Loading…

The burden of conveyor belt work in the canteen kitchen: A question of working height?

BACKGROUND: Working in forced postures and standing continuously can be classified as straining the musculoskeletal system. OBJECTIVE: Since such postures are frequently used in hospital canteen kitchens, we used kinematic analysis to determine the working postures of canteen kitchen staff. METHODS:...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Work (Reading, Mass.) Mass.), 2022-01, Vol.73 (3), p.881-894
Main Authors: Ohlendorf, Daniela, Schneidereit, Laura, Hermanns, Ingo, Holzgreve, Fabian, Maltry, Laura, Ellegast, Rolf, Wanke, Eileen M., Nienhaus, Albert, Groneberg, David A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-c0cbb4a9450dfa727922e47c065d5d8a982494565cb80d2a75c5fd9d2b98f5a73
container_end_page 894
container_issue 3
container_start_page 881
container_title Work (Reading, Mass.)
container_volume 73
creator Ohlendorf, Daniela
Schneidereit, Laura
Hermanns, Ingo
Holzgreve, Fabian
Maltry, Laura
Ellegast, Rolf
Wanke, Eileen M.
Nienhaus, Albert
Groneberg, David A.
description BACKGROUND: Working in forced postures and standing continuously can be classified as straining the musculoskeletal system. OBJECTIVE: Since such postures are frequently used in hospital canteen kitchens, we used kinematic analysis to determine the working postures of canteen kitchen staff. METHODS: In this study, the daily work routine of 18 (11 w/7 m) workers of a hospital canteen kitchen (Frankfurt Main/Germany) aged 21–62 years (46±13 years) was examined by means of kinematic analysis (CULEA system; IFA; Sankt Augustin/Germany) and a detailed computerized analysis of the activities performed on-site. Angle values of the head and trunk were evaluated in accordance with ergonomic standards and presented using percentile values (P05-P95). The OWAS method was also employed to capture the proportions of standing, walking and sitting work. RESULTS: The kinematic posture analysis showed for all activities on the conveyor belt a tendency towards a dorsally inclined body position: trunk inclination (–7.5° to 0), thoracic spine inclination or a bending forward (–11.3° to 0°) and curvature of the back within the thoracic spine (–15.2° to 0°). In addition, >90% of the “activities on the belt” (46% of the daily working routine) were carried out standing. CONCLUSION: The activities on the conveyor belt were characterized by a tendency towards hyperextension of the trunk, possibly due to a too high working environment. Furthermore, an increased burden on body structures while standing can be concluded. From a primary prevention perspective, this increased standing load should be reduced by behavioral and relational prevention measures.
doi_str_mv 10.3233/WOR-205170
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2704873339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3233_WOR-205170</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2704873339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-c0cbb4a9450dfa727922e47c065d5d8a982494565cb80d2a75c5fd9d2b98f5a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0MtOAyEUBmBiNLFWNz4BO43JKMMMBdyYpvGWNGliqi4JA8ylnUKFGU3fXtpx6QoC3zk55wfgMkW3Gc6yu8_FW4IRSSk6AqOUUZJwTNFxvMfHhLOUnIKzEFYIIYwRH4GPZW1g0XttLHQlVM5-m53zsDBtB3-cX8PGwi4aJW1nIlo3naqNvYdT-NWb0DXuULinja1gbZqq7h7OwUkp22Au_s4xeH96XM5ekvni-XU2nScKE9IlCqmiyCXPCdKlpJhyjE1OFZoQTTSTnOE8fk6IKhjSWFKiSKm5xgVnJZE0G4Proe_Wu8M4YtMEZdpWWuP6IOLyOaNZlvFIbwaqvAvBm1JsfbORfidSJPbhiRieGMKL-GrAQVZGrFzvbVzjP_kL4mptig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2704873339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The burden of conveyor belt work in the canteen kitchen: A question of working height?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><creator>Ohlendorf, Daniela ; Schneidereit, Laura ; Hermanns, Ingo ; Holzgreve, Fabian ; Maltry, Laura ; Ellegast, Rolf ; Wanke, Eileen M. ; Nienhaus, Albert ; Groneberg, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ohlendorf, Daniela ; Schneidereit, Laura ; Hermanns, Ingo ; Holzgreve, Fabian ; Maltry, Laura ; Ellegast, Rolf ; Wanke, Eileen M. ; Nienhaus, Albert ; Groneberg, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Working in forced postures and standing continuously can be classified as straining the musculoskeletal system. OBJECTIVE: Since such postures are frequently used in hospital canteen kitchens, we used kinematic analysis to determine the working postures of canteen kitchen staff. METHODS: In this study, the daily work routine of 18 (11 w/7 m) workers of a hospital canteen kitchen (Frankfurt Main/Germany) aged 21–62 years (46±13 years) was examined by means of kinematic analysis (CULEA system; IFA; Sankt Augustin/Germany) and a detailed computerized analysis of the activities performed on-site. Angle values of the head and trunk were evaluated in accordance with ergonomic standards and presented using percentile values (P05-P95). The OWAS method was also employed to capture the proportions of standing, walking and sitting work. RESULTS: The kinematic posture analysis showed for all activities on the conveyor belt a tendency towards a dorsally inclined body position: trunk inclination (–7.5° to 0), thoracic spine inclination or a bending forward (–11.3° to 0°) and curvature of the back within the thoracic spine (–15.2° to 0°). In addition, &gt;90% of the “activities on the belt” (46% of the daily working routine) were carried out standing. CONCLUSION: The activities on the conveyor belt were characterized by a tendency towards hyperextension of the trunk, possibly due to a too high working environment. Furthermore, an increased burden on body structures while standing can be concluded. From a primary prevention perspective, this increased standing load should be reduced by behavioral and relational prevention measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-9815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-9270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3233/WOR-205170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Work (Reading, Mass.), 2022-01, Vol.73 (3), p.881-894</ispartof><rights>2022 – IOS Press. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-c0cbb4a9450dfa727922e47c065d5d8a982494565cb80d2a75c5fd9d2b98f5a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ohlendorf, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneidereit, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermanns, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzgreve, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltry, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellegast, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanke, Eileen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nienhaus, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groneberg, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>The burden of conveyor belt work in the canteen kitchen: A question of working height?</title><title>Work (Reading, Mass.)</title><description>BACKGROUND: Working in forced postures and standing continuously can be classified as straining the musculoskeletal system. OBJECTIVE: Since such postures are frequently used in hospital canteen kitchens, we used kinematic analysis to determine the working postures of canteen kitchen staff. METHODS: In this study, the daily work routine of 18 (11 w/7 m) workers of a hospital canteen kitchen (Frankfurt Main/Germany) aged 21–62 years (46±13 years) was examined by means of kinematic analysis (CULEA system; IFA; Sankt Augustin/Germany) and a detailed computerized analysis of the activities performed on-site. Angle values of the head and trunk were evaluated in accordance with ergonomic standards and presented using percentile values (P05-P95). The OWAS method was also employed to capture the proportions of standing, walking and sitting work. RESULTS: The kinematic posture analysis showed for all activities on the conveyor belt a tendency towards a dorsally inclined body position: trunk inclination (–7.5° to 0), thoracic spine inclination or a bending forward (–11.3° to 0°) and curvature of the back within the thoracic spine (–15.2° to 0°). In addition, &gt;90% of the “activities on the belt” (46% of the daily working routine) were carried out standing. CONCLUSION: The activities on the conveyor belt were characterized by a tendency towards hyperextension of the trunk, possibly due to a too high working environment. Furthermore, an increased burden on body structures while standing can be concluded. From a primary prevention perspective, this increased standing load should be reduced by behavioral and relational prevention measures.</description><issn>1051-9815</issn><issn>1875-9270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0MtOAyEUBmBiNLFWNz4BO43JKMMMBdyYpvGWNGliqi4JA8ylnUKFGU3fXtpx6QoC3zk55wfgMkW3Gc6yu8_FW4IRSSk6AqOUUZJwTNFxvMfHhLOUnIKzEFYIIYwRH4GPZW1g0XttLHQlVM5-m53zsDBtB3-cX8PGwi4aJW1nIlo3naqNvYdT-NWb0DXuULinja1gbZqq7h7OwUkp22Au_s4xeH96XM5ekvni-XU2nScKE9IlCqmiyCXPCdKlpJhyjE1OFZoQTTSTnOE8fk6IKhjSWFKiSKm5xgVnJZE0G4Proe_Wu8M4YtMEZdpWWuP6IOLyOaNZlvFIbwaqvAvBm1JsfbORfidSJPbhiRieGMKL-GrAQVZGrFzvbVzjP_kL4mptig</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Ohlendorf, Daniela</creator><creator>Schneidereit, Laura</creator><creator>Hermanns, Ingo</creator><creator>Holzgreve, Fabian</creator><creator>Maltry, Laura</creator><creator>Ellegast, Rolf</creator><creator>Wanke, Eileen M.</creator><creator>Nienhaus, Albert</creator><creator>Groneberg, David A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>The burden of conveyor belt work in the canteen kitchen: A question of working height?</title><author>Ohlendorf, Daniela ; Schneidereit, Laura ; Hermanns, Ingo ; Holzgreve, Fabian ; Maltry, Laura ; Ellegast, Rolf ; Wanke, Eileen M. ; Nienhaus, Albert ; Groneberg, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-c0cbb4a9450dfa727922e47c065d5d8a982494565cb80d2a75c5fd9d2b98f5a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ohlendorf, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneidereit, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermanns, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzgreve, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltry, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellegast, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanke, Eileen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nienhaus, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groneberg, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Work (Reading, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ohlendorf, Daniela</au><au>Schneidereit, Laura</au><au>Hermanns, Ingo</au><au>Holzgreve, Fabian</au><au>Maltry, Laura</au><au>Ellegast, Rolf</au><au>Wanke, Eileen M.</au><au>Nienhaus, Albert</au><au>Groneberg, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The burden of conveyor belt work in the canteen kitchen: A question of working height?</atitle><jtitle>Work (Reading, Mass.)</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>881</spage><epage>894</epage><pages>881-894</pages><issn>1051-9815</issn><eissn>1875-9270</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Working in forced postures and standing continuously can be classified as straining the musculoskeletal system. OBJECTIVE: Since such postures are frequently used in hospital canteen kitchens, we used kinematic analysis to determine the working postures of canteen kitchen staff. METHODS: In this study, the daily work routine of 18 (11 w/7 m) workers of a hospital canteen kitchen (Frankfurt Main/Germany) aged 21–62 years (46±13 years) was examined by means of kinematic analysis (CULEA system; IFA; Sankt Augustin/Germany) and a detailed computerized analysis of the activities performed on-site. Angle values of the head and trunk were evaluated in accordance with ergonomic standards and presented using percentile values (P05-P95). The OWAS method was also employed to capture the proportions of standing, walking and sitting work. RESULTS: The kinematic posture analysis showed for all activities on the conveyor belt a tendency towards a dorsally inclined body position: trunk inclination (–7.5° to 0), thoracic spine inclination or a bending forward (–11.3° to 0°) and curvature of the back within the thoracic spine (–15.2° to 0°). In addition, &gt;90% of the “activities on the belt” (46% of the daily working routine) were carried out standing. CONCLUSION: The activities on the conveyor belt were characterized by a tendency towards hyperextension of the trunk, possibly due to a too high working environment. Furthermore, an increased burden on body structures while standing can be concluded. From a primary prevention perspective, this increased standing load should be reduced by behavioral and relational prevention measures.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3233/WOR-205170</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-9815
ispartof Work (Reading, Mass.), 2022-01, Vol.73 (3), p.881-894
issn 1051-9815
1875-9270
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2704873339
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate
title The burden of conveyor belt work in the canteen kitchen: A question of working height?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A00%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20burden%20of%20conveyor%20belt%20work%20in%20the%20canteen%20kitchen:%20A%20question%20of%20working%20height?&rft.jtitle=Work%20(Reading,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Ohlendorf,%20Daniela&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=881&rft.epage=894&rft.pages=881-894&rft.issn=1051-9815&rft.eissn=1875-9270&rft_id=info:doi/10.3233/WOR-205170&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2704873339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-c0cbb4a9450dfa727922e47c065d5d8a982494565cb80d2a75c5fd9d2b98f5a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2704873339&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.3233_WOR-205170&rfr_iscdi=true