Quantifiable brain atrophy synthesis for benchmarking of cortical thickness estimation methods

• Published in: Medical image analysis 2022-11, Vol.82, p.102576-102576, Article 102576
• Main Authors: Rusak, Filip, Santa Cruz, Rodrigo, Lebrat, Léo, Hlinka, Ondrej, Fripp, Jurgen, Smith, Elliot, Fookes, Clinton, Bradley, Andrew P., Bourgeat, Pierrick
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Brain MRI; Generative adversarial networks; Synthetic atrophy
• ISSN: 1361-8415; 1361-8423
• DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102576

Cortical thickness (CTh) is routinely used to quantify grey matter atrophy as it is a significant biomarker in studying neurodegenerative and neurological conditions. Clinical studies commonly employ one of several available CTh estimation software tools to estimate CTh from brain MRI scans. In recent years, machine learning-based methods emerged as a faster alternative to the main-stream CTh estimation methods (e.g. FreeSurfer). Evaluation and comparison of CTh estimation methods often include various metrics and downstream tasks, but none fully covers the sensitivity to sub-voxel atrophy characteristic of neurodegeneration. In addition, current evaluation methods do not provide a framework for the intra-method region-wise evaluation of CTh estimation methods. Therefore, we propose a method for brain MRI synthesis capable of generating a range of sub-voxel atrophy levels (global and local) with quantifiable changes from the baseline scan. We further create a synthetic test set and evaluate four different CTh estimation methods: FreeSurfer (cross-sectional), FreeSurfer (longitudinal), DL+DiReCT and HerstonNet. DL+DiReCT showed superior sensitivity to sub-voxel atrophy over other methods in our testing framework. The obtained results indicate that our synthetic test set is suitable for benchmarking CTh estimation methods on both global and local scales as well as regional inter-and intra-method performance comparison. •A novel data synthesis framework for evaluating cortical thickness estimation methods.•Quantifiable global and local atrophy simulation.•Regional inter-and intra-method performance benchmarking reveals valuable insights.•DL+DiReCT is more sensitive to sub-voxel atrophy than FreeSurfer pipelines and HerstonNet.