Clinical Utility of Routine Postprocedural Computed Tomography of the Head Following Elective Neuroendovascular Interventions

• Published in: World neurosurgery 2022-11, Vol.167, p.e1426-e1431
• Main Authors: Barros, Guilherme, Meyer, R. Michael, Bass, David I., Nistal, Dominic, McAvoy, Malia, Clarke, Julian V., Vanent, Kevin N., Cruz, Michael J., Levitt, Michael R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aneurysm; Arteriovenous Fistula; Carotid Stenosis; Computed tomography; CT head; Endovascular Procedures - methods; Humans; Neuroendovascular; Neurointerventional; Postoperative imaging; Postprocedural imaging; Retrospective Studies; Routine imaging; Stents; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
• ISSN: 1878-8750; 1878-8769; 1878-8769
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.059

Little evidence supports acquisition of routine head imaging after uncomplicated elective neurosurgical procedures for patients with unchanged neurological examinations; however, imaging is still performed by some neurointerventionalists. We assessed the clinical utility of routine computed tomography of the head (CTH) following elective neuroendovascular interventions, including aneurysm coiling, aneurysm stent-assisted coiling, aneurysm flow diversion, arteriovenous malformation/fistula embolization, middle meningeal artery embolization for subdural hematoma, extracranial carotid artery stenting, and venous sinus stenting. Retrospective chart review identified patients undergoing neuroendovascular intervention from 2011 to 2021 at our institution. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables, including presenting signs and symptoms, antiplatelets and/or anticoagulant medications, intraprocedural complications, postprocedural CTH findings, and postprocedural neurological examinations, were recorded. Association of clinical variables with an abnormal postprocedural CTH was assessed with univariate analysis. Patients with ruptured vascular pathology, preoperative embolizations, and missing postprocedural CTH images and/or reports were excluded. Of 509 procedures identified, 354 were eligible for analysis; 4.8% of patients (17/354) had abnormal findings on postprocedural CTH. Nine patients had intraprocedural complications or new postprocedural neurological deficits that would have prompted imaging regardless of institutional practice. None of the remaining 8 (2.3%) patients required additional procedures. New postprocedural neurological deficit was the only significant predictor of abnormal postprocedural CTH (odds ratio = 6.79; 95% confidence interval, 2.01–20.32; P = 0.0009). In a large cohort of patients undergoing elective neuroendovascular intervention, no patients were identified for whom routine postprocedural CTH alone meaningfully altered their clinical care. Routine CTH is not necessary after uncomplicated elective neuroendovascular interventions performed with careful postprocedural neurological assessment.