Loading…

Customized three dimensional printed prosthesis as a novel intercalary reconstruction for resection of extremity bone tumours: a retrospective cohort study

Aims The 3D-printed prosthesis (3DP) is a novel treatment for massive bone defect reconstruction after tumor resection. This study was aiming to explore the clinical efficacy of customized 3DP for intercalary reconstruction by comparing the clinical outcomes after implanting customized 3DP or conven...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International orthopaedics 2022-12, Vol.46 (12), p.2971-2981
Main Authors: Zhang, Zhao, Shi, Yubo, Fu, Jun, Liu, Dong, Zhu, Dongze, Liu, Xincheng, Dang, Jingyi, Fan, Hongbin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims The 3D-printed prosthesis (3DP) is a novel treatment for massive bone defect reconstruction after tumor resection. This study was aiming to explore the clinical efficacy of customized 3DP for intercalary reconstruction by comparing the clinical outcomes after implanting customized 3DP or conventional allograft in limb salvage surgery. Methods A total of 28 patients with extremity bone tumors who underwent customized 3DP or conventional allograft reconstruction between 2011 and 2018 at our institution were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 14 cases received customized 3DP reconstruction (3DP group), and 14 cases received conventional allograft reconstruction (control group). Demographics, surgical outcomes, radiographical assessments, limb functions, and post-operative complications between these two groups were collected to evaluate clinical outcomes. Results No significant difference was observed in the demographics, mean intra-operative blood loss, MOSI scores, and MSTS scores between the two groups. Patients in 3DP group had a shorter operative time (157.9 vs 199.6 min, p  = 0.03) and lesser number of fluoroscopy (4.1 vs 8.1, p  
ISSN:0341-2695
1432-5195
DOI:10.1007/s00264-022-05559-y