Loading…

How We Look At Mature Faces-An Eye-Tracking Investigation Into the Perception of Age

It is still unclear which facial region contributes most to the perception of an aged face when evaluated by eye-tracking analyses. The authors sought to apply eye-tracking technology to identify whether mature faces require longer fixation durations than young faces and which facial region contribu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aesthetic surgery journal 2023-02, Vol.43 (2), p.115-122
Main Authors: Frank, Konstantin, Ehrl, Denis, Bernardini, Francesco, Walbrun, Alina, Moellhoff, Nicholas, Alfertshofer, Michael, Davidovic, Kristina, Mardini, Samir, Gotkin, Robert H, Cotofana, Sebastian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f7bc23b73881693126c209eb721bac5f12d5a2548787ff44e52612a94a2e2e743
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f7bc23b73881693126c209eb721bac5f12d5a2548787ff44e52612a94a2e2e743
container_end_page 122
container_issue 2
container_start_page 115
container_title Aesthetic surgery journal
container_volume 43
creator Frank, Konstantin
Ehrl, Denis
Bernardini, Francesco
Walbrun, Alina
Moellhoff, Nicholas
Alfertshofer, Michael
Davidovic, Kristina
Mardini, Samir
Gotkin, Robert H
Cotofana, Sebastian
description It is still unclear which facial region contributes most to the perception of an aged face when evaluated by eye-tracking analyses. The authors sought to apply eye-tracking technology to identify whether mature faces require longer fixation durations than young faces and which facial region contributes most to the perception of a mature face. Eye-tracking analyses were conducted in 74 volunteers (37 males, 37 females; 43 ≤ 40 years, 31 > 40 years) evaluating their gaze pattern and the fixation durations for the entire face and 9 facial subregions. Frontal facial images of 16 younger (40 years) gender-matched individuals were presented in a standardized setting. Independent of age or gender of the observer, a younger stimulus image was viewed shorter than an older stimulus image with 0.82 (0.63) seconds vs 1.06 (0.73) seconds with P < 0.001. There was no statistically significant difference in their duration of a stable eye fixation when observers inspected a male vs a female stimulus image [0.94 (0.70) seconds vs 0.94 (0.68) seconds; P = 0.657] independent of the observer's age or gender. The facial image that captured the most attention of the observer (rank 9) was the perioral region with 1.61 (0.73) seconds for younger observers and 1.57 (0.73) seconds for older observers. It was revealed that the perioral region attracts the most attention of observers and contributes most to an aged facial appearance. Practitioners should be mindful of the importance of the perioral region when designing an aesthetic treatment plan.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/asj/sjac251
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714389684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2714389684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f7bc23b73881693126c209eb721bac5f12d5a2548787ff44e52612a94a2e2e743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwkAQhjdGI4ievJs9mpjKfrW7e2wICAlGDxi5NdtliuWji7uthn9vEfQ0M2-evJk8CN1S8kiJ5n0TVv2wMpbF9Ax1acxkxDmZn7c70SRSjMw76CqEFSEtnohL1OEJ0VpI2kWzsfvG74Cnzq1xWuNnUzce8MhYCFFa4eEeopk3dl1WSzypviDU5dLUpavaq3a4_gD8Ct7C7jdzBU6XcI0uCrMJcHOaPfQ2Gs4G42j68jQZpNPIck7rqJC5ZTyXXCmaaE5ZYhnRkEtGc2PjgrJFbFgslFSyKISAmCWUGS0MAwZS8B66P_buvPts2teybRksbDamAteEjEkquNKJOqAPR9R6F4KHItv5cmv8PqMkO2jMWo3ZSWNL352Km3wLi3_2zxv_AbsZbR4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714389684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How We Look At Mature Faces-An Eye-Tracking Investigation Into the Perception of Age</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Frank, Konstantin ; Ehrl, Denis ; Bernardini, Francesco ; Walbrun, Alina ; Moellhoff, Nicholas ; Alfertshofer, Michael ; Davidovic, Kristina ; Mardini, Samir ; Gotkin, Robert H ; Cotofana, Sebastian</creator><creatorcontrib>Frank, Konstantin ; Ehrl, Denis ; Bernardini, Francesco ; Walbrun, Alina ; Moellhoff, Nicholas ; Alfertshofer, Michael ; Davidovic, Kristina ; Mardini, Samir ; Gotkin, Robert H ; Cotofana, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><description>It is still unclear which facial region contributes most to the perception of an aged face when evaluated by eye-tracking analyses. The authors sought to apply eye-tracking technology to identify whether mature faces require longer fixation durations than young faces and which facial region contributes most to the perception of a mature face. Eye-tracking analyses were conducted in 74 volunteers (37 males, 37 females; 43 ≤ 40 years, 31 &gt; 40 years) evaluating their gaze pattern and the fixation durations for the entire face and 9 facial subregions. Frontal facial images of 16 younger (&lt;40 years) and older (&gt;40 years) gender-matched individuals were presented in a standardized setting. Independent of age or gender of the observer, a younger stimulus image was viewed shorter than an older stimulus image with 0.82 (0.63) seconds vs 1.06 (0.73) seconds with P &lt; 0.001. There was no statistically significant difference in their duration of a stable eye fixation when observers inspected a male vs a female stimulus image [0.94 (0.70) seconds vs 0.94 (0.68) seconds; P = 0.657] independent of the observer's age or gender. The facial image that captured the most attention of the observer (rank 9) was the perioral region with 1.61 (0.73) seconds for younger observers and 1.57 (0.73) seconds for older observers. It was revealed that the perioral region attracts the most attention of observers and contributes most to an aged facial appearance. Practitioners should be mindful of the importance of the perioral region when designing an aesthetic treatment plan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-820X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-330X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjac251</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36099471</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Attention ; Eye Movements ; Eye-Tracking Technology ; Face ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Perception</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic surgery journal, 2023-02, Vol.43 (2), p.115-122</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f7bc23b73881693126c209eb721bac5f12d5a2548787ff44e52612a94a2e2e743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f7bc23b73881693126c209eb721bac5f12d5a2548787ff44e52612a94a2e2e743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4892-2376 ; 0000-0001-6994-8877</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36099471$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frank, Konstantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrl, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardini, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walbrun, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moellhoff, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfertshofer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidovic, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mardini, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotkin, Robert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotofana, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><title>How We Look At Mature Faces-An Eye-Tracking Investigation Into the Perception of Age</title><title>Aesthetic surgery journal</title><addtitle>Aesthet Surg J</addtitle><description>It is still unclear which facial region contributes most to the perception of an aged face when evaluated by eye-tracking analyses. The authors sought to apply eye-tracking technology to identify whether mature faces require longer fixation durations than young faces and which facial region contributes most to the perception of a mature face. Eye-tracking analyses were conducted in 74 volunteers (37 males, 37 females; 43 ≤ 40 years, 31 &gt; 40 years) evaluating their gaze pattern and the fixation durations for the entire face and 9 facial subregions. Frontal facial images of 16 younger (&lt;40 years) and older (&gt;40 years) gender-matched individuals were presented in a standardized setting. Independent of age or gender of the observer, a younger stimulus image was viewed shorter than an older stimulus image with 0.82 (0.63) seconds vs 1.06 (0.73) seconds with P &lt; 0.001. There was no statistically significant difference in their duration of a stable eye fixation when observers inspected a male vs a female stimulus image [0.94 (0.70) seconds vs 0.94 (0.68) seconds; P = 0.657] independent of the observer's age or gender. The facial image that captured the most attention of the observer (rank 9) was the perioral region with 1.61 (0.73) seconds for younger observers and 1.57 (0.73) seconds for older observers. It was revealed that the perioral region attracts the most attention of observers and contributes most to an aged facial appearance. Practitioners should be mindful of the importance of the perioral region when designing an aesthetic treatment plan.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye-Tracking Technology</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Perception</subject><issn>1090-820X</issn><issn>1527-330X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1PwkAQhjdGI4ievJs9mpjKfrW7e2wICAlGDxi5NdtliuWji7uthn9vEfQ0M2-evJk8CN1S8kiJ5n0TVv2wMpbF9Ax1acxkxDmZn7c70SRSjMw76CqEFSEtnohL1OEJ0VpI2kWzsfvG74Cnzq1xWuNnUzce8MhYCFFa4eEeopk3dl1WSzypviDU5dLUpavaq3a4_gD8Ct7C7jdzBU6XcI0uCrMJcHOaPfQ2Gs4G42j68jQZpNPIck7rqJC5ZTyXXCmaaE5ZYhnRkEtGc2PjgrJFbFgslFSyKISAmCWUGS0MAwZS8B66P_buvPts2teybRksbDamAteEjEkquNKJOqAPR9R6F4KHItv5cmv8PqMkO2jMWo3ZSWNL352Km3wLi3_2zxv_AbsZbR4</recordid><startdate>20230203</startdate><enddate>20230203</enddate><creator>Frank, Konstantin</creator><creator>Ehrl, Denis</creator><creator>Bernardini, Francesco</creator><creator>Walbrun, Alina</creator><creator>Moellhoff, Nicholas</creator><creator>Alfertshofer, Michael</creator><creator>Davidovic, Kristina</creator><creator>Mardini, Samir</creator><creator>Gotkin, Robert H</creator><creator>Cotofana, Sebastian</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4892-2376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6994-8877</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230203</creationdate><title>How We Look At Mature Faces-An Eye-Tracking Investigation Into the Perception of Age</title><author>Frank, Konstantin ; Ehrl, Denis ; Bernardini, Francesco ; Walbrun, Alina ; Moellhoff, Nicholas ; Alfertshofer, Michael ; Davidovic, Kristina ; Mardini, Samir ; Gotkin, Robert H ; Cotofana, Sebastian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f7bc23b73881693126c209eb721bac5f12d5a2548787ff44e52612a94a2e2e743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye-Tracking Technology</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frank, Konstantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrl, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardini, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walbrun, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moellhoff, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfertshofer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidovic, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mardini, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotkin, Robert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotofana, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic surgery journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frank, Konstantin</au><au>Ehrl, Denis</au><au>Bernardini, Francesco</au><au>Walbrun, Alina</au><au>Moellhoff, Nicholas</au><au>Alfertshofer, Michael</au><au>Davidovic, Kristina</au><au>Mardini, Samir</au><au>Gotkin, Robert H</au><au>Cotofana, Sebastian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How We Look At Mature Faces-An Eye-Tracking Investigation Into the Perception of Age</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic surgery journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aesthet Surg J</addtitle><date>2023-02-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>115-122</pages><issn>1090-820X</issn><eissn>1527-330X</eissn><abstract>It is still unclear which facial region contributes most to the perception of an aged face when evaluated by eye-tracking analyses. The authors sought to apply eye-tracking technology to identify whether mature faces require longer fixation durations than young faces and which facial region contributes most to the perception of a mature face. Eye-tracking analyses were conducted in 74 volunteers (37 males, 37 females; 43 ≤ 40 years, 31 &gt; 40 years) evaluating their gaze pattern and the fixation durations for the entire face and 9 facial subregions. Frontal facial images of 16 younger (&lt;40 years) and older (&gt;40 years) gender-matched individuals were presented in a standardized setting. Independent of age or gender of the observer, a younger stimulus image was viewed shorter than an older stimulus image with 0.82 (0.63) seconds vs 1.06 (0.73) seconds with P &lt; 0.001. There was no statistically significant difference in their duration of a stable eye fixation when observers inspected a male vs a female stimulus image [0.94 (0.70) seconds vs 0.94 (0.68) seconds; P = 0.657] independent of the observer's age or gender. The facial image that captured the most attention of the observer (rank 9) was the perioral region with 1.61 (0.73) seconds for younger observers and 1.57 (0.73) seconds for older observers. It was revealed that the perioral region attracts the most attention of observers and contributes most to an aged facial appearance. Practitioners should be mindful of the importance of the perioral region when designing an aesthetic treatment plan.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>36099471</pmid><doi>10.1093/asj/sjac251</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4892-2376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6994-8877</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-820X
ispartof Aesthetic surgery journal, 2023-02, Vol.43 (2), p.115-122
issn 1090-820X
1527-330X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714389684
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Aged
Attention
Eye Movements
Eye-Tracking Technology
Face
Female
Humans
Male
Perception
title How We Look At Mature Faces-An Eye-Tracking Investigation Into the Perception of Age
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A53%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20We%20Look%20At%20Mature%20Faces-An%20Eye-Tracking%20Investigation%20Into%20the%20Perception%20of%20Age&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20surgery%20journal&rft.au=Frank,%20Konstantin&rft.date=2023-02-03&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=115-122&rft.issn=1090-820X&rft.eissn=1527-330X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/asj/sjac251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714389684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f7bc23b73881693126c209eb721bac5f12d5a2548787ff44e52612a94a2e2e743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714389684&rft_id=info:pmid/36099471&rfr_iscdi=true