Loading…

A critical ethnographic perspective on risk and dangerousness in forensic psychiatry

In the Canadian forensic psychiatric context, the concepts of risk and dangerousness interact, intersect, and morph into the notion of significant threat to the safety of the public. Stemming from the results of a critical ethnography of the Ontario Review Board, this article unpacks the central rol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nursing inquiry 2023-04, Vol.30 (2), p.e12521-n/a
Main Authors: Domingue, Jean‐Laurent, Jacob, Jean‐Daniel, Perron, Amélie, Pariseau‐Legault, Pierre, Foth, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dee6c3fc773883156f835901384811fd3c6b98edf633ca16272f64e7e780d1953
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dee6c3fc773883156f835901384811fd3c6b98edf633ca16272f64e7e780d1953
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page e12521
container_title Nursing inquiry
container_volume 30
creator Domingue, Jean‐Laurent
Jacob, Jean‐Daniel
Perron, Amélie
Pariseau‐Legault, Pierre
Foth, Thomas
description In the Canadian forensic psychiatric context, the concepts of risk and dangerousness interact, intersect, and morph into the notion of significant threat to the safety of the public. Stemming from the results of a critical ethnography of the Ontario Review Board, this article unpacks the central role of forensic psychiatric nursing, as an example of a 'psych' discipline (e.g., psychiatry and psychology), in a system that is built to produce risky persons and to legitimize their detention and supervision. By using excerpt of interviews conducted with nurses, ethnographic observations of Review Board hearings, and other documentary artifacts, the findings illustrate how rationalizations of risk and dangerousness are contingent on space, time, and observer. Depending on the time of the assessment or on the health‐care professional who performs it, different elements including, but not limited to, mental illness, interpersonal relationships, financial instability, and sexual vulnerability, are relied upon in very fluid, interchangeable, and discretionary ways to justify findings of dangerousness. Such a dynamic expands the reach of psychiatry's legitimacy at identifying risky conduct and controlling risky persons to domains very loosely associated with the notion of dangerousness. The work of Foucault and Castel provides the theoretical backdrop on which rests the discussion and the implications for nursing.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nin.12521
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709743538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2709743538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dee6c3fc773883156f835901384811fd3c6b98edf633ca16272f64e7e780d1953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EoqUw8AWQJRYY0tpxnDhjVfGnUlWWMkeuc2ldUifYCSjfHpcUBiRuudPpd--eHkLXlIypr4nRZkxDHtITNKRRRAIqCDn1MwtJkAhBB-jCuR0hfsHFORqwmEQpifgQraZYWd1oJUsMzdZUGyvrrVa4ButqUI3-AFwZbLV7w9LkOJdmA7ZqnQHnsDa4qCwYd7hwndpq2djuEp0VsnRwdewj9Pr4sJo9B4uXp_lsuggU44wGOUCsWKGShAnBKI8LwXjqTYpIUFrkTMXrVEBexIwpSeMwCYs4ggQSQXKacjZCd71ubav3FlyT7bVTUJbSgHeYhQlJk8j_Eh69_YPuqtYa785TqX_I05B46r6nlK2cs1BktdV7abuMkuwQdeajzr6j9uzNUbFd7yH_JX-y9cCkBz51Cd3_StlyvuwlvwBVfocq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2798485920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A critical ethnographic perspective on risk and dangerousness in forensic psychiatry</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Domingue, Jean‐Laurent ; Jacob, Jean‐Daniel ; Perron, Amélie ; Pariseau‐Legault, Pierre ; Foth, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Domingue, Jean‐Laurent ; Jacob, Jean‐Daniel ; Perron, Amélie ; Pariseau‐Legault, Pierre ; Foth, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>In the Canadian forensic psychiatric context, the concepts of risk and dangerousness interact, intersect, and morph into the notion of significant threat to the safety of the public. Stemming from the results of a critical ethnography of the Ontario Review Board, this article unpacks the central role of forensic psychiatric nursing, as an example of a 'psych' discipline (e.g., psychiatry and psychology), in a system that is built to produce risky persons and to legitimize their detention and supervision. By using excerpt of interviews conducted with nurses, ethnographic observations of Review Board hearings, and other documentary artifacts, the findings illustrate how rationalizations of risk and dangerousness are contingent on space, time, and observer. Depending on the time of the assessment or on the health‐care professional who performs it, different elements including, but not limited to, mental illness, interpersonal relationships, financial instability, and sexual vulnerability, are relied upon in very fluid, interchangeable, and discretionary ways to justify findings of dangerousness. Such a dynamic expands the reach of psychiatry's legitimacy at identifying risky conduct and controlling risky persons to domains very loosely associated with the notion of dangerousness. The work of Foucault and Castel provides the theoretical backdrop on which rests the discussion and the implications for nursing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1320-7881</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nin.12521</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36049045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Anthropology, Cultural ; Dangerous Behavior ; dangerousness ; Detention ; Ethnography ; forensic nursing ; Forensic psychiatric nursing ; Forensic Psychiatry ; Foucauldian analysis ; Health care ; Humans ; Interpersonal relations ; Legitimacy ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; mental health ; Ontario ; Psychiatric-mental health nursing ; psychiatry ; Psychological assessment ; Psychology ; review board ; Review boards ; risk</subject><ispartof>Nursing inquiry, 2023-04, Vol.30 (2), p.e12521-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dee6c3fc773883156f835901384811fd3c6b98edf633ca16272f64e7e780d1953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dee6c3fc773883156f835901384811fd3c6b98edf633ca16272f64e7e780d1953</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4967-9299</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36049045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Domingue, Jean‐Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Jean‐Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perron, Amélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pariseau‐Legault, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foth, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>A critical ethnographic perspective on risk and dangerousness in forensic psychiatry</title><title>Nursing inquiry</title><addtitle>Nurs Inq</addtitle><description>In the Canadian forensic psychiatric context, the concepts of risk and dangerousness interact, intersect, and morph into the notion of significant threat to the safety of the public. Stemming from the results of a critical ethnography of the Ontario Review Board, this article unpacks the central role of forensic psychiatric nursing, as an example of a 'psych' discipline (e.g., psychiatry and psychology), in a system that is built to produce risky persons and to legitimize their detention and supervision. By using excerpt of interviews conducted with nurses, ethnographic observations of Review Board hearings, and other documentary artifacts, the findings illustrate how rationalizations of risk and dangerousness are contingent on space, time, and observer. Depending on the time of the assessment or on the health‐care professional who performs it, different elements including, but not limited to, mental illness, interpersonal relationships, financial instability, and sexual vulnerability, are relied upon in very fluid, interchangeable, and discretionary ways to justify findings of dangerousness. Such a dynamic expands the reach of psychiatry's legitimacy at identifying risky conduct and controlling risky persons to domains very loosely associated with the notion of dangerousness. The work of Foucault and Castel provides the theoretical backdrop on which rests the discussion and the implications for nursing.</description><subject>Anthropology, Cultural</subject><subject>Dangerous Behavior</subject><subject>dangerousness</subject><subject>Detention</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>forensic nursing</subject><subject>Forensic psychiatric nursing</subject><subject>Forensic Psychiatry</subject><subject>Foucauldian analysis</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>mental health</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</subject><subject>psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychological assessment</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>review board</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>risk</subject><issn>1320-7881</issn><issn>1440-1800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EoqUw8AWQJRYY0tpxnDhjVfGnUlWWMkeuc2ldUifYCSjfHpcUBiRuudPpd--eHkLXlIypr4nRZkxDHtITNKRRRAIqCDn1MwtJkAhBB-jCuR0hfsHFORqwmEQpifgQraZYWd1oJUsMzdZUGyvrrVa4ButqUI3-AFwZbLV7w9LkOJdmA7ZqnQHnsDa4qCwYd7hwndpq2djuEp0VsnRwdewj9Pr4sJo9B4uXp_lsuggU44wGOUCsWKGShAnBKI8LwXjqTYpIUFrkTMXrVEBexIwpSeMwCYs4ggQSQXKacjZCd71ubav3FlyT7bVTUJbSgHeYhQlJk8j_Eh69_YPuqtYa785TqX_I05B46r6nlK2cs1BktdV7abuMkuwQdeajzr6j9uzNUbFd7yH_JX-y9cCkBz51Cd3_StlyvuwlvwBVfocq</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Domingue, Jean‐Laurent</creator><creator>Jacob, Jean‐Daniel</creator><creator>Perron, Amélie</creator><creator>Pariseau‐Legault, Pierre</creator><creator>Foth, Thomas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4967-9299</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>A critical ethnographic perspective on risk and dangerousness in forensic psychiatry</title><author>Domingue, Jean‐Laurent ; Jacob, Jean‐Daniel ; Perron, Amélie ; Pariseau‐Legault, Pierre ; Foth, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dee6c3fc773883156f835901384811fd3c6b98edf633ca16272f64e7e780d1953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anthropology, Cultural</topic><topic>Dangerous Behavior</topic><topic>dangerousness</topic><topic>Detention</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>forensic nursing</topic><topic>Forensic psychiatric nursing</topic><topic>Forensic Psychiatry</topic><topic>Foucauldian analysis</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>mental health</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</topic><topic>psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychological assessment</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>review board</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Domingue, Jean‐Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Jean‐Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perron, Amélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pariseau‐Legault, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foth, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nursing inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Domingue, Jean‐Laurent</au><au>Jacob, Jean‐Daniel</au><au>Perron, Amélie</au><au>Pariseau‐Legault, Pierre</au><au>Foth, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A critical ethnographic perspective on risk and dangerousness in forensic psychiatry</atitle><jtitle>Nursing inquiry</jtitle><addtitle>Nurs Inq</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e12521</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12521-n/a</pages><issn>1320-7881</issn><eissn>1440-1800</eissn><abstract>In the Canadian forensic psychiatric context, the concepts of risk and dangerousness interact, intersect, and morph into the notion of significant threat to the safety of the public. Stemming from the results of a critical ethnography of the Ontario Review Board, this article unpacks the central role of forensic psychiatric nursing, as an example of a 'psych' discipline (e.g., psychiatry and psychology), in a system that is built to produce risky persons and to legitimize their detention and supervision. By using excerpt of interviews conducted with nurses, ethnographic observations of Review Board hearings, and other documentary artifacts, the findings illustrate how rationalizations of risk and dangerousness are contingent on space, time, and observer. Depending on the time of the assessment or on the health‐care professional who performs it, different elements including, but not limited to, mental illness, interpersonal relationships, financial instability, and sexual vulnerability, are relied upon in very fluid, interchangeable, and discretionary ways to justify findings of dangerousness. Such a dynamic expands the reach of psychiatry's legitimacy at identifying risky conduct and controlling risky persons to domains very loosely associated with the notion of dangerousness. The work of Foucault and Castel provides the theoretical backdrop on which rests the discussion and the implications for nursing.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36049045</pmid><doi>10.1111/nin.12521</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4967-9299</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1320-7881
ispartof Nursing inquiry, 2023-04, Vol.30 (2), p.e12521-n/a
issn 1320-7881
1440-1800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709743538
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley
subjects Anthropology, Cultural
Dangerous Behavior
dangerousness
Detention
Ethnography
forensic nursing
Forensic psychiatric nursing
Forensic Psychiatry
Foucauldian analysis
Health care
Humans
Interpersonal relations
Legitimacy
Mental disorders
Mental Disorders - psychology
mental health
Ontario
Psychiatric-mental health nursing
psychiatry
Psychological assessment
Psychology
review board
Review boards
risk
title A critical ethnographic perspective on risk and dangerousness in forensic psychiatry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A07%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20critical%20ethnographic%20perspective%20on%20risk%20and%20dangerousness%20in%20forensic%20psychiatry&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20inquiry&rft.au=Domingue,%20Jean%E2%80%90Laurent&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e12521&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12521-n/a&rft.issn=1320-7881&rft.eissn=1440-1800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nin.12521&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2709743538%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dee6c3fc773883156f835901384811fd3c6b98edf633ca16272f64e7e780d1953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2798485920&rft_id=info:pmid/36049045&rfr_iscdi=true