The 1998 AI Planning Systems Competition

The 1998 Planning Competition at the AI Planning Systems Conference was the first of its kind. Its goal was to create planning domains that a wide variety of planning researchers could agree on to make comparison among planners more meaningful, measure overall progress in the field, and set up a fra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The AI magazine 2000-06, Vol.21 (2), p.35-55
Main Author: McDermott, Drew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algorithms
Artificial intelligence
Artificial neural networks
Committees
Competition
Computer networks
Intelligent devices
Intelligent machines
Language
Machine learning
Natural language
Neural networks
Planning
Scheduling
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The 1998 Planning Competition at the AI Planning Systems Conference was the first of its kind. Its goal was to create planning domains that a wide variety of planning researchers could agree on to make comparison among planners more meaningful, measure overall progress in the field, and set up a framework for long‐term creation of a repository of problems in a standard notation. A rules committee for the competition was created in 1997 and had long discussions on how the contest should go. One result of these discussions was the pddl notation for planning domains. This notation was used to set up a set of planning problems and get a modest problem repository started. As a result, five planning systems were able to compete when the contest took place in June 1998. All these systems solved problems in the strips framework, with some slight extensions. The attempt to find domains for other forms of planning foundered because of technical and organizational problems. In spite of this problem, the competition achieved its goals partially in that it confirmed that substantial progress had occurred in some subfields of planning, and it allowed qualitative comparison among different planning algorithms. It is urged that the competition continue to take place and to evolve.
ISSN:0738-4602
2371-9621
DOI:10.1609/aimag.v21i2.1506