Loading…

The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin

Purpose The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of three‐dimensionally (3D) printed post and core fabricated with two different materials: reinforced wax and castable resin. Materials and methods Fifteen extracted single root central incisors were selected. Root canal treatment and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of prosthodontics 2023-07, Vol.32 (6), p.540-545
Main Authors: Piangsuk, Tarin, Henprasert, Pantip, Boonsiriphant, Piriya, Lindquist, Terry J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693
container_end_page 545
container_issue 6
container_start_page 540
container_title Journal of prosthodontics
container_volume 32
creator Piangsuk, Tarin
Henprasert, Pantip
Boonsiriphant, Piriya
Lindquist, Terry J.
description Purpose The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of three‐dimensionally (3D) printed post and core fabricated with two different materials: reinforced wax and castable resin. Materials and methods Fifteen extracted single root central incisors were selected. Root canal treatment and tooth preparation for crown were performed on all teeth. Eleven millimeters post space was created with standardized prefabricated fiber post drill. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used for root canal impressions. Each impression was then 3D scanned using an extraoral scanner and cast posts and cores were designed using 3Shape software. The digitally designed post and cores were 3D printed with two different materials: castable wax resin and castable resin. The castable resin patterns were scanned before and after complete polymerization. The wax patterns were also scanned. Digital volumetric measurement using Geomagic® Control X™ software was performed to determine accuracy. Results The printed post and core had reduced volume (16.09 ± 3.839 mm3) compared to the digital design (17.828 ± 3.904, p < 0.05). Before complete polymerization, the accuracy of 3D printed resin pattern (16.464 ± 3.017) was found to be superior to post and core printed with wax (16.193 ± 3.018, p < 0.05). However, no volume difference was found between completely polymerized resin (16.09 ± 3.839) and wax (16.044 ± 3.834, p = 1). Conclusion 3D printed post and core showed significant volume shrinkage from the digital files used to create them. However, different materials had no effect on the accuracy of 3D printed post and core.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jopr.13594
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2707614151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2835197647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotlY3PoAE3IgwNWcy16XUO4WKVOguZDKnOmU6GZMOtTsfwWf0SUyd1oULs0lyzsfPz0fIMbA-uHMx07XpAw_TYId0IeS-lwTpZNe9WZh6aQCTDjmwdsYYQJjAPunwiLGEh3GXyPErUqlUY6RaUaXntTSF1RXVU8qvvj4-a1NUC8xpre2Cyip3jEHa2KJ6oUrahcxKpAbdv91uR0v53o4Pyd5UlhaPNnePPN9cjwd33nB0ez-4HHrKFQk8SDiTUyYlS1ztMONBGvt-jjyHxFecu20CMfIk41HgM4kZhhwhAkzzKI9S3iNnbW5t9FuDdiHmhVVYlrJC3VjhxyyOIIAQHHr6B53pxlSunfCdFkjjKIgddd5SymhrDU6FczGXZiWAibV4sRYvfsQ7-GQT2WRzzH_RrWkHQAssixJX_0SJh9HjUxv6DTSYjZ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2835197647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Piangsuk, Tarin ; Henprasert, Pantip ; Boonsiriphant, Piriya ; Lindquist, Terry J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Piangsuk, Tarin ; Henprasert, Pantip ; Boonsiriphant, Piriya ; Lindquist, Terry J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of three‐dimensionally (3D) printed post and core fabricated with two different materials: reinforced wax and castable resin. Materials and methods Fifteen extracted single root central incisors were selected. Root canal treatment and tooth preparation for crown were performed on all teeth. Eleven millimeters post space was created with standardized prefabricated fiber post drill. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used for root canal impressions. Each impression was then 3D scanned using an extraoral scanner and cast posts and cores were designed using 3Shape software. The digitally designed post and cores were 3D printed with two different materials: castable wax resin and castable resin. The castable resin patterns were scanned before and after complete polymerization. The wax patterns were also scanned. Digital volumetric measurement using Geomagic® Control X™ software was performed to determine accuracy. Results The printed post and core had reduced volume (16.09 ± 3.839 mm3) compared to the digital design (17.828 ± 3.904, p &lt; 0.05). Before complete polymerization, the accuracy of 3D printed resin pattern (16.464 ± 3.017) was found to be superior to post and core printed with wax (16.193 ± 3.018, p &lt; 0.05). However, no volume difference was found between completely polymerized resin (16.09 ± 3.839) and wax (16.044 ± 3.834, p = 1). Conclusion 3D printed post and core showed significant volume shrinkage from the digital files used to create them. However, different materials had no effect on the accuracy of 3D printed post and core.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-849X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36008357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>3D printing ; Accuracy ; accuracy of post and core ; Computer-Aided Design ; Crowns ; customized post and core ; Dental Impression Materials ; Endodontics ; Incisor ; Incisors ; Polymerization ; post and core ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Root canals ; Tooth Crown</subject><ispartof>Journal of prosthodontics, 2023-07, Vol.32 (6), p.540-545</ispartof><rights>2022 by the American College of Prosthodontists.</rights><rights>2023 American College of Prosthodontists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8021-2868 ; 0000-0002-9705-4085</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36008357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piangsuk, Tarin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henprasert, Pantip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boonsiriphant, Piriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindquist, Terry J.</creatorcontrib><title>The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin</title><title>Journal of prosthodontics</title><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><description>Purpose The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of three‐dimensionally (3D) printed post and core fabricated with two different materials: reinforced wax and castable resin. Materials and methods Fifteen extracted single root central incisors were selected. Root canal treatment and tooth preparation for crown were performed on all teeth. Eleven millimeters post space was created with standardized prefabricated fiber post drill. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used for root canal impressions. Each impression was then 3D scanned using an extraoral scanner and cast posts and cores were designed using 3Shape software. The digitally designed post and cores were 3D printed with two different materials: castable wax resin and castable resin. The castable resin patterns were scanned before and after complete polymerization. The wax patterns were also scanned. Digital volumetric measurement using Geomagic® Control X™ software was performed to determine accuracy. Results The printed post and core had reduced volume (16.09 ± 3.839 mm3) compared to the digital design (17.828 ± 3.904, p &lt; 0.05). Before complete polymerization, the accuracy of 3D printed resin pattern (16.464 ± 3.017) was found to be superior to post and core printed with wax (16.193 ± 3.018, p &lt; 0.05). However, no volume difference was found between completely polymerized resin (16.09 ± 3.839) and wax (16.044 ± 3.834, p = 1). Conclusion 3D printed post and core showed significant volume shrinkage from the digital files used to create them. However, different materials had no effect on the accuracy of 3D printed post and core.</description><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>accuracy of post and core</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>customized post and core</subject><subject>Dental Impression Materials</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Incisor</subject><subject>Incisors</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>post and core</subject><subject>Printing, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Tooth Crown</subject><issn>1059-941X</issn><issn>1532-849X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotlY3PoAE3IgwNWcy16XUO4WKVOguZDKnOmU6GZMOtTsfwWf0SUyd1oULs0lyzsfPz0fIMbA-uHMx07XpAw_TYId0IeS-lwTpZNe9WZh6aQCTDjmwdsYYQJjAPunwiLGEh3GXyPErUqlUY6RaUaXntTSF1RXVU8qvvj4-a1NUC8xpre2Cyip3jEHa2KJ6oUrahcxKpAbdv91uR0v53o4Pyd5UlhaPNnePPN9cjwd33nB0ez-4HHrKFQk8SDiTUyYlS1ztMONBGvt-jjyHxFecu20CMfIk41HgM4kZhhwhAkzzKI9S3iNnbW5t9FuDdiHmhVVYlrJC3VjhxyyOIIAQHHr6B53pxlSunfCdFkjjKIgddd5SymhrDU6FczGXZiWAibV4sRYvfsQ7-GQT2WRzzH_RrWkHQAssixJX_0SJh9HjUxv6DTSYjZ4</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Piangsuk, Tarin</creator><creator>Henprasert, Pantip</creator><creator>Boonsiriphant, Piriya</creator><creator>Lindquist, Terry J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-2868</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-4085</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin</title><author>Piangsuk, Tarin ; Henprasert, Pantip ; Boonsiriphant, Piriya ; Lindquist, Terry J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>accuracy of post and core</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>customized post and core</topic><topic>Dental Impression Materials</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Incisor</topic><topic>Incisors</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>post and core</topic><topic>Printing, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Tooth Crown</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piangsuk, Tarin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henprasert, Pantip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boonsiriphant, Piriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindquist, Terry J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piangsuk, Tarin</au><au>Henprasert, Pantip</au><au>Boonsiriphant, Piriya</au><au>Lindquist, Terry J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin</atitle><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>540</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>540-545</pages><issn>1059-941X</issn><eissn>1532-849X</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of three‐dimensionally (3D) printed post and core fabricated with two different materials: reinforced wax and castable resin. Materials and methods Fifteen extracted single root central incisors were selected. Root canal treatment and tooth preparation for crown were performed on all teeth. Eleven millimeters post space was created with standardized prefabricated fiber post drill. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used for root canal impressions. Each impression was then 3D scanned using an extraoral scanner and cast posts and cores were designed using 3Shape software. The digitally designed post and cores were 3D printed with two different materials: castable wax resin and castable resin. The castable resin patterns were scanned before and after complete polymerization. The wax patterns were also scanned. Digital volumetric measurement using Geomagic® Control X™ software was performed to determine accuracy. Results The printed post and core had reduced volume (16.09 ± 3.839 mm3) compared to the digital design (17.828 ± 3.904, p &lt; 0.05). Before complete polymerization, the accuracy of 3D printed resin pattern (16.464 ± 3.017) was found to be superior to post and core printed with wax (16.193 ± 3.018, p &lt; 0.05). However, no volume difference was found between completely polymerized resin (16.09 ± 3.839) and wax (16.044 ± 3.834, p = 1). Conclusion 3D printed post and core showed significant volume shrinkage from the digital files used to create them. However, different materials had no effect on the accuracy of 3D printed post and core.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36008357</pmid><doi>10.1111/jopr.13594</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-2868</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-4085</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-941X
ispartof Journal of prosthodontics, 2023-07, Vol.32 (6), p.540-545
issn 1059-941X
1532-849X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2707614151
source Wiley
subjects 3D printing
Accuracy
accuracy of post and core
Computer-Aided Design
Crowns
customized post and core
Dental Impression Materials
Endodontics
Incisor
Incisors
Polymerization
post and core
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Root canals
Tooth Crown
title The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A42%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20accuracy%20comparison%20of%203D%E2%80%90printed%20post%20and%20core%20using%20castable%20resin%20and%20castable%20wax%20resin&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20prosthodontics&rft.au=Piangsuk,%20Tarin&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=540&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=540-545&rft.issn=1059-941X&rft.eissn=1532-849X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jopr.13594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2835197647%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2835197647&rft_id=info:pmid/36008357&rfr_iscdi=true