Adjustment disorder in the Armed Forces: a systematic review

In the UK military, adjustment disorder (AjD) is reported as one of the most diagnosed mental disorders, alongside depression, in personnel presenting to mental health services. Despite this, little is understood about what may predict AjD, common treatment or outcomes for this population. The syste...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England) England), 2023-10, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-23
Main Authors: McKenzie, Amber, Burdett, Howard, Croak, Bethany, Rafferty, Laura, Greenberg, Neil, Stevelink, Sharon A. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adjustment
Adjustment disorder
Armed forces
Childhood
Literature reviews
Mental disorders
Mental health services
military personnel
Risk factors
Suicidal ideation
Suicide
Systematic review
Talking
Treatment outcomes
Veterans
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the UK military, adjustment disorder (AjD) is reported as one of the most diagnosed mental disorders, alongside depression, in personnel presenting to mental health services. Despite this, little is understood about what may predict AjD, common treatment or outcomes for this population. The systematic review aimed to summarise existing research for AjD in Armed Forces (AF) populations, including prevalence and risk factors, and to outline clinical and occupational outcomes. A literature search was conducted in December 2020 to identify research that investigated AjD within an AF population (serving or veteran) following the PRISMA guidelines. Eighty-three studies were included in the review. The AjD prevalence estimates in AF populations with a mental disorder was considerably higher for serving AF personnel (34.9%) compared to veterans (12.8%). Childhood adversities were identified as a risk factor for AjD. AjD was found to increase the risk of suicidal ideation, with one study reporting a risk ratio of 4.70 (95% Confidence Interval: 3.50-6.20). Talking therapies were the most common treatment for AjD, however none reported on treatment effectiveness. This review found that AjD was commonly reported across international AF. Despite heterogeneity in the results, the review identifies several literature gaps.
ISSN:0963-8237
1360-0567
DOI:10.1080/09638237.2022.2140792