Loading…
Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions
Proteins interact with each other through binding interfaces that differ greatly in size and physico‐chemical properties. Within the binding interface, a few residues called hot spots contribute the majority of the binding free energy and are hence irreplaceable. In contrast, cold spots are occupied...
Saved in:
Published in: | Protein science 2022-10, Vol.31 (10), p.e4435-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e4435 |
container_title | Protein science |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S. Oppenheimer, Ben Shifman, Julia M. |
description | Proteins interact with each other through binding interfaces that differ greatly in size and physico‐chemical properties. Within the binding interface, a few residues called hot spots contribute the majority of the binding free energy and are hence irreplaceable. In contrast, cold spots are occupied by suboptimal amino acids, providing possibility for affinity enhancement through mutations. In this study, we identify cold spots due to cavities and unfavorable charge interactions in multiple protein–protein interactions (PPIs). For our cold spot analysis, we first use a small affinity database of PPIs with known structures and affinities and then expand our search to nearly 4000 homo‐ and heterodimers in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We observe that cold spots due to cavities are present in nearly all PPIs unrelated to their binding affinity, while unfavorable charge interactions are relatively rare. We also find that most cold spots are located in the periphery of the binding interface, with high‐affinity complexes showing fewer centrally located colds spots than low‐affinity complexes. A larger number of cold spots is also found in non‐cognate interactions compared to their cognate counterparts. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that cold spots are more frequent in homo‐dimeric complexes compared to hetero‐complexes, likely due to symmetry constraints imposed on sequences of homodimers. Finally, we find that glycines, glutamates, and arginines are the most frequent amino acids appearing at cold spot positions. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of cold spot positions to protein evolution and facilitates protein engineering studies directed at enhancing binding affinity and specificity in a wide range of applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pro.4435 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2719418755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2719418755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotlbBJ5ABN26m5jpJ3EnxBgVFunAXMpkEpkwnNZlRuvMdfEOfxNRWBcHNufHxcfgBOEZwjCDE58vgx5QStgOGiBYyF7J42gVDKAuUC1KIATiIcQ4hpAiTfTAgBeIEMTEEFxPfVFlc-i5mOtisb-sXG6JusrrNkrazdfvx9r6d0rGzQZuu9m08BHtON9EebfsIzK6vZpPbfHp_cze5nOaGCMLySlBTGekoEqU1nBkGkWFU4lISUwgHnSQ0VW0wLssSMY6hYwxVTjvGKRmBs402_fDc29ipRR2NbRrdWt9HhTmSyc0ZS-jpH3Tu-9Cm59aUEERCzH-FJvgYg3VqGeqFDiuFoFrHmXav1nEm9GQr7MuFrX7A7_wSkG-A17qxq39F6uHx_kv4CdhRftA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718839027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions</title><source>PubMed Central (Open access)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S. ; Oppenheimer, Ben ; Shifman, Julia M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S. ; Oppenheimer, Ben ; Shifman, Julia M.</creatorcontrib><description>Proteins interact with each other through binding interfaces that differ greatly in size and physico‐chemical properties. Within the binding interface, a few residues called hot spots contribute the majority of the binding free energy and are hence irreplaceable. In contrast, cold spots are occupied by suboptimal amino acids, providing possibility for affinity enhancement through mutations. In this study, we identify cold spots due to cavities and unfavorable charge interactions in multiple protein–protein interactions (PPIs). For our cold spot analysis, we first use a small affinity database of PPIs with known structures and affinities and then expand our search to nearly 4000 homo‐ and heterodimers in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We observe that cold spots due to cavities are present in nearly all PPIs unrelated to their binding affinity, while unfavorable charge interactions are relatively rare. We also find that most cold spots are located in the periphery of the binding interface, with high‐affinity complexes showing fewer centrally located colds spots than low‐affinity complexes. A larger number of cold spots is also found in non‐cognate interactions compared to their cognate counterparts. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that cold spots are more frequent in homo‐dimeric complexes compared to hetero‐complexes, likely due to symmetry constraints imposed on sequences of homodimers. Finally, we find that glycines, glutamates, and arginines are the most frequent amino acids appearing at cold spot positions. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of cold spot positions to protein evolution and facilitates protein engineering studies directed at enhancing binding affinity and specificity in a wide range of applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-8368</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-896X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-896X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pro.4435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36173158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Affinity ; Amino acids ; Amino Acids - chemistry ; Binding ; binding affinity ; binding interfaces ; Cavities ; Chemical properties ; cold spots of binding ; Databases, Protein ; Free energy ; Glutamates ; Glutamates - genetics ; Glutamates - metabolism ; hot spots of binding ; Interfaces ; Mutation ; Protein Binding ; Protein Engineering ; Protein interaction ; Proteins ; Proteins - chemistry ; protein–protein interactions</subject><ispartof>Protein science, 2022-10, Vol.31 (10), p.e4435-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Protein Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6678-6497</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36173158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppenheimer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shifman, Julia M.</creatorcontrib><title>Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions</title><title>Protein science</title><addtitle>Protein Sci</addtitle><description>Proteins interact with each other through binding interfaces that differ greatly in size and physico‐chemical properties. Within the binding interface, a few residues called hot spots contribute the majority of the binding free energy and are hence irreplaceable. In contrast, cold spots are occupied by suboptimal amino acids, providing possibility for affinity enhancement through mutations. In this study, we identify cold spots due to cavities and unfavorable charge interactions in multiple protein–protein interactions (PPIs). For our cold spot analysis, we first use a small affinity database of PPIs with known structures and affinities and then expand our search to nearly 4000 homo‐ and heterodimers in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We observe that cold spots due to cavities are present in nearly all PPIs unrelated to their binding affinity, while unfavorable charge interactions are relatively rare. We also find that most cold spots are located in the periphery of the binding interface, with high‐affinity complexes showing fewer centrally located colds spots than low‐affinity complexes. A larger number of cold spots is also found in non‐cognate interactions compared to their cognate counterparts. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that cold spots are more frequent in homo‐dimeric complexes compared to hetero‐complexes, likely due to symmetry constraints imposed on sequences of homodimers. Finally, we find that glycines, glutamates, and arginines are the most frequent amino acids appearing at cold spot positions. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of cold spot positions to protein evolution and facilitates protein engineering studies directed at enhancing binding affinity and specificity in a wide range of applications.</description><subject>Affinity</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Amino Acids - chemistry</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>binding affinity</subject><subject>binding interfaces</subject><subject>Cavities</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>cold spots of binding</subject><subject>Databases, Protein</subject><subject>Free energy</subject><subject>Glutamates</subject><subject>Glutamates - genetics</subject><subject>Glutamates - metabolism</subject><subject>hot spots of binding</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Protein Engineering</subject><subject>Protein interaction</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>protein–protein interactions</subject><issn>0961-8368</issn><issn>1469-896X</issn><issn>1469-896X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotlbBJ5ABN26m5jpJ3EnxBgVFunAXMpkEpkwnNZlRuvMdfEOfxNRWBcHNufHxcfgBOEZwjCDE58vgx5QStgOGiBYyF7J42gVDKAuUC1KIATiIcQ4hpAiTfTAgBeIEMTEEFxPfVFlc-i5mOtisb-sXG6JusrrNkrazdfvx9r6d0rGzQZuu9m08BHtON9EebfsIzK6vZpPbfHp_cze5nOaGCMLySlBTGekoEqU1nBkGkWFU4lISUwgHnSQ0VW0wLssSMY6hYwxVTjvGKRmBs402_fDc29ipRR2NbRrdWt9HhTmSyc0ZS-jpH3Tu-9Cm59aUEERCzH-FJvgYg3VqGeqFDiuFoFrHmXav1nEm9GQr7MuFrX7A7_wSkG-A17qxq39F6uHx_kv4CdhRftA</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S.</creator><creator>Oppenheimer, Ben</creator><creator>Shifman, Julia M.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6678-6497</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions</title><author>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S. ; Oppenheimer, Ben ; Shifman, Julia M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Affinity</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Amino Acids - chemistry</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>binding affinity</topic><topic>binding interfaces</topic><topic>Cavities</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>cold spots of binding</topic><topic>Databases, Protein</topic><topic>Free energy</topic><topic>Glutamates</topic><topic>Glutamates - genetics</topic><topic>Glutamates - metabolism</topic><topic>hot spots of binding</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Protein Engineering</topic><topic>Protein interaction</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>protein–protein interactions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppenheimer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shifman, Julia M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Protein science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S.</au><au>Oppenheimer, Ben</au><au>Shifman, Julia M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions</atitle><jtitle>Protein science</jtitle><addtitle>Protein Sci</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e4435</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e4435-n/a</pages><issn>0961-8368</issn><issn>1469-896X</issn><eissn>1469-896X</eissn><abstract>Proteins interact with each other through binding interfaces that differ greatly in size and physico‐chemical properties. Within the binding interface, a few residues called hot spots contribute the majority of the binding free energy and are hence irreplaceable. In contrast, cold spots are occupied by suboptimal amino acids, providing possibility for affinity enhancement through mutations. In this study, we identify cold spots due to cavities and unfavorable charge interactions in multiple protein–protein interactions (PPIs). For our cold spot analysis, we first use a small affinity database of PPIs with known structures and affinities and then expand our search to nearly 4000 homo‐ and heterodimers in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We observe that cold spots due to cavities are present in nearly all PPIs unrelated to their binding affinity, while unfavorable charge interactions are relatively rare. We also find that most cold spots are located in the periphery of the binding interface, with high‐affinity complexes showing fewer centrally located colds spots than low‐affinity complexes. A larger number of cold spots is also found in non‐cognate interactions compared to their cognate counterparts. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that cold spots are more frequent in homo‐dimeric complexes compared to hetero‐complexes, likely due to symmetry constraints imposed on sequences of homodimers. Finally, we find that glycines, glutamates, and arginines are the most frequent amino acids appearing at cold spot positions. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of cold spot positions to protein evolution and facilitates protein engineering studies directed at enhancing binding affinity and specificity in a wide range of applications.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36173158</pmid><doi>10.1002/pro.4435</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6678-6497</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0961-8368 |
ispartof | Protein science, 2022-10, Vol.31 (10), p.e4435-n/a |
issn | 0961-8368 1469-896X 1469-896X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2719418755 |
source | PubMed Central (Open access); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Affinity Amino acids Amino Acids - chemistry Binding binding affinity binding interfaces Cavities Chemical properties cold spots of binding Databases, Protein Free energy Glutamates Glutamates - genetics Glutamates - metabolism hot spots of binding Interfaces Mutation Protein Binding Protein Engineering Protein interaction Proteins Proteins - chemistry protein–protein interactions |
title | Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A31%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cold%20spots%20are%20universal%20in%20protein%E2%80%93protein%20interactions&rft.jtitle=Protein%20science&rft.au=Gurusinghe,%20Sagara%20N.S.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e4435&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e4435-n/a&rft.issn=0961-8368&rft.eissn=1469-896X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pro.4435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2719418755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718839027&rft_id=info:pmid/36173158&rfr_iscdi=true |