Loading…

Artificial intelligence assists surgeons’ decision-making of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who have received anterior resection

Due to the difficult evaluation of the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer resection, the decision to perform a temporary ileostomy is not easily distinguishable. The aim of the present study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for identifying the risk of AL to assi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of surgical oncology 2023-02, Vol.49 (2), p.433-439
Main Authors: Shao, Shengli, Zhao, Yufeng, Lu, Qiyi, Liu, Lu, Mu, Lei, Qin, Jichao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-deee3bfb086b75c1d2b8869e69a2316fe50e318b3bf1fac496e7cef4d5aeb07b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-deee3bfb086b75c1d2b8869e69a2316fe50e318b3bf1fac496e7cef4d5aeb07b3
container_end_page 439
container_issue 2
container_start_page 433
container_title European journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 49
creator Shao, Shengli
Zhao, Yufeng
Lu, Qiyi
Liu, Lu
Mu, Lei
Qin, Jichao
description Due to the difficult evaluation of the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer resection, the decision to perform a temporary ileostomy is not easily distinguishable. The aim of the present study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for identifying the risk of AL to assist surgeons in the selective implementation of a temporary ileostomy. The data from 2240 patients with rectal cancer who received anterior resection were collected, and these patients were divided into one training and two test cohorts. Five AI algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and random forest (RF) were employed to develop predictive models using clinical variables and were assessed using the two test cohorts. The SVM model indicated good discernment of AL, and might have increased the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients with AL in the training cohort (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.09.020
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2725439871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0748798322006904</els_id><sourcerecordid>2725439871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-deee3bfb086b75c1d2b8869e69a2316fe50e318b3bf1fac496e7cef4d5aeb07b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhy0EokvhBTggH7kk-E8SJxKXqioUqRIXOFuOM9mdJYkXj3er3ngKJF6PJ8HRFo6cbI2--Y1mPsZeS1FKIZt3-xL2FEollCpFVwolnrCNrLUqlKzNU7YRpmoL07X6gr0g2gshOm265-xCN6qq2qrasJ9XMeGIHt3EcUkwTbiFxQN3REiJOB3jFsJCv3_84gN4JAxLMbtvuGx5GHmC-RCiiw8cJwiUwpx_Cz-4hLDk9ntMOx7Bp5zvXQ6O_H4X-M6dYC0DnmDgLg-OGGKuUEbzhJfs2egmgleP7yX7-uHmy_Vtcff546frq7vC67pJxQAAuh970Ta9qb0cVN-2TQdN55SWzQi1AC3bPjNydL7qGjAexmqoHfTC9PqSvT3nHmL4fgRKdkby-QpugXAkq4yqK921RmZUnVEfA1GE0R4iznlzK4Vdfdi9XX3Y1YcVnc0-ctObx_xjP8Pwr-WvgAy8PwOQtzwhREseVwEDrlezQ8D_5f8B41mi2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2725439871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Artificial intelligence assists surgeons’ decision-making of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who have received anterior resection</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Shao, Shengli ; Zhao, Yufeng ; Lu, Qiyi ; Liu, Lu ; Mu, Lei ; Qin, Jichao</creator><creatorcontrib>Shao, Shengli ; Zhao, Yufeng ; Lu, Qiyi ; Liu, Lu ; Mu, Lei ; Qin, Jichao</creatorcontrib><description>Due to the difficult evaluation of the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer resection, the decision to perform a temporary ileostomy is not easily distinguishable. The aim of the present study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for identifying the risk of AL to assist surgeons in the selective implementation of a temporary ileostomy. The data from 2240 patients with rectal cancer who received anterior resection were collected, and these patients were divided into one training and two test cohorts. Five AI algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and random forest (RF) were employed to develop predictive models using clinical variables and were assessed using the two test cohorts. The SVM model indicated good discernment of AL, and might have increased the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients with AL in the training cohort (p &lt; 0.001). Following the assessment of the two test cohorts, the SVM model could identify AL in a favorable manner, which performed with positive predictive values of 0.150 (0.091–0.234) and 0.151 (0.091–0.237), and negative predictive values of 0.977 (0.958–0.988) and 0.986 (0.969–0.994), respectively. It is important to note that the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients without AL would have been significantly reduced (p &lt; 0.001) and which would have been significantly increased in patients with AL (p &lt; 0.05). The model (https://alrisk.21cloudbox.com/) indicated good discernment of AL, which may be used to assist the surgeon's decision-making of performing temporary ileostomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.09.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36244844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical ; Anastomotic Leak - surgery ; Anastomotic leakage ; Artificial Intelligence ; Bayes Theorem ; Humans ; Ileostomy ; Rectal cancer ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgeons ; Temporary ileostomy</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2023-02, Vol.49 (2), p.433-439</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-deee3bfb086b75c1d2b8869e69a2316fe50e318b3bf1fac496e7cef4d5aeb07b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-deee3bfb086b75c1d2b8869e69a2316fe50e318b3bf1fac496e7cef4d5aeb07b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2961-7624</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36244844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shao, Shengli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Qiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mu, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Jichao</creatorcontrib><title>Artificial intelligence assists surgeons’ decision-making of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who have received anterior resection</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Due to the difficult evaluation of the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer resection, the decision to perform a temporary ileostomy is not easily distinguishable. The aim of the present study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for identifying the risk of AL to assist surgeons in the selective implementation of a temporary ileostomy. The data from 2240 patients with rectal cancer who received anterior resection were collected, and these patients were divided into one training and two test cohorts. Five AI algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and random forest (RF) were employed to develop predictive models using clinical variables and were assessed using the two test cohorts. The SVM model indicated good discernment of AL, and might have increased the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients with AL in the training cohort (p &lt; 0.001). Following the assessment of the two test cohorts, the SVM model could identify AL in a favorable manner, which performed with positive predictive values of 0.150 (0.091–0.234) and 0.151 (0.091–0.237), and negative predictive values of 0.977 (0.958–0.988) and 0.986 (0.969–0.994), respectively. It is important to note that the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients without AL would have been significantly reduced (p &lt; 0.001) and which would have been significantly increased in patients with AL (p &lt; 0.05). The model (https://alrisk.21cloudbox.com/) indicated good discernment of AL, which may be used to assist the surgeon's decision-making of performing temporary ileostomy.</description><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - surgery</subject><subject>Anastomotic leakage</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileostomy</subject><subject>Rectal cancer</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Temporary ileostomy</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhy0EokvhBTggH7kk-E8SJxKXqioUqRIXOFuOM9mdJYkXj3er3ngKJF6PJ8HRFo6cbI2--Y1mPsZeS1FKIZt3-xL2FEollCpFVwolnrCNrLUqlKzNU7YRpmoL07X6gr0g2gshOm265-xCN6qq2qrasJ9XMeGIHt3EcUkwTbiFxQN3REiJOB3jFsJCv3_84gN4JAxLMbtvuGx5GHmC-RCiiw8cJwiUwpx_Cz-4hLDk9ntMOx7Bp5zvXQ6O_H4X-M6dYC0DnmDgLg-OGGKuUEbzhJfs2egmgleP7yX7-uHmy_Vtcff546frq7vC67pJxQAAuh970Ta9qb0cVN-2TQdN55SWzQi1AC3bPjNydL7qGjAexmqoHfTC9PqSvT3nHmL4fgRKdkby-QpugXAkq4yqK921RmZUnVEfA1GE0R4iznlzK4Vdfdi9XX3Y1YcVnc0-ctObx_xjP8Pwr-WvgAy8PwOQtzwhREseVwEDrlezQ8D_5f8B41mi2g</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Shao, Shengli</creator><creator>Zhao, Yufeng</creator><creator>Lu, Qiyi</creator><creator>Liu, Lu</creator><creator>Mu, Lei</creator><creator>Qin, Jichao</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-7624</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Artificial intelligence assists surgeons’ decision-making of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who have received anterior resection</title><author>Shao, Shengli ; Zhao, Yufeng ; Lu, Qiyi ; Liu, Lu ; Mu, Lei ; Qin, Jichao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-deee3bfb086b75c1d2b8869e69a2316fe50e318b3bf1fac496e7cef4d5aeb07b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - surgery</topic><topic>Anastomotic leakage</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileostomy</topic><topic>Rectal cancer</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Temporary ileostomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shao, Shengli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Qiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mu, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Jichao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shao, Shengli</au><au>Zhao, Yufeng</au><au>Lu, Qiyi</au><au>Liu, Lu</au><au>Mu, Lei</au><au>Qin, Jichao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Artificial intelligence assists surgeons’ decision-making of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who have received anterior resection</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>433</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>433-439</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><abstract>Due to the difficult evaluation of the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer resection, the decision to perform a temporary ileostomy is not easily distinguishable. The aim of the present study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for identifying the risk of AL to assist surgeons in the selective implementation of a temporary ileostomy. The data from 2240 patients with rectal cancer who received anterior resection were collected, and these patients were divided into one training and two test cohorts. Five AI algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and random forest (RF) were employed to develop predictive models using clinical variables and were assessed using the two test cohorts. The SVM model indicated good discernment of AL, and might have increased the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients with AL in the training cohort (p &lt; 0.001). Following the assessment of the two test cohorts, the SVM model could identify AL in a favorable manner, which performed with positive predictive values of 0.150 (0.091–0.234) and 0.151 (0.091–0.237), and negative predictive values of 0.977 (0.958–0.988) and 0.986 (0.969–0.994), respectively. It is important to note that the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients without AL would have been significantly reduced (p &lt; 0.001) and which would have been significantly increased in patients with AL (p &lt; 0.05). The model (https://alrisk.21cloudbox.com/) indicated good discernment of AL, which may be used to assist the surgeon's decision-making of performing temporary ileostomy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36244844</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejso.2022.09.020</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-7624</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-7983
ispartof European journal of surgical oncology, 2023-02, Vol.49 (2), p.433-439
issn 0748-7983
1532-2157
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2725439871
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anastomosis, Surgical
Anastomotic Leak - surgery
Anastomotic leakage
Artificial Intelligence
Bayes Theorem
Humans
Ileostomy
Rectal cancer
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Surgeons
Temporary ileostomy
title Artificial intelligence assists surgeons’ decision-making of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who have received anterior resection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A41%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial%20intelligence%20assists%20surgeons%E2%80%99%20decision-making%20of%20temporary%20ileostomy%20in%20patients%20with%20rectal%20cancer%20who%20have%20received%20anterior%20resection&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Shao,%20Shengli&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=433&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=433-439&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.09.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2725439871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-deee3bfb086b75c1d2b8869e69a2316fe50e318b3bf1fac496e7cef4d5aeb07b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2725439871&rft_id=info:pmid/36244844&rfr_iscdi=true