Loading…
Most recent, modal, or median heroin purchase: Does it matter when estimating market size?
Assessing the size of illicit drug markets is an important activity of many government agencies; however, the expenditure-based method for estimating market size relies on the relatively untested assumption that the cash value of the most recent purchase is representative of the average purchase amo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Drug and alcohol dependence 2022-12, Vol.241, p.109667-109667, Article 109667 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a19e2ddf3433ff5817b0814248a634a5d0e656ffad26b68ad903800dec58685a3 |
container_end_page | 109667 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109667 |
container_title | Drug and alcohol dependence |
container_volume | 241 |
creator | Olmstead, Todd A. Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo Alessi, Sheila M. Scott, James |
description | Assessing the size of illicit drug markets is an important activity of many government agencies; however, the expenditure-based method for estimating market size relies on the relatively untested assumption that the cash value of the most recent purchase is representative of the average purchase amount. Using panel data, we test the representativeness of the most recent, modal and median purchase compared to the average purchase amount.
Data were drawn from a prior study that collected daily transaction-level purchase data from a sample of 120 people who were using heroin regularly. The same study participants completed two distinct two-week waves of data collection, separated by six months. T-tests and bootstrapping were used to detect differences within each wave between the average cash value of participant heroin purchases and the cash value of their most recent, modal and median heroin purchases.
In both waves, we found (a) no evidence that the expected value of the most recent purchase differs from the expected value of the average purchase, and (b) the expected values of the modal and median purchases are smaller than the expected value of the average purchase. These results imply that estimates of total market size based on the modal or median purchase will suffer from a significant downward bias, but that estimates based on the most recent purchase will be unbiased.
We provide evidence in support of using the most recent (but not the modal or the median) purchase to estimate market size for heroin.
•Illicit drug market size estimates rely on representativeness of survey responses.•Panel data on daily purchases of heroin for two full weeks are examined.•Total expenditure is constructed based on actual/modal/most recent/median purchases.•Market size estimates based on most recent purchase were unbiased.•Market size estimates based on modal/median purchase were downwardly biased. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109667 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2730314351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376871622004045</els_id><sourcerecordid>2730314351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a19e2ddf3433ff5817b0814248a634a5d0e656ffad26b68ad903800dec58685a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2PFCEQhonRuLOrf8GQePGwPRZNN9BejK7rR7LGi168EAaqdxh7mhFojf56azOrJl7kQqg8xVs8MMYFrAUI9XS3Dnm5dpMPeFi30LZUHpTSd9hKGD00AJ26y1YgtWqMFuqEnZayA1pqgPvsRCoJSgOs2Of3qVSe0eNcz_k-BTed85T5HkN0M99iTnHmhyX7rSv4jL9KWHisfO9qxcy_b3HmWGqkc5yvqZy_YOUl_sTnD9i90U0FH97uZ-zT68uPF2-bqw9v3l28uGq87HRtnBiwDWGUnZTj2BuhN2BE13bGKdm5PgCqXo2jC63aKOPCANIABPS9UaZ38ow9Od57yOnrQsPYfSwep8nNmJZiWy1Bik72gtDH_6C7tOSZpiNKU2anBkOUOVI-p1IyjvaQ6YH5hxVgb_zbnf3r3974t0f_1ProNmDZkMI_jb-FE_DyCCAZ-RYx2-Ijzp500ydUG1L8f8ovsf2aWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774244698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Most recent, modal, or median heroin purchase: Does it matter when estimating market size?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Olmstead, Todd A. ; Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo ; Alessi, Sheila M. ; Scott, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Olmstead, Todd A. ; Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo ; Alessi, Sheila M. ; Scott, James</creatorcontrib><description>Assessing the size of illicit drug markets is an important activity of many government agencies; however, the expenditure-based method for estimating market size relies on the relatively untested assumption that the cash value of the most recent purchase is representative of the average purchase amount. Using panel data, we test the representativeness of the most recent, modal and median purchase compared to the average purchase amount.
Data were drawn from a prior study that collected daily transaction-level purchase data from a sample of 120 people who were using heroin regularly. The same study participants completed two distinct two-week waves of data collection, separated by six months. T-tests and bootstrapping were used to detect differences within each wave between the average cash value of participant heroin purchases and the cash value of their most recent, modal and median heroin purchases.
In both waves, we found (a) no evidence that the expected value of the most recent purchase differs from the expected value of the average purchase, and (b) the expected values of the modal and median purchases are smaller than the expected value of the average purchase. These results imply that estimates of total market size based on the modal or median purchase will suffer from a significant downward bias, but that estimates based on the most recent purchase will be unbiased.
We provide evidence in support of using the most recent (but not the modal or the median) purchase to estimate market size for heroin.
•Illicit drug market size estimates rely on representativeness of survey responses.•Panel data on daily purchases of heroin for two full weeks are examined.•Total expenditure is constructed based on actual/modal/most recent/median purchases.•Market size estimates based on most recent purchase were unbiased.•Market size estimates based on modal/median purchase were downwardly biased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8716</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36306700</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Averages ; Bootstrap method ; Consumer Behavior ; Data collection ; Drug abuse ; Drug markets ; Drug purchases ; Estimates ; Expected values ; Government agencies ; Heroin ; Humans ; Illicit Drugs ; Market size ; Median purchase ; Modal purchase ; Most recent purchase ; Narcotics ; Panel data ; Purchasing ; Representativeness</subject><ispartof>Drug and alcohol dependence, 2022-12, Vol.241, p.109667-109667, Article 109667</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 1, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a19e2ddf3433ff5817b0814248a634a5d0e656ffad26b68ad903800dec58685a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871622004045$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,30999,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36306700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olmstead, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessi, Sheila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, James</creatorcontrib><title>Most recent, modal, or median heroin purchase: Does it matter when estimating market size?</title><title>Drug and alcohol dependence</title><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Depend</addtitle><description>Assessing the size of illicit drug markets is an important activity of many government agencies; however, the expenditure-based method for estimating market size relies on the relatively untested assumption that the cash value of the most recent purchase is representative of the average purchase amount. Using panel data, we test the representativeness of the most recent, modal and median purchase compared to the average purchase amount.
Data were drawn from a prior study that collected daily transaction-level purchase data from a sample of 120 people who were using heroin regularly. The same study participants completed two distinct two-week waves of data collection, separated by six months. T-tests and bootstrapping were used to detect differences within each wave between the average cash value of participant heroin purchases and the cash value of their most recent, modal and median heroin purchases.
In both waves, we found (a) no evidence that the expected value of the most recent purchase differs from the expected value of the average purchase, and (b) the expected values of the modal and median purchases are smaller than the expected value of the average purchase. These results imply that estimates of total market size based on the modal or median purchase will suffer from a significant downward bias, but that estimates based on the most recent purchase will be unbiased.
We provide evidence in support of using the most recent (but not the modal or the median) purchase to estimate market size for heroin.
•Illicit drug market size estimates rely on representativeness of survey responses.•Panel data on daily purchases of heroin for two full weeks are examined.•Total expenditure is constructed based on actual/modal/most recent/median purchases.•Market size estimates based on most recent purchase were unbiased.•Market size estimates based on modal/median purchase were downwardly biased.</description><subject>Averages</subject><subject>Bootstrap method</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug markets</subject><subject>Drug purchases</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Heroin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illicit Drugs</subject><subject>Market size</subject><subject>Median purchase</subject><subject>Modal purchase</subject><subject>Most recent purchase</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Representativeness</subject><issn>0376-8716</issn><issn>1879-0046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2PFCEQhonRuLOrf8GQePGwPRZNN9BejK7rR7LGi168EAaqdxh7mhFojf56azOrJl7kQqg8xVs8MMYFrAUI9XS3Dnm5dpMPeFi30LZUHpTSd9hKGD00AJ26y1YgtWqMFuqEnZayA1pqgPvsRCoJSgOs2Of3qVSe0eNcz_k-BTed85T5HkN0M99iTnHmhyX7rSv4jL9KWHisfO9qxcy_b3HmWGqkc5yvqZy_YOUl_sTnD9i90U0FH97uZ-zT68uPF2-bqw9v3l28uGq87HRtnBiwDWGUnZTj2BuhN2BE13bGKdm5PgCqXo2jC63aKOPCANIABPS9UaZ38ow9Od57yOnrQsPYfSwep8nNmJZiWy1Bik72gtDH_6C7tOSZpiNKU2anBkOUOVI-p1IyjvaQ6YH5hxVgb_zbnf3r3974t0f_1ProNmDZkMI_jb-FE_DyCCAZ-RYx2-Ijzp500ydUG1L8f8ovsf2aWQ</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Olmstead, Todd A.</creator><creator>Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo</creator><creator>Alessi, Sheila M.</creator><creator>Scott, James</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Most recent, modal, or median heroin purchase: Does it matter when estimating market size?</title><author>Olmstead, Todd A. ; Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo ; Alessi, Sheila M. ; Scott, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a19e2ddf3433ff5817b0814248a634a5d0e656ffad26b68ad903800dec58685a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Averages</topic><topic>Bootstrap method</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug markets</topic><topic>Drug purchases</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Heroin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illicit Drugs</topic><topic>Market size</topic><topic>Median purchase</topic><topic>Modal purchase</topic><topic>Most recent purchase</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Representativeness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olmstead, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessi, Sheila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, James</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Drug and alcohol dependence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olmstead, Todd A.</au><au>Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo</au><au>Alessi, Sheila M.</au><au>Scott, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Most recent, modal, or median heroin purchase: Does it matter when estimating market size?</atitle><jtitle>Drug and alcohol dependence</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Depend</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>241</volume><spage>109667</spage><epage>109667</epage><pages>109667-109667</pages><artnum>109667</artnum><issn>0376-8716</issn><eissn>1879-0046</eissn><abstract>Assessing the size of illicit drug markets is an important activity of many government agencies; however, the expenditure-based method for estimating market size relies on the relatively untested assumption that the cash value of the most recent purchase is representative of the average purchase amount. Using panel data, we test the representativeness of the most recent, modal and median purchase compared to the average purchase amount.
Data were drawn from a prior study that collected daily transaction-level purchase data from a sample of 120 people who were using heroin regularly. The same study participants completed two distinct two-week waves of data collection, separated by six months. T-tests and bootstrapping were used to detect differences within each wave between the average cash value of participant heroin purchases and the cash value of their most recent, modal and median heroin purchases.
In both waves, we found (a) no evidence that the expected value of the most recent purchase differs from the expected value of the average purchase, and (b) the expected values of the modal and median purchases are smaller than the expected value of the average purchase. These results imply that estimates of total market size based on the modal or median purchase will suffer from a significant downward bias, but that estimates based on the most recent purchase will be unbiased.
We provide evidence in support of using the most recent (but not the modal or the median) purchase to estimate market size for heroin.
•Illicit drug market size estimates rely on representativeness of survey responses.•Panel data on daily purchases of heroin for two full weeks are examined.•Total expenditure is constructed based on actual/modal/most recent/median purchases.•Market size estimates based on most recent purchase were unbiased.•Market size estimates based on modal/median purchase were downwardly biased.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36306700</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109667</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-8716 |
ispartof | Drug and alcohol dependence, 2022-12, Vol.241, p.109667-109667, Article 109667 |
issn | 0376-8716 1879-0046 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2730314351 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals; Elsevier |
subjects | Averages Bootstrap method Consumer Behavior Data collection Drug abuse Drug markets Drug purchases Estimates Expected values Government agencies Heroin Humans Illicit Drugs Market size Median purchase Modal purchase Most recent purchase Narcotics Panel data Purchasing Representativeness |
title | Most recent, modal, or median heroin purchase: Does it matter when estimating market size? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A55%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Most%20recent,%20modal,%20or%20median%20heroin%20purchase:%20Does%20it%20matter%20when%20estimating%20market%20size?&rft.jtitle=Drug%20and%20alcohol%20dependence&rft.au=Olmstead,%20Todd%20A.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=241&rft.spage=109667&rft.epage=109667&rft.pages=109667-109667&rft.artnum=109667&rft.issn=0376-8716&rft.eissn=1879-0046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109667&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2730314351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a19e2ddf3433ff5817b0814248a634a5d0e656ffad26b68ad903800dec58685a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774244698&rft_id=info:pmid/36306700&rfr_iscdi=true |