Loading…

Sickle Cell Disease and Quality of Life: An Evaluation of Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials

Sickle cell disease significantly impacts one's quality of life (QOL); thus, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess patients' health from their perspective. We aim to evaluate the completeness of reporting of PROs included in sickle c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hemoglobin 2022-09, Vol.46 (5), p.265-268
Main Authors: Renner, Abbey, Love, Mitchell, Garrett, Elizabeth, Douglas, Alexander, Kee, Micah, Heigle, Benjamin, Wise, Audrey, Ottwell, Ryan, Hartwell, Micah, Vassar, Matt
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-10ea28f32bae3b5695faddb1816c931153cca00da7023ebe11ded281303c39413
container_end_page 268
container_issue 5
container_start_page 265
container_title Hemoglobin
container_volume 46
creator Renner, Abbey
Love, Mitchell
Garrett, Elizabeth
Douglas, Alexander
Kee, Micah
Heigle, Benjamin
Wise, Audrey
Ottwell, Ryan
Hartwell, Micah
Vassar, Matt
description Sickle cell disease significantly impacts one's quality of life (QOL); thus, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess patients' health from their perspective. We aim to evaluate the completeness of reporting of PROs included in sickle cell disease RCTs. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for published sickle cell disease RCTs with at least one PRO measure from 2006 to 2021. In a masked, duplicate fashion, two investigators evaluated RCTs using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting in Trials (CONSORT)-PRO adaptation and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool. The primary objective was mean percent completeness of the CONSORT-PRO adaptation. Additional relationships between trial characteristics and completeness of reporting were evaluated. Mean completeness of reporting of RCTs was 41.49% (SD = 20.90). Randomized controlled trials with primary outcomes were more complete (57.50%, SD = 8.33) than RCTs with secondary PROs (33.48%, SD = 20.91). We did not find a significant difference in completion between trials with primary PROs and secondary PROs (t = 2.07;  = 0.06). Our secondary objectives included factors that may be associated with completeness of PRO reporting. Of the 12 included studies, five were considered to be overall 'high' RoB (41.67%). In each of the five domains, the majority of studies received 'low' RoB evaluations. Incomplete PRO reporting was common within sickle cell RCTs. Therefore, we recommend future RCTs including PROs should take measures to increase completeness of reporting.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03630269.2022.2121215
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2727642887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2727642887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-10ea28f32bae3b5695faddb1816c931153cca00da7023ebe11ded281303c39413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwE0A5cunIRz9SbqiMD2nSYAyJW5SmLgq0zWhapHHip5NqG_LB9qvXtvwgdE7JlBJBrgiPOWFxOmWEsSmjQ0QHaEwjzoKQs7dDNB48wWAaoRPnPgihaULCYzTiMYuF4MkY_b4Y_VkBzqCq8K1xoBxg1RT4uVeV6TbYlnhuSrjGNw2efauqV52xzSAvYW3bzjTvQ_PkZWi6YCtCgRd9p20NDpsGL_1CW5sfL2e26VpbVb5ctUZV7hQdlT7B2S5P0OvdbJU9BPPF_WN2Mw8042EXUAKKiZKzXAHPoziNSlUUORU01imn_mutFSGFSgjjkAOlBRRMUE645mlI-QRdbveuW_vVg-tkbZz2X6sGbO8kS1gSh0yIxFujrVW31rkWSrluTa3ajaREDvDlHr4c4MsdfD93sTvR5zUU_1N72vwP6a-ADw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2727642887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sickle Cell Disease and Quality of Life: An Evaluation of Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Renner, Abbey ; Love, Mitchell ; Garrett, Elizabeth ; Douglas, Alexander ; Kee, Micah ; Heigle, Benjamin ; Wise, Audrey ; Ottwell, Ryan ; Hartwell, Micah ; Vassar, Matt</creator><creatorcontrib>Renner, Abbey ; Love, Mitchell ; Garrett, Elizabeth ; Douglas, Alexander ; Kee, Micah ; Heigle, Benjamin ; Wise, Audrey ; Ottwell, Ryan ; Hartwell, Micah ; Vassar, Matt</creatorcontrib><description>Sickle cell disease significantly impacts one's quality of life (QOL); thus, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess patients' health from their perspective. We aim to evaluate the completeness of reporting of PROs included in sickle cell disease RCTs. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for published sickle cell disease RCTs with at least one PRO measure from 2006 to 2021. In a masked, duplicate fashion, two investigators evaluated RCTs using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting in Trials (CONSORT)-PRO adaptation and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool. The primary objective was mean percent completeness of the CONSORT-PRO adaptation. Additional relationships between trial characteristics and completeness of reporting were evaluated. Mean completeness of reporting of RCTs was 41.49% (SD = 20.90). Randomized controlled trials with primary outcomes were more complete (57.50%, SD = 8.33) than RCTs with secondary PROs (33.48%, SD = 20.91). We did not find a significant difference in completion between trials with primary PROs and secondary PROs (t = 2.07;  = 0.06). Our secondary objectives included factors that may be associated with completeness of PRO reporting. Of the 12 included studies, five were considered to be overall 'high' RoB (41.67%). In each of the five domains, the majority of studies received 'low' RoB evaluations. Incomplete PRO reporting was common within sickle cell RCTs. Therefore, we recommend future RCTs including PROs should take measures to increase completeness of reporting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-0269</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-432X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03630269.2022.2121215</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36268837</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Humans ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Quality of Life ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><ispartof>Hemoglobin, 2022-09, Vol.46 (5), p.265-268</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-10ea28f32bae3b5695faddb1816c931153cca00da7023ebe11ded281303c39413</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6810-6571 ; 0000-0002-7463-2620 ; 0000-0003-2859-6152 ; 0000-0002-6574-2844</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268837$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Renner, Abbey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Mitchell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kee, Micah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heigle, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Audrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottwell, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartwell, Micah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassar, Matt</creatorcontrib><title>Sickle Cell Disease and Quality of Life: An Evaluation of Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials</title><title>Hemoglobin</title><addtitle>Hemoglobin</addtitle><description>Sickle cell disease significantly impacts one's quality of life (QOL); thus, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess patients' health from their perspective. We aim to evaluate the completeness of reporting of PROs included in sickle cell disease RCTs. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for published sickle cell disease RCTs with at least one PRO measure from 2006 to 2021. In a masked, duplicate fashion, two investigators evaluated RCTs using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting in Trials (CONSORT)-PRO adaptation and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool. The primary objective was mean percent completeness of the CONSORT-PRO adaptation. Additional relationships between trial characteristics and completeness of reporting were evaluated. Mean completeness of reporting of RCTs was 41.49% (SD = 20.90). Randomized controlled trials with primary outcomes were more complete (57.50%, SD = 8.33) than RCTs with secondary PROs (33.48%, SD = 20.91). We did not find a significant difference in completion between trials with primary PROs and secondary PROs (t = 2.07;  = 0.06). Our secondary objectives included factors that may be associated with completeness of PRO reporting. Of the 12 included studies, five were considered to be overall 'high' RoB (41.67%). In each of the five domains, the majority of studies received 'low' RoB evaluations. Incomplete PRO reporting was common within sickle cell RCTs. Therefore, we recommend future RCTs including PROs should take measures to increase completeness of reporting.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><issn>0363-0269</issn><issn>1532-432X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwE0A5cunIRz9SbqiMD2nSYAyJW5SmLgq0zWhapHHip5NqG_LB9qvXtvwgdE7JlBJBrgiPOWFxOmWEsSmjQ0QHaEwjzoKQs7dDNB48wWAaoRPnPgihaULCYzTiMYuF4MkY_b4Y_VkBzqCq8K1xoBxg1RT4uVeV6TbYlnhuSrjGNw2efauqV52xzSAvYW3bzjTvQ_PkZWi6YCtCgRd9p20NDpsGL_1CW5sfL2e26VpbVb5ctUZV7hQdlT7B2S5P0OvdbJU9BPPF_WN2Mw8042EXUAKKiZKzXAHPoziNSlUUORU01imn_mutFSGFSgjjkAOlBRRMUE645mlI-QRdbveuW_vVg-tkbZz2X6sGbO8kS1gSh0yIxFujrVW31rkWSrluTa3ajaREDvDlHr4c4MsdfD93sTvR5zUU_1N72vwP6a-ADw</recordid><startdate>20220903</startdate><enddate>20220903</enddate><creator>Renner, Abbey</creator><creator>Love, Mitchell</creator><creator>Garrett, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Douglas, Alexander</creator><creator>Kee, Micah</creator><creator>Heigle, Benjamin</creator><creator>Wise, Audrey</creator><creator>Ottwell, Ryan</creator><creator>Hartwell, Micah</creator><creator>Vassar, Matt</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-6571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7463-2620</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-6152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6574-2844</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220903</creationdate><title>Sickle Cell Disease and Quality of Life: An Evaluation of Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials</title><author>Renner, Abbey ; Love, Mitchell ; Garrett, Elizabeth ; Douglas, Alexander ; Kee, Micah ; Heigle, Benjamin ; Wise, Audrey ; Ottwell, Ryan ; Hartwell, Micah ; Vassar, Matt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-10ea28f32bae3b5695faddb1816c931153cca00da7023ebe11ded281303c39413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Renner, Abbey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Mitchell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kee, Micah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heigle, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Audrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottwell, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartwell, Micah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassar, Matt</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hemoglobin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Renner, Abbey</au><au>Love, Mitchell</au><au>Garrett, Elizabeth</au><au>Douglas, Alexander</au><au>Kee, Micah</au><au>Heigle, Benjamin</au><au>Wise, Audrey</au><au>Ottwell, Ryan</au><au>Hartwell, Micah</au><au>Vassar, Matt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sickle Cell Disease and Quality of Life: An Evaluation of Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials</atitle><jtitle>Hemoglobin</jtitle><addtitle>Hemoglobin</addtitle><date>2022-09-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>265-268</pages><issn>0363-0269</issn><eissn>1532-432X</eissn><abstract>Sickle cell disease significantly impacts one's quality of life (QOL); thus, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess patients' health from their perspective. We aim to evaluate the completeness of reporting of PROs included in sickle cell disease RCTs. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for published sickle cell disease RCTs with at least one PRO measure from 2006 to 2021. In a masked, duplicate fashion, two investigators evaluated RCTs using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting in Trials (CONSORT)-PRO adaptation and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool. The primary objective was mean percent completeness of the CONSORT-PRO adaptation. Additional relationships between trial characteristics and completeness of reporting were evaluated. Mean completeness of reporting of RCTs was 41.49% (SD = 20.90). Randomized controlled trials with primary outcomes were more complete (57.50%, SD = 8.33) than RCTs with secondary PROs (33.48%, SD = 20.91). We did not find a significant difference in completion between trials with primary PROs and secondary PROs (t = 2.07;  = 0.06). Our secondary objectives included factors that may be associated with completeness of PRO reporting. Of the 12 included studies, five were considered to be overall 'high' RoB (41.67%). In each of the five domains, the majority of studies received 'low' RoB evaluations. Incomplete PRO reporting was common within sickle cell RCTs. Therefore, we recommend future RCTs including PROs should take measures to increase completeness of reporting.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>36268837</pmid><doi>10.1080/03630269.2022.2121215</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-6571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7463-2620</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-6152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6574-2844</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-0269
ispartof Hemoglobin, 2022-09, Vol.46 (5), p.265-268
issn 0363-0269
1532-432X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2727642887
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Humans
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Quality of Life
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
title Sickle Cell Disease and Quality of Life: An Evaluation of Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sickle%20Cell%20Disease%20and%20Quality%20of%20Life:%20An%20Evaluation%20of%20Reporting%20of%20Patient-Reported%20Outcomes%20in%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Hemoglobin&rft.au=Renner,%20Abbey&rft.date=2022-09-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=265-268&rft.issn=0363-0269&rft.eissn=1532-432X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03630269.2022.2121215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2727642887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-10ea28f32bae3b5695faddb1816c931153cca00da7023ebe11ded281303c39413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2727642887&rft_id=info:pmid/36268837&rfr_iscdi=true