Loading…

First Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion for Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Fixation Constructs Regarding Initial Maintenance of Correction and Complications: Traditional Crossing Screw Fixation Versus Dorsomedial Locking Plate and Intercuneiform Compression Screw

Various fixation constructs exist to address hallux valgus when performing a first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis. The goal of this present study is to compare complication rates, and degree and maintenance of angular correction between a dorsomedial locking plate with intercuneiform compression...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of foot and ankle surgery 2023-03, Vol.62 (2), p.347-354
Main Authors: Abben, Kyle W., Sakow, Chloe F., Sorensen, Tyler, Chang, Howard C., Boffeli, Troy J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c28bdf3e966c567b02a8959917df258c39b92592471d7e82020ac29ff761844c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c28bdf3e966c567b02a8959917df258c39b92592471d7e82020ac29ff761844c3
container_end_page 354
container_issue 2
container_start_page 347
container_title The Journal of foot and ankle surgery
container_volume 62
creator Abben, Kyle W.
Sakow, Chloe F.
Sorensen, Tyler
Chang, Howard C.
Boffeli, Troy J.
description Various fixation constructs exist to address hallux valgus when performing a first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis. The goal of this present study is to compare complication rates, and degree and maintenance of angular correction between a dorsomedial locking plate with intercuneiform compression screw construct versus traditional crossing solid screw fixation construct. The plate plus intercuneiform compression screw construct fixation utilized a combined sagittal saw and curette method of joint preparation while the crossed screw fixation group utilized a curette and bur technique. A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent a midfoot fusion using either constructs. Sixty four total feet in 56 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty four consecutive patients (32 feet) who underwent a midfoot arthrodesis using the locking plate and intercuneiform fixation were fully fused (100%) by 10 weeks postoperatively, with no incidents of nonunion and one deep vein thrombosis event. Thirty two consecutive patients (32 feet) who underwent midfoot arthrodesis with crossing screw fixation had 2 nonunion events, one that was asymptomatic and the other that required a revision midfoot fusion. There was a statistically significant improvement from the pre-operative intermetatarsal angle, hallux abductus angle compared to the 10 week and 1 year radiographs (p < .05) for the entire cohort for both fixation constructs. There was a statistically significant increase in American College of Foot and Ankle Surgery first ray scores from pre-op to 1 year follow-up for both fixation constructs. Overall, the dorsomedial locking plate plus intercuneiform compression screw fixation construct better maintains Intermetatarsal angle (IMA) correction at midterm follow-up compared to the traditional crossing screw construct. Both cohorts overall demonstrate similar fusion rates at 10 weeks, nonunion events, incidences of broken hardware, hardware removal, deep vein thrombosis, neuritis at 1 year postoperatively, and hallux varus.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.09.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2727638477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1067251622002666</els_id><sourcerecordid>2727638477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c28bdf3e966c567b02a8959917df258c39b92592471d7e82020ac29ff761844c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kktv1DAUhQMC0VL4AywqL9kkOM7DccWmCgwdNAgEQ7eWx7kZecjEU9vp499znSmwY5Wr6Jzv5ObcJHmT0yynVfFul-165TNGGcuoyChlT5PTvCpZyhgrn-FMa56yKq9Pkpfe71DARFO9SE6KmnEmKnb65HxhnA9krZy3ewgq4KAG8tmaMZDF5I0dSW8duVLDMN2TazVsJ08-AL7bm_BwQS7JdwjO-gPoYG6BtHZ_UM549NmerO8sWZh7FSKntaMPbtLBo2erXGfGLVmOJhhM_KIwEUY1aojG1joXiWhTYzdTB6Nnjr8ga6c6E2c0thjuI-mHdnD3L-0anI-faufNupixsvpXVH4bVICZu8RMp6cRTFxojnHg561n3Kvkea8GD68fn2fJz8XHdXuVrr5-WraXq1SXlIZUs2bT9QWIutZVzTeUqUZUQuS861nV6EJsBKsEK3necWiwMao0E33P67wpS12cJW-P3IOzNxP4IPfGaxgGNYKdvMS6eF00JecoZUepjos76OXBmb1yDzKnMt6F3Ml4FzLehaRCYu1oOn_kTxv8GX8tfw4BBe-PAsAtbw046bUBLKMzsQfZWfM__m9JOtCj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2727638477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>First Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion for Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Fixation Constructs Regarding Initial Maintenance of Correction and Complications: Traditional Crossing Screw Fixation Versus Dorsomedial Locking Plate and Intercuneiform Compression Screw</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Abben, Kyle W. ; Sakow, Chloe F. ; Sorensen, Tyler ; Chang, Howard C. ; Boffeli, Troy J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abben, Kyle W. ; Sakow, Chloe F. ; Sorensen, Tyler ; Chang, Howard C. ; Boffeli, Troy J.</creatorcontrib><description>Various fixation constructs exist to address hallux valgus when performing a first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis. The goal of this present study is to compare complication rates, and degree and maintenance of angular correction between a dorsomedial locking plate with intercuneiform compression screw construct versus traditional crossing solid screw fixation construct. The plate plus intercuneiform compression screw construct fixation utilized a combined sagittal saw and curette method of joint preparation while the crossed screw fixation group utilized a curette and bur technique. A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent a midfoot fusion using either constructs. Sixty four total feet in 56 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty four consecutive patients (32 feet) who underwent a midfoot arthrodesis using the locking plate and intercuneiform fixation were fully fused (100%) by 10 weeks postoperatively, with no incidents of nonunion and one deep vein thrombosis event. Thirty two consecutive patients (32 feet) who underwent midfoot arthrodesis with crossing screw fixation had 2 nonunion events, one that was asymptomatic and the other that required a revision midfoot fusion. There was a statistically significant improvement from the pre-operative intermetatarsal angle, hallux abductus angle compared to the 10 week and 1 year radiographs (p &lt; .05) for the entire cohort for both fixation constructs. There was a statistically significant increase in American College of Foot and Ankle Surgery first ray scores from pre-op to 1 year follow-up for both fixation constructs. Overall, the dorsomedial locking plate plus intercuneiform compression screw fixation construct better maintains Intermetatarsal angle (IMA) correction at midterm follow-up compared to the traditional crossing screw construct. Both cohorts overall demonstrate similar fusion rates at 10 weeks, nonunion events, incidences of broken hardware, hardware removal, deep vein thrombosis, neuritis at 1 year postoperatively, and hallux varus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-2516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.09.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36272952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>crossing screw fixation ; curette and bur ; intercuneiform fixation ; lapidus ; midfoot fusion</subject><ispartof>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2023-03, Vol.62 (2), p.347-354</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c28bdf3e966c567b02a8959917df258c39b92592471d7e82020ac29ff761844c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c28bdf3e966c567b02a8959917df258c39b92592471d7e82020ac29ff761844c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1096-8942</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36272952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abben, Kyle W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakow, Chloe F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Howard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boffeli, Troy J.</creatorcontrib><title>First Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion for Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Fixation Constructs Regarding Initial Maintenance of Correction and Complications: Traditional Crossing Screw Fixation Versus Dorsomedial Locking Plate and Intercuneiform Compression Screw</title><title>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</title><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><description>Various fixation constructs exist to address hallux valgus when performing a first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis. The goal of this present study is to compare complication rates, and degree and maintenance of angular correction between a dorsomedial locking plate with intercuneiform compression screw construct versus traditional crossing solid screw fixation construct. The plate plus intercuneiform compression screw construct fixation utilized a combined sagittal saw and curette method of joint preparation while the crossed screw fixation group utilized a curette and bur technique. A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent a midfoot fusion using either constructs. Sixty four total feet in 56 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty four consecutive patients (32 feet) who underwent a midfoot arthrodesis using the locking plate and intercuneiform fixation were fully fused (100%) by 10 weeks postoperatively, with no incidents of nonunion and one deep vein thrombosis event. Thirty two consecutive patients (32 feet) who underwent midfoot arthrodesis with crossing screw fixation had 2 nonunion events, one that was asymptomatic and the other that required a revision midfoot fusion. There was a statistically significant improvement from the pre-operative intermetatarsal angle, hallux abductus angle compared to the 10 week and 1 year radiographs (p &lt; .05) for the entire cohort for both fixation constructs. There was a statistically significant increase in American College of Foot and Ankle Surgery first ray scores from pre-op to 1 year follow-up for both fixation constructs. Overall, the dorsomedial locking plate plus intercuneiform compression screw fixation construct better maintains Intermetatarsal angle (IMA) correction at midterm follow-up compared to the traditional crossing screw construct. Both cohorts overall demonstrate similar fusion rates at 10 weeks, nonunion events, incidences of broken hardware, hardware removal, deep vein thrombosis, neuritis at 1 year postoperatively, and hallux varus.</description><subject>crossing screw fixation</subject><subject>curette and bur</subject><subject>intercuneiform fixation</subject><subject>lapidus</subject><subject>midfoot fusion</subject><issn>1067-2516</issn><issn>1542-2224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kktv1DAUhQMC0VL4AywqL9kkOM7DccWmCgwdNAgEQ7eWx7kZecjEU9vp499znSmwY5Wr6Jzv5ObcJHmT0yynVfFul-165TNGGcuoyChlT5PTvCpZyhgrn-FMa56yKq9Pkpfe71DARFO9SE6KmnEmKnb65HxhnA9krZy3ewgq4KAG8tmaMZDF5I0dSW8duVLDMN2TazVsJ08-AL7bm_BwQS7JdwjO-gPoYG6BtHZ_UM549NmerO8sWZh7FSKntaMPbtLBo2erXGfGLVmOJhhM_KIwEUY1aojG1joXiWhTYzdTB6Nnjr8ga6c6E2c0thjuI-mHdnD3L-0anI-faufNupixsvpXVH4bVICZu8RMp6cRTFxojnHg561n3Kvkea8GD68fn2fJz8XHdXuVrr5-WraXq1SXlIZUs2bT9QWIutZVzTeUqUZUQuS861nV6EJsBKsEK3necWiwMao0E33P67wpS12cJW-P3IOzNxP4IPfGaxgGNYKdvMS6eF00JecoZUepjos76OXBmb1yDzKnMt6F3Ml4FzLehaRCYu1oOn_kTxv8GX8tfw4BBe-PAsAtbw046bUBLKMzsQfZWfM__m9JOtCj</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Abben, Kyle W.</creator><creator>Sakow, Chloe F.</creator><creator>Sorensen, Tyler</creator><creator>Chang, Howard C.</creator><creator>Boffeli, Troy J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1096-8942</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>First Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion for Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Fixation Constructs Regarding Initial Maintenance of Correction and Complications: Traditional Crossing Screw Fixation Versus Dorsomedial Locking Plate and Intercuneiform Compression Screw</title><author>Abben, Kyle W. ; Sakow, Chloe F. ; Sorensen, Tyler ; Chang, Howard C. ; Boffeli, Troy J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c28bdf3e966c567b02a8959917df258c39b92592471d7e82020ac29ff761844c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>crossing screw fixation</topic><topic>curette and bur</topic><topic>intercuneiform fixation</topic><topic>lapidus</topic><topic>midfoot fusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abben, Kyle W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakow, Chloe F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Howard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boffeli, Troy J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abben, Kyle W.</au><au>Sakow, Chloe F.</au><au>Sorensen, Tyler</au><au>Chang, Howard C.</au><au>Boffeli, Troy J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>First Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion for Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Fixation Constructs Regarding Initial Maintenance of Correction and Complications: Traditional Crossing Screw Fixation Versus Dorsomedial Locking Plate and Intercuneiform Compression Screw</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>347-354</pages><issn>1067-2516</issn><eissn>1542-2224</eissn><abstract>Various fixation constructs exist to address hallux valgus when performing a first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis. The goal of this present study is to compare complication rates, and degree and maintenance of angular correction between a dorsomedial locking plate with intercuneiform compression screw construct versus traditional crossing solid screw fixation construct. The plate plus intercuneiform compression screw construct fixation utilized a combined sagittal saw and curette method of joint preparation while the crossed screw fixation group utilized a curette and bur technique. A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent a midfoot fusion using either constructs. Sixty four total feet in 56 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty four consecutive patients (32 feet) who underwent a midfoot arthrodesis using the locking plate and intercuneiform fixation were fully fused (100%) by 10 weeks postoperatively, with no incidents of nonunion and one deep vein thrombosis event. Thirty two consecutive patients (32 feet) who underwent midfoot arthrodesis with crossing screw fixation had 2 nonunion events, one that was asymptomatic and the other that required a revision midfoot fusion. There was a statistically significant improvement from the pre-operative intermetatarsal angle, hallux abductus angle compared to the 10 week and 1 year radiographs (p &lt; .05) for the entire cohort for both fixation constructs. There was a statistically significant increase in American College of Foot and Ankle Surgery first ray scores from pre-op to 1 year follow-up for both fixation constructs. Overall, the dorsomedial locking plate plus intercuneiform compression screw fixation construct better maintains Intermetatarsal angle (IMA) correction at midterm follow-up compared to the traditional crossing screw construct. Both cohorts overall demonstrate similar fusion rates at 10 weeks, nonunion events, incidences of broken hardware, hardware removal, deep vein thrombosis, neuritis at 1 year postoperatively, and hallux varus.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36272952</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jfas.2022.09.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1096-8942</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-2516
ispartof The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2023-03, Vol.62 (2), p.347-354
issn 1067-2516
1542-2224
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2727638477
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects crossing screw fixation
curette and bur
intercuneiform fixation
lapidus
midfoot fusion
title First Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion for Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Fixation Constructs Regarding Initial Maintenance of Correction and Complications: Traditional Crossing Screw Fixation Versus Dorsomedial Locking Plate and Intercuneiform Compression Screw
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A59%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=First%20Tarsometatarsal%20Joint%20Fusion%20for%20Hallux%20Valgus%20Deformity:%20A%20Retrospective%20Comparison%20of%20Two%20Fixation%20Constructs%20Regarding%20Initial%20Maintenance%20of%20Correction%20and%20Complications:%20Traditional%20Crossing%20Screw%20Fixation%20Versus%20Dorsomedial%20Locking%20Plate%20and%20Intercuneiform%20Compression%20Screw&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20foot%20and%20ankle%20surgery&rft.au=Abben,%20Kyle%20W.&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=347-354&rft.issn=1067-2516&rft.eissn=1542-2224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jfas.2022.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2727638477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c28bdf3e966c567b02a8959917df258c39b92592471d7e82020ac29ff761844c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2727638477&rft_id=info:pmid/36272952&rfr_iscdi=true