Loading…

Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies

Embryo production in donkeys is inefficient compared with that in other livestock. Obtaining a sufficient number of MII oocytes is the first step to solving this problem. In this study, the number, morphology and maturation rates of cumulus‐oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from abattoir‐derived ovar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Reproduction in domestic animals 2023-01, Vol.58 (1), p.168-175
Main Authors: Dai, Shizhen, Di, Zhengyang, Li, Nan, Zeng, Shenming
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43
container_end_page 175
container_issue 1
container_start_page 168
container_title Reproduction in domestic animals
container_volume 58
creator Dai, Shizhen
Di, Zhengyang
Li, Nan
Zeng, Shenming
description Embryo production in donkeys is inefficient compared with that in other livestock. Obtaining a sufficient number of MII oocytes is the first step to solving this problem. In this study, the number, morphology and maturation rates of cumulus‐oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from abattoir‐derived ovaries or live jennies were compared. The diameter of follicles from abattoir‐derived ovaries was measured and divided into group 1 (2–6 mm), group 2 (6–10 mm), group 3 (10–20 mm), group 4 (20–28 mm) and group 5 (>28 mm). The results showed that the number of follicles per ovary in group 2 (3.6 ± 0.28) and 3 (4.2 ± 0.90) was higher than that in the other groups (p 35 mm) were aspirated from live jennies using OPU. Although there was no difference in the recovery rates of COCs between group 3 and OPU (48.8% vs. 43.0%, p = .184), the percentage of grades A COCs in group OPU was higher than group 3 (72.5% vs. 59.3%, p = .036). There was no difference in the maturation rate between group 3 and OPU (60.3% vs. 69.3%, p = .171) after the COCs matured in vitro. The rates of recovery (72.2%) and maturation (92.3%) in group OPU‐Preov were higher than those in other groups (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/rda.14276
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723483280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2723483280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10LtOwzAUBmALgWi5DLwAssQCQ1tfktgZEXepEhLqwhS59rFIlcTFToAy8Qg8I0-CIYUBibOc4Xz6dfQjdEDJmMaZeKPGNGEi20BDmvB8RFJON9GQ5DwbZSKTA7QTwoIQmkohttGAZ4wmJKdDdH-7bMu6fFVt6RrsLPag3RP4FVaNwbVqO9-famgfnAnYOo91V3dVFz7e3p3TqxawdvWyghcIuGzwApqmhLCHtqyqAuyv9y6aXV7Mzq5H09urm7PT6UgzGd9jObdgCDA111qyPLWpUNIalnFDpYWMg05UCiTJtaZaUCNYLpWZC24Sm_BddNzHLr177CC0RV0GDVWlGnBdKJhgPJGcSRLp0R-6cJ1v4nNRZUSQXEga1UmvtHcheLDF0pe18quCkuKr7iLWXXzXHe3hOrGb12B-5U-_EUx68FxWsPo_qbg7P-0jPwFT9YuC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760709781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Dai, Shizhen ; Di, Zhengyang ; Li, Nan ; Zeng, Shenming</creator><creatorcontrib>Dai, Shizhen ; Di, Zhengyang ; Li, Nan ; Zeng, Shenming</creatorcontrib><description>Embryo production in donkeys is inefficient compared with that in other livestock. Obtaining a sufficient number of MII oocytes is the first step to solving this problem. In this study, the number, morphology and maturation rates of cumulus‐oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from abattoir‐derived ovaries or live jennies were compared. The diameter of follicles from abattoir‐derived ovaries was measured and divided into group 1 (2–6 mm), group 2 (6–10 mm), group 3 (10–20 mm), group 4 (20–28 mm) and group 5 (&gt;28 mm). The results showed that the number of follicles per ovary in group 2 (3.6 ± 0.28) and 3 (4.2 ± 0.90) was higher than that in the other groups (p &lt; .05). The recovery rate in group 3 was higher than group 1 (48.8% vs. 26.8%, p = .00), but lower than group 5 (48.8% vs. 76.5%, p = .025). The percentage of grade A COCs in group 3 was higher than group 2 (59.3% vs. 39.5%, p = .00) and group 1 (59.3% vs. 26.7%, p = .00). Moreover, the percentage of grade A COCs in group 4 (55.0%, p = .710) and group 5 (46.2%, p = .351) was reduced compared with that in group 3. From the above results, the developing follicles (group ovum pick‐up [OPU], 10–20 mm) and preovulation follicles (group OPU‐Preov, &gt;35 mm) were aspirated from live jennies using OPU. Although there was no difference in the recovery rates of COCs between group 3 and OPU (48.8% vs. 43.0%, p = .184), the percentage of grades A COCs in group OPU was higher than group 3 (72.5% vs. 59.3%, p = .036). There was no difference in the maturation rate between group 3 and OPU (60.3% vs. 69.3%, p = .171) after the COCs matured in vitro. The rates of recovery (72.2%) and maturation (92.3%) in group OPU‐Preov were higher than those in other groups (p &lt; .05). Moreover, the effects of maturation time and serum type on maturation rates were evaluated in groups B44 (44 h, FBS), B36 (36 h, FBS) and D44 (44 h, foetal donkey serum, FDS). These results indicated that the maturation rate in group B36 was lower than group B44 (13.1% vs. 47.0%, p = .00) and group D44 (13.1% vs. 53.3%, p = .00). In conclusion, the quality of donkey COCs from OPU was higher than that from abattoir‐derived ovaries, the suitable time of donkey in vitro maturation (IVM) was 44 h, and FBS could be replaced with FDS in donkey IVM medium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rda.14276</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36214091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Animals ; COCs morphology ; Diameters ; donkey ; Embryo, Mammalian ; Equidae ; Female ; Follicles ; Gametocytes ; In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods ; In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary ; Livestock ; Maturation ; maturation medium ; Oocytes ; Optimization ; Ovaries ; Ovary ; ovum pick‐up ; Recovery</subject><ispartof>Reproduction in domestic animals, 2023-01, Vol.58 (1), p.168-175</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2188-6122</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36214091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dai, Shizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Zhengyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Shenming</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies</title><title>Reproduction in domestic animals</title><addtitle>Reprod Domest Anim</addtitle><description>Embryo production in donkeys is inefficient compared with that in other livestock. Obtaining a sufficient number of MII oocytes is the first step to solving this problem. In this study, the number, morphology and maturation rates of cumulus‐oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from abattoir‐derived ovaries or live jennies were compared. The diameter of follicles from abattoir‐derived ovaries was measured and divided into group 1 (2–6 mm), group 2 (6–10 mm), group 3 (10–20 mm), group 4 (20–28 mm) and group 5 (&gt;28 mm). The results showed that the number of follicles per ovary in group 2 (3.6 ± 0.28) and 3 (4.2 ± 0.90) was higher than that in the other groups (p &lt; .05). The recovery rate in group 3 was higher than group 1 (48.8% vs. 26.8%, p = .00), but lower than group 5 (48.8% vs. 76.5%, p = .025). The percentage of grade A COCs in group 3 was higher than group 2 (59.3% vs. 39.5%, p = .00) and group 1 (59.3% vs. 26.7%, p = .00). Moreover, the percentage of grade A COCs in group 4 (55.0%, p = .710) and group 5 (46.2%, p = .351) was reduced compared with that in group 3. From the above results, the developing follicles (group ovum pick‐up [OPU], 10–20 mm) and preovulation follicles (group OPU‐Preov, &gt;35 mm) were aspirated from live jennies using OPU. Although there was no difference in the recovery rates of COCs between group 3 and OPU (48.8% vs. 43.0%, p = .184), the percentage of grades A COCs in group OPU was higher than group 3 (72.5% vs. 59.3%, p = .036). There was no difference in the maturation rate between group 3 and OPU (60.3% vs. 69.3%, p = .171) after the COCs matured in vitro. The rates of recovery (72.2%) and maturation (92.3%) in group OPU‐Preov were higher than those in other groups (p &lt; .05). Moreover, the effects of maturation time and serum type on maturation rates were evaluated in groups B44 (44 h, FBS), B36 (36 h, FBS) and D44 (44 h, foetal donkey serum, FDS). These results indicated that the maturation rate in group B36 was lower than group B44 (13.1% vs. 47.0%, p = .00) and group D44 (13.1% vs. 53.3%, p = .00). In conclusion, the quality of donkey COCs from OPU was higher than that from abattoir‐derived ovaries, the suitable time of donkey in vitro maturation (IVM) was 44 h, and FBS could be replaced with FDS in donkey IVM medium.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>COCs morphology</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>donkey</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian</subject><subject>Equidae</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follicles</subject><subject>Gametocytes</subject><subject>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods</subject><subject>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Maturation</subject><subject>maturation medium</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Ovary</subject><subject>ovum pick‐up</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><issn>0936-6768</issn><issn>1439-0531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10LtOwzAUBmALgWi5DLwAssQCQ1tfktgZEXepEhLqwhS59rFIlcTFToAy8Qg8I0-CIYUBibOc4Xz6dfQjdEDJmMaZeKPGNGEi20BDmvB8RFJON9GQ5DwbZSKTA7QTwoIQmkohttGAZ4wmJKdDdH-7bMu6fFVt6RrsLPag3RP4FVaNwbVqO9-famgfnAnYOo91V3dVFz7e3p3TqxawdvWyghcIuGzwApqmhLCHtqyqAuyv9y6aXV7Mzq5H09urm7PT6UgzGd9jObdgCDA111qyPLWpUNIalnFDpYWMg05UCiTJtaZaUCNYLpWZC24Sm_BddNzHLr177CC0RV0GDVWlGnBdKJhgPJGcSRLp0R-6cJ1v4nNRZUSQXEga1UmvtHcheLDF0pe18quCkuKr7iLWXXzXHe3hOrGb12B-5U-_EUx68FxWsPo_qbg7P-0jPwFT9YuC</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Dai, Shizhen</creator><creator>Di, Zhengyang</creator><creator>Li, Nan</creator><creator>Zeng, Shenming</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-6122</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies</title><author>Dai, Shizhen ; Di, Zhengyang ; Li, Nan ; Zeng, Shenming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>COCs morphology</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>donkey</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian</topic><topic>Equidae</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follicles</topic><topic>Gametocytes</topic><topic>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods</topic><topic>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Maturation</topic><topic>maturation medium</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Ovary</topic><topic>ovum pick‐up</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dai, Shizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Zhengyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Shenming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dai, Shizhen</au><au>Di, Zhengyang</au><au>Li, Nan</au><au>Zeng, Shenming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies</atitle><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Domest Anim</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>168-175</pages><issn>0936-6768</issn><eissn>1439-0531</eissn><abstract>Embryo production in donkeys is inefficient compared with that in other livestock. Obtaining a sufficient number of MII oocytes is the first step to solving this problem. In this study, the number, morphology and maturation rates of cumulus‐oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from abattoir‐derived ovaries or live jennies were compared. The diameter of follicles from abattoir‐derived ovaries was measured and divided into group 1 (2–6 mm), group 2 (6–10 mm), group 3 (10–20 mm), group 4 (20–28 mm) and group 5 (&gt;28 mm). The results showed that the number of follicles per ovary in group 2 (3.6 ± 0.28) and 3 (4.2 ± 0.90) was higher than that in the other groups (p &lt; .05). The recovery rate in group 3 was higher than group 1 (48.8% vs. 26.8%, p = .00), but lower than group 5 (48.8% vs. 76.5%, p = .025). The percentage of grade A COCs in group 3 was higher than group 2 (59.3% vs. 39.5%, p = .00) and group 1 (59.3% vs. 26.7%, p = .00). Moreover, the percentage of grade A COCs in group 4 (55.0%, p = .710) and group 5 (46.2%, p = .351) was reduced compared with that in group 3. From the above results, the developing follicles (group ovum pick‐up [OPU], 10–20 mm) and preovulation follicles (group OPU‐Preov, &gt;35 mm) were aspirated from live jennies using OPU. Although there was no difference in the recovery rates of COCs between group 3 and OPU (48.8% vs. 43.0%, p = .184), the percentage of grades A COCs in group OPU was higher than group 3 (72.5% vs. 59.3%, p = .036). There was no difference in the maturation rate between group 3 and OPU (60.3% vs. 69.3%, p = .171) after the COCs matured in vitro. The rates of recovery (72.2%) and maturation (92.3%) in group OPU‐Preov were higher than those in other groups (p &lt; .05). Moreover, the effects of maturation time and serum type on maturation rates were evaluated in groups B44 (44 h, FBS), B36 (36 h, FBS) and D44 (44 h, foetal donkey serum, FDS). These results indicated that the maturation rate in group B36 was lower than group B44 (13.1% vs. 47.0%, p = .00) and group D44 (13.1% vs. 53.3%, p = .00). In conclusion, the quality of donkey COCs from OPU was higher than that from abattoir‐derived ovaries, the suitable time of donkey in vitro maturation (IVM) was 44 h, and FBS could be replaced with FDS in donkey IVM medium.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36214091</pmid><doi>10.1111/rda.14276</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-6122</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-6768
ispartof Reproduction in domestic animals, 2023-01, Vol.58 (1), p.168-175
issn 0936-6768
1439-0531
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723483280
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Abattoirs
Animals
COCs morphology
Diameters
donkey
Embryo, Mammalian
Equidae
Female
Follicles
Gametocytes
In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods
In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary
Livestock
Maturation
maturation medium
Oocytes
Optimization
Ovaries
Ovary
ovum pick‐up
Recovery
title Optimization of recovery and maturation methods for cumulus‐oocyte complexes in jennies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A43%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20recovery%20and%20maturation%20methods%20for%20cumulus%E2%80%90oocyte%20complexes%20in%20jennies&rft.jtitle=Reproduction%20in%20domestic%20animals&rft.au=Dai,%20Shizhen&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=168-175&rft.issn=0936-6768&rft.eissn=1439-0531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rda.14276&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2723483280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-293fed0e2abcc8295f57a8fd263d18fe63ec4a5e049cc1c71d7298adb73d4f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760709781&rft_id=info:pmid/36214091&rfr_iscdi=true