Loading…

Neural signatures of evidence accumulation in temporal decisions

Cognitive models of interval timing can be formulated as an accumulation-to-bound process. However, the physiological manifestation of such processes has not yet been identified. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the neural responses of participants while they performed a temporal bise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current biology 2022-09, Vol.32 (18), p.4093-4100.e6
Main Authors: Ofir, Nir, Landau, Ayelet N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-1c5ca9a3abb2c576cf7c2153d190bcb0cf9cf3589dfd8e53e7ce24a6b20dac7c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-1c5ca9a3abb2c576cf7c2153d190bcb0cf9cf3589dfd8e53e7ce24a6b20dac7c3
container_end_page 4100.e6
container_issue 18
container_start_page 4093
container_title Current biology
container_volume 32
creator Ofir, Nir
Landau, Ayelet N
description Cognitive models of interval timing can be formulated as an accumulation-to-bound process. However, the physiological manifestation of such processes has not yet been identified. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the neural responses of participants while they performed a temporal bisection task in which they were requested to categorize the duration of visual stimuli as short or long. We found that the stimulus-offset and response-locked activity depends on both stimulus duration and the participants' decision. To relate this activity to the underlying cognitive processes, we used a drift-diffusion model. The model includes a noisy accumulator starting with the stimulus onset and a decision threshold. According to the model, a stimulus duration will be categorized as "long" if the accumulator reaches the threshold during stimulus presentation. Otherwise, it will be categorized as "short." We found that at the offset of stimulus presentation, an EEG response marks the distance of the accumulator from the threshold. Therefore, this model offers an accurate description of our behavioral data as well as the EEG response using the same two model parameters. We then replicated this finding in an identical experiment conducted in the tactile domain. We also extended this finding to two different temporal ranges (sub- and supra-second). Taken together, the work provides a new way to study the cognitive processes underlying temporal decisions, using a combination of behavior, EEG, and modeling.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2707619564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2707619564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-1c5ca9a3abb2c576cf7c2153d190bcb0cf9cf3589dfd8e53e7ce24a6b20dac7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMozjj6A9xIl25ab9ImaXaK-IJBN7oO6e2NdOhjbBrBf2-HGV0dOHznLD7GLjlkHLi62WQYq0yAEBmUGYA6YkteapNCUchjtgSjIDWlEAt2FsIGgIvSqFO2yBWAlkIv2e0rxdG1SWg-ezfFkUIy-IS-m5p6pMQhxi62bmqGPmn6ZKJuO-z4mrAJcxnO2Yl3baCLQ67Yx-PD-_1zun57erm_W6codDGlHCU643JXVQKlVug1Ci7zmhuosAL0Bn0uS1P7uiSZk0YShVOVgNqhxnzFrve_23H4ihQm2zUBqW1dT0MMVmjQihupihnlexTHIYSRvN2OTefGH8vB7sTZjZ3F2Z04C6Wdxc2bq8N9rDqq_xd_pvJfreZrkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2707619564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neural signatures of evidence accumulation in temporal decisions</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Ofir, Nir ; Landau, Ayelet N</creator><creatorcontrib>Ofir, Nir ; Landau, Ayelet N</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive models of interval timing can be formulated as an accumulation-to-bound process. However, the physiological manifestation of such processes has not yet been identified. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the neural responses of participants while they performed a temporal bisection task in which they were requested to categorize the duration of visual stimuli as short or long. We found that the stimulus-offset and response-locked activity depends on both stimulus duration and the participants' decision. To relate this activity to the underlying cognitive processes, we used a drift-diffusion model. The model includes a noisy accumulator starting with the stimulus onset and a decision threshold. According to the model, a stimulus duration will be categorized as "long" if the accumulator reaches the threshold during stimulus presentation. Otherwise, it will be categorized as "short." We found that at the offset of stimulus presentation, an EEG response marks the distance of the accumulator from the threshold. Therefore, this model offers an accurate description of our behavioral data as well as the EEG response using the same two model parameters. We then replicated this finding in an identical experiment conducted in the tactile domain. We also extended this finding to two different temporal ranges (sub- and supra-second). Taken together, the work provides a new way to study the cognitive processes underlying temporal decisions, using a combination of behavior, EEG, and modeling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0445</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36007527</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Decision Making - physiology ; Electroencephalography ; Humans</subject><ispartof>Current biology, 2022-09, Vol.32 (18), p.4093-4100.e6</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-1c5ca9a3abb2c576cf7c2153d190bcb0cf9cf3589dfd8e53e7ce24a6b20dac7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-1c5ca9a3abb2c576cf7c2153d190bcb0cf9cf3589dfd8e53e7ce24a6b20dac7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36007527$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ofir, Nir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landau, Ayelet N</creatorcontrib><title>Neural signatures of evidence accumulation in temporal decisions</title><title>Current biology</title><addtitle>Curr Biol</addtitle><description>Cognitive models of interval timing can be formulated as an accumulation-to-bound process. However, the physiological manifestation of such processes has not yet been identified. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the neural responses of participants while they performed a temporal bisection task in which they were requested to categorize the duration of visual stimuli as short or long. We found that the stimulus-offset and response-locked activity depends on both stimulus duration and the participants' decision. To relate this activity to the underlying cognitive processes, we used a drift-diffusion model. The model includes a noisy accumulator starting with the stimulus onset and a decision threshold. According to the model, a stimulus duration will be categorized as "long" if the accumulator reaches the threshold during stimulus presentation. Otherwise, it will be categorized as "short." We found that at the offset of stimulus presentation, an EEG response marks the distance of the accumulator from the threshold. Therefore, this model offers an accurate description of our behavioral data as well as the EEG response using the same two model parameters. We then replicated this finding in an identical experiment conducted in the tactile domain. We also extended this finding to two different temporal ranges (sub- and supra-second). Taken together, the work provides a new way to study the cognitive processes underlying temporal decisions, using a combination of behavior, EEG, and modeling.</description><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0960-9822</issn><issn>1879-0445</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMozjj6A9xIl25ab9ImaXaK-IJBN7oO6e2NdOhjbBrBf2-HGV0dOHznLD7GLjlkHLi62WQYq0yAEBmUGYA6YkteapNCUchjtgSjIDWlEAt2FsIGgIvSqFO2yBWAlkIv2e0rxdG1SWg-ezfFkUIy-IS-m5p6pMQhxi62bmqGPmn6ZKJuO-z4mrAJcxnO2Yl3baCLQ67Yx-PD-_1zun57erm_W6codDGlHCU643JXVQKlVug1Ci7zmhuosAL0Bn0uS1P7uiSZk0YShVOVgNqhxnzFrve_23H4ihQm2zUBqW1dT0MMVmjQihupihnlexTHIYSRvN2OTefGH8vB7sTZjZ3F2Z04C6Wdxc2bq8N9rDqq_xd_pvJfreZrkQ</recordid><startdate>20220926</startdate><enddate>20220926</enddate><creator>Ofir, Nir</creator><creator>Landau, Ayelet N</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220926</creationdate><title>Neural signatures of evidence accumulation in temporal decisions</title><author>Ofir, Nir ; Landau, Ayelet N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-1c5ca9a3abb2c576cf7c2153d190bcb0cf9cf3589dfd8e53e7ce24a6b20dac7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ofir, Nir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landau, Ayelet N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ofir, Nir</au><au>Landau, Ayelet N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neural signatures of evidence accumulation in temporal decisions</atitle><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Biol</addtitle><date>2022-09-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>4093</spage><epage>4100.e6</epage><pages>4093-4100.e6</pages><issn>0960-9822</issn><eissn>1879-0445</eissn><abstract>Cognitive models of interval timing can be formulated as an accumulation-to-bound process. However, the physiological manifestation of such processes has not yet been identified. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the neural responses of participants while they performed a temporal bisection task in which they were requested to categorize the duration of visual stimuli as short or long. We found that the stimulus-offset and response-locked activity depends on both stimulus duration and the participants' decision. To relate this activity to the underlying cognitive processes, we used a drift-diffusion model. The model includes a noisy accumulator starting with the stimulus onset and a decision threshold. According to the model, a stimulus duration will be categorized as "long" if the accumulator reaches the threshold during stimulus presentation. Otherwise, it will be categorized as "short." We found that at the offset of stimulus presentation, an EEG response marks the distance of the accumulator from the threshold. Therefore, this model offers an accurate description of our behavioral data as well as the EEG response using the same two model parameters. We then replicated this finding in an identical experiment conducted in the tactile domain. We also extended this finding to two different temporal ranges (sub- and supra-second). Taken together, the work provides a new way to study the cognitive processes underlying temporal decisions, using a combination of behavior, EEG, and modeling.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>36007527</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.006</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-9822
ispartof Current biology, 2022-09, Vol.32 (18), p.4093-4100.e6
issn 0960-9822
1879-0445
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2707619564
source BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS
subjects Decision Making - physiology
Electroencephalography
Humans
title Neural signatures of evidence accumulation in temporal decisions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A07%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neural%20signatures%20of%20evidence%20accumulation%20in%20temporal%20decisions&rft.jtitle=Current%20biology&rft.au=Ofir,%20Nir&rft.date=2022-09-26&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=4093&rft.epage=4100.e6&rft.pages=4093-4100.e6&rft.issn=0960-9822&rft.eissn=1879-0445&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2707619564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-1c5ca9a3abb2c576cf7c2153d190bcb0cf9cf3589dfd8e53e7ce24a6b20dac7c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2707619564&rft_id=info:pmid/36007527&rfr_iscdi=true