Loading…

Effectiveness and safety of anti‐tau drugs for Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

Objective To assess the cognitive effectiveness and safety of tau‐targeting drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD) Methods The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases were searched from inception to 22 Novemb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2022-11, Vol.70 (11), p.3281-3292
Main Authors: Zheng, Xiaoyan, Tang, Yuyuan, Yang, Qinghui, Wang, Shuting, Chen, Rouhao, Tao, Chenyang, Zhang, Peiming, Fan, Baochao, Zhan, Jie, Tang, Chunzhi, Lu, Liming
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-e8ab15452ea89071f1c98010245f49369e637bd88f518fe02ccb473f2aa4b1333
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-e8ab15452ea89071f1c98010245f49369e637bd88f518fe02ccb473f2aa4b1333
container_end_page 3292
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3281
container_title Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)
container_volume 70
creator Zheng, Xiaoyan
Tang, Yuyuan
Yang, Qinghui
Wang, Shuting
Chen, Rouhao
Tao, Chenyang
Zhang, Peiming
Fan, Baochao
Zhan, Jie
Tang, Chunzhi
Lu, Liming
description Objective To assess the cognitive effectiveness and safety of tau‐targeting drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD) Methods The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases were searched from inception to 22 November 2021. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed Results Thirty‐four randomized controlled trials comprising 5549 participants, of which fifteen (51.7%) had a low risk of bias, were included. The meta‐analysis showed no differences in the cognitive subscale of the AD: Assessment Scale (ADAS‐Cog) between anti‐tau drugs and placebo (mean difference [MD]: −0.77, 95% CI: −1.64 to 0.10; minimal important difference 3.1–3.8 points, moderate certainty evidence). For ADAS‐Cog, the results subgroup analysis suggested a statistical effect of tau posttranslational modifications on drug inhibition (MD: −0.80, 95% CI: −1.43 to −0.17), which was not seen with tau aggregation inhibitors or immunotherapy (interaction p = 0.24). A total of 11.0%, 5.2%, and 4.8% of drugs inhibiting tau aggregation, immunotherapy, and drugs targeting posttranslational modifications, respectively, had a reduced risk of dropouts due to adverse events (AEs). Discussion Current evidence suggests that anti‐tau drugs are unlikely to have an important impact on slowing cognitive impairment. Although the subgroup analysis suggested that inhibition of tau posttranslational modifications is statistically effective and generally safer because of reduced dropouts due to AEs, the analysis has limited credibility. Additional large‐scale and well‐designed randomized and placebo‐controlled trials will be necessary to explore the benefit of a certain type of anti‐tau drug for AD.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jgs.18025
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723155496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2723155496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-e8ab15452ea89071f1c98010245f49369e637bd88f518fe02ccb473f2aa4b1333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAQxy3UCpaPAy-ALPVQOAT8mXW4IbRdqJB6WDhHTjIGL8kGPAkoPfEIPGOfBC-7cECqL-ORfvPTaP6E7HN2zOM7md_iMTdM6A0y4lqKRCuuv5ERY0wkJuVqi2wjzhnjghmzSbZkGj-RGZH7iXNQdv4JFoBI7aKiaB10A21d7Dr_7-W1sz2tQn-L1LWBntV_78A3EH4irTyCRTilswE7aGznSxrgycPzu6mBzsZ5u7D1gB53yXdna4S9dd0hN78m1-cXydWf6eX52VVSSi11AsYWXCstwJqMjbnjZWYYZ0JppzKZZpDKcVEZ4zQ3Dpgoy0KNpRPWqoJLKXfI4cr7ENrHHrDLG48l1LVdQNtjLsZCcq1Vlkb0xxd03vYh7rukpDKSp-lSeLSiytAiBnD5Q_CNDUPOWb5MII8J5O8JRPZgbeyLBqpP8uPkEThZAc--huH_pvz3dLZSvgHY1JD-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734831663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness and safety of anti‐tau drugs for Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Zheng, Xiaoyan ; Tang, Yuyuan ; Yang, Qinghui ; Wang, Shuting ; Chen, Rouhao ; Tao, Chenyang ; Zhang, Peiming ; Fan, Baochao ; Zhan, Jie ; Tang, Chunzhi ; Lu, Liming</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiaoyan ; Tang, Yuyuan ; Yang, Qinghui ; Wang, Shuting ; Chen, Rouhao ; Tao, Chenyang ; Zhang, Peiming ; Fan, Baochao ; Zhan, Jie ; Tang, Chunzhi ; Lu, Liming</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To assess the cognitive effectiveness and safety of tau‐targeting drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD) Methods The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases were searched from inception to 22 November 2021. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed Results Thirty‐four randomized controlled trials comprising 5549 participants, of which fifteen (51.7%) had a low risk of bias, were included. The meta‐analysis showed no differences in the cognitive subscale of the AD: Assessment Scale (ADAS‐Cog) between anti‐tau drugs and placebo (mean difference [MD]: −0.77, 95% CI: −1.64 to 0.10; minimal important difference 3.1–3.8 points, moderate certainty evidence). For ADAS‐Cog, the results subgroup analysis suggested a statistical effect of tau posttranslational modifications on drug inhibition (MD: −0.80, 95% CI: −1.43 to −0.17), which was not seen with tau aggregation inhibitors or immunotherapy (interaction p = 0.24). A total of 11.0%, 5.2%, and 4.8% of drugs inhibiting tau aggregation, immunotherapy, and drugs targeting posttranslational modifications, respectively, had a reduced risk of dropouts due to adverse events (AEs). Discussion Current evidence suggests that anti‐tau drugs are unlikely to have an important impact on slowing cognitive impairment. Although the subgroup analysis suggested that inhibition of tau posttranslational modifications is statistically effective and generally safer because of reduced dropouts due to AEs, the analysis has limited credibility. Additional large‐scale and well‐designed randomized and placebo‐controlled trials will be necessary to explore the benefit of a certain type of anti‐tau drug for AD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36208415</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Alzheimer Disease - drug therapy ; Alzheimer's disease ; anti‐tau drugs ; Clinical trials ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Dysfunction - drug therapy ; Drug delivery ; Drugs ; Humans ; Immunotherapy ; Meta-analysis ; Neurodegenerative diseases ; Placebos ; Systematic review ; Tau protein</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2022-11, Vol.70 (11), p.3281-3292</ispartof><rights>2022 The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2022 American Geriatrics Society and Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-e8ab15452ea89071f1c98010245f49369e637bd88f518fe02ccb473f2aa4b1333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-e8ab15452ea89071f1c98010245f49369e637bd88f518fe02ccb473f2aa4b1333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36208415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yuyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qinghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Rouhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Chenyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Peiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Baochao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chunzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Liming</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness and safety of anti‐tau drugs for Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>Objective To assess the cognitive effectiveness and safety of tau‐targeting drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD) Methods The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases were searched from inception to 22 November 2021. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed Results Thirty‐four randomized controlled trials comprising 5549 participants, of which fifteen (51.7%) had a low risk of bias, were included. The meta‐analysis showed no differences in the cognitive subscale of the AD: Assessment Scale (ADAS‐Cog) between anti‐tau drugs and placebo (mean difference [MD]: −0.77, 95% CI: −1.64 to 0.10; minimal important difference 3.1–3.8 points, moderate certainty evidence). For ADAS‐Cog, the results subgroup analysis suggested a statistical effect of tau posttranslational modifications on drug inhibition (MD: −0.80, 95% CI: −1.43 to −0.17), which was not seen with tau aggregation inhibitors or immunotherapy (interaction p = 0.24). A total of 11.0%, 5.2%, and 4.8% of drugs inhibiting tau aggregation, immunotherapy, and drugs targeting posttranslational modifications, respectively, had a reduced risk of dropouts due to adverse events (AEs). Discussion Current evidence suggests that anti‐tau drugs are unlikely to have an important impact on slowing cognitive impairment. Although the subgroup analysis suggested that inhibition of tau posttranslational modifications is statistically effective and generally safer because of reduced dropouts due to AEs, the analysis has limited credibility. Additional large‐scale and well‐designed randomized and placebo‐controlled trials will be necessary to explore the benefit of a certain type of anti‐tau drug for AD.</description><subject>Alzheimer Disease - drug therapy</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>anti‐tau drugs</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - drug therapy</subject><subject>Drug delivery</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative diseases</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tau protein</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAQxy3UCpaPAy-ALPVQOAT8mXW4IbRdqJB6WDhHTjIGL8kGPAkoPfEIPGOfBC-7cECqL-ORfvPTaP6E7HN2zOM7md_iMTdM6A0y4lqKRCuuv5ERY0wkJuVqi2wjzhnjghmzSbZkGj-RGZH7iXNQdv4JFoBI7aKiaB10A21d7Dr_7-W1sz2tQn-L1LWBntV_78A3EH4irTyCRTilswE7aGznSxrgycPzu6mBzsZ5u7D1gB53yXdna4S9dd0hN78m1-cXydWf6eX52VVSSi11AsYWXCstwJqMjbnjZWYYZ0JppzKZZpDKcVEZ4zQ3Dpgoy0KNpRPWqoJLKXfI4cr7ENrHHrDLG48l1LVdQNtjLsZCcq1Vlkb0xxd03vYh7rukpDKSp-lSeLSiytAiBnD5Q_CNDUPOWb5MII8J5O8JRPZgbeyLBqpP8uPkEThZAc--huH_pvz3dLZSvgHY1JD-</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Zheng, Xiaoyan</creator><creator>Tang, Yuyuan</creator><creator>Yang, Qinghui</creator><creator>Wang, Shuting</creator><creator>Chen, Rouhao</creator><creator>Tao, Chenyang</creator><creator>Zhang, Peiming</creator><creator>Fan, Baochao</creator><creator>Zhan, Jie</creator><creator>Tang, Chunzhi</creator><creator>Lu, Liming</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Effectiveness and safety of anti‐tau drugs for Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Zheng, Xiaoyan ; Tang, Yuyuan ; Yang, Qinghui ; Wang, Shuting ; Chen, Rouhao ; Tao, Chenyang ; Zhang, Peiming ; Fan, Baochao ; Zhan, Jie ; Tang, Chunzhi ; Lu, Liming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-e8ab15452ea89071f1c98010245f49369e637bd88f518fe02ccb473f2aa4b1333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alzheimer Disease - drug therapy</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>anti‐tau drugs</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - drug therapy</topic><topic>Drug delivery</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative diseases</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tau protein</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yuyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qinghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Rouhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Chenyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Peiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Baochao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chunzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Liming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, Xiaoyan</au><au>Tang, Yuyuan</au><au>Yang, Qinghui</au><au>Wang, Shuting</au><au>Chen, Rouhao</au><au>Tao, Chenyang</au><au>Zhang, Peiming</au><au>Fan, Baochao</au><au>Zhan, Jie</au><au>Tang, Chunzhi</au><au>Lu, Liming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness and safety of anti‐tau drugs for Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3281</spage><epage>3292</epage><pages>3281-3292</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><abstract>Objective To assess the cognitive effectiveness and safety of tau‐targeting drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD) Methods The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases were searched from inception to 22 November 2021. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed Results Thirty‐four randomized controlled trials comprising 5549 participants, of which fifteen (51.7%) had a low risk of bias, were included. The meta‐analysis showed no differences in the cognitive subscale of the AD: Assessment Scale (ADAS‐Cog) between anti‐tau drugs and placebo (mean difference [MD]: −0.77, 95% CI: −1.64 to 0.10; minimal important difference 3.1–3.8 points, moderate certainty evidence). For ADAS‐Cog, the results subgroup analysis suggested a statistical effect of tau posttranslational modifications on drug inhibition (MD: −0.80, 95% CI: −1.43 to −0.17), which was not seen with tau aggregation inhibitors or immunotherapy (interaction p = 0.24). A total of 11.0%, 5.2%, and 4.8% of drugs inhibiting tau aggregation, immunotherapy, and drugs targeting posttranslational modifications, respectively, had a reduced risk of dropouts due to adverse events (AEs). Discussion Current evidence suggests that anti‐tau drugs are unlikely to have an important impact on slowing cognitive impairment. Although the subgroup analysis suggested that inhibition of tau posttranslational modifications is statistically effective and generally safer because of reduced dropouts due to AEs, the analysis has limited credibility. Additional large‐scale and well‐designed randomized and placebo‐controlled trials will be necessary to explore the benefit of a certain type of anti‐tau drug for AD.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36208415</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgs.18025</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8614
ispartof Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2022-11, Vol.70 (11), p.3281-3292
issn 0002-8614
1532-5415
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723155496
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Alzheimer Disease - drug therapy
Alzheimer's disease
anti‐tau drugs
Clinical trials
Cognitive ability
Cognitive Dysfunction - drug therapy
Drug delivery
Drugs
Humans
Immunotherapy
Meta-analysis
Neurodegenerative diseases
Placebos
Systematic review
Tau protein
title Effectiveness and safety of anti‐tau drugs for Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A46%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20and%20safety%20of%20anti%E2%80%90tau%20drugs%20for%20Alzheimer's%20disease:%20Systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Zheng,%20Xiaoyan&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3281&rft.epage=3292&rft.pages=3281-3292&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgs.18025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2723155496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-e8ab15452ea89071f1c98010245f49369e637bd88f518fe02ccb473f2aa4b1333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734831663&rft_id=info:pmid/36208415&rfr_iscdi=true