Loading…
Development and Interrater Reliability of the Lactation Assessment Care Tool
Background: There have been no comprehensive predictive measurement instruments published that account for the dynamic interaction between maternal, infant, and functional factors related to breastfeeding difficulty. The Lactation Care Assessment Tool (LACT) was developed by the authors as a predict...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of human lactation 2023-02, Vol.39 (1), p.30-39 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-bc931424b8913c8cf80f83107e17f2376fee679ff93964ae10cf6f4d672427d63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-bc931424b8913c8cf80f83107e17f2376fee679ff93964ae10cf6f4d672427d63 |
container_end_page | 39 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | Journal of human lactation |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Wessells, Allyson Chertok, Ilana R. A. Haile, Zelalem T. Johnston, Jarold |
description | Background:
There have been no comprehensive predictive measurement instruments published that account for the dynamic interaction between maternal, infant, and functional factors related to breastfeeding difficulty. The Lactation Care Assessment Tool (LACT) was developed by the authors as a predictive measure of lactation acuity to identify families at risk for breastfeeding difficulty and facilitate access to the most effective level of care.
Research Aim:
To describe the development, content validation, and interrater reliability of the LACT.
Methods:
This study was a cross-sectional, online survey. Upon reading a standardized case scenario reflective of common experiences among families with goals to breastfeed, participants (N = 82) anonymously completed the LACT, which consisted of 16 measures based upon research relevant to maternal, infant, and functional factors affecting breastfeeding success. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and describe the characteristics of the study sample. Interrater reliability was evaluated using Krippendorff’s alpha.
Results:
An acceptable degree of interrater reliability (α = 0.70) among participants was detected for the 16 measures included in the instrument.
Conclusion:
This instrument supports Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Step 10 to facilitate more precise and timely continuity of care after discharge from the hospital by identifying families in need of referral to a level of care consistent with their lactation acuity. Future research is necessary to determine appropriate levels of care and support based on the instrument scores in diverse breastfeeding dyads during early lactation and through the duration of breastfeeding. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/08903344221121102 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2710972420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_08903344221121102</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2710972420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-bc931424b8913c8cf80f83107e17f2376fee679ff93964ae10cf6f4d672427d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ADeSpZvUeWUmsyz1VSgIUtdhMrmjKUmmzkyE_nsTq24E4XLv4n7nwDkIXRI8J0TKG5wrzBjnlBIyDKZHaEqyjKaZZPQYTcd_OgITdBbCFmOisCSnaMIEFlmGsyla38IHNG7XQhcT3VXJqovgvR5W8gxNrcu6qeM-cTaJb5CstYk61q5LFiFACF-ypfaQbJxrztGJ1U2Ai-87Qy_3d5vlY7p-elgtF-vUMI5jWhrFCKe8zBVhJjc2xzZnBEsg0lImhQUQUlmrmBJcA8HGCssrISmnshJshq4Pvjvv3nsIsWjrYKBpdAeuDwWVBKsRxgNKDqjxLgQPttj5utV-XxBcjCUWf0ocNFff9n3ZQvWr-GltAOYHIOhXKLau990Q9x_HTzUYeDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2710972420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Interrater Reliability of the Lactation Assessment Care Tool</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Wessells, Allyson ; Chertok, Ilana R. A. ; Haile, Zelalem T. ; Johnston, Jarold</creator><creatorcontrib>Wessells, Allyson ; Chertok, Ilana R. A. ; Haile, Zelalem T. ; Johnston, Jarold</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
There have been no comprehensive predictive measurement instruments published that account for the dynamic interaction between maternal, infant, and functional factors related to breastfeeding difficulty. The Lactation Care Assessment Tool (LACT) was developed by the authors as a predictive measure of lactation acuity to identify families at risk for breastfeeding difficulty and facilitate access to the most effective level of care.
Research Aim:
To describe the development, content validation, and interrater reliability of the LACT.
Methods:
This study was a cross-sectional, online survey. Upon reading a standardized case scenario reflective of common experiences among families with goals to breastfeed, participants (N = 82) anonymously completed the LACT, which consisted of 16 measures based upon research relevant to maternal, infant, and functional factors affecting breastfeeding success. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and describe the characteristics of the study sample. Interrater reliability was evaluated using Krippendorff’s alpha.
Results:
An acceptable degree of interrater reliability (α = 0.70) among participants was detected for the 16 measures included in the instrument.
Conclusion:
This instrument supports Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Step 10 to facilitate more precise and timely continuity of care after discharge from the hospital by identifying families in need of referral to a level of care consistent with their lactation acuity. Future research is necessary to determine appropriate levels of care and support based on the instrument scores in diverse breastfeeding dyads during early lactation and through the duration of breastfeeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-3344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/08903344221121102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36065505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Breast Feeding ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant ; Lactation ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Journal of human lactation, 2023-02, Vol.39 (1), p.30-39</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-bc931424b8913c8cf80f83107e17f2376fee679ff93964ae10cf6f4d672427d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-bc931424b8913c8cf80f83107e17f2376fee679ff93964ae10cf6f4d672427d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2912-8564 ; 0000-0001-7767-2081 ; 0000-0001-9298-098X ; 0000-0003-3477-1965</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79236</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36065505$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wessells, Allyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chertok, Ilana R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haile, Zelalem T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Jarold</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Interrater Reliability of the Lactation Assessment Care Tool</title><title>Journal of human lactation</title><addtitle>J Hum Lact</addtitle><description>Background:
There have been no comprehensive predictive measurement instruments published that account for the dynamic interaction between maternal, infant, and functional factors related to breastfeeding difficulty. The Lactation Care Assessment Tool (LACT) was developed by the authors as a predictive measure of lactation acuity to identify families at risk for breastfeeding difficulty and facilitate access to the most effective level of care.
Research Aim:
To describe the development, content validation, and interrater reliability of the LACT.
Methods:
This study was a cross-sectional, online survey. Upon reading a standardized case scenario reflective of common experiences among families with goals to breastfeed, participants (N = 82) anonymously completed the LACT, which consisted of 16 measures based upon research relevant to maternal, infant, and functional factors affecting breastfeeding success. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and describe the characteristics of the study sample. Interrater reliability was evaluated using Krippendorff’s alpha.
Results:
An acceptable degree of interrater reliability (α = 0.70) among participants was detected for the 16 measures included in the instrument.
Conclusion:
This instrument supports Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Step 10 to facilitate more precise and timely continuity of care after discharge from the hospital by identifying families in need of referral to a level of care consistent with their lactation acuity. Future research is necessary to determine appropriate levels of care and support based on the instrument scores in diverse breastfeeding dyads during early lactation and through the duration of breastfeeding.</description><subject>Breast Feeding</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0890-3344</issn><issn>1552-5732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ADeSpZvUeWUmsyz1VSgIUtdhMrmjKUmmzkyE_nsTq24E4XLv4n7nwDkIXRI8J0TKG5wrzBjnlBIyDKZHaEqyjKaZZPQYTcd_OgITdBbCFmOisCSnaMIEFlmGsyla38IHNG7XQhcT3VXJqovgvR5W8gxNrcu6qeM-cTaJb5CstYk61q5LFiFACF-ypfaQbJxrztGJ1U2Ai-87Qy_3d5vlY7p-elgtF-vUMI5jWhrFCKe8zBVhJjc2xzZnBEsg0lImhQUQUlmrmBJcA8HGCssrISmnshJshq4Pvjvv3nsIsWjrYKBpdAeuDwWVBKsRxgNKDqjxLgQPttj5utV-XxBcjCUWf0ocNFff9n3ZQvWr-GltAOYHIOhXKLau990Q9x_HTzUYeDA</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Wessells, Allyson</creator><creator>Chertok, Ilana R. A.</creator><creator>Haile, Zelalem T.</creator><creator>Johnston, Jarold</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-8564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7767-2081</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-098X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3477-1965</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Development and Interrater Reliability of the Lactation Assessment Care Tool</title><author>Wessells, Allyson ; Chertok, Ilana R. A. ; Haile, Zelalem T. ; Johnston, Jarold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-bc931424b8913c8cf80f83107e17f2376fee679ff93964ae10cf6f4d672427d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Breast Feeding</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wessells, Allyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chertok, Ilana R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haile, Zelalem T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Jarold</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of human lactation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wessells, Allyson</au><au>Chertok, Ilana R. A.</au><au>Haile, Zelalem T.</au><au>Johnston, Jarold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Interrater Reliability of the Lactation Assessment Care Tool</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human lactation</jtitle><addtitle>J Hum Lact</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>30-39</pages><issn>0890-3344</issn><eissn>1552-5732</eissn><abstract>Background:
There have been no comprehensive predictive measurement instruments published that account for the dynamic interaction between maternal, infant, and functional factors related to breastfeeding difficulty. The Lactation Care Assessment Tool (LACT) was developed by the authors as a predictive measure of lactation acuity to identify families at risk for breastfeeding difficulty and facilitate access to the most effective level of care.
Research Aim:
To describe the development, content validation, and interrater reliability of the LACT.
Methods:
This study was a cross-sectional, online survey. Upon reading a standardized case scenario reflective of common experiences among families with goals to breastfeed, participants (N = 82) anonymously completed the LACT, which consisted of 16 measures based upon research relevant to maternal, infant, and functional factors affecting breastfeeding success. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and describe the characteristics of the study sample. Interrater reliability was evaluated using Krippendorff’s alpha.
Results:
An acceptable degree of interrater reliability (α = 0.70) among participants was detected for the 16 measures included in the instrument.
Conclusion:
This instrument supports Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Step 10 to facilitate more precise and timely continuity of care after discharge from the hospital by identifying families in need of referral to a level of care consistent with their lactation acuity. Future research is necessary to determine appropriate levels of care and support based on the instrument scores in diverse breastfeeding dyads during early lactation and through the duration of breastfeeding.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>36065505</pmid><doi>10.1177/08903344221121102</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-8564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7767-2081</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-098X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3477-1965</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-3344 |
ispartof | Journal of human lactation, 2023-02, Vol.39 (1), p.30-39 |
issn | 0890-3344 1552-5732 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2710972420 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Breast Feeding Cross-Sectional Studies Female Hospitals Humans Infant Lactation Reproducibility of Results |
title | Development and Interrater Reliability of the Lactation Assessment Care Tool |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A09%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Interrater%20Reliability%20of%20the%20Lactation%20Assessment%20Care%20Tool&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20lactation&rft.au=Wessells,%20Allyson&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=30-39&rft.issn=0890-3344&rft.eissn=1552-5732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/08903344221121102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2710972420%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-bc931424b8913c8cf80f83107e17f2376fee679ff93964ae10cf6f4d672427d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2710972420&rft_id=info:pmid/36065505&rft_sage_id=10.1177_08903344221121102&rfr_iscdi=true |