Loading…
Preoperative patient activation predicts minimum clinically important difference for PROMIS pain and physical function in patients undergoing elective spine surgery
•Preoperative patient activation is an independent predictor of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMIS pain at 1-year follow-up.•Preoperative patient activation is an independent predictor of MCID for PROMIS physical function at 1-year follow-up.•Routine preoperative assessment of...
Saved in:
Published in: | The spine journal 2023-01, Vol.23 (1), p.85-91 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4195037ac8e5efb28288fb6b4628671382ede48fda5c53b6c5c279a40eab71863 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4195037ac8e5efb28288fb6b4628671382ede48fda5c53b6c5c279a40eab71863 |
container_end_page | 91 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | The spine journal |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Sachdev, Rahul Mo, Kevin Wang, Kevin Y. Zhang, Bo Musharbash, Farah N. Vadhera, Amar Ochuba, Arinze J. Kebaish, Khaled M. Skolasky, Richard L. Neuman, Brian J. |
description | •Preoperative patient activation is an independent predictor of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMIS pain at 1-year follow-up.•Preoperative patient activation is an independent predictor of MCID for PROMIS physical function at 1-year follow-up.•Routine preoperative assessment of patient activation may help identify patients at risk for poor clinical outcomes.
Patient activation is a patient's willingness to take independent actions to manage their own health care.
The goal of this study is to determine whether preoperative patient activation measure (PAM) predicts minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain, physical function, depression, and anxiety for patients undergoing elective spine surgery.
Retrospective review.
A single-institution, academic database of patients undergoing elective spine surgery.
MCID at 1-year follow-up for PROMIS pain, physical function, depression and anxiety.
We retrospectively reviewed a single-institution, academic database of patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Preoperative patient activation was evaluated using the PAM-13 survey, which was used to stratify patients into four activation stages. Primary outcome variable was achieving MCID at 1-year follow-up for PROMIS pain and physical function. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine impact of patient activation on PROMIS pain and the physical function.
Of the 430 patients, 220 (51%) were female with a mean age of 58.2±16.8. Preoperatively, 34 (8%) were in activation stage 1, 45 (10%) in stage 2, 98 (23%) in stage 3, and 253 (59%) in stage 4. At 1-year follow up, 248 (58%) achieved MCID for PROMIS physical function, 256 (60%) achieved MCID for PROMIS pain, 151 (35.28%) achieved MCID for PROMIS depression, and 197 (46%) achieved MCID for PROMIS anxiety. For PROMIS physical function, when compared to patients at stage 1 activation, patients at stage 2 (aOR:3.49, 95% CI:1.27, 9.59), stage 3 (aOR:3.54, 95% CI:1.40, 8.98) and stage 4 (aOR:7.88, 95% CI:3.29, 18.9) were more likely to achieve MCID. For PROMIS pain, when compared against patients at stage 1, patients at stage 3 (aOR:2.82, 95% CI:1.18, 6.76) and stage 4 (aOR:5.44, 95% CI:2.41, 12.3) were more likely to achieve MCID. For PROMIS depression, when compared against patients at stage 1, patients at stage 4 were more likely to achieve MCID (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR):2.59, 95% CI:1.08–6.19). Fo |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2707616560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943022008762</els_id><sourcerecordid>2707616560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4195037ac8e5efb28288fb6b4628671382ede48fda5c53b6c5c279a40eab71863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1TAQtBAVLYV_gJCPXBJsJ7GdCxKqClQqatXC2XLs9cNPiR3spNL7P_zQ-n3AkdOO5Zmd3R2E3lFSU0L5x22dZx8AakYYq4msCREv0AWVQlaUN-xlwR3rq75tyDl6nfOWECIFZa_QecMJ63veXqA_9wniDEkv_gnwXAqEBWtTngXHgOcE1psl48kHP60TNmMBRo_jDvtpjmnRRWC9c5AgGMAuJnz_cPf95rG08wHrYPH8a5f3GuzWYA5ty8fJLOM1WEib6MMGwwjmMMlhN5zXtIG0e4POnB4zvD3VS_Tzy_WPq2_V7d3Xm6vPt5VhPVuqlvYdaYQ2EjpwA5NMSjfwoeVMckEbycBCK53VnemagZvOMNHrloAeBJW8uUQfjn3nFH-vkBc1-WxgHHWAuGbFBBGc8o6TQm2PVJNizgmcmpOfdNopStQ-H7VVx3zUPh9FpCr5FNn7k8M6TGD_if4GUgifjgQoez55SCobv7-r9amcRtno_-_wDKmGqCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2707616560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preoperative patient activation predicts minimum clinically important difference for PROMIS pain and physical function in patients undergoing elective spine surgery</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Sachdev, Rahul ; Mo, Kevin ; Wang, Kevin Y. ; Zhang, Bo ; Musharbash, Farah N. ; Vadhera, Amar ; Ochuba, Arinze J. ; Kebaish, Khaled M. ; Skolasky, Richard L. ; Neuman, Brian J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Rahul ; Mo, Kevin ; Wang, Kevin Y. ; Zhang, Bo ; Musharbash, Farah N. ; Vadhera, Amar ; Ochuba, Arinze J. ; Kebaish, Khaled M. ; Skolasky, Richard L. ; Neuman, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><description>•Preoperative patient activation is an independent predictor of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMIS pain at 1-year follow-up.•Preoperative patient activation is an independent predictor of MCID for PROMIS physical function at 1-year follow-up.•Routine preoperative assessment of patient activation may help identify patients at risk for poor clinical outcomes.
Patient activation is a patient's willingness to take independent actions to manage their own health care.
The goal of this study is to determine whether preoperative patient activation measure (PAM) predicts minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain, physical function, depression, and anxiety for patients undergoing elective spine surgery.
Retrospective review.
A single-institution, academic database of patients undergoing elective spine surgery.
MCID at 1-year follow-up for PROMIS pain, physical function, depression and anxiety.
We retrospectively reviewed a single-institution, academic database of patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Preoperative patient activation was evaluated using the PAM-13 survey, which was used to stratify patients into four activation stages. Primary outcome variable was achieving MCID at 1-year follow-up for PROMIS pain and physical function. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine impact of patient activation on PROMIS pain and the physical function.
Of the 430 patients, 220 (51%) were female with a mean age of 58.2±16.8. Preoperatively, 34 (8%) were in activation stage 1, 45 (10%) in stage 2, 98 (23%) in stage 3, and 253 (59%) in stage 4. At 1-year follow up, 248 (58%) achieved MCID for PROMIS physical function, 256 (60%) achieved MCID for PROMIS pain, 151 (35.28%) achieved MCID for PROMIS depression, and 197 (46%) achieved MCID for PROMIS anxiety. For PROMIS physical function, when compared to patients at stage 1 activation, patients at stage 2 (aOR:3.49, 95% CI:1.27, 9.59), stage 3 (aOR:3.54, 95% CI:1.40, 8.98) and stage 4 (aOR:7.88, 95% CI:3.29, 18.9) were more likely to achieve MCID. For PROMIS pain, when compared against patients at stage 1, patients at stage 3 (aOR:2.82, 95% CI:1.18, 6.76) and stage 4 (aOR:5.44, 95% CI:2.41, 12.3) were more likely to achieve MCID. For PROMIS depression, when compared against patients at stage 1, patients at stage 4 were more likely to achieve MCID (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR):2.59, 95% CI:1.08–6.19). For PROMIS anxiety, when compared against patients at stage 1, stage 3 (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR):3.21, 95% CI:1.20–8.57), and stage 4 (aOR:5.56, 95% CI:2.20–14.01) were more likely to achieve MCID.
Patients at higher stages of activation were more likely to achieve MCID for PROMIS pain, physical function, depression, and anxiety at 1-year follow-up. Routine preoperative assessment of patient activation may help identify patients at risk of poor outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36029964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; MCID ; Middle Aged ; Minimal Clinically Important Difference ; Pain ; PAM-13 ; Patient activation ; Patient Participation ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Physical function ; Postoperative outcomes ; Preoperative Assessment ; PROMIS ; Retrospective Studies ; Spine surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2023-01, Vol.23 (1), p.85-91</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4195037ac8e5efb28288fb6b4628671382ede48fda5c53b6c5c279a40eab71863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4195037ac8e5efb28288fb6b4628671382ede48fda5c53b6c5c279a40eab71863</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2162-7446 ; 0000-0002-2598-4427 ; 0000-0001-9467-613X ; 0000-0001-5225-4641 ; 0000-0002-7728-0093 ; 0000-0003-4740-4531 ; 0000-0003-0739-2863</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36029964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kevin Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musharbash, Farah N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vadhera, Amar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochuba, Arinze J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kebaish, Khaled M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skolasky, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuman, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><title>Preoperative patient activation predicts minimum clinically important difference for PROMIS pain and physical function in patients undergoing elective spine surgery</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>•Preoperative patient activation is an independent predictor of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMIS pain at 1-year follow-up.•Preoperative patient activation is an independent predictor of MCID for PROMIS physical function at 1-year follow-up.•Routine preoperative assessment of patient activation may help identify patients at risk for poor clinical outcomes.
Patient activation is a patient's willingness to take independent actions to manage their own health care.
The goal of this study is to determine whether preoperative patient activation measure (PAM) predicts minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain, physical function, depression, and anxiety for patients undergoing elective spine surgery.
Retrospective review.
A single-institution, academic database of patients undergoing elective spine surgery.
MCID at 1-year follow-up for PROMIS pain, physical function, depression and anxiety.
We retrospectively reviewed a single-institution, academic database of patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Preoperative patient activation was evaluated using the PAM-13 survey, which was used to stratify patients into four activation stages. Primary outcome variable was achieving MCID at 1-year follow-up for PROMIS pain and physical function. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine impact of patient activation on PROMIS pain and the physical function.
Of the 430 patients, 220 (51%) were female with a mean age of 58.2±16.8. Preoperatively, 34 (8%) were in activation stage 1, 45 (10%) in stage 2, 98 (23%) in stage 3, and 253 (59%) in stage 4. At 1-year follow up, 248 (58%) achieved MCID for PROMIS physical function, 256 (60%) achieved MCID for PROMIS pain, 151 (35.28%) achieved MCID for PROMIS depression, and 197 (46%) achieved MCID for PROMIS anxiety. For PROMIS physical function, when compared to patients at stage 1 activation, patients at stage 2 (aOR:3.49, 95% CI:1.27, 9.59), stage 3 (aOR:3.54, 95% CI:1.40, 8.98) and stage 4 (aOR:7.88, 95% CI:3.29, 18.9) were more likely to achieve MCID. For PROMIS pain, when compared against patients at stage 1, patients at stage 3 (aOR:2.82, 95% CI:1.18, 6.76) and stage 4 (aOR:5.44, 95% CI:2.41, 12.3) were more likely to achieve MCID. For PROMIS depression, when compared against patients at stage 1, patients at stage 4 were more likely to achieve MCID (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR):2.59, 95% CI:1.08–6.19). For PROMIS anxiety, when compared against patients at stage 1, stage 3 (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR):3.21, 95% CI:1.20–8.57), and stage 4 (aOR:5.56, 95% CI:2.20–14.01) were more likely to achieve MCID.
Patients at higher stages of activation were more likely to achieve MCID for PROMIS pain, physical function, depression, and anxiety at 1-year follow-up. Routine preoperative assessment of patient activation may help identify patients at risk of poor outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MCID</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimal Clinically Important Difference</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>PAM-13</subject><subject>Patient activation</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Physical function</subject><subject>Postoperative outcomes</subject><subject>Preoperative Assessment</subject><subject>PROMIS</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spine surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU1v1TAQtBAVLYV_gJCPXBJsJ7GdCxKqClQqatXC2XLs9cNPiR3spNL7P_zQ-n3AkdOO5Zmd3R2E3lFSU0L5x22dZx8AakYYq4msCREv0AWVQlaUN-xlwR3rq75tyDl6nfOWECIFZa_QecMJ63veXqA_9wniDEkv_gnwXAqEBWtTngXHgOcE1psl48kHP60TNmMBRo_jDvtpjmnRRWC9c5AgGMAuJnz_cPf95rG08wHrYPH8a5f3GuzWYA5ty8fJLOM1WEib6MMGwwjmMMlhN5zXtIG0e4POnB4zvD3VS_Tzy_WPq2_V7d3Xm6vPt5VhPVuqlvYdaYQ2EjpwA5NMSjfwoeVMckEbycBCK53VnemagZvOMNHrloAeBJW8uUQfjn3nFH-vkBc1-WxgHHWAuGbFBBGc8o6TQm2PVJNizgmcmpOfdNopStQ-H7VVx3zUPh9FpCr5FNn7k8M6TGD_if4GUgifjgQoez55SCobv7-r9amcRtno_-_wDKmGqCY</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Sachdev, Rahul</creator><creator>Mo, Kevin</creator><creator>Wang, Kevin Y.</creator><creator>Zhang, Bo</creator><creator>Musharbash, Farah N.</creator><creator>Vadhera, Amar</creator><creator>Ochuba, Arinze J.</creator><creator>Kebaish, Khaled M.</creator><creator>Skolasky, Richard L.</creator><creator>Neuman, Brian J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2162-7446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2598-4427</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9467-613X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-4641</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7728-0093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-4531</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-2863</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Preoperative patient activation predicts minimum clinically important difference for PROMIS pain and physical function in patients undergoing elective spine surgery</title><author>Sachdev, Rahul ; Mo, Kevin ; Wang, Kevin Y. ; Zhang, Bo ; Musharbash, Farah N. ; Vadhera, Amar ; Ochuba, Arinze J. ; Kebaish, Khaled M. ; Skolasky, Richard L. ; Neuman, Brian J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4195037ac8e5efb28288fb6b4628671382ede48fda5c53b6c5c279a40eab71863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MCID</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimal Clinically Important Difference</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>PAM-13</topic><topic>Patient activation</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Physical function</topic><topic>Postoperative outcomes</topic><topic>Preoperative Assessment</topic><topic>PROMIS</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spine surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kevin Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musharbash, Farah N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vadhera, Amar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochuba, Arinze J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kebaish, Khaled M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skolasky, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuman, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sachdev, Rahul</au><au>Mo, Kevin</au><au>Wang, Kevin Y.</au><au>Zhang, Bo</au><au>Musharbash, Farah N.</au><au>Vadhera, Amar</au><au>Ochuba, Arinze J.</au><au>Kebaish, Khaled M.</au><au>Skolasky, Richard L.</au><au>Neuman, Brian J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preoperative patient activation predicts minimum clinically important difference for PROMIS pain and physical function in patients undergoing elective spine surgery</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>85-91</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>•Preoperative patient activation is an independent predictor of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMIS pain at 1-year follow-up.•Preoperative patient activation is an independent predictor of MCID for PROMIS physical function at 1-year follow-up.•Routine preoperative assessment of patient activation may help identify patients at risk for poor clinical outcomes.
Patient activation is a patient's willingness to take independent actions to manage their own health care.
The goal of this study is to determine whether preoperative patient activation measure (PAM) predicts minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain, physical function, depression, and anxiety for patients undergoing elective spine surgery.
Retrospective review.
A single-institution, academic database of patients undergoing elective spine surgery.
MCID at 1-year follow-up for PROMIS pain, physical function, depression and anxiety.
We retrospectively reviewed a single-institution, academic database of patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Preoperative patient activation was evaluated using the PAM-13 survey, which was used to stratify patients into four activation stages. Primary outcome variable was achieving MCID at 1-year follow-up for PROMIS pain and physical function. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine impact of patient activation on PROMIS pain and the physical function.
Of the 430 patients, 220 (51%) were female with a mean age of 58.2±16.8. Preoperatively, 34 (8%) were in activation stage 1, 45 (10%) in stage 2, 98 (23%) in stage 3, and 253 (59%) in stage 4. At 1-year follow up, 248 (58%) achieved MCID for PROMIS physical function, 256 (60%) achieved MCID for PROMIS pain, 151 (35.28%) achieved MCID for PROMIS depression, and 197 (46%) achieved MCID for PROMIS anxiety. For PROMIS physical function, when compared to patients at stage 1 activation, patients at stage 2 (aOR:3.49, 95% CI:1.27, 9.59), stage 3 (aOR:3.54, 95% CI:1.40, 8.98) and stage 4 (aOR:7.88, 95% CI:3.29, 18.9) were more likely to achieve MCID. For PROMIS pain, when compared against patients at stage 1, patients at stage 3 (aOR:2.82, 95% CI:1.18, 6.76) and stage 4 (aOR:5.44, 95% CI:2.41, 12.3) were more likely to achieve MCID. For PROMIS depression, when compared against patients at stage 1, patients at stage 4 were more likely to achieve MCID (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR):2.59, 95% CI:1.08–6.19). For PROMIS anxiety, when compared against patients at stage 1, stage 3 (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR):3.21, 95% CI:1.20–8.57), and stage 4 (aOR:5.56, 95% CI:2.20–14.01) were more likely to achieve MCID.
Patients at higher stages of activation were more likely to achieve MCID for PROMIS pain, physical function, depression, and anxiety at 1-year follow-up. Routine preoperative assessment of patient activation may help identify patients at risk of poor outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36029964</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2162-7446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2598-4427</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9467-613X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-4641</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7728-0093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-4531</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-2863</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1529-9430 |
ispartof | The spine journal, 2023-01, Vol.23 (1), p.85-91 |
issn | 1529-9430 1878-1632 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2707616560 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Female Humans Male MCID Middle Aged Minimal Clinically Important Difference Pain PAM-13 Patient activation Patient Participation Patient Reported Outcome Measures Physical function Postoperative outcomes Preoperative Assessment PROMIS Retrospective Studies Spine surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Preoperative patient activation predicts minimum clinically important difference for PROMIS pain and physical function in patients undergoing elective spine surgery |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A06%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative%20patient%20activation%20predicts%20minimum%20clinically%20important%20difference%20for%20PROMIS%20pain%20and%20physical%20function%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20elective%20spine%20surgery&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Sachdev,%20Rahul&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=85-91&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2707616560%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4195037ac8e5efb28288fb6b4628671382ede48fda5c53b6c5c279a40eab71863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2707616560&rft_id=info:pmid/36029964&rfr_iscdi=true |