Loading…

Diagnostic accuracy of fused CBCT images in the evaluation of temporomandibular joint condylar bone resorption

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fused CBCT images for patients with condylar bone resorption of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthrosis. Materials and methods Forty-two TMJs from twenty-one patients were included. Bone resorption of condyles evaluated by three experts was used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical oral investigations 2023-03, Vol.27 (3), p.1277-1288
Main Authors: Feng, Ji-ling, Ma, Ruo-han, Du, Han, Zhao, Yan-ping, Meng, Juan-hong, Li, Gang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fused CBCT images for patients with condylar bone resorption of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthrosis. Materials and methods Forty-two TMJs from twenty-one patients were included. Bone resorption of condyles evaluated by three experts was used as the reference standard. Three oral and maxillofacial radiology residents evaluated the resorption of condyles with a five-point scale for the four sets of images (two consecutive CBCT images without fusion, fused 2D cross-sectional images, fused 3D images, and combining fused 2D cross-sectional images and fused 3D images) randomly and independently. Each set of images was evaluated at least 1 week apart, and a second evaluation was performed 4 weeks later. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the intra- and inter-observer agreement. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were compared among the four image sets using the Z test. Results Twenty-four TMJs were determined as condylar bone resorption, and eighteen were determined as no obvious change. The average AUC values from the three observers for the three fused image sets (0.94, 0.93, 0.93) were significantly higher than the image set without fusion ( p  
ISSN:1436-3771
1432-6981
1436-3771
DOI:10.1007/s00784-022-04761-x