Loading…

Assessment of a Simplified Cell-Free DNA Method for Prenatal Down Syndrome Screening

Prenatal screening for common trisomies via cell-free (cfDNA) is usually implemented by technologies utilizing massively parallel sequencing, stringent environmental controls, complex bioinformatics, and molecular expertise. An alternative and less complex methodology utilizes rolling circle amplifi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2022-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1449-1458
Main Authors: Palomaki, Glenn E, Eklund, Elizabeth E, Kloza, Edward M, Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e6187bd2edfe5739bebb4fa78a94a8ff603f786f26b2b944a7d4f399f2f223713
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e6187bd2edfe5739bebb4fa78a94a8ff603f786f26b2b944a7d4f399f2f223713
container_end_page 1458
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1449
container_title Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)
container_volume 68
creator Palomaki, Glenn E
Eklund, Elizabeth E
Kloza, Edward M
Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M
description Prenatal screening for common trisomies via cell-free (cfDNA) is usually implemented by technologies utilizing massively parallel sequencing, stringent environmental controls, complex bioinformatics, and molecular expertise. An alternative and less complex methodology utilizes rolling circle amplification (RCA). Further evaluation of its performance and related requirements are warranted. At 16 sites, women at 10 to 20 weeks gestation provided informed consent, relevant information, and 2 to 3 blood samples. Samples shipped for testing were processed and stored. Women were enrolled at primary cfDNA screening, or following such screening at referral for diagnostic testing. RCA testing occurred post-enrollment, over 11 months. Diagnostic results and delivery notes determined clinical truth. Detection rates were based on confirmed trisomic pregnancies; false-positive rates were based on unaffected pregnancies from the general population. Detection rate for the common trisomies was 95.9% (117/122, 95% CI, 90.5%-98.5%); overall false-positive rate was 1.00% (22/2,205, 0.65%-1.51%). Test failure rate after repeat testing was 0.04%. When assay standard deviations were below pre-specified levels, the overall false-positive rate was much lower at 0.30% (P < 0.001). Fetal sex calls were correct for 99.7%. One technician analyzed 560 samples over 2 weeks, a rate of 14 000/year. Our assessment of this simplified cfDNA-based system for prenatal screening for common trisomies performed in a prenatal screening laboratory is encouraging. Improved detection, low failure rates and rapid reporting can be achieved by collecting 2 samples. Future priorities should include achieving higher run precision using a single collection tube. NCT03087357.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/clinchem/hvac131
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714391160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2714391160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e6187bd2edfe5739bebb4fa78a94a8ff603f786f26b2b944a7d4f399f2f223713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqWwMyGPLKF-JY7HqqWAVB5Syxw5yTU1Suxip6D-e4LaMl1d6ZxPRx9C15TcUaL4uGqsq9bQjtffuqKcnqAhTTlJ8jSjp2hICFGJokIO0EWMn_0rZJ6dowHPKOEsVUO0msQIMbbgOuwN1nhp201jjYUaT6FpknkAwLOXCX6Gbu1rbHzAbwGc7nSDZ_7H4eXO1cG3gJdVn3XWfVyiM6ObCFeHO0Lv8_vV9DFZvD48TSeLpOKCdglkNJdlzaA2kEquSihLYbTMtRI6NyYj3PR7DctKViohtKyF4UoZZhjjkvIRut1zN8F_bSF2RWtj1a_WDvw2FkxSwRWlPWiEyD5aBR9jAFNsgm112BWUFH8ui6PL4uCyr9wc6Nuyhfq_cJTHfwEo4HKd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714391160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of a Simplified Cell-Free DNA Method for Prenatal Down Syndrome Screening</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Palomaki, Glenn E ; Eklund, Elizabeth E ; Kloza, Edward M ; Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M</creator><creatorcontrib>Palomaki, Glenn E ; Eklund, Elizabeth E ; Kloza, Edward M ; Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M</creatorcontrib><description>Prenatal screening for common trisomies via cell-free (cfDNA) is usually implemented by technologies utilizing massively parallel sequencing, stringent environmental controls, complex bioinformatics, and molecular expertise. An alternative and less complex methodology utilizes rolling circle amplification (RCA). Further evaluation of its performance and related requirements are warranted. At 16 sites, women at 10 to 20 weeks gestation provided informed consent, relevant information, and 2 to 3 blood samples. Samples shipped for testing were processed and stored. Women were enrolled at primary cfDNA screening, or following such screening at referral for diagnostic testing. RCA testing occurred post-enrollment, over 11 months. Diagnostic results and delivery notes determined clinical truth. Detection rates were based on confirmed trisomic pregnancies; false-positive rates were based on unaffected pregnancies from the general population. Detection rate for the common trisomies was 95.9% (117/122, 95% CI, 90.5%-98.5%); overall false-positive rate was 1.00% (22/2,205, 0.65%-1.51%). Test failure rate after repeat testing was 0.04%. When assay standard deviations were below pre-specified levels, the overall false-positive rate was much lower at 0.30% (P &lt; 0.001). Fetal sex calls were correct for 99.7%. One technician analyzed 560 samples over 2 weeks, a rate of 14 000/year. Our assessment of this simplified cfDNA-based system for prenatal screening for common trisomies performed in a prenatal screening laboratory is encouraging. Improved detection, low failure rates and rapid reporting can be achieved by collecting 2 samples. Future priorities should include achieving higher run precision using a single collection tube. NCT03087357.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac131</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36103259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids ; Down Syndrome - diagnosis ; Down Syndrome - genetics ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; Trisomy ; Trisomy 13 Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2022-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1449-1458</ispartof><rights>American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e6187bd2edfe5739bebb4fa78a94a8ff603f786f26b2b944a7d4f399f2f223713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e6187bd2edfe5739bebb4fa78a94a8ff603f786f26b2b944a7d4f399f2f223713</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6154-8449</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36103259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palomaki, Glenn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Elizabeth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloza, Edward M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of a Simplified Cell-Free DNA Method for Prenatal Down Syndrome Screening</title><title>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><description>Prenatal screening for common trisomies via cell-free (cfDNA) is usually implemented by technologies utilizing massively parallel sequencing, stringent environmental controls, complex bioinformatics, and molecular expertise. An alternative and less complex methodology utilizes rolling circle amplification (RCA). Further evaluation of its performance and related requirements are warranted. At 16 sites, women at 10 to 20 weeks gestation provided informed consent, relevant information, and 2 to 3 blood samples. Samples shipped for testing were processed and stored. Women were enrolled at primary cfDNA screening, or following such screening at referral for diagnostic testing. RCA testing occurred post-enrollment, over 11 months. Diagnostic results and delivery notes determined clinical truth. Detection rates were based on confirmed trisomic pregnancies; false-positive rates were based on unaffected pregnancies from the general population. Detection rate for the common trisomies was 95.9% (117/122, 95% CI, 90.5%-98.5%); overall false-positive rate was 1.00% (22/2,205, 0.65%-1.51%). Test failure rate after repeat testing was 0.04%. When assay standard deviations were below pre-specified levels, the overall false-positive rate was much lower at 0.30% (P &lt; 0.001). Fetal sex calls were correct for 99.7%. One technician analyzed 560 samples over 2 weeks, a rate of 14 000/year. Our assessment of this simplified cfDNA-based system for prenatal screening for common trisomies performed in a prenatal screening laboratory is encouraging. Improved detection, low failure rates and rapid reporting can be achieved by collecting 2 samples. Future priorities should include achieving higher run precision using a single collection tube. NCT03087357.</description><subject>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Trisomy</subject><subject>Trisomy 13 Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><issn>0009-9147</issn><issn>1530-8561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqWwMyGPLKF-JY7HqqWAVB5Syxw5yTU1Suxip6D-e4LaMl1d6ZxPRx9C15TcUaL4uGqsq9bQjtffuqKcnqAhTTlJ8jSjp2hICFGJokIO0EWMn_0rZJ6dowHPKOEsVUO0msQIMbbgOuwN1nhp201jjYUaT6FpknkAwLOXCX6Gbu1rbHzAbwGc7nSDZ_7H4eXO1cG3gJdVn3XWfVyiM6ObCFeHO0Lv8_vV9DFZvD48TSeLpOKCdglkNJdlzaA2kEquSihLYbTMtRI6NyYj3PR7DctKViohtKyF4UoZZhjjkvIRut1zN8F_bSF2RWtj1a_WDvw2FkxSwRWlPWiEyD5aBR9jAFNsgm112BWUFH8ui6PL4uCyr9wc6Nuyhfq_cJTHfwEo4HKd</recordid><startdate>20221103</startdate><enddate>20221103</enddate><creator>Palomaki, Glenn E</creator><creator>Eklund, Elizabeth E</creator><creator>Kloza, Edward M</creator><creator>Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-8449</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221103</creationdate><title>Assessment of a Simplified Cell-Free DNA Method for Prenatal Down Syndrome Screening</title><author>Palomaki, Glenn E ; Eklund, Elizabeth E ; Kloza, Edward M ; Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e6187bd2edfe5739bebb4fa78a94a8ff603f786f26b2b944a7d4f399f2f223713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Trisomy</topic><topic>Trisomy 13 Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palomaki, Glenn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Elizabeth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloza, Edward M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palomaki, Glenn E</au><au>Eklund, Elizabeth E</au><au>Kloza, Edward M</au><au>Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of a Simplified Cell-Free DNA Method for Prenatal Down Syndrome Screening</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><date>2022-11-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1449</spage><epage>1458</epage><pages>1449-1458</pages><issn>0009-9147</issn><eissn>1530-8561</eissn><abstract>Prenatal screening for common trisomies via cell-free (cfDNA) is usually implemented by technologies utilizing massively parallel sequencing, stringent environmental controls, complex bioinformatics, and molecular expertise. An alternative and less complex methodology utilizes rolling circle amplification (RCA). Further evaluation of its performance and related requirements are warranted. At 16 sites, women at 10 to 20 weeks gestation provided informed consent, relevant information, and 2 to 3 blood samples. Samples shipped for testing were processed and stored. Women were enrolled at primary cfDNA screening, or following such screening at referral for diagnostic testing. RCA testing occurred post-enrollment, over 11 months. Diagnostic results and delivery notes determined clinical truth. Detection rates were based on confirmed trisomic pregnancies; false-positive rates were based on unaffected pregnancies from the general population. Detection rate for the common trisomies was 95.9% (117/122, 95% CI, 90.5%-98.5%); overall false-positive rate was 1.00% (22/2,205, 0.65%-1.51%). Test failure rate after repeat testing was 0.04%. When assay standard deviations were below pre-specified levels, the overall false-positive rate was much lower at 0.30% (P &lt; 0.001). Fetal sex calls were correct for 99.7%. One technician analyzed 560 samples over 2 weeks, a rate of 14 000/year. Our assessment of this simplified cfDNA-based system for prenatal screening for common trisomies performed in a prenatal screening laboratory is encouraging. Improved detection, low failure rates and rapid reporting can be achieved by collecting 2 samples. Future priorities should include achieving higher run precision using a single collection tube. NCT03087357.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>36103259</pmid><doi>10.1093/clinchem/hvac131</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-8449</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9147
ispartof Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2022-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1449-1458
issn 0009-9147
1530-8561
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714391160
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
Down Syndrome - diagnosis
Down Syndrome - genetics
Female
Humans
Pregnancy
Prenatal Diagnosis - methods
Trisomy
Trisomy 13 Syndrome - diagnosis
title Assessment of a Simplified Cell-Free DNA Method for Prenatal Down Syndrome Screening
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T00%3A02%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20a%20Simplified%20Cell-Free%20DNA%20Method%20for%20Prenatal%20Down%20Syndrome%20Screening&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Palomaki,%20Glenn%20E&rft.date=2022-11-03&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1449&rft.epage=1458&rft.pages=1449-1458&rft.issn=0009-9147&rft.eissn=1530-8561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/clinchem/hvac131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714391160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e6187bd2edfe5739bebb4fa78a94a8ff603f786f26b2b944a7d4f399f2f223713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714391160&rft_id=info:pmid/36103259&rfr_iscdi=true