Loading…

What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills

Studies indicate that learning surgical skills on low-fidelity models is equally beneficial to learning on high-fidelity models in terms of skills retention and transfer. However, it is unclear how low-fidelity simulation training impacts retention and transfer in novice learners, particularly on co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of surgical research 2022-12, Vol.280, p.411-420
Main Authors: Wilson, Claire A., Davidson, Jacob, Chahine, Saad, Chan, Ernest Pang, Stringer, Leandra, Quantz, Mackenzie A., Saklofske, Donald H., Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3
container_end_page 420
container_issue
container_start_page 411
container_title The Journal of surgical research
container_volume 280
creator Wilson, Claire A.
Davidson, Jacob
Chahine, Saad
Chan, Ernest Pang
Stringer, Leandra
Quantz, Mackenzie A.
Saklofske, Donald H.
Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)
description Studies indicate that learning surgical skills on low-fidelity models is equally beneficial to learning on high-fidelity models in terms of skills retention and transfer. However, it is unclear how low-fidelity simulation training impacts retention and transfer in novice learners, particularly on complex surgical tasks that incorporate multiple challenging skills. This study explores the capacity of complete novices to learn and transfer complex surgical skills from a low-fidelity model to a high-fidelity simulation after a delay. Task-naïve medical and nonmedical undergraduate students (n = 62) participated in a three-phase prospective double-arm randomized (2:1) experimental study. Participants completed two skills training sessions (end-to-side anastomosis) on a low-fidelity bench model. After a 4-week delay, participants completed the task again either using the low-fidelity model or a high-fidelity model (cadaver) and were assessed using a validated checklist. There was a significant time × fidelity group interaction (P = 0.004). Simple effects analysis indicated the high-fidelity group (Mdiff = 4.18, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.040
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2708736853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480422004887</els_id><sourcerecordid>2708736853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OGzEQx62KqgToA_SCfOSy2_HnbsQBoQhIJSokkqqXSpZjzxaH_Qj2bgtvw7P0ybpRgCOn0ej_oZkfIV8Y5AyY_rrO1ynlHDjPochBwgcyYTBVWakLsUcmMCqZLEHuk4OU1jDu00J8IvtCg2RCsgn59fPO9jQkuoy2TRXGiJ7a1tN595d-H9zdVrvF3oYW_Rk9__e8CM1Q2z50LV30g3-iXUVnXbOp8ZEuhvg7OFvTxX2o63REPla2Tvj5ZR6SH5cXy9k8u765-jY7v86cUKLPnNOF13x7ECrQwJy0qAvuV5VCOQUFimuleSUUt0KUyld2JXkJfKWlVZU4JCe73k3sHgZMvWlCcljXtsVuSIYXUBZCl0qMVrazutilFLEymxgaG58MA7OFatZmhGq2UA0UZoQ6Zo5f6odVg_4t8UpxNJzuDDg--SdgNMkFbB36ENH1xnfhnfr_uE6GvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2708736853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Wilson, Claire A. ; Davidson, Jacob ; Chahine, Saad ; Chan, Ernest Pang ; Stringer, Leandra ; Quantz, Mackenzie A. ; Saklofske, Donald H. ; Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Claire A. ; Davidson, Jacob ; Chahine, Saad ; Chan, Ernest Pang ; Stringer, Leandra ; Quantz, Mackenzie A. ; Saklofske, Donald H. ; Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</creatorcontrib><description>Studies indicate that learning surgical skills on low-fidelity models is equally beneficial to learning on high-fidelity models in terms of skills retention and transfer. However, it is unclear how low-fidelity simulation training impacts retention and transfer in novice learners, particularly on complex surgical tasks that incorporate multiple challenging skills. This study explores the capacity of complete novices to learn and transfer complex surgical skills from a low-fidelity model to a high-fidelity simulation after a delay. Task-naïve medical and nonmedical undergraduate students (n = 62) participated in a three-phase prospective double-arm randomized (2:1) experimental study. Participants completed two skills training sessions (end-to-side anastomosis) on a low-fidelity bench model. After a 4-week delay, participants completed the task again either using the low-fidelity model or a high-fidelity model (cadaver) and were assessed using a validated checklist. There was a significant time × fidelity group interaction (P = 0.004). Simple effects analysis indicated the high-fidelity group (Mdiff = 4.18, P &lt; 0.001) performed significantly worse (P = 0.003) in phase 3 relative to phase 2 compared to the low-fidelity group (Mdiff = 0.75, P = 0.39). Post hoc logistic regression analysis indicated that radial suturing technique and economy of motion skills were less likely to be completed correctly for those in the high-fidelity group. These findings suggest that for novice populations, relying on low-fidelity simulation training as a source of teaching complex skills may not provide a reliable transfer to high-fidelity models and in turn clinical settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36041341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cadaver ; Clinical Competence ; Humans ; Learning ; Novices ; Prospective Studies ; Simulation Training - methods ; Skills retention ; Skills transfer ; Surgical skills</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2022-12, Vol.280, p.411-420</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0699-7561 ; 0000-0002-3976-9058 ; 0000-0003-0488-773X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36041341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Claire A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ernest Pang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stringer, Leandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quantz, Mackenzie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saklofske, Donald H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</creatorcontrib><title>What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>Studies indicate that learning surgical skills on low-fidelity models is equally beneficial to learning on high-fidelity models in terms of skills retention and transfer. However, it is unclear how low-fidelity simulation training impacts retention and transfer in novice learners, particularly on complex surgical tasks that incorporate multiple challenging skills. This study explores the capacity of complete novices to learn and transfer complex surgical skills from a low-fidelity model to a high-fidelity simulation after a delay. Task-naïve medical and nonmedical undergraduate students (n = 62) participated in a three-phase prospective double-arm randomized (2:1) experimental study. Participants completed two skills training sessions (end-to-side anastomosis) on a low-fidelity bench model. After a 4-week delay, participants completed the task again either using the low-fidelity model or a high-fidelity model (cadaver) and were assessed using a validated checklist. There was a significant time × fidelity group interaction (P = 0.004). Simple effects analysis indicated the high-fidelity group (Mdiff = 4.18, P &lt; 0.001) performed significantly worse (P = 0.003) in phase 3 relative to phase 2 compared to the low-fidelity group (Mdiff = 0.75, P = 0.39). Post hoc logistic regression analysis indicated that radial suturing technique and economy of motion skills were less likely to be completed correctly for those in the high-fidelity group. These findings suggest that for novice populations, relying on low-fidelity simulation training as a source of teaching complex skills may not provide a reliable transfer to high-fidelity models and in turn clinical settings.</description><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Novices</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Simulation Training - methods</subject><subject>Skills retention</subject><subject>Skills transfer</subject><subject>Surgical skills</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OGzEQx62KqgToA_SCfOSy2_HnbsQBoQhIJSokkqqXSpZjzxaH_Qj2bgtvw7P0ybpRgCOn0ej_oZkfIV8Y5AyY_rrO1ynlHDjPochBwgcyYTBVWakLsUcmMCqZLEHuk4OU1jDu00J8IvtCg2RCsgn59fPO9jQkuoy2TRXGiJ7a1tN595d-H9zdVrvF3oYW_Rk9__e8CM1Q2z50LV30g3-iXUVnXbOp8ZEuhvg7OFvTxX2o63REPla2Tvj5ZR6SH5cXy9k8u765-jY7v86cUKLPnNOF13x7ECrQwJy0qAvuV5VCOQUFimuleSUUt0KUyld2JXkJfKWlVZU4JCe73k3sHgZMvWlCcljXtsVuSIYXUBZCl0qMVrazutilFLEymxgaG58MA7OFatZmhGq2UA0UZoQ6Zo5f6odVg_4t8UpxNJzuDDg--SdgNMkFbB36ENH1xnfhnfr_uE6GvQ</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Wilson, Claire A.</creator><creator>Davidson, Jacob</creator><creator>Chahine, Saad</creator><creator>Chan, Ernest Pang</creator><creator>Stringer, Leandra</creator><creator>Quantz, Mackenzie A.</creator><creator>Saklofske, Donald H.</creator><creator>Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-7561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3976-9058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-773X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills</title><author>Wilson, Claire A. ; Davidson, Jacob ; Chahine, Saad ; Chan, Ernest Pang ; Stringer, Leandra ; Quantz, Mackenzie A. ; Saklofske, Donald H. ; Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Novices</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Simulation Training - methods</topic><topic>Skills retention</topic><topic>Skills transfer</topic><topic>Surgical skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Claire A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ernest Pang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stringer, Leandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quantz, Mackenzie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saklofske, Donald H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Claire A.</au><au>Davidson, Jacob</au><au>Chahine, Saad</au><au>Chan, Ernest Pang</au><au>Stringer, Leandra</au><au>Quantz, Mackenzie A.</au><au>Saklofske, Donald H.</au><au>Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>280</volume><spage>411</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>411-420</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><abstract>Studies indicate that learning surgical skills on low-fidelity models is equally beneficial to learning on high-fidelity models in terms of skills retention and transfer. However, it is unclear how low-fidelity simulation training impacts retention and transfer in novice learners, particularly on complex surgical tasks that incorporate multiple challenging skills. This study explores the capacity of complete novices to learn and transfer complex surgical skills from a low-fidelity model to a high-fidelity simulation after a delay. Task-naïve medical and nonmedical undergraduate students (n = 62) participated in a three-phase prospective double-arm randomized (2:1) experimental study. Participants completed two skills training sessions (end-to-side anastomosis) on a low-fidelity bench model. After a 4-week delay, participants completed the task again either using the low-fidelity model or a high-fidelity model (cadaver) and were assessed using a validated checklist. There was a significant time × fidelity group interaction (P = 0.004). Simple effects analysis indicated the high-fidelity group (Mdiff = 4.18, P &lt; 0.001) performed significantly worse (P = 0.003) in phase 3 relative to phase 2 compared to the low-fidelity group (Mdiff = 0.75, P = 0.39). Post hoc logistic regression analysis indicated that radial suturing technique and economy of motion skills were less likely to be completed correctly for those in the high-fidelity group. These findings suggest that for novice populations, relying on low-fidelity simulation training as a source of teaching complex skills may not provide a reliable transfer to high-fidelity models and in turn clinical settings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36041341</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.040</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-7561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3976-9058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-773X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4804
ispartof The Journal of surgical research, 2022-12, Vol.280, p.411-420
issn 0022-4804
1095-8673
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2708736853
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Cadaver
Clinical Competence
Humans
Learning
Novices
Prospective Studies
Simulation Training - methods
Skills retention
Skills transfer
Surgical skills
title What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A45%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20Transferred%20and%20How%20Much%20is%20Retained?%20A%C2%A0Simulation%20Study%20of%20Complex%20Surgical%20Skills&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Wilson,%20Claire%20A.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=280&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=411-420&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2708736853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2708736853&rft_id=info:pmid/36041341&rfr_iscdi=true