Loading…

Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions

Proteins interact with each other through binding interfaces that differ greatly in size and physico‐chemical properties. Within the binding interface, a few residues called hot spots contribute the majority of the binding free energy and are hence irreplaceable. In contrast, cold spots are occupied...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Protein science 2022-10, Vol.31 (10), p.e4435-n/a
Main Authors: Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S., Oppenheimer, Ben, Shifman, Julia M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page e4435
container_title Protein science
container_volume 31
creator Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S.
Oppenheimer, Ben
Shifman, Julia M.
description Proteins interact with each other through binding interfaces that differ greatly in size and physico‐chemical properties. Within the binding interface, a few residues called hot spots contribute the majority of the binding free energy and are hence irreplaceable. In contrast, cold spots are occupied by suboptimal amino acids, providing possibility for affinity enhancement through mutations. In this study, we identify cold spots due to cavities and unfavorable charge interactions in multiple protein–protein interactions (PPIs). For our cold spot analysis, we first use a small affinity database of PPIs with known structures and affinities and then expand our search to nearly 4000 homo‐ and heterodimers in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We observe that cold spots due to cavities are present in nearly all PPIs unrelated to their binding affinity, while unfavorable charge interactions are relatively rare. We also find that most cold spots are located in the periphery of the binding interface, with high‐affinity complexes showing fewer centrally located colds spots than low‐affinity complexes. A larger number of cold spots is also found in non‐cognate interactions compared to their cognate counterparts. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that cold spots are more frequent in homo‐dimeric complexes compared to hetero‐complexes, likely due to symmetry constraints imposed on sequences of homodimers. Finally, we find that glycines, glutamates, and arginines are the most frequent amino acids appearing at cold spot positions. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of cold spot positions to protein evolution and facilitates protein engineering studies directed at enhancing binding affinity and specificity in a wide range of applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pro.4435
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2719418755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2719418755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotlbBJ5ABN26m5jpJ3EnxBgVFunAXMpkEpkwnNZlRuvMdfEOfxNRWBcHNufHxcfgBOEZwjCDE58vgx5QStgOGiBYyF7J42gVDKAuUC1KIATiIcQ4hpAiTfTAgBeIEMTEEFxPfVFlc-i5mOtisb-sXG6JusrrNkrazdfvx9r6d0rGzQZuu9m08BHtON9EebfsIzK6vZpPbfHp_cze5nOaGCMLySlBTGekoEqU1nBkGkWFU4lISUwgHnSQ0VW0wLssSMY6hYwxVTjvGKRmBs402_fDc29ipRR2NbRrdWt9HhTmSyc0ZS-jpH3Tu-9Cm59aUEERCzH-FJvgYg3VqGeqFDiuFoFrHmXav1nEm9GQr7MuFrX7A7_wSkG-A17qxq39F6uHx_kv4CdhRftA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718839027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions</title><source>PubMed Central (Open access)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S. ; Oppenheimer, Ben ; Shifman, Julia M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S. ; Oppenheimer, Ben ; Shifman, Julia M.</creatorcontrib><description>Proteins interact with each other through binding interfaces that differ greatly in size and physico‐chemical properties. Within the binding interface, a few residues called hot spots contribute the majority of the binding free energy and are hence irreplaceable. In contrast, cold spots are occupied by suboptimal amino acids, providing possibility for affinity enhancement through mutations. In this study, we identify cold spots due to cavities and unfavorable charge interactions in multiple protein–protein interactions (PPIs). For our cold spot analysis, we first use a small affinity database of PPIs with known structures and affinities and then expand our search to nearly 4000 homo‐ and heterodimers in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We observe that cold spots due to cavities are present in nearly all PPIs unrelated to their binding affinity, while unfavorable charge interactions are relatively rare. We also find that most cold spots are located in the periphery of the binding interface, with high‐affinity complexes showing fewer centrally located colds spots than low‐affinity complexes. A larger number of cold spots is also found in non‐cognate interactions compared to their cognate counterparts. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that cold spots are more frequent in homo‐dimeric complexes compared to hetero‐complexes, likely due to symmetry constraints imposed on sequences of homodimers. Finally, we find that glycines, glutamates, and arginines are the most frequent amino acids appearing at cold spot positions. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of cold spot positions to protein evolution and facilitates protein engineering studies directed at enhancing binding affinity and specificity in a wide range of applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-8368</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-896X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-896X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pro.4435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36173158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Affinity ; Amino acids ; Amino Acids - chemistry ; Binding ; binding affinity ; binding interfaces ; Cavities ; Chemical properties ; cold spots of binding ; Databases, Protein ; Free energy ; Glutamates ; Glutamates - genetics ; Glutamates - metabolism ; hot spots of binding ; Interfaces ; Mutation ; Protein Binding ; Protein Engineering ; Protein interaction ; Proteins ; Proteins - chemistry ; protein–protein interactions</subject><ispartof>Protein science, 2022-10, Vol.31 (10), p.e4435-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Protein Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6678-6497</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36173158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppenheimer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shifman, Julia M.</creatorcontrib><title>Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions</title><title>Protein science</title><addtitle>Protein Sci</addtitle><description>Proteins interact with each other through binding interfaces that differ greatly in size and physico‐chemical properties. Within the binding interface, a few residues called hot spots contribute the majority of the binding free energy and are hence irreplaceable. In contrast, cold spots are occupied by suboptimal amino acids, providing possibility for affinity enhancement through mutations. In this study, we identify cold spots due to cavities and unfavorable charge interactions in multiple protein–protein interactions (PPIs). For our cold spot analysis, we first use a small affinity database of PPIs with known structures and affinities and then expand our search to nearly 4000 homo‐ and heterodimers in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We observe that cold spots due to cavities are present in nearly all PPIs unrelated to their binding affinity, while unfavorable charge interactions are relatively rare. We also find that most cold spots are located in the periphery of the binding interface, with high‐affinity complexes showing fewer centrally located colds spots than low‐affinity complexes. A larger number of cold spots is also found in non‐cognate interactions compared to their cognate counterparts. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that cold spots are more frequent in homo‐dimeric complexes compared to hetero‐complexes, likely due to symmetry constraints imposed on sequences of homodimers. Finally, we find that glycines, glutamates, and arginines are the most frequent amino acids appearing at cold spot positions. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of cold spot positions to protein evolution and facilitates protein engineering studies directed at enhancing binding affinity and specificity in a wide range of applications.</description><subject>Affinity</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Amino Acids - chemistry</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>binding affinity</subject><subject>binding interfaces</subject><subject>Cavities</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>cold spots of binding</subject><subject>Databases, Protein</subject><subject>Free energy</subject><subject>Glutamates</subject><subject>Glutamates - genetics</subject><subject>Glutamates - metabolism</subject><subject>hot spots of binding</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Protein Engineering</subject><subject>Protein interaction</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>protein–protein interactions</subject><issn>0961-8368</issn><issn>1469-896X</issn><issn>1469-896X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotlbBJ5ABN26m5jpJ3EnxBgVFunAXMpkEpkwnNZlRuvMdfEOfxNRWBcHNufHxcfgBOEZwjCDE58vgx5QStgOGiBYyF7J42gVDKAuUC1KIATiIcQ4hpAiTfTAgBeIEMTEEFxPfVFlc-i5mOtisb-sXG6JusrrNkrazdfvx9r6d0rGzQZuu9m08BHtON9EebfsIzK6vZpPbfHp_cze5nOaGCMLySlBTGekoEqU1nBkGkWFU4lISUwgHnSQ0VW0wLssSMY6hYwxVTjvGKRmBs402_fDc29ipRR2NbRrdWt9HhTmSyc0ZS-jpH3Tu-9Cm59aUEERCzH-FJvgYg3VqGeqFDiuFoFrHmXav1nEm9GQr7MuFrX7A7_wSkG-A17qxq39F6uHx_kv4CdhRftA</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S.</creator><creator>Oppenheimer, Ben</creator><creator>Shifman, Julia M.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6678-6497</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions</title><author>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S. ; Oppenheimer, Ben ; Shifman, Julia M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Affinity</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Amino Acids - chemistry</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>binding affinity</topic><topic>binding interfaces</topic><topic>Cavities</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>cold spots of binding</topic><topic>Databases, Protein</topic><topic>Free energy</topic><topic>Glutamates</topic><topic>Glutamates - genetics</topic><topic>Glutamates - metabolism</topic><topic>hot spots of binding</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Protein Engineering</topic><topic>Protein interaction</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>protein–protein interactions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppenheimer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shifman, Julia M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Protein science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gurusinghe, Sagara N.S.</au><au>Oppenheimer, Ben</au><au>Shifman, Julia M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions</atitle><jtitle>Protein science</jtitle><addtitle>Protein Sci</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e4435</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e4435-n/a</pages><issn>0961-8368</issn><issn>1469-896X</issn><eissn>1469-896X</eissn><abstract>Proteins interact with each other through binding interfaces that differ greatly in size and physico‐chemical properties. Within the binding interface, a few residues called hot spots contribute the majority of the binding free energy and are hence irreplaceable. In contrast, cold spots are occupied by suboptimal amino acids, providing possibility for affinity enhancement through mutations. In this study, we identify cold spots due to cavities and unfavorable charge interactions in multiple protein–protein interactions (PPIs). For our cold spot analysis, we first use a small affinity database of PPIs with known structures and affinities and then expand our search to nearly 4000 homo‐ and heterodimers in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We observe that cold spots due to cavities are present in nearly all PPIs unrelated to their binding affinity, while unfavorable charge interactions are relatively rare. We also find that most cold spots are located in the periphery of the binding interface, with high‐affinity complexes showing fewer centrally located colds spots than low‐affinity complexes. A larger number of cold spots is also found in non‐cognate interactions compared to their cognate counterparts. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that cold spots are more frequent in homo‐dimeric complexes compared to hetero‐complexes, likely due to symmetry constraints imposed on sequences of homodimers. Finally, we find that glycines, glutamates, and arginines are the most frequent amino acids appearing at cold spot positions. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of cold spot positions to protein evolution and facilitates protein engineering studies directed at enhancing binding affinity and specificity in a wide range of applications.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36173158</pmid><doi>10.1002/pro.4435</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6678-6497</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0961-8368
ispartof Protein science, 2022-10, Vol.31 (10), p.e4435-n/a
issn 0961-8368
1469-896X
1469-896X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2719418755
source PubMed Central (Open access); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Affinity
Amino acids
Amino Acids - chemistry
Binding
binding affinity
binding interfaces
Cavities
Chemical properties
cold spots of binding
Databases, Protein
Free energy
Glutamates
Glutamates - genetics
Glutamates - metabolism
hot spots of binding
Interfaces
Mutation
Protein Binding
Protein Engineering
Protein interaction
Proteins
Proteins - chemistry
protein–protein interactions
title Cold spots are universal in protein–protein interactions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A31%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cold%20spots%20are%20universal%20in%20protein%E2%80%93protein%20interactions&rft.jtitle=Protein%20science&rft.au=Gurusinghe,%20Sagara%20N.S.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e4435&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e4435-n/a&rft.issn=0961-8368&rft.eissn=1469-896X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pro.4435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2719418755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-d84cdc9f418bec75c501c5492b93c68f0f934f0fac22bbb15720f551dfaf5743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718839027&rft_id=info:pmid/36173158&rfr_iscdi=true