Loading…

Partnering with recovery community centers to build recovery capital by improving access to reproductive health

Background People with substance use disorders (SUD), especially opioid use disorder (OUD) have the highest rates of unintended pregnancies (80–95%) and report unmet reproductive health needs. Women of childbearing age have some of the highest death rates from opioids and are notably rising the most...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of nursing scholarship 2023-05, Vol.55 (3), p.692-700
Main Authors: Feld, Hartley, Elswick, Alex, Goodin, Amie, Fallin‐Bennett, Amanda
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9ade2665e2d6b6f6fa79bb044c3fac6794904284fdb1c4cc8e6909abc8e2cf703
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9ade2665e2d6b6f6fa79bb044c3fac6794904284fdb1c4cc8e6909abc8e2cf703
container_end_page 700
container_issue 3
container_start_page 692
container_title Journal of nursing scholarship
container_volume 55
creator Feld, Hartley
Elswick, Alex
Goodin, Amie
Fallin‐Bennett, Amanda
description Background People with substance use disorders (SUD), especially opioid use disorder (OUD) have the highest rates of unintended pregnancies (80–95%) and report unmet reproductive health needs. Women of childbearing age have some of the highest death rates from opioids and are notably rising the most rapidly, and when pregnancy does occur overdose is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. There are numerous gender‐based health disparities and social determinants of health shaped by the distribution of power and privilege that influence the risk trajectories of people who can get pregnant or are pregnant with a substance use disorder (SUD). Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe how reproductive health is essential to recovery and building recovery capital for people who can get pregnant, (1) introduce a pilot implementation science study working with trained peer support coaches to promote reproductive autonomy in the community, and (2) make policy and advocacy recommendations relevant to the new reproductive health landscape in the United States. We will also describe the adaptation and feasibility of the initial pilot study where we partnered with a recovery community center to train peer recovery coaches to provide low barrier resources (contraception, pregnancy tests and prenatal vitamins) and referrals to health care. Methods This initiative is the merging of best practices in recovery and community‐based global reproductive health, to empower people with SUD who can get pregnant in an implementation science framework. The pilot study will last 3 months in each city and aims to (1) assess and describe the effectiveness of the training of local peer recovery coaches on the link between recovery capital and reproductive health, and (2) assess the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, scalability, sustainability, and uptake and reach of low barrier reproductive health resources (pregnancy tests, prenatal vitamins, and emergency contraception). In this paper we are only reporting the initial findings regarding adaptation and feasibility. Findings Informed by qualitative interviews with stakeholders and participants, the method of contraception was adapted from injectable to emergency to meet the needs and context of the community with SUD. Early outcomes such as uptake and acceptability indicate that this is a feasible model with peer recovery coaches and recovery community centers, with the greatest uptake of emergency contracep
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jnu.12836
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734165850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2813692331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9ade2665e2d6b6f6fa79bb044c3fac6794904284fdb1c4cc8e6909abc8e2cf703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKAzEUhoMotl4WvoAMuNHF1NxnZiniFVEXug6ZzBmbMpeaZCp9e9NWRQTP5vyEj49DfoSOCJ6QOOezbpgQmjO5hcZE8CwVWBbbq0yzVAouR2jP-xnGWJKM7aIRk4wLQsUY9c_ahQ6c7d6SDxumiQPTL8AtE9O37dDZEBN0AZxPQp-Ug22qX4ye26CbpFwmtp27frHSaGPAr2kH8a0aTLALSKagmzA9QDu1bjwcfu199Hp99XJ5mz483dxdXjykhgkm00JXQKUUQCtZylrWOivKEnNuWK2NzApeYE5zXlclMdyYHGSBC13GQE2dYbaPTjfeeMH7AD6o1noDTaM76AevaMY4kSIXK_TkDzrrB9fF6xTNCZMFZYxE6mxDGdd776BWc2db7ZaKYLVqQcUW1LqFyB5_GYeyheqH_P72CJxvgA_bwPJ_k7p_fN0oPwFOAZN3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2813692331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partnering with recovery community centers to build recovery capital by improving access to reproductive health</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><creator>Feld, Hartley ; Elswick, Alex ; Goodin, Amie ; Fallin‐Bennett, Amanda</creator><creatorcontrib>Feld, Hartley ; Elswick, Alex ; Goodin, Amie ; Fallin‐Bennett, Amanda</creatorcontrib><description>Background People with substance use disorders (SUD), especially opioid use disorder (OUD) have the highest rates of unintended pregnancies (80–95%) and report unmet reproductive health needs. Women of childbearing age have some of the highest death rates from opioids and are notably rising the most rapidly, and when pregnancy does occur overdose is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. There are numerous gender‐based health disparities and social determinants of health shaped by the distribution of power and privilege that influence the risk trajectories of people who can get pregnant or are pregnant with a substance use disorder (SUD). Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe how reproductive health is essential to recovery and building recovery capital for people who can get pregnant, (1) introduce a pilot implementation science study working with trained peer support coaches to promote reproductive autonomy in the community, and (2) make policy and advocacy recommendations relevant to the new reproductive health landscape in the United States. We will also describe the adaptation and feasibility of the initial pilot study where we partnered with a recovery community center to train peer recovery coaches to provide low barrier resources (contraception, pregnancy tests and prenatal vitamins) and referrals to health care. Methods This initiative is the merging of best practices in recovery and community‐based global reproductive health, to empower people with SUD who can get pregnant in an implementation science framework. The pilot study will last 3 months in each city and aims to (1) assess and describe the effectiveness of the training of local peer recovery coaches on the link between recovery capital and reproductive health, and (2) assess the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, scalability, sustainability, and uptake and reach of low barrier reproductive health resources (pregnancy tests, prenatal vitamins, and emergency contraception). In this paper we are only reporting the initial findings regarding adaptation and feasibility. Findings Informed by qualitative interviews with stakeholders and participants, the method of contraception was adapted from injectable to emergency to meet the needs and context of the community with SUD. Early outcomes such as uptake and acceptability indicate that this is a feasible model with peer recovery coaches and recovery community centers, with the greatest uptake of emergency contraception and pregnancy tests. Conclusion Considering recent policies limiting access to reproductive health, innovative community‐based solutions are needed to engage and empower people who can get pregnant or are pregnant while in active drug use and in recovery. Providing low barrier reproductive health items by people with lived experience with SUD can serve as a valuable harm reduction model and improve recovery capital. Clinical Relevance This is the first study to propose a methodology and context to implement a community‐based study merging best practices in recovery with those in reproductive health with the potential to improve recovery capital and maternal/child health trajectories for people with SUD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-6546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12836</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36345125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Access ; Adaptation ; Advocacy ; Autonomy ; Barriers ; Best practice ; Birth control ; Child ; Childbearing ; Childbearing age ; Childrens health ; Clinical outcomes ; Community centers ; Contraception ; Delivery of Health Care ; Drug abuse ; Drug overdose ; Drug use ; Empowerment ; Family planning ; Feasibility ; Female ; Gender ; Harm reduction ; Health care ; Health disparities ; Health needs ; Health services ; Health status ; Humans ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Maternal characteristics ; Maternal mortality ; Narcotics ; Needle exchange programs ; Opioids ; Peers ; Pilot Projects ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal care ; Public Health ; Recovery (Medical) ; Reproductive Health ; Substance use disorder ; Trauma ; United States ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of nursing scholarship, 2023-05, Vol.55 (3), p.692-700</ispartof><rights>2022 Sigma Theta Tau International.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. May 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9ade2665e2d6b6f6fa79bb044c3fac6794904284fdb1c4cc8e6909abc8e2cf703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9ade2665e2d6b6f6fa79bb044c3fac6794904284fdb1c4cc8e6909abc8e2cf703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4883-9222</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2813692331/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2813692331?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,21374,21375,27903,27904,30978,33590,33591,34509,34510,43712,44094,73968,74386</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345125$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feld, Hartley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elswick, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodin, Amie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallin‐Bennett, Amanda</creatorcontrib><title>Partnering with recovery community centers to build recovery capital by improving access to reproductive health</title><title>Journal of nursing scholarship</title><addtitle>J Nurs Scholarsh</addtitle><description>Background People with substance use disorders (SUD), especially opioid use disorder (OUD) have the highest rates of unintended pregnancies (80–95%) and report unmet reproductive health needs. Women of childbearing age have some of the highest death rates from opioids and are notably rising the most rapidly, and when pregnancy does occur overdose is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. There are numerous gender‐based health disparities and social determinants of health shaped by the distribution of power and privilege that influence the risk trajectories of people who can get pregnant or are pregnant with a substance use disorder (SUD). Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe how reproductive health is essential to recovery and building recovery capital for people who can get pregnant, (1) introduce a pilot implementation science study working with trained peer support coaches to promote reproductive autonomy in the community, and (2) make policy and advocacy recommendations relevant to the new reproductive health landscape in the United States. We will also describe the adaptation and feasibility of the initial pilot study where we partnered with a recovery community center to train peer recovery coaches to provide low barrier resources (contraception, pregnancy tests and prenatal vitamins) and referrals to health care. Methods This initiative is the merging of best practices in recovery and community‐based global reproductive health, to empower people with SUD who can get pregnant in an implementation science framework. The pilot study will last 3 months in each city and aims to (1) assess and describe the effectiveness of the training of local peer recovery coaches on the link between recovery capital and reproductive health, and (2) assess the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, scalability, sustainability, and uptake and reach of low barrier reproductive health resources (pregnancy tests, prenatal vitamins, and emergency contraception). In this paper we are only reporting the initial findings regarding adaptation and feasibility. Findings Informed by qualitative interviews with stakeholders and participants, the method of contraception was adapted from injectable to emergency to meet the needs and context of the community with SUD. Early outcomes such as uptake and acceptability indicate that this is a feasible model with peer recovery coaches and recovery community centers, with the greatest uptake of emergency contraception and pregnancy tests. Conclusion Considering recent policies limiting access to reproductive health, innovative community‐based solutions are needed to engage and empower people who can get pregnant or are pregnant while in active drug use and in recovery. Providing low barrier reproductive health items by people with lived experience with SUD can serve as a valuable harm reduction model and improve recovery capital. Clinical Relevance This is the first study to propose a methodology and context to implement a community‐based study merging best practices in recovery with those in reproductive health with the potential to improve recovery capital and maternal/child health trajectories for people with SUD.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Childbearing</subject><subject>Childbearing age</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Community centers</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug overdose</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Harm reduction</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health needs</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Maternal characteristics</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Needle exchange programs</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Reproductive Health</subject><subject>Substance use disorder</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1527-6546</issn><issn>1547-5069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKAzEUhoMotl4WvoAMuNHF1NxnZiniFVEXug6ZzBmbMpeaZCp9e9NWRQTP5vyEj49DfoSOCJ6QOOezbpgQmjO5hcZE8CwVWBbbq0yzVAouR2jP-xnGWJKM7aIRk4wLQsUY9c_ahQ6c7d6SDxumiQPTL8AtE9O37dDZEBN0AZxPQp-Ug22qX4ye26CbpFwmtp27frHSaGPAr2kH8a0aTLALSKagmzA9QDu1bjwcfu199Hp99XJ5mz483dxdXjykhgkm00JXQKUUQCtZylrWOivKEnNuWK2NzApeYE5zXlclMdyYHGSBC13GQE2dYbaPTjfeeMH7AD6o1noDTaM76AevaMY4kSIXK_TkDzrrB9fF6xTNCZMFZYxE6mxDGdd776BWc2db7ZaKYLVqQcUW1LqFyB5_GYeyheqH_P72CJxvgA_bwPJ_k7p_fN0oPwFOAZN3</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Feld, Hartley</creator><creator>Elswick, Alex</creator><creator>Goodin, Amie</creator><creator>Fallin‐Bennett, Amanda</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4883-9222</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Partnering with recovery community centers to build recovery capital by improving access to reproductive health</title><author>Feld, Hartley ; Elswick, Alex ; Goodin, Amie ; Fallin‐Bennett, Amanda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9ade2665e2d6b6f6fa79bb044c3fac6794904284fdb1c4cc8e6909abc8e2cf703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Childbearing</topic><topic>Childbearing age</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Community centers</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug overdose</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Harm reduction</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health needs</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Maternal characteristics</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Needle exchange programs</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Reproductive Health</topic><topic>Substance use disorder</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feld, Hartley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elswick, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodin, Amie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallin‐Bennett, Amanda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of nursing scholarship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feld, Hartley</au><au>Elswick, Alex</au><au>Goodin, Amie</au><au>Fallin‐Bennett, Amanda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partnering with recovery community centers to build recovery capital by improving access to reproductive health</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nursing scholarship</jtitle><addtitle>J Nurs Scholarsh</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>692</spage><epage>700</epage><pages>692-700</pages><issn>1527-6546</issn><eissn>1547-5069</eissn><abstract>Background People with substance use disorders (SUD), especially opioid use disorder (OUD) have the highest rates of unintended pregnancies (80–95%) and report unmet reproductive health needs. Women of childbearing age have some of the highest death rates from opioids and are notably rising the most rapidly, and when pregnancy does occur overdose is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. There are numerous gender‐based health disparities and social determinants of health shaped by the distribution of power and privilege that influence the risk trajectories of people who can get pregnant or are pregnant with a substance use disorder (SUD). Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe how reproductive health is essential to recovery and building recovery capital for people who can get pregnant, (1) introduce a pilot implementation science study working with trained peer support coaches to promote reproductive autonomy in the community, and (2) make policy and advocacy recommendations relevant to the new reproductive health landscape in the United States. We will also describe the adaptation and feasibility of the initial pilot study where we partnered with a recovery community center to train peer recovery coaches to provide low barrier resources (contraception, pregnancy tests and prenatal vitamins) and referrals to health care. Methods This initiative is the merging of best practices in recovery and community‐based global reproductive health, to empower people with SUD who can get pregnant in an implementation science framework. The pilot study will last 3 months in each city and aims to (1) assess and describe the effectiveness of the training of local peer recovery coaches on the link between recovery capital and reproductive health, and (2) assess the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, scalability, sustainability, and uptake and reach of low barrier reproductive health resources (pregnancy tests, prenatal vitamins, and emergency contraception). In this paper we are only reporting the initial findings regarding adaptation and feasibility. Findings Informed by qualitative interviews with stakeholders and participants, the method of contraception was adapted from injectable to emergency to meet the needs and context of the community with SUD. Early outcomes such as uptake and acceptability indicate that this is a feasible model with peer recovery coaches and recovery community centers, with the greatest uptake of emergency contraception and pregnancy tests. Conclusion Considering recent policies limiting access to reproductive health, innovative community‐based solutions are needed to engage and empower people who can get pregnant or are pregnant while in active drug use and in recovery. Providing low barrier reproductive health items by people with lived experience with SUD can serve as a valuable harm reduction model and improve recovery capital. Clinical Relevance This is the first study to propose a methodology and context to implement a community‐based study merging best practices in recovery with those in reproductive health with the potential to improve recovery capital and maternal/child health trajectories for people with SUD.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36345125</pmid><doi>10.1111/jnu.12836</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4883-9222</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1527-6546
ispartof Journal of nursing scholarship, 2023-05, Vol.55 (3), p.692-700
issn 1527-6546
1547-5069
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734165850
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley; Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection
subjects Access
Adaptation
Advocacy
Autonomy
Barriers
Best practice
Birth control
Child
Childbearing
Childbearing age
Childrens health
Clinical outcomes
Community centers
Contraception
Delivery of Health Care
Drug abuse
Drug overdose
Drug use
Empowerment
Family planning
Feasibility
Female
Gender
Harm reduction
Health care
Health disparities
Health needs
Health services
Health status
Humans
Maternal & child health
Maternal characteristics
Maternal mortality
Narcotics
Needle exchange programs
Opioids
Peers
Pilot Projects
Pregnancy
Prenatal care
Public Health
Recovery (Medical)
Reproductive Health
Substance use disorder
Trauma
United States
Women
Womens health
title Partnering with recovery community centers to build recovery capital by improving access to reproductive health
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A11%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partnering%20with%20recovery%20community%20centers%20to%20build%20recovery%20capital%20by%20improving%20access%20to%20reproductive%20health&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nursing%20scholarship&rft.au=Feld,%20Hartley&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=692&rft.epage=700&rft.pages=692-700&rft.issn=1527-6546&rft.eissn=1547-5069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jnu.12836&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2813692331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9ade2665e2d6b6f6fa79bb044c3fac6794904284fdb1c4cc8e6909abc8e2cf703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2813692331&rft_id=info:pmid/36345125&rfr_iscdi=true