Loading…
What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills
Studies indicate that learning surgical skills on low-fidelity models is equally beneficial to learning on high-fidelity models in terms of skills retention and transfer. However, it is unclear how low-fidelity simulation training impacts retention and transfer in novice learners, particularly on co...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of surgical research 2022-12, Vol.280, p.411-420 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3 |
container_end_page | 420 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 411 |
container_title | The Journal of surgical research |
container_volume | 280 |
creator | Wilson, Claire A. Davidson, Jacob Chahine, Saad Chan, Ernest Pang Stringer, Leandra Quantz, Mackenzie A. Saklofske, Donald H. Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao) |
description | Studies indicate that learning surgical skills on low-fidelity models is equally beneficial to learning on high-fidelity models in terms of skills retention and transfer. However, it is unclear how low-fidelity simulation training impacts retention and transfer in novice learners, particularly on complex surgical tasks that incorporate multiple challenging skills. This study explores the capacity of complete novices to learn and transfer complex surgical skills from a low-fidelity model to a high-fidelity simulation after a delay.
Task-naïve medical and nonmedical undergraduate students (n = 62) participated in a three-phase prospective double-arm randomized (2:1) experimental study. Participants completed two skills training sessions (end-to-side anastomosis) on a low-fidelity bench model. After a 4-week delay, participants completed the task again either using the low-fidelity model or a high-fidelity model (cadaver) and were assessed using a validated checklist.
There was a significant time × fidelity group interaction (P = 0.004). Simple effects analysis indicated the high-fidelity group (Mdiff = 4.18, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.040 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2708736853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480422004887</els_id><sourcerecordid>2708736853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OGzEQx62KqgToA_SCfOSy2_HnbsQBoQhIJSokkqqXSpZjzxaH_Qj2bgtvw7P0ybpRgCOn0ej_oZkfIV8Y5AyY_rrO1ynlHDjPochBwgcyYTBVWakLsUcmMCqZLEHuk4OU1jDu00J8IvtCg2RCsgn59fPO9jQkuoy2TRXGiJ7a1tN595d-H9zdVrvF3oYW_Rk9__e8CM1Q2z50LV30g3-iXUVnXbOp8ZEuhvg7OFvTxX2o63REPla2Tvj5ZR6SH5cXy9k8u765-jY7v86cUKLPnNOF13x7ECrQwJy0qAvuV5VCOQUFimuleSUUt0KUyld2JXkJfKWlVZU4JCe73k3sHgZMvWlCcljXtsVuSIYXUBZCl0qMVrazutilFLEymxgaG58MA7OFatZmhGq2UA0UZoQ6Zo5f6odVg_4t8UpxNJzuDDg--SdgNMkFbB36ENH1xnfhnfr_uE6GvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2708736853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Wilson, Claire A. ; Davidson, Jacob ; Chahine, Saad ; Chan, Ernest Pang ; Stringer, Leandra ; Quantz, Mackenzie A. ; Saklofske, Donald H. ; Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Claire A. ; Davidson, Jacob ; Chahine, Saad ; Chan, Ernest Pang ; Stringer, Leandra ; Quantz, Mackenzie A. ; Saklofske, Donald H. ; Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</creatorcontrib><description>Studies indicate that learning surgical skills on low-fidelity models is equally beneficial to learning on high-fidelity models in terms of skills retention and transfer. However, it is unclear how low-fidelity simulation training impacts retention and transfer in novice learners, particularly on complex surgical tasks that incorporate multiple challenging skills. This study explores the capacity of complete novices to learn and transfer complex surgical skills from a low-fidelity model to a high-fidelity simulation after a delay.
Task-naïve medical and nonmedical undergraduate students (n = 62) participated in a three-phase prospective double-arm randomized (2:1) experimental study. Participants completed two skills training sessions (end-to-side anastomosis) on a low-fidelity bench model. After a 4-week delay, participants completed the task again either using the low-fidelity model or a high-fidelity model (cadaver) and were assessed using a validated checklist.
There was a significant time × fidelity group interaction (P = 0.004). Simple effects analysis indicated the high-fidelity group (Mdiff = 4.18, P < 0.001) performed significantly worse (P = 0.003) in phase 3 relative to phase 2 compared to the low-fidelity group (Mdiff = 0.75, P = 0.39). Post hoc logistic regression analysis indicated that radial suturing technique and economy of motion skills were less likely to be completed correctly for those in the high-fidelity group.
These findings suggest that for novice populations, relying on low-fidelity simulation training as a source of teaching complex skills may not provide a reliable transfer to high-fidelity models and in turn clinical settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36041341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cadaver ; Clinical Competence ; Humans ; Learning ; Novices ; Prospective Studies ; Simulation Training - methods ; Skills retention ; Skills transfer ; Surgical skills</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2022-12, Vol.280, p.411-420</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0699-7561 ; 0000-0002-3976-9058 ; 0000-0003-0488-773X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36041341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Claire A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ernest Pang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stringer, Leandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quantz, Mackenzie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saklofske, Donald H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</creatorcontrib><title>What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>Studies indicate that learning surgical skills on low-fidelity models is equally beneficial to learning on high-fidelity models in terms of skills retention and transfer. However, it is unclear how low-fidelity simulation training impacts retention and transfer in novice learners, particularly on complex surgical tasks that incorporate multiple challenging skills. This study explores the capacity of complete novices to learn and transfer complex surgical skills from a low-fidelity model to a high-fidelity simulation after a delay.
Task-naïve medical and nonmedical undergraduate students (n = 62) participated in a three-phase prospective double-arm randomized (2:1) experimental study. Participants completed two skills training sessions (end-to-side anastomosis) on a low-fidelity bench model. After a 4-week delay, participants completed the task again either using the low-fidelity model or a high-fidelity model (cadaver) and were assessed using a validated checklist.
There was a significant time × fidelity group interaction (P = 0.004). Simple effects analysis indicated the high-fidelity group (Mdiff = 4.18, P < 0.001) performed significantly worse (P = 0.003) in phase 3 relative to phase 2 compared to the low-fidelity group (Mdiff = 0.75, P = 0.39). Post hoc logistic regression analysis indicated that radial suturing technique and economy of motion skills were less likely to be completed correctly for those in the high-fidelity group.
These findings suggest that for novice populations, relying on low-fidelity simulation training as a source of teaching complex skills may not provide a reliable transfer to high-fidelity models and in turn clinical settings.</description><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Novices</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Simulation Training - methods</subject><subject>Skills retention</subject><subject>Skills transfer</subject><subject>Surgical skills</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OGzEQx62KqgToA_SCfOSy2_HnbsQBoQhIJSokkqqXSpZjzxaH_Qj2bgtvw7P0ybpRgCOn0ej_oZkfIV8Y5AyY_rrO1ynlHDjPochBwgcyYTBVWakLsUcmMCqZLEHuk4OU1jDu00J8IvtCg2RCsgn59fPO9jQkuoy2TRXGiJ7a1tN595d-H9zdVrvF3oYW_Rk9__e8CM1Q2z50LV30g3-iXUVnXbOp8ZEuhvg7OFvTxX2o63REPla2Tvj5ZR6SH5cXy9k8u765-jY7v86cUKLPnNOF13x7ECrQwJy0qAvuV5VCOQUFimuleSUUt0KUyld2JXkJfKWlVZU4JCe73k3sHgZMvWlCcljXtsVuSIYXUBZCl0qMVrazutilFLEymxgaG58MA7OFatZmhGq2UA0UZoQ6Zo5f6odVg_4t8UpxNJzuDDg--SdgNMkFbB36ENH1xnfhnfr_uE6GvQ</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Wilson, Claire A.</creator><creator>Davidson, Jacob</creator><creator>Chahine, Saad</creator><creator>Chan, Ernest Pang</creator><creator>Stringer, Leandra</creator><creator>Quantz, Mackenzie A.</creator><creator>Saklofske, Donald H.</creator><creator>Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-7561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3976-9058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-773X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills</title><author>Wilson, Claire A. ; Davidson, Jacob ; Chahine, Saad ; Chan, Ernest Pang ; Stringer, Leandra ; Quantz, Mackenzie A. ; Saklofske, Donald H. ; Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Novices</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Simulation Training - methods</topic><topic>Skills retention</topic><topic>Skills transfer</topic><topic>Surgical skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Claire A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ernest Pang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stringer, Leandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quantz, Mackenzie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saklofske, Donald H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Claire A.</au><au>Davidson, Jacob</au><au>Chahine, Saad</au><au>Chan, Ernest Pang</au><au>Stringer, Leandra</au><au>Quantz, Mackenzie A.</au><au>Saklofske, Donald H.</au><au>Wang, Peter (Zhan Tao)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>280</volume><spage>411</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>411-420</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><abstract>Studies indicate that learning surgical skills on low-fidelity models is equally beneficial to learning on high-fidelity models in terms of skills retention and transfer. However, it is unclear how low-fidelity simulation training impacts retention and transfer in novice learners, particularly on complex surgical tasks that incorporate multiple challenging skills. This study explores the capacity of complete novices to learn and transfer complex surgical skills from a low-fidelity model to a high-fidelity simulation after a delay.
Task-naïve medical and nonmedical undergraduate students (n = 62) participated in a three-phase prospective double-arm randomized (2:1) experimental study. Participants completed two skills training sessions (end-to-side anastomosis) on a low-fidelity bench model. After a 4-week delay, participants completed the task again either using the low-fidelity model or a high-fidelity model (cadaver) and were assessed using a validated checklist.
There was a significant time × fidelity group interaction (P = 0.004). Simple effects analysis indicated the high-fidelity group (Mdiff = 4.18, P < 0.001) performed significantly worse (P = 0.003) in phase 3 relative to phase 2 compared to the low-fidelity group (Mdiff = 0.75, P = 0.39). Post hoc logistic regression analysis indicated that radial suturing technique and economy of motion skills were less likely to be completed correctly for those in the high-fidelity group.
These findings suggest that for novice populations, relying on low-fidelity simulation training as a source of teaching complex skills may not provide a reliable transfer to high-fidelity models and in turn clinical settings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36041341</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.040</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-7561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3976-9058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-773X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4804 |
ispartof | The Journal of surgical research, 2022-12, Vol.280, p.411-420 |
issn | 0022-4804 1095-8673 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2708736853 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Cadaver Clinical Competence Humans Learning Novices Prospective Studies Simulation Training - methods Skills retention Skills transfer Surgical skills |
title | What is Transferred and How Much is Retained? A Simulation Study of Complex Surgical Skills |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A45%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20Transferred%20and%20How%20Much%20is%20Retained?%20A%C2%A0Simulation%20Study%20of%20Complex%20Surgical%20Skills&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Wilson,%20Claire%20A.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=280&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=411-420&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2708736853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-cc67d621341e50601c4ae672dbf5e49050526562f352a3385dfab42802b64a5f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2708736853&rft_id=info:pmid/36041341&rfr_iscdi=true |