Osseointegration of 3D-printed titanium implants with surface and structure modifications

• Published in: Dental materials 2022-10, Vol.38 (10), p.1648-1660
• Main Authors: Lee, Ui-Lyong, Yun, Seokhwan, Lee, Ho, Cao, Hua-Lian, Woo, Su-Heon, Jeong, Yong-Hoon, Jung, Tae-Gon, Kim, Chul Min, Choung, Pill-Hoon
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biocompatibility; Bone implants; Cell adhesion; Cell differentiation; Cell proliferation; Computed tomography; Differentiation (biology); Gene expression; Image reconstruction; Maxillofacial; Mesenchyme; Microparticles; Osseointegration; Osteogenesis; Oxidation; Polymerase chain reaction; Scaffolds; Stem cells; Surface treatment; Surgical implants; Three dimensional analysis; Three dimensional printing; Titanium
• ISSN: 0109-5641; 1879-0097
• DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.08.003

Background The purpose of this study was to establish a mechanical and histological basis for the development of biocompatible maxillofacial reconstruction implants by combining 3D-printed porous titanium structures and surface treatment. Improved osseointegration of 3D-printed titanium implants for reconstruction of maxillofacial segmental bone defect could be advantageous in not only quick osseointegration into the bone tissue but also in stabilizing the reconstruction. Methods Various macro-mesh titanium scaffolds were fabricated by 3D-printing. Human mesenchymal stem cells were used for cell attachment and proliferation assays. Osteogenic differentiation was confirmed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. The osseointegration rate was measured using micro computed tomography imaging and histological analysis. Results In three dimensional-printed scaffold, globular microparticle shape was observed regardless of structure or surface modification. Cell attachment and proliferation rates increased according to the internal mesh structure and surface modification. However, osteogenic differentiation in vitro and osseointegration in vivo revealed that non-mesh structure/non-surface modified scaffolds showed the most appropriate treatment effect. Conclusion 3D-printed solid structure is the most suitable option for maxillofacial reconstruction. Various mesh structures reduced osteogenesis of the mesenchymal stem cells and osseointegration compared with that by the solid structure. Surface modification by microarc oxidation induced cell proliferation and increased the expression of some osteogenic genes partially; however, most of the markers revealed that the non-anodized solid scaffold was the most suitable for maxillofacial reconstruction.