Loading…
Positive predictive value of LI-RADS US-3 observations: multivariable analysis of clinical and imaging features
Purpose To determine how clinical and imaging features affect the positive predictive values (PPV) of US-3 observations. Methods In this retrospective study, 10,546 adult patients who were high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from 2017 to 2021 underwent ultrasound screening/surveillance. Of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Abdominal imaging 2023-01, Vol.48 (1), p.271-281 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
To determine how clinical and imaging features affect the positive predictive values (PPV) of US-3 observations.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 10,546 adult patients who were high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from 2017 to 2021 underwent ultrasound screening/surveillance. Of these, 225 adult patients (100 women, 125 men) with an US-3 observation underwent diagnostic characterization with multiphasic CT (93; 41%), MRI (130; 58%), or contrast-enhanced ultrasound (2; 1%). US-3 observations included focal observations ≥ 10 mm in 216 patients and new venous thrombi in 9 patients. PPV with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using diagnostic characterization as the reference standard. Multivariable analysis of clinical and imaging features was performed to determine the strongest associations with cancer.
Results
Overall PPV for an US-3 observation was 33% (27–39%) for at least intermediate probability of cancer (≥ LR-3) and 15% (10–20%) for at least probable cancer (≥ LR-4). At multivariable analysis, cirrhosis had the strongest effect size for at least probable cancer (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2366-0058 2366-004X 2366-0058 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00261-022-03681-4 |