Loading…

Using high resolution manometry impedance to diagnose upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngeal motor disorders

Background Oro‐pharyngeal pathophysiology, including upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and pharyngeal disorders, can be assessed by pharyngeal high‐resolution manometry impedance (P‐HRM‐I). We aimed to establish methodology to diagnose disorders utilizing P‐HRM‐I, hypothesizing that the objective mea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurogastroenterology and motility 2023-01, Vol.35 (1), p.e14461-n/a
Main Authors: Omari, Taher, Cock, Charles, Wu, Peter, Szczesniak, Michal Marcin, Schar, Mistyka, Tack, Jan, Rommel, Nathalie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2831-b99161048bd4ad05d3a45e3183c06253edeff60c62e2914b3522af38cc2a7efd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2831-b99161048bd4ad05d3a45e3183c06253edeff60c62e2914b3522af38cc2a7efd3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e14461
container_title Neurogastroenterology and motility
container_volume 35
creator Omari, Taher
Cock, Charles
Wu, Peter
Szczesniak, Michal Marcin
Schar, Mistyka
Tack, Jan
Rommel, Nathalie
description Background Oro‐pharyngeal pathophysiology, including upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and pharyngeal disorders, can be assessed by pharyngeal high‐resolution manometry impedance (P‐HRM‐I). We aimed to establish methodology to diagnose disorders utilizing P‐HRM‐I, hypothesizing that the objective measures could be used to diagnose disordered deglutition evidenced by greater aspiration scores. Methods Patients (n = 509, 18–91 years) were compared to controls (n = 120, 20–94 years). Variables measuring UES relaxation, UES opening extent, intrabolus pressure, and pharyngeal contractile strength were derived for 10 ml liquid swallows. Three associated pharyngeal pressurization patterns, which may be indicative of obstructed flow, were characterized: pan‐pressurization (Type 1), distal compartmentalized pressurization (Type 2), and transient pressurization (Type 3). Deglutitive aspiration was determined from video fluoroscopy. Results UES relaxation pressure was best able to differentiate patients from controls (T 6.528, p 8 mmHg) more frequently exhibited pharyngeal pressurization patterns and had adjunct evidence of reduced luminal distensibility (high intrabolus pressure and/or reduced UES opening). Utilizing this information, a diagnostic scheme was devised identifying 138 patients with UES disorder. A further 96 patients without evidence of UES disorder had abnormally weak pharyngeal pressures, confirming propulsive disorder. Amongst a sub‐sample of 320 patients undergoing video fluoroscopy, those with pharyngeal pressurizations and adjunct evidence of reduced UES relaxation and/or distensibility had higher aspiration scores (Chi‐square 60.169, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nmo.14461
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715790446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2715790446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2831-b99161048bd4ad05d3a45e3183c06253edeff60c62e2914b3522af38cc2a7efd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUlPwzAQhS0EYj_wB5AlLnBI8d7kiCo2ieUC58i1J61RYgc7Eeq_x7TAAYm5ePT8-ckzD6ETSiY016XvwoQKoegW2qdcyYJVJdv-6iUpaMXkHjpI6Y0QophQu2iPK8qoKuU-Cq_J-QVeusUSR0ihHQcXPO60Dx0McYVd14PV3gAeArZOL3xIgMe-h4gz3y_1AnSLU7903gxZ1N7irMaVX190YQgxP0whWojpCO00uk1w_H0eoteb65fZXfHwfHs_u3ooDCs5LeZVRRUlopxboS2RlmshgdOSmzyD5GChaRQxigGrqJhzyZhueGkM01NoLD9E5xvfPob3EdJQdy4ZaFvtIYypZlMqpxXJS8vo2R_0LYzR599lSpZCCaqqTF1sKBNDShGauo-uy2PWlNRfKdQ5hXqdQmZPvx3HeQf2l_xZewYuN8CHa2H1v1P99Pi8sfwEbfSSsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758464169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using high resolution manometry impedance to diagnose upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngeal motor disorders</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Omari, Taher ; Cock, Charles ; Wu, Peter ; Szczesniak, Michal Marcin ; Schar, Mistyka ; Tack, Jan ; Rommel, Nathalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Omari, Taher ; Cock, Charles ; Wu, Peter ; Szczesniak, Michal Marcin ; Schar, Mistyka ; Tack, Jan ; Rommel, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><description>Background Oro‐pharyngeal pathophysiology, including upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and pharyngeal disorders, can be assessed by pharyngeal high‐resolution manometry impedance (P‐HRM‐I). We aimed to establish methodology to diagnose disorders utilizing P‐HRM‐I, hypothesizing that the objective measures could be used to diagnose disordered deglutition evidenced by greater aspiration scores. Methods Patients (n = 509, 18–91 years) were compared to controls (n = 120, 20–94 years). Variables measuring UES relaxation, UES opening extent, intrabolus pressure, and pharyngeal contractile strength were derived for 10 ml liquid swallows. Three associated pharyngeal pressurization patterns, which may be indicative of obstructed flow, were characterized: pan‐pressurization (Type 1), distal compartmentalized pressurization (Type 2), and transient pressurization (Type 3). Deglutitive aspiration was determined from video fluoroscopy. Results UES relaxation pressure was best able to differentiate patients from controls (T 6.528, p &lt; 0.0001). Patients with abnormal relaxation pressure (&gt;8 mmHg) more frequently exhibited pharyngeal pressurization patterns and had adjunct evidence of reduced luminal distensibility (high intrabolus pressure and/or reduced UES opening). Utilizing this information, a diagnostic scheme was devised identifying 138 patients with UES disorder. A further 96 patients without evidence of UES disorder had abnormally weak pharyngeal pressures, confirming propulsive disorder. Amongst a sub‐sample of 320 patients undergoing video fluoroscopy, those with pharyngeal pressurizations and adjunct evidence of reduced UES relaxation and/or distensibility had higher aspiration scores (Chi‐square 60.169, p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusion P‐HRM‐I can provide evidence for UES disorder based on pharyngeal pressurization patterns and abnormal findings for UES relaxation pressure, UES opening, and intrabolus pressure. Measuring pharyngeal contractility requires further optimization. By using a combination of pharyngeal pressurization patterns (depicted) and adjunct objective measures of UES relaxation pressure and luminal distensibility, swallowing assessments by Pharyngeal High‐Resolution Manometry Impedance (P‐HRM‐I) may provide a diagnosis of an Upper Esophageal Sphincter Disorder in patients with oro‐pharyngeal dysphagia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-1925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2982</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14461</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36121685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Contractility ; Deglutition - physiology ; Deglutition Disorders ; diagnosis ; dysphagia ; Electric Impedance ; Esophageal sphincter ; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper - physiology ; Esophagus ; Fluoroscopy ; high‐resolution manometry ; Humans ; impedance ; Information processing ; Manometry - methods ; Motor Disorders ; Movement disorders ; Pharynx ; Pressure ; Sphincter ; swallowing ; upper esophageal sphincter</subject><ispartof>Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2023-01, Vol.35 (1), p.e14461-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2831-b99161048bd4ad05d3a45e3183c06253edeff60c62e2914b3522af38cc2a7efd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2831-b99161048bd4ad05d3a45e3183c06253edeff60c62e2914b3522af38cc2a7efd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5108-7378 ; 0000-0002-7440-592X ; 0000-0001-5675-7334 ; 0000-0003-3578-1137 ; 0000-0002-9812-8373 ; 0000-0001-8137-9179 ; 0000-0002-3206-6704</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121685$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omari, Taher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cock, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczesniak, Michal Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schar, Mistyka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tack, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rommel, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><title>Using high resolution manometry impedance to diagnose upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngeal motor disorders</title><title>Neurogastroenterology and motility</title><addtitle>Neurogastroenterol Motil</addtitle><description>Background Oro‐pharyngeal pathophysiology, including upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and pharyngeal disorders, can be assessed by pharyngeal high‐resolution manometry impedance (P‐HRM‐I). We aimed to establish methodology to diagnose disorders utilizing P‐HRM‐I, hypothesizing that the objective measures could be used to diagnose disordered deglutition evidenced by greater aspiration scores. Methods Patients (n = 509, 18–91 years) were compared to controls (n = 120, 20–94 years). Variables measuring UES relaxation, UES opening extent, intrabolus pressure, and pharyngeal contractile strength were derived for 10 ml liquid swallows. Three associated pharyngeal pressurization patterns, which may be indicative of obstructed flow, were characterized: pan‐pressurization (Type 1), distal compartmentalized pressurization (Type 2), and transient pressurization (Type 3). Deglutitive aspiration was determined from video fluoroscopy. Results UES relaxation pressure was best able to differentiate patients from controls (T 6.528, p &lt; 0.0001). Patients with abnormal relaxation pressure (&gt;8 mmHg) more frequently exhibited pharyngeal pressurization patterns and had adjunct evidence of reduced luminal distensibility (high intrabolus pressure and/or reduced UES opening). Utilizing this information, a diagnostic scheme was devised identifying 138 patients with UES disorder. A further 96 patients without evidence of UES disorder had abnormally weak pharyngeal pressures, confirming propulsive disorder. Amongst a sub‐sample of 320 patients undergoing video fluoroscopy, those with pharyngeal pressurizations and adjunct evidence of reduced UES relaxation and/or distensibility had higher aspiration scores (Chi‐square 60.169, p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusion P‐HRM‐I can provide evidence for UES disorder based on pharyngeal pressurization patterns and abnormal findings for UES relaxation pressure, UES opening, and intrabolus pressure. Measuring pharyngeal contractility requires further optimization. By using a combination of pharyngeal pressurization patterns (depicted) and adjunct objective measures of UES relaxation pressure and luminal distensibility, swallowing assessments by Pharyngeal High‐Resolution Manometry Impedance (P‐HRM‐I) may provide a diagnosis of an Upper Esophageal Sphincter Disorder in patients with oro‐pharyngeal dysphagia.</description><subject>Contractility</subject><subject>Deglutition - physiology</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>dysphagia</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Esophageal sphincter</subject><subject>Esophageal Sphincter, Upper - physiology</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>high‐resolution manometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>impedance</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Manometry - methods</subject><subject>Motor Disorders</subject><subject>Movement disorders</subject><subject>Pharynx</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Sphincter</subject><subject>swallowing</subject><subject>upper esophageal sphincter</subject><issn>1350-1925</issn><issn>1365-2982</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUlPwzAQhS0EYj_wB5AlLnBI8d7kiCo2ieUC58i1J61RYgc7Eeq_x7TAAYm5ePT8-ckzD6ETSiY016XvwoQKoegW2qdcyYJVJdv-6iUpaMXkHjpI6Y0QophQu2iPK8qoKuU-Cq_J-QVeusUSR0ihHQcXPO60Dx0McYVd14PV3gAeArZOL3xIgMe-h4gz3y_1AnSLU7903gxZ1N7irMaVX190YQgxP0whWojpCO00uk1w_H0eoteb65fZXfHwfHs_u3ooDCs5LeZVRRUlopxboS2RlmshgdOSmzyD5GChaRQxigGrqJhzyZhueGkM01NoLD9E5xvfPob3EdJQdy4ZaFvtIYypZlMqpxXJS8vo2R_0LYzR599lSpZCCaqqTF1sKBNDShGauo-uy2PWlNRfKdQ5hXqdQmZPvx3HeQf2l_xZewYuN8CHa2H1v1P99Pi8sfwEbfSSsw</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Omari, Taher</creator><creator>Cock, Charles</creator><creator>Wu, Peter</creator><creator>Szczesniak, Michal Marcin</creator><creator>Schar, Mistyka</creator><creator>Tack, Jan</creator><creator>Rommel, Nathalie</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-7378</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-592X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5675-7334</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-1137</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-8373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-9179</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-6704</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Using high resolution manometry impedance to diagnose upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngeal motor disorders</title><author>Omari, Taher ; Cock, Charles ; Wu, Peter ; Szczesniak, Michal Marcin ; Schar, Mistyka ; Tack, Jan ; Rommel, Nathalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2831-b99161048bd4ad05d3a45e3183c06253edeff60c62e2914b3522af38cc2a7efd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Contractility</topic><topic>Deglutition - physiology</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>dysphagia</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Esophageal sphincter</topic><topic>Esophageal Sphincter, Upper - physiology</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>high‐resolution manometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>impedance</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Manometry - methods</topic><topic>Motor Disorders</topic><topic>Movement disorders</topic><topic>Pharynx</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Sphincter</topic><topic>swallowing</topic><topic>upper esophageal sphincter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omari, Taher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cock, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczesniak, Michal Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schar, Mistyka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tack, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rommel, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurogastroenterology and motility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omari, Taher</au><au>Cock, Charles</au><au>Wu, Peter</au><au>Szczesniak, Michal Marcin</au><au>Schar, Mistyka</au><au>Tack, Jan</au><au>Rommel, Nathalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using high resolution manometry impedance to diagnose upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngeal motor disorders</atitle><jtitle>Neurogastroenterology and motility</jtitle><addtitle>Neurogastroenterol Motil</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e14461</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14461-n/a</pages><issn>1350-1925</issn><eissn>1365-2982</eissn><abstract>Background Oro‐pharyngeal pathophysiology, including upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and pharyngeal disorders, can be assessed by pharyngeal high‐resolution manometry impedance (P‐HRM‐I). We aimed to establish methodology to diagnose disorders utilizing P‐HRM‐I, hypothesizing that the objective measures could be used to diagnose disordered deglutition evidenced by greater aspiration scores. Methods Patients (n = 509, 18–91 years) were compared to controls (n = 120, 20–94 years). Variables measuring UES relaxation, UES opening extent, intrabolus pressure, and pharyngeal contractile strength were derived for 10 ml liquid swallows. Three associated pharyngeal pressurization patterns, which may be indicative of obstructed flow, were characterized: pan‐pressurization (Type 1), distal compartmentalized pressurization (Type 2), and transient pressurization (Type 3). Deglutitive aspiration was determined from video fluoroscopy. Results UES relaxation pressure was best able to differentiate patients from controls (T 6.528, p &lt; 0.0001). Patients with abnormal relaxation pressure (&gt;8 mmHg) more frequently exhibited pharyngeal pressurization patterns and had adjunct evidence of reduced luminal distensibility (high intrabolus pressure and/or reduced UES opening). Utilizing this information, a diagnostic scheme was devised identifying 138 patients with UES disorder. A further 96 patients without evidence of UES disorder had abnormally weak pharyngeal pressures, confirming propulsive disorder. Amongst a sub‐sample of 320 patients undergoing video fluoroscopy, those with pharyngeal pressurizations and adjunct evidence of reduced UES relaxation and/or distensibility had higher aspiration scores (Chi‐square 60.169, p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusion P‐HRM‐I can provide evidence for UES disorder based on pharyngeal pressurization patterns and abnormal findings for UES relaxation pressure, UES opening, and intrabolus pressure. Measuring pharyngeal contractility requires further optimization. By using a combination of pharyngeal pressurization patterns (depicted) and adjunct objective measures of UES relaxation pressure and luminal distensibility, swallowing assessments by Pharyngeal High‐Resolution Manometry Impedance (P‐HRM‐I) may provide a diagnosis of an Upper Esophageal Sphincter Disorder in patients with oro‐pharyngeal dysphagia.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36121685</pmid><doi>10.1111/nmo.14461</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-7378</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-592X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5675-7334</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-1137</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-8373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-9179</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-6704</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-1925
ispartof Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2023-01, Vol.35 (1), p.e14461-n/a
issn 1350-1925
1365-2982
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715790446
source Wiley
subjects Contractility
Deglutition - physiology
Deglutition Disorders
diagnosis
dysphagia
Electric Impedance
Esophageal sphincter
Esophageal Sphincter, Upper - physiology
Esophagus
Fluoroscopy
high‐resolution manometry
Humans
impedance
Information processing
Manometry - methods
Motor Disorders
Movement disorders
Pharynx
Pressure
Sphincter
swallowing
upper esophageal sphincter
title Using high resolution manometry impedance to diagnose upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngeal motor disorders
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A51%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20high%20resolution%20manometry%20impedance%20to%20diagnose%20upper%20esophageal%20sphincter%20and%20pharyngeal%20motor%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Neurogastroenterology%20and%20motility&rft.au=Omari,%20Taher&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e14461&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14461-n/a&rft.issn=1350-1925&rft.eissn=1365-2982&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nmo.14461&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2715790446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2831-b99161048bd4ad05d3a45e3183c06253edeff60c62e2914b3522af38cc2a7efd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758464169&rft_id=info:pmid/36121685&rfr_iscdi=true