Loading…

Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundImpaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological medicine 2023-08, Vol.53 (11), p.5218-5226
Main Authors: Prasannakumar, Akash, Kumar, Vijay, Rao, Naren P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13
container_end_page 5226
container_issue 11
container_start_page 5218
container_title Psychological medicine
container_volume 53
creator Prasannakumar, Akash
Kumar, Vijay
Rao, Naren P.
description BackgroundImpaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However, the findings are inconsistent. Hence, we systematically reviewed the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis to examine trust behavior in patients with psychosis, their relatives, and those at high risk for psychosis.MethodsWe searched electronic databases for studies that have examined trust game in patients with psychosis, published up to November 2021. The primary outcome measure was the baseline trust in a trust game by patients and controls. The meta-analysis was performed if at least three data sets of control and patient groups were available for that measure/design. We conducted meta-analyses with a random-effects model. The results were described narratively wherever meta-analysis was not possible due to paucity of studies.ResultsThe searches across the databases including cross-references yielded 465 publications of which 10 studies were included in the final analysis. Baseline trust in the trust game was significantly lower in patients with psychosis compared to controls (SMD 0.39, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.64, p −0.002). However, a similar decrease in baseline trust was not present in relatives of patients (SMD 0.08, 95% CI −0.20 to 0.36, p −0.58).ConclusionsThe current meta-analysis suggests significant trust deficits in patients with psychosis. Future studies with a bigger sample size are required to understand the nature of trust deficits and factors affecting this impairment.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0033291722002562
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2703415526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0033291722002562</cupid><sourcerecordid>2703415526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLuAGzfRe-eZdCfFFxRcWNdhkt5oStLUmUTJv3diC4Li6sI93zkcDmPnCFcIaK6fAYTgKRrOAbjS_IBNUOo0TlKTHLLJKMejfsxOvF8DoEDJJ2y2dL3vIrtZRVs_FG-tr_wsspEffEeN7aoicvRR0ec30lBnY7ux9RCwU3ZU2trT2f5O2cvd7XL-EC-e7h_nN4u4EAq6mANZZRLkAiE1gniZgsmNtKXVqEsyJrxTrkgXoRFHMKLMIU9ISpunOYopu9zlbl373pPvsqbyBdW13VDb-4wbEBKV4jqgF7_Qddu70DdQiUoSrVCOgbijCtd676jMtq5qrBsyhGxcM_uzZvCIvcc2uatWr_QT_b_rC0Woc8c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2858865141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Prasannakumar, Akash ; Kumar, Vijay ; Rao, Naren P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Prasannakumar, Akash ; Kumar, Vijay ; Rao, Naren P.</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundImpaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However, the findings are inconsistent. Hence, we systematically reviewed the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis to examine trust behavior in patients with psychosis, their relatives, and those at high risk for psychosis.MethodsWe searched electronic databases for studies that have examined trust game in patients with psychosis, published up to November 2021. The primary outcome measure was the baseline trust in a trust game by patients and controls. The meta-analysis was performed if at least three data sets of control and patient groups were available for that measure/design. We conducted meta-analyses with a random-effects model. The results were described narratively wherever meta-analysis was not possible due to paucity of studies.ResultsThe searches across the databases including cross-references yielded 465 publications of which 10 studies were included in the final analysis. Baseline trust in the trust game was significantly lower in patients with psychosis compared to controls (SMD 0.39, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.64, p −0.002). However, a similar decrease in baseline trust was not present in relatives of patients (SMD 0.08, 95% CI −0.20 to 0.36, p −0.58).ConclusionsThe current meta-analysis suggests significant trust deficits in patients with psychosis. Future studies with a bigger sample size are required to understand the nature of trust deficits and factors affecting this impairment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033291722002562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavior ; Cooperation ; Decision making ; Games ; High risk ; Hormones ; Meta-analysis ; Original Article ; Psychosis ; Social interaction ; Systematic review ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Psychological medicine, 2023-08, Vol.53 (11), p.5218-5226</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9272-1873</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2858865141/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2858865141?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,72960,74221,74639</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prasannakumar, Akash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Naren P.</creatorcontrib><title>Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Psychological medicine</title><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><description>BackgroundImpaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However, the findings are inconsistent. Hence, we systematically reviewed the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis to examine trust behavior in patients with psychosis, their relatives, and those at high risk for psychosis.MethodsWe searched electronic databases for studies that have examined trust game in patients with psychosis, published up to November 2021. The primary outcome measure was the baseline trust in a trust game by patients and controls. The meta-analysis was performed if at least three data sets of control and patient groups were available for that measure/design. We conducted meta-analyses with a random-effects model. The results were described narratively wherever meta-analysis was not possible due to paucity of studies.ResultsThe searches across the databases including cross-references yielded 465 publications of which 10 studies were included in the final analysis. Baseline trust in the trust game was significantly lower in patients with psychosis compared to controls (SMD 0.39, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.64, p −0.002). However, a similar decrease in baseline trust was not present in relatives of patients (SMD 0.08, 95% CI −0.20 to 0.36, p −0.58).ConclusionsThe current meta-analysis suggests significant trust deficits in patients with psychosis. Future studies with a bigger sample size are required to understand the nature of trust deficits and factors affecting this impairment.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Hormones</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0033-2917</issn><issn>1469-8978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLuAGzfRe-eZdCfFFxRcWNdhkt5oStLUmUTJv3diC4Li6sI93zkcDmPnCFcIaK6fAYTgKRrOAbjS_IBNUOo0TlKTHLLJKMejfsxOvF8DoEDJJ2y2dL3vIrtZRVs_FG-tr_wsspEffEeN7aoicvRR0ec30lBnY7ux9RCwU3ZU2trT2f5O2cvd7XL-EC-e7h_nN4u4EAq6mANZZRLkAiE1gniZgsmNtKXVqEsyJrxTrkgXoRFHMKLMIU9ISpunOYopu9zlbl373pPvsqbyBdW13VDb-4wbEBKV4jqgF7_Qddu70DdQiUoSrVCOgbijCtd676jMtq5qrBsyhGxcM_uzZvCIvcc2uatWr_QT_b_rC0Woc8c</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Prasannakumar, Akash</creator><creator>Kumar, Vijay</creator><creator>Rao, Naren P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-1873</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Prasannakumar, Akash ; Kumar, Vijay ; Rao, Naren P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Hormones</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prasannakumar, Akash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Naren P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prasannakumar, Akash</au><au>Kumar, Vijay</au><au>Rao, Naren P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5218</spage><epage>5226</epage><pages>5218-5226</pages><issn>0033-2917</issn><eissn>1469-8978</eissn><abstract>BackgroundImpaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However, the findings are inconsistent. Hence, we systematically reviewed the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis to examine trust behavior in patients with psychosis, their relatives, and those at high risk for psychosis.MethodsWe searched electronic databases for studies that have examined trust game in patients with psychosis, published up to November 2021. The primary outcome measure was the baseline trust in a trust game by patients and controls. The meta-analysis was performed if at least three data sets of control and patient groups were available for that measure/design. We conducted meta-analyses with a random-effects model. The results were described narratively wherever meta-analysis was not possible due to paucity of studies.ResultsThe searches across the databases including cross-references yielded 465 publications of which 10 studies were included in the final analysis. Baseline trust in the trust game was significantly lower in patients with psychosis compared to controls (SMD 0.39, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.64, p −0.002). However, a similar decrease in baseline trust was not present in relatives of patients (SMD 0.08, 95% CI −0.20 to 0.36, p −0.58).ConclusionsThe current meta-analysis suggests significant trust deficits in patients with psychosis. Future studies with a bigger sample size are required to understand the nature of trust deficits and factors affecting this impairment.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0033291722002562</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-1873</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2917
ispartof Psychological medicine, 2023-08, Vol.53 (11), p.5218-5226
issn 0033-2917
1469-8978
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2703415526
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; Cambridge University Press
subjects Analysis
Behavior
Cooperation
Decision making
Games
High risk
Hormones
Meta-analysis
Original Article
Psychosis
Social interaction
Systematic review
Trust
title Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A28%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trust%20and%20psychosis:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20medicine&rft.au=Prasannakumar,%20Akash&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5218&rft.epage=5226&rft.pages=5218-5226&rft.issn=0033-2917&rft.eissn=1469-8978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033291722002562&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2703415526%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2858865141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0033291722002562&rfr_iscdi=true