Loading…
Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies
Embryo production in donkeys is inefficient compared with that in other livestock. Obtaining a sufficient number of MII oocytes is the first step to solving this problem. In this study, the number, morphology and maturation rates of cumulus‐oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from abattoir‐derived ovar...
Saved in:
Published in: | Reproduction in domestic animals 2023-01, Vol.58 (1), p.168-175 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43 |
container_end_page | 175 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 168 |
container_title | Reproduction in domestic animals |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Dai, Shizhen Di, Zhengyang Li, Nan Zeng, Shenming |
description | Embryo production in donkeys is inefficient compared with that in other livestock. Obtaining a sufficient number of MII oocytes is the first step to solving this problem. In this study, the number, morphology and maturation rates of cumulus‐oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from abattoir‐derived ovaries or live jennies were compared. The diameter of follicles from abattoir‐derived ovaries was measured and divided into group 1 (2–6 mm), group 2 (6–10 mm), group 3 (10–20 mm), group 4 (20–28 mm) and group 5 (>28 mm). The results showed that the number of follicles per ovary in group 2 (3.6 ± 0.28) and 3 (4.2 ± 0.90) was higher than that in the other groups (p 35 mm) were aspirated from live jennies using OPU. Although there was no difference in the recovery rates of COCs between group 3 and OPU (48.8% vs. 43.0%, p = .184), the percentage of grades A COCs in group OPU was higher than group 3 (72.5% vs. 59.3%, p = .036). There was no difference in the maturation rate between group 3 and OPU (60.3% vs. 69.3%, p = .171) after the COCs matured in vitro. The rates of recovery (72.2%) and maturation (92.3%) in group OPU‐Preov were higher than those in other groups (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rda.14276 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723483280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2723483280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10LtOwzAUBmALgWi5DLwAssQCQ1tfktgZEXepEhLqwhS59rFIlcTFToAy8Qg8I0-CIYUBibOc4Xz6dfQjdEDJmMaZeKPGNGEi20BDmvB8RFJON9GQ5DwbZSKTA7QTwoIQmkohttGAZ4wmJKdDdH-7bMu6fFVt6RrsLPag3RP4FVaNwbVqO9-famgfnAnYOo91V3dVFz7e3p3TqxawdvWyghcIuGzwApqmhLCHtqyqAuyv9y6aXV7Mzq5H09urm7PT6UgzGd9jObdgCDA111qyPLWpUNIalnFDpYWMg05UCiTJtaZaUCNYLpWZC24Sm_BddNzHLr177CC0RV0GDVWlGnBdKJhgPJGcSRLp0R-6cJ1v4nNRZUSQXEga1UmvtHcheLDF0pe18quCkuKr7iLWXXzXHe3hOrGb12B-5U-_EUx68FxWsPo_qbg7P-0jPwFT9YuC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760709781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Dai, Shizhen ; Di, Zhengyang ; Li, Nan ; Zeng, Shenming</creator><creatorcontrib>Dai, Shizhen ; Di, Zhengyang ; Li, Nan ; Zeng, Shenming</creatorcontrib><description>Embryo production in donkeys is inefficient compared with that in other livestock. Obtaining a sufficient number of MII oocytes is the first step to solving this problem. In this study, the number, morphology and maturation rates of cumulus‐oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from abattoir‐derived ovaries or live jennies were compared. The diameter of follicles from abattoir‐derived ovaries was measured and divided into group 1 (2–6 mm), group 2 (6–10 mm), group 3 (10–20 mm), group 4 (20–28 mm) and group 5 (>28 mm). The results showed that the number of follicles per ovary in group 2 (3.6 ± 0.28) and 3 (4.2 ± 0.90) was higher than that in the other groups (p < .05). The recovery rate in group 3 was higher than group 1 (48.8% vs. 26.8%, p = .00), but lower than group 5 (48.8% vs. 76.5%, p = .025). The percentage of grade A COCs in group 3 was higher than group 2 (59.3% vs. 39.5%, p = .00) and group 1 (59.3% vs. 26.7%, p = .00). Moreover, the percentage of grade A COCs in group 4 (55.0%, p = .710) and group 5 (46.2%, p = .351) was reduced compared with that in group 3. From the above results, the developing follicles (group ovum pick‐up [OPU], 10–20 mm) and preovulation follicles (group OPU‐Preov, >35 mm) were aspirated from live jennies using OPU. Although there was no difference in the recovery rates of COCs between group 3 and OPU (48.8% vs. 43.0%, p = .184), the percentage of grades A COCs in group OPU was higher than group 3 (72.5% vs. 59.3%, p = .036). There was no difference in the maturation rate between group 3 and OPU (60.3% vs. 69.3%, p = .171) after the COCs matured in vitro. The rates of recovery (72.2%) and maturation (92.3%) in group OPU‐Preov were higher than those in other groups (p < .05). Moreover, the effects of maturation time and serum type on maturation rates were evaluated in groups B44 (44 h, FBS), B36 (36 h, FBS) and D44 (44 h, foetal donkey serum, FDS). These results indicated that the maturation rate in group B36 was lower than group B44 (13.1% vs. 47.0%, p = .00) and group D44 (13.1% vs. 53.3%, p = .00). In conclusion, the quality of donkey COCs from OPU was higher than that from abattoir‐derived ovaries, the suitable time of donkey in vitro maturation (IVM) was 44 h, and FBS could be replaced with FDS in donkey IVM medium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rda.14276</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36214091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Animals ; COCs morphology ; Diameters ; donkey ; Embryo, Mammalian ; Equidae ; Female ; Follicles ; Gametocytes ; In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods ; In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary ; Livestock ; Maturation ; maturation medium ; Oocytes ; Optimization ; Ovaries ; Ovary ; ovum pick‐up ; Recovery</subject><ispartof>Reproduction in domestic animals, 2023-01, Vol.58 (1), p.168-175</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2188-6122</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36214091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dai, Shizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Zhengyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Shenming</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies</title><title>Reproduction in domestic animals</title><addtitle>Reprod Domest Anim</addtitle><description>Embryo production in donkeys is inefficient compared with that in other livestock. Obtaining a sufficient number of MII oocytes is the first step to solving this problem. In this study, the number, morphology and maturation rates of cumulus‐oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from abattoir‐derived ovaries or live jennies were compared. The diameter of follicles from abattoir‐derived ovaries was measured and divided into group 1 (2–6 mm), group 2 (6–10 mm), group 3 (10–20 mm), group 4 (20–28 mm) and group 5 (>28 mm). The results showed that the number of follicles per ovary in group 2 (3.6 ± 0.28) and 3 (4.2 ± 0.90) was higher than that in the other groups (p < .05). The recovery rate in group 3 was higher than group 1 (48.8% vs. 26.8%, p = .00), but lower than group 5 (48.8% vs. 76.5%, p = .025). The percentage of grade A COCs in group 3 was higher than group 2 (59.3% vs. 39.5%, p = .00) and group 1 (59.3% vs. 26.7%, p = .00). Moreover, the percentage of grade A COCs in group 4 (55.0%, p = .710) and group 5 (46.2%, p = .351) was reduced compared with that in group 3. From the above results, the developing follicles (group ovum pick‐up [OPU], 10–20 mm) and preovulation follicles (group OPU‐Preov, >35 mm) were aspirated from live jennies using OPU. Although there was no difference in the recovery rates of COCs between group 3 and OPU (48.8% vs. 43.0%, p = .184), the percentage of grades A COCs in group OPU was higher than group 3 (72.5% vs. 59.3%, p = .036). There was no difference in the maturation rate between group 3 and OPU (60.3% vs. 69.3%, p = .171) after the COCs matured in vitro. The rates of recovery (72.2%) and maturation (92.3%) in group OPU‐Preov were higher than those in other groups (p < .05). Moreover, the effects of maturation time and serum type on maturation rates were evaluated in groups B44 (44 h, FBS), B36 (36 h, FBS) and D44 (44 h, foetal donkey serum, FDS). These results indicated that the maturation rate in group B36 was lower than group B44 (13.1% vs. 47.0%, p = .00) and group D44 (13.1% vs. 53.3%, p = .00). In conclusion, the quality of donkey COCs from OPU was higher than that from abattoir‐derived ovaries, the suitable time of donkey in vitro maturation (IVM) was 44 h, and FBS could be replaced with FDS in donkey IVM medium.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>COCs morphology</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>donkey</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian</subject><subject>Equidae</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follicles</subject><subject>Gametocytes</subject><subject>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods</subject><subject>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Maturation</subject><subject>maturation medium</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Ovary</subject><subject>ovum pick‐up</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><issn>0936-6768</issn><issn>1439-0531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10LtOwzAUBmALgWi5DLwAssQCQ1tfktgZEXepEhLqwhS59rFIlcTFToAy8Qg8I0-CIYUBibOc4Xz6dfQjdEDJmMaZeKPGNGEi20BDmvB8RFJON9GQ5DwbZSKTA7QTwoIQmkohttGAZ4wmJKdDdH-7bMu6fFVt6RrsLPag3RP4FVaNwbVqO9-famgfnAnYOo91V3dVFz7e3p3TqxawdvWyghcIuGzwApqmhLCHtqyqAuyv9y6aXV7Mzq5H09urm7PT6UgzGd9jObdgCDA111qyPLWpUNIalnFDpYWMg05UCiTJtaZaUCNYLpWZC24Sm_BddNzHLr177CC0RV0GDVWlGnBdKJhgPJGcSRLp0R-6cJ1v4nNRZUSQXEga1UmvtHcheLDF0pe18quCkuKr7iLWXXzXHe3hOrGb12B-5U-_EUx68FxWsPo_qbg7P-0jPwFT9YuC</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Dai, Shizhen</creator><creator>Di, Zhengyang</creator><creator>Li, Nan</creator><creator>Zeng, Shenming</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-6122</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies</title><author>Dai, Shizhen ; Di, Zhengyang ; Li, Nan ; Zeng, Shenming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>COCs morphology</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>donkey</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian</topic><topic>Equidae</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follicles</topic><topic>Gametocytes</topic><topic>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods</topic><topic>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Maturation</topic><topic>maturation medium</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Ovary</topic><topic>ovum pick‐up</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dai, Shizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Zhengyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Shenming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dai, Shizhen</au><au>Di, Zhengyang</au><au>Li, Nan</au><au>Zeng, Shenming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies</atitle><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Domest Anim</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>168-175</pages><issn>0936-6768</issn><eissn>1439-0531</eissn><abstract>Embryo production in donkeys is inefficient compared with that in other livestock. Obtaining a sufficient number of MII oocytes is the first step to solving this problem. In this study, the number, morphology and maturation rates of cumulus‐oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from abattoir‐derived ovaries or live jennies were compared. The diameter of follicles from abattoir‐derived ovaries was measured and divided into group 1 (2–6 mm), group 2 (6–10 mm), group 3 (10–20 mm), group 4 (20–28 mm) and group 5 (>28 mm). The results showed that the number of follicles per ovary in group 2 (3.6 ± 0.28) and 3 (4.2 ± 0.90) was higher than that in the other groups (p < .05). The recovery rate in group 3 was higher than group 1 (48.8% vs. 26.8%, p = .00), but lower than group 5 (48.8% vs. 76.5%, p = .025). The percentage of grade A COCs in group 3 was higher than group 2 (59.3% vs. 39.5%, p = .00) and group 1 (59.3% vs. 26.7%, p = .00). Moreover, the percentage of grade A COCs in group 4 (55.0%, p = .710) and group 5 (46.2%, p = .351) was reduced compared with that in group 3. From the above results, the developing follicles (group ovum pick‐up [OPU], 10–20 mm) and preovulation follicles (group OPU‐Preov, >35 mm) were aspirated from live jennies using OPU. Although there was no difference in the recovery rates of COCs between group 3 and OPU (48.8% vs. 43.0%, p = .184), the percentage of grades A COCs in group OPU was higher than group 3 (72.5% vs. 59.3%, p = .036). There was no difference in the maturation rate between group 3 and OPU (60.3% vs. 69.3%, p = .171) after the COCs matured in vitro. The rates of recovery (72.2%) and maturation (92.3%) in group OPU‐Preov were higher than those in other groups (p < .05). Moreover, the effects of maturation time and serum type on maturation rates were evaluated in groups B44 (44 h, FBS), B36 (36 h, FBS) and D44 (44 h, foetal donkey serum, FDS). These results indicated that the maturation rate in group B36 was lower than group B44 (13.1% vs. 47.0%, p = .00) and group D44 (13.1% vs. 53.3%, p = .00). In conclusion, the quality of donkey COCs from OPU was higher than that from abattoir‐derived ovaries, the suitable time of donkey in vitro maturation (IVM) was 44 h, and FBS could be replaced with FDS in donkey IVM medium.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36214091</pmid><doi>10.1111/rda.14276</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-6122</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0936-6768 |
ispartof | Reproduction in domestic animals, 2023-01, Vol.58 (1), p.168-175 |
issn | 0936-6768 1439-0531 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723483280 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Abattoirs Animals COCs morphology Diameters donkey Embryo, Mammalian Equidae Female Follicles Gametocytes In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary Livestock Maturation maturation medium Oocytes Optimization Ovaries Ovary ovum pick‐up Recovery |
title | Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A43%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20recovery%20and%20maturation%20methods%20for%20cumulus%E2%80%90oocyte%20complexes%20in%20jennies&rft.jtitle=Reproduction%20in%20domestic%20animals&rft.au=Dai,%20Shizhen&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=168-175&rft.issn=0936-6768&rft.eissn=1439-0531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rda.14276&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2723483280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760709781&rft_id=info:pmid/36214091&rfr_iscdi=true |