpl-YIYFA</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Huberman, Jackie S.</creator><creator>Mangardich, Haykaz</creator><creator>Sabbagh, Mark A.</creator><creator>Chivers, Meredith L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-9263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0252-265X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-5545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-6288</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>ERP responses to sexual cues among young women attracted to men</title><author>Huberman, Jackie S. ; Mangardich, Haykaz ; Sabbagh, Mark A. ; Chivers, Meredith L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b6c27c01457ca560089fdbff0f3969ab663eb42c4b970005cd949bb54ba30e2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>event‐related potential</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>neural response</topic><topic>Penis</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>sexual processing</topic><topic>sexual response</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huberman, Jackie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangardich, Haykaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabbagh, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, Meredith L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huberman, Jackie S.</au><au>Mangardich, Haykaz</au><au>Sabbagh, Mark A.</au><au>Chivers, Meredith L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ERP responses to sexual cues among young women attracted to men</atitle><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e14162</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14162-n/a</pages><issn>0048-5772</issn><eissn>1469-8986</eissn><eissn>1540-5958</eissn><abstract>Previous event‐related potential (ERP) studies reported larger N170, P3, and late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes to sexual than nonsexual stimuli. These ERPs may not be specifically sensitive to processing sexual cues, however, because the sexual stimuli included information beyond sexual cues (e.g., faces, bodies, social interaction) to a greater extent than comparison stimuli. We investigated ERPs to stimuli that focused on sexual and nonsexual body regions, in different states of readiness for activity, to elucidate neural responses involved in processing sexual cues. Forty cisgender, primarily white, undergraduate women who were attracted to men (Mage = 18.6, SD = 0.9) viewed images that varied by male body part (penis, arm) and activity state (rest, poised for activity). Participants viewed 40 images per category (flaccid penises, erect penises, outstretched arms, bent arms). Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded using a 128‐channel net, time‐locked to the onset of each image. Using a whole‐head cluster‐mass approach, we found that the P3 was sensitive to sexual readiness—P3 amplitudes were larger to erect than flaccid penises, but not to bent than outstretched arms. The N170 and LPP components did not show evidence of similarly specific responses to sexual readiness, revealing potential dissociation of different neural processes commonly elicited in response to more complex sexual stimuli. An additional novel finding was that an anterior N270‐400 was sensitive to sexual readiness. Findings clarify the brain's rapid responses to sexual stimuli, setting the stage for future research aimed at better understanding the neurocognitive processes that contribute to the coordination of sexual arousal. This study was the first to examine ERPs to constrained stimuli that specifically varied in a salient sexual cue—readiness for sexual activity. We tested whether previously identified ERPs were integrally involved in sexual processing among young women, and our whole‐head analysis revealed a novel ERP that was sensitive to sexual cues. Results provide insight into the brain's rapid detection of sexual cues and the fundamental neurocognitive processes involved in sexual response.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35949009</pmid><doi>10.1111/psyp.14162</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-9263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0252-265X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-5545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-6288</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5772
ispartof Psychophysiology, 2023-02, Vol.60 (2), p.e14162-n/a
issn 0048-5772
1469-8986
1540-5958
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2701072645
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Wiley
subjects Adolescent
Cognition
Cues
EEG
Electroencephalography - methods
Event-related potentials
event‐related potential
Evoked Potentials - physiology
Female
Humans
Information processing
Male
neural response
Penis
Photic Stimulation
Sexual Behavior
sexual processing
sexual response
title ERP responses to sexual cues among young women attracted to men
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A14%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ERP%20responses%20to%20sexual%20cues%20among%20young%20women%20attracted%20to%20men&rft.jtitle=Psychophysiology&rft.au=Huberman,%20Jackie%20S.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e14162&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14162-n/a&rft.issn=0048-5772&rft.eissn=1469-8986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/psyp.14162&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2701072645%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b6c27c01457ca560089fdbff0f3969ab663eb42c4b970005cd949bb54ba30e2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2759587412&rft_id=info:pmid/35949009&rfr_iscdi=true