Loading…
The world's most spectacular marine hydrocarbon seeps (Coal Oil Point, Santa Barbara Channel, California): Quantification of emissions
We used 50 kHz sonar data to estimate natural hydrocarbon emission rates from the 18 km2 marine seep field offshore from Coal Oil Point, Santa Barbara, California. The hydrocarbon gas emission rate is 1.7 ± 0.3 × 105 m3 d−1 (including gas captured by a subsea seep containment device) and the associa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Geophysical Research 1999-09, Vol.104 (C9), p.20703-20711 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We used 50 kHz sonar data to estimate natural hydrocarbon emission rates from the 18 km2 marine seep field offshore from Coal Oil Point, Santa Barbara, California. The hydrocarbon gas emission rate is 1.7 ± 0.3 × 105 m3 d−1 (including gas captured by a subsea seep containment device) and the associated oil emission rate is 1.6 ± 0.2 × 104 Ld−1 (100 barrels d−1). The nonmethane hydrocarbon emission rate from the gas seepage is 35±7 td−1 and a large source of air pollution in Santa Barbara County. Our estimate is equal to twice the emission rate from all the on‐road vehicle traffic in the county. Our estimated methane emission rate for the Coal Oil Point seeps (80±12 td−1) is 4 times higher than previous estimates. The most intense areas of seepage correspond to structural culminations along anticlinal axes. Seep locations are mostly unchanged from those documented in 1946, 1953, and 1973. An exception is the seepage field that once existed near offshore oil platform Holly. A reduction in seepage within a 1 km radius around this offshore platform is correlated with reduced reservoir pressure beneath the natural seeps due to oil production. Our findings suggest that global emissions of methane from natural marine seepage have been underestimated and may be decreasing because of oil production. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0148-0227 2169-9275 2156-2202 2169-9291 |
DOI: | 10.1029/1999JC900148 |