Doctors, Patients, and Interpreters’ Views on the Co-Construction of Empathic Communication in Interpreter-Mediated Consultations: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Video Stimulated Recall Interviews

Doctors and patients rely on verbal and nonverbal resources to co-construct clinical empathy. In language-discordant consultations, interpreters’ communicative actions might compromise this process. We aim to explore doctors, patients, and professional interpreters’ perspectives on their own and oth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Qualitative health research 2022-10, Vol.32 (12), p.1843-1857
Main Authors: Theys, Laura, Wermuth, Cornelia, Hsieh, Elaine, Krystallidou, Demi, Pype, Peter, Salaets, Heidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognitive-behavioral factors
Communication
Content analysis
Empathy
Interpreters
Interviews
Medical appointments
Nonverbal communication
Patient satisfaction
Physician patient relationships
Physicians
Professional practice
Qualitative research
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Doctors and patients rely on verbal and nonverbal resources to co-construct clinical empathy. In language-discordant consultations, interpreters’ communicative actions might compromise this process. We aim to explore doctors, patients, and professional interpreters’ perspectives on their own and others’ actions during their empathic interaction in interpreter-mediated consultations (IMCs). We analyzed 20 video stimulated recall interviews with doctors, patients, and interpreters using qualitative content analysis. Doctors and patients found ways to connect with each other on the level of empathic communication (EC) that is not limited by interpreters’ alterations or disengaged demeanor. Some aspects of doctors and interpreters’ professional practices might jeopardize the co-construction of EC in IMCs. The co-construction of EC in IMCs is not only subject to participants’ communicative (inter)actions, but also to organizational and subjective factors. These results provide evidence of the transactional process between the behavioral, cognitive, and affective components of clinical empathy in the context of IMCs.
ISSN:1049-7323
1552-7557
DOI:10.1177/10497323221119369