Loading…
Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundImpaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological medicine 2023-08, Vol.53 (11), p.5218-5226 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13 |
container_end_page | 5226 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 5218 |
container_title | Psychological medicine |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Prasannakumar, Akash Kumar, Vijay Rao, Naren P. |
description | BackgroundImpaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However, the findings are inconsistent. Hence, we systematically reviewed the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis to examine trust behavior in patients with psychosis, their relatives, and those at high risk for psychosis.MethodsWe searched electronic databases for studies that have examined trust game in patients with psychosis, published up to November 2021. The primary outcome measure was the baseline trust in a trust game by patients and controls. The meta-analysis was performed if at least three data sets of control and patient groups were available for that measure/design. We conducted meta-analyses with a random-effects model. The results were described narratively wherever meta-analysis was not possible due to paucity of studies.ResultsThe searches across the databases including cross-references yielded 465 publications of which 10 studies were included in the final analysis. Baseline trust in the trust game was significantly lower in patients with psychosis compared to controls (SMD 0.39, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.64, p −0.002). However, a similar decrease in baseline trust was not present in relatives of patients (SMD 0.08, 95% CI −0.20 to 0.36, p −0.58).ConclusionsThe current meta-analysis suggests significant trust deficits in patients with psychosis. Future studies with a bigger sample size are required to understand the nature of trust deficits and factors affecting this impairment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0033291722002562 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2703415526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0033291722002562</cupid><sourcerecordid>2703415526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLuAGzfRe-eZdCfFFxRcWNdhkt5oStLUmUTJv3diC4Li6sI93zkcDmPnCFcIaK6fAYTgKRrOAbjS_IBNUOo0TlKTHLLJKMejfsxOvF8DoEDJJ2y2dL3vIrtZRVs_FG-tr_wsspEffEeN7aoicvRR0ec30lBnY7ux9RCwU3ZU2trT2f5O2cvd7XL-EC-e7h_nN4u4EAq6mANZZRLkAiE1gniZgsmNtKXVqEsyJrxTrkgXoRFHMKLMIU9ISpunOYopu9zlbl373pPvsqbyBdW13VDb-4wbEBKV4jqgF7_Qddu70DdQiUoSrVCOgbijCtd676jMtq5qrBsyhGxcM_uzZvCIvcc2uatWr_QT_b_rC0Woc8c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2858865141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Prasannakumar, Akash ; Kumar, Vijay ; Rao, Naren P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Prasannakumar, Akash ; Kumar, Vijay ; Rao, Naren P.</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundImpaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However, the findings are inconsistent. Hence, we systematically reviewed the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis to examine trust behavior in patients with psychosis, their relatives, and those at high risk for psychosis.MethodsWe searched electronic databases for studies that have examined trust game in patients with psychosis, published up to November 2021. The primary outcome measure was the baseline trust in a trust game by patients and controls. The meta-analysis was performed if at least three data sets of control and patient groups were available for that measure/design. We conducted meta-analyses with a random-effects model. The results were described narratively wherever meta-analysis was not possible due to paucity of studies.ResultsThe searches across the databases including cross-references yielded 465 publications of which 10 studies were included in the final analysis. Baseline trust in the trust game was significantly lower in patients with psychosis compared to controls (SMD 0.39, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.64, p −0.002). However, a similar decrease in baseline trust was not present in relatives of patients (SMD 0.08, 95% CI −0.20 to 0.36, p −0.58).ConclusionsThe current meta-analysis suggests significant trust deficits in patients with psychosis. Future studies with a bigger sample size are required to understand the nature of trust deficits and factors affecting this impairment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033291722002562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavior ; Cooperation ; Decision making ; Games ; High risk ; Hormones ; Meta-analysis ; Original Article ; Psychosis ; Social interaction ; Systematic review ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Psychological medicine, 2023-08, Vol.53 (11), p.5218-5226</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9272-1873</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2858865141/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2858865141?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,72960,74221,74639</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prasannakumar, Akash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Naren P.</creatorcontrib><title>Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Psychological medicine</title><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><description>BackgroundImpaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However, the findings are inconsistent. Hence, we systematically reviewed the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis to examine trust behavior in patients with psychosis, their relatives, and those at high risk for psychosis.MethodsWe searched electronic databases for studies that have examined trust game in patients with psychosis, published up to November 2021. The primary outcome measure was the baseline trust in a trust game by patients and controls. The meta-analysis was performed if at least three data sets of control and patient groups were available for that measure/design. We conducted meta-analyses with a random-effects model. The results were described narratively wherever meta-analysis was not possible due to paucity of studies.ResultsThe searches across the databases including cross-references yielded 465 publications of which 10 studies were included in the final analysis. Baseline trust in the trust game was significantly lower in patients with psychosis compared to controls (SMD 0.39, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.64, p −0.002). However, a similar decrease in baseline trust was not present in relatives of patients (SMD 0.08, 95% CI −0.20 to 0.36, p −0.58).ConclusionsThe current meta-analysis suggests significant trust deficits in patients with psychosis. Future studies with a bigger sample size are required to understand the nature of trust deficits and factors affecting this impairment.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Hormones</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0033-2917</issn><issn>1469-8978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLuAGzfRe-eZdCfFFxRcWNdhkt5oStLUmUTJv3diC4Li6sI93zkcDmPnCFcIaK6fAYTgKRrOAbjS_IBNUOo0TlKTHLLJKMejfsxOvF8DoEDJJ2y2dL3vIrtZRVs_FG-tr_wsspEffEeN7aoicvRR0ec30lBnY7ux9RCwU3ZU2trT2f5O2cvd7XL-EC-e7h_nN4u4EAq6mANZZRLkAiE1gniZgsmNtKXVqEsyJrxTrkgXoRFHMKLMIU9ISpunOYopu9zlbl373pPvsqbyBdW13VDb-4wbEBKV4jqgF7_Qddu70DdQiUoSrVCOgbijCtd676jMtq5qrBsyhGxcM_uzZvCIvcc2uatWr_QT_b_rC0Woc8c</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Prasannakumar, Akash</creator><creator>Kumar, Vijay</creator><creator>Rao, Naren P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-1873</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Prasannakumar, Akash ; Kumar, Vijay ; Rao, Naren P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Hormones</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prasannakumar, Akash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Naren P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prasannakumar, Akash</au><au>Kumar, Vijay</au><au>Rao, Naren P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5218</spage><epage>5226</epage><pages>5218-5226</pages><issn>0033-2917</issn><eissn>1469-8978</eissn><abstract>BackgroundImpaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However, the findings are inconsistent. Hence, we systematically reviewed the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis to examine trust behavior in patients with psychosis, their relatives, and those at high risk for psychosis.MethodsWe searched electronic databases for studies that have examined trust game in patients with psychosis, published up to November 2021. The primary outcome measure was the baseline trust in a trust game by patients and controls. The meta-analysis was performed if at least three data sets of control and patient groups were available for that measure/design. We conducted meta-analyses with a random-effects model. The results were described narratively wherever meta-analysis was not possible due to paucity of studies.ResultsThe searches across the databases including cross-references yielded 465 publications of which 10 studies were included in the final analysis. Baseline trust in the trust game was significantly lower in patients with psychosis compared to controls (SMD 0.39, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.64, p −0.002). However, a similar decrease in baseline trust was not present in relatives of patients (SMD 0.08, 95% CI −0.20 to 0.36, p −0.58).ConclusionsThe current meta-analysis suggests significant trust deficits in patients with psychosis. Future studies with a bigger sample size are required to understand the nature of trust deficits and factors affecting this impairment.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0033291722002562</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-1873</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2917 |
ispartof | Psychological medicine, 2023-08, Vol.53 (11), p.5218-5226 |
issn | 0033-2917 1469-8978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2703415526 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Analysis Behavior Cooperation Decision making Games High risk Hormones Meta-analysis Original Article Psychosis Social interaction Systematic review Trust |
title | Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A28%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trust%20and%20psychosis:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20medicine&rft.au=Prasannakumar,%20Akash&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5218&rft.epage=5226&rft.pages=5218-5226&rft.issn=0033-2917&rft.eissn=1469-8978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033291722002562&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2703415526%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-20ea57812310973e2f907b74afa616fe77097925e6c14221073fb0b8e44ab9b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2858865141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0033291722002562&rfr_iscdi=true |