Loading…
Caveat emptor: The accuracy of claims data in appendicitis research
International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes are used to identify patients with appendicitis and classify severity of disease for research and hospital reimbursement. We sought to determine accuracy of International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes in clas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Surgery 2022-10, Vol.172 (4), p.1050-1056 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-458db0fcedc1738b1a7d044168c46279075de4694161d3cca450950b033e85b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-458db0fcedc1738b1a7d044168c46279075de4694161d3cca450950b033e85b3 |
container_end_page | 1056 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1050 |
container_title | Surgery |
container_volume | 172 |
creator | Duraiswamy, Swetha Sanchez, Sabrina E. Flum, David R. Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. Kenzik, Kelly M. Tseng, Jennifer F. Drake, Frederick Thurston |
description | International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes are used to identify patients with appendicitis and classify severity of disease for research and hospital reimbursement. We sought to determine accuracy of International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes in classifying appendicitis as uncomplicated versus complicated (defined as perforated, necrotic, or abscess) compared with the clinical gold standard: surgeon characterization of the appendix in the operative report.
Retrospective review of operative reports and discharge International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes for patients ≥18 years old who underwent noninterval, nonincidental appendectomy between January 2012 and December 2019 at a tertiary referral center. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated for International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes to classify appendicitis accurately as complicated compared with surgeon description. ICD-9/10 codes and surgeon description were categorized into complicated/uncomplicated based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading system.
In the study, 1,495 patients with acute appendicitis underwent appendectomy. Per surgeon description, 200 (13%) were complicated and 1,295 (87%) uncomplicated. Compared with surgeon description, discharge International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes did not accurately identify complicated appendicitis: sensitivity = 0.68, positive predictive value = 0.77. As a sensitivity analysis, the cohort was stratified by public versus private payers, and the results did not change.
International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes do not accurately identify surgeon-described complicated appendicitis. Nearly one-third of the cases of complicated appendicitis were coded as uncomplicated. Such misclassification negatively impacts reimbursement for complicated appendicitis care and could lead to misleading results in research and quality improvement activities that rely on these codes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.014 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2704867520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606022004408</els_id><sourcerecordid>2704867520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-458db0fcedc1738b1a7d044168c46279075de4694161d3cca450950b033e85b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwB5g8siRcP-IkiAVFvKRKLN0tx76hrvLCTir135OqzEx3Od_RuR8h9wxSBkw97tM4h--UA-cpqBSYvCArlgme5EKxS7ICEGWiQME1uYlxDwClZMWKVJU5oJkoduM0hCe63SE11s7B2CMdGmpb47tInZkM9T0144i989ZPPtKAEU2wu1ty1Zg24t3fXZPt2-u2-kg2X--f1csmsUKIKZFZ4WpoLDrLclHUzOQOpGSqsFLxvIQ8cyjVsksxJ6w1MoMygxqEwCKrxZo8nGvHMPzMGCfd-WixbU2Pwxw1z0EWKs84LFF-jtowxBiw0WPwnQlHzUCfhOm9PgnTJ2EalF6ELdDzGcLlh4PHoKP12C97fUA7aTf4__Bf7-tzEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2704867520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Caveat emptor: The accuracy of claims data in appendicitis research</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Duraiswamy, Swetha ; Sanchez, Sabrina E. ; Flum, David R. ; Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. ; Kenzik, Kelly M. ; Tseng, Jennifer F. ; Drake, Frederick Thurston</creator><creatorcontrib>Duraiswamy, Swetha ; Sanchez, Sabrina E. ; Flum, David R. ; Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. ; Kenzik, Kelly M. ; Tseng, Jennifer F. ; Drake, Frederick Thurston</creatorcontrib><description>International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes are used to identify patients with appendicitis and classify severity of disease for research and hospital reimbursement. We sought to determine accuracy of International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes in classifying appendicitis as uncomplicated versus complicated (defined as perforated, necrotic, or abscess) compared with the clinical gold standard: surgeon characterization of the appendix in the operative report.
Retrospective review of operative reports and discharge International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes for patients ≥18 years old who underwent noninterval, nonincidental appendectomy between January 2012 and December 2019 at a tertiary referral center. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated for International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes to classify appendicitis accurately as complicated compared with surgeon description. ICD-9/10 codes and surgeon description were categorized into complicated/uncomplicated based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading system.
In the study, 1,495 patients with acute appendicitis underwent appendectomy. Per surgeon description, 200 (13%) were complicated and 1,295 (87%) uncomplicated. Compared with surgeon description, discharge International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes did not accurately identify complicated appendicitis: sensitivity = 0.68, positive predictive value = 0.77. As a sensitivity analysis, the cohort was stratified by public versus private payers, and the results did not change.
International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes do not accurately identify surgeon-described complicated appendicitis. Nearly one-third of the cases of complicated appendicitis were coded as uncomplicated. Such misclassification negatively impacts reimbursement for complicated appendicitis care and could lead to misleading results in research and quality improvement activities that rely on these codes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Surgery, 2022-10, Vol.172 (4), p.1050-1056</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-458db0fcedc1738b1a7d044168c46279075de4694161d3cca450950b033e85b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-458db0fcedc1738b1a7d044168c46279075de4694161d3cca450950b033e85b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6402-8446 ; 0000-0003-0977-1306 ; 0000-0002-9276-7190 ; 0000-0003-2437-9505 ; 0000-0002-3191-0950</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duraiswamy, Swetha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Sabrina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flum, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenzik, Kelly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Jennifer F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drake, Frederick Thurston</creatorcontrib><title>Caveat emptor: The accuracy of claims data in appendicitis research</title><title>Surgery</title><description>International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes are used to identify patients with appendicitis and classify severity of disease for research and hospital reimbursement. We sought to determine accuracy of International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes in classifying appendicitis as uncomplicated versus complicated (defined as perforated, necrotic, or abscess) compared with the clinical gold standard: surgeon characterization of the appendix in the operative report.
Retrospective review of operative reports and discharge International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes for patients ≥18 years old who underwent noninterval, nonincidental appendectomy between January 2012 and December 2019 at a tertiary referral center. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated for International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes to classify appendicitis accurately as complicated compared with surgeon description. ICD-9/10 codes and surgeon description were categorized into complicated/uncomplicated based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading system.
In the study, 1,495 patients with acute appendicitis underwent appendectomy. Per surgeon description, 200 (13%) were complicated and 1,295 (87%) uncomplicated. Compared with surgeon description, discharge International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes did not accurately identify complicated appendicitis: sensitivity = 0.68, positive predictive value = 0.77. As a sensitivity analysis, the cohort was stratified by public versus private payers, and the results did not change.
International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes do not accurately identify surgeon-described complicated appendicitis. Nearly one-third of the cases of complicated appendicitis were coded as uncomplicated. Such misclassification negatively impacts reimbursement for complicated appendicitis care and could lead to misleading results in research and quality improvement activities that rely on these codes.</description><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwB5g8siRcP-IkiAVFvKRKLN0tx76hrvLCTir135OqzEx3Od_RuR8h9wxSBkw97tM4h--UA-cpqBSYvCArlgme5EKxS7ICEGWiQME1uYlxDwClZMWKVJU5oJkoduM0hCe63SE11s7B2CMdGmpb47tInZkM9T0144i989ZPPtKAEU2wu1ty1Zg24t3fXZPt2-u2-kg2X--f1csmsUKIKZFZ4WpoLDrLclHUzOQOpGSqsFLxvIQ8cyjVsksxJ6w1MoMygxqEwCKrxZo8nGvHMPzMGCfd-WixbU2Pwxw1z0EWKs84LFF-jtowxBiw0WPwnQlHzUCfhOm9PgnTJ2EalF6ELdDzGcLlh4PHoKP12C97fUA7aTf4__Bf7-tzEA</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Duraiswamy, Swetha</creator><creator>Sanchez, Sabrina E.</creator><creator>Flum, David R.</creator><creator>Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.</creator><creator>Kenzik, Kelly M.</creator><creator>Tseng, Jennifer F.</creator><creator>Drake, Frederick Thurston</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-8446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0977-1306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9276-7190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2437-9505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3191-0950</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Caveat emptor: The accuracy of claims data in appendicitis research</title><author>Duraiswamy, Swetha ; Sanchez, Sabrina E. ; Flum, David R. ; Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. ; Kenzik, Kelly M. ; Tseng, Jennifer F. ; Drake, Frederick Thurston</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-458db0fcedc1738b1a7d044168c46279075de4694161d3cca450950b033e85b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duraiswamy, Swetha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Sabrina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flum, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenzik, Kelly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Jennifer F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drake, Frederick Thurston</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duraiswamy, Swetha</au><au>Sanchez, Sabrina E.</au><au>Flum, David R.</au><au>Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.</au><au>Kenzik, Kelly M.</au><au>Tseng, Jennifer F.</au><au>Drake, Frederick Thurston</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Caveat emptor: The accuracy of claims data in appendicitis research</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>172</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1050</spage><epage>1056</epage><pages>1050-1056</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes are used to identify patients with appendicitis and classify severity of disease for research and hospital reimbursement. We sought to determine accuracy of International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes in classifying appendicitis as uncomplicated versus complicated (defined as perforated, necrotic, or abscess) compared with the clinical gold standard: surgeon characterization of the appendix in the operative report.
Retrospective review of operative reports and discharge International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes for patients ≥18 years old who underwent noninterval, nonincidental appendectomy between January 2012 and December 2019 at a tertiary referral center. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated for International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes to classify appendicitis accurately as complicated compared with surgeon description. ICD-9/10 codes and surgeon description were categorized into complicated/uncomplicated based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading system.
In the study, 1,495 patients with acute appendicitis underwent appendectomy. Per surgeon description, 200 (13%) were complicated and 1,295 (87%) uncomplicated. Compared with surgeon description, discharge International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes did not accurately identify complicated appendicitis: sensitivity = 0.68, positive predictive value = 0.77. As a sensitivity analysis, the cohort was stratified by public versus private payers, and the results did not change.
International Classification of Disease, ninth/tenth revision codes do not accurately identify surgeon-described complicated appendicitis. Nearly one-third of the cases of complicated appendicitis were coded as uncomplicated. Such misclassification negatively impacts reimbursement for complicated appendicitis care and could lead to misleading results in research and quality improvement activities that rely on these codes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.014</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-8446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0977-1306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9276-7190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2437-9505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3191-0950</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-6060 |
ispartof | Surgery, 2022-10, Vol.172 (4), p.1050-1056 |
issn | 0039-6060 1532-7361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2704867520 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
title | Caveat emptor: The accuracy of claims data in appendicitis research |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Caveat%20emptor:%20The%20accuracy%20of%20claims%20data%20in%20appendicitis%20research&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Duraiswamy,%20Swetha&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=172&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1050&rft.epage=1056&rft.pages=1050-1056&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2704867520%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-458db0fcedc1738b1a7d044168c46279075de4694161d3cca450950b033e85b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2704867520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |