Loading…

Pay (for it) as you go: Prepaid energy meters and the heat-or-eat dilemma

The “heat-or-eat” dilemma, a trade-off typically between food consumption and heating, may elevate public health concerns during the 2022 energy-price crisis. Our paper contributes to the literature by exploring the role of domestic energy prepayment meters (PPMs) in the heat-or-eat dilemma, focusin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social science & medicine (1982) 2022-12, Vol.315, p.115498-115498, Article 115498
Main Authors: Burlinson, Andrew, Davillas, Apostolos, Law, Cherry
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-4d0f162ec0ff7523878de3296f41d9ecce9cb6b1c81c31bfc2ae0850a46f5aa63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-4d0f162ec0ff7523878de3296f41d9ecce9cb6b1c81c31bfc2ae0850a46f5aa63
container_end_page 115498
container_issue
container_start_page 115498
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 315
creator Burlinson, Andrew
Davillas, Apostolos
Law, Cherry
description The “heat-or-eat” dilemma, a trade-off typically between food consumption and heating, may elevate public health concerns during the 2022 energy-price crisis. Our paper contributes to the literature by exploring the role of domestic energy prepayment meters (PPMs) in the heat-or-eat dilemma, focusing on the association between PPM use and fruit and vegetable consumption. Using a representative sample of 24,811 individuals residing in Great Britain (January 2019–May 2021), we find robust evidence of lower fruit and vegetable consumption amongst individuals using PPMs, compared to those using post-payment energy bill payment methods. On average, our point estimates suggest that individuals using a PPM consume 2.7 fewer portions of fruit and vegetables per week. Our findings hold when bounding analysis is employed to account for omitted variable bias. Using a suite of IV approaches to further alleviate endogeneity concerns we found that our ordinary least squares results are consistent as opposed to IV models. Further robustness analyses highlight the deleterious impact of PPMs on people's healthy eating habits relevant to the consumption of enough fruit and vegetables. Our results suggest that targeted support for PPM users may have beneficial effects on people's fruit and vegetable consumption patterns. •This paper explores the role of prepayment meters (PPMs) in the heat-or-eat dilemma.•We focus on fruit and vegetable consumption, a crucial element of healthy diets.•Negative associations between PPMs and fruit and vegetable consumption are observed.•OLS estimates show PPM users eat fewer potions of fruit and vegetables (2.7/week).•Bounding and instrumental variable analyses suggest the OLS results are consistent.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115498
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2736304358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953622008048</els_id><sourcerecordid>2736304358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-4d0f162ec0ff7523878de3296f41d9ecce9cb6b1c81c31bfc2ae0850a46f5aa63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwjAYxxujEUS_gvaIh2FftnXzRogvJCRy0HPTtU-hhFFsh8m-vSMDr57-h-f_kueH0AMlE0po_rSZRK-jdjWYCSOMTSjN0rK4QENaCJ5kPBWXaEiYEEmZ8XyAbmLcEEIoKfg1GvCcC1pyOkTzpWrx2PqAXfOIVcStP-CVf8bLAHvlDIYdhFWLa2ggRKx2BjdrwGtQTeJD0gk2bgt1rW7RlVXbCHcnHaGv15fP2Xuy-Hibz6aLRPOMNElqiKU5A02sFRnjhSgMcFbmNqWmBK2h1FVeUV1QzWllNVNAioyoNLeZUjkfoXHfuw_--wCxkbWLGrZbtQN_iJKJ7juS8qzorKK36uBjDGDlPrhahVZSIo8c5Ub-cZRHjrLn2CXvTyOH6ng7587gOsO0N0D36o-DILsW2GkwLoBupPHu35FfvoCHGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736304358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pay (for it) as you go: Prepaid energy meters and the heat-or-eat dilemma</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Burlinson, Andrew ; Davillas, Apostolos ; Law, Cherry</creator><creatorcontrib>Burlinson, Andrew ; Davillas, Apostolos ; Law, Cherry</creatorcontrib><description>The “heat-or-eat” dilemma, a trade-off typically between food consumption and heating, may elevate public health concerns during the 2022 energy-price crisis. Our paper contributes to the literature by exploring the role of domestic energy prepayment meters (PPMs) in the heat-or-eat dilemma, focusing on the association between PPM use and fruit and vegetable consumption. Using a representative sample of 24,811 individuals residing in Great Britain (January 2019–May 2021), we find robust evidence of lower fruit and vegetable consumption amongst individuals using PPMs, compared to those using post-payment energy bill payment methods. On average, our point estimates suggest that individuals using a PPM consume 2.7 fewer portions of fruit and vegetables per week. Our findings hold when bounding analysis is employed to account for omitted variable bias. Using a suite of IV approaches to further alleviate endogeneity concerns we found that our ordinary least squares results are consistent as opposed to IV models. Further robustness analyses highlight the deleterious impact of PPMs on people's healthy eating habits relevant to the consumption of enough fruit and vegetables. Our results suggest that targeted support for PPM users may have beneficial effects on people's fruit and vegetable consumption patterns. •This paper explores the role of prepayment meters (PPMs) in the heat-or-eat dilemma.•We focus on fruit and vegetable consumption, a crucial element of healthy diets.•Negative associations between PPMs and fruit and vegetable consumption are observed.•OLS estimates show PPM users eat fewer potions of fruit and vegetables (2.7/week).•Bounding and instrumental variable analyses suggest the OLS results are consistent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115498</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36371931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Diet ; Feeding Behavior ; Fruit ; Fruit and vegetables ; Healthy diets ; Heat-or-eat ; Hot Temperature ; Humans ; Pay-as-you-go ; Prepayment meters ; United Kingdom ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 2022-12, Vol.315, p.115498-115498, Article 115498</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-4d0f162ec0ff7523878de3296f41d9ecce9cb6b1c81c31bfc2ae0850a46f5aa63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-4d0f162ec0ff7523878de3296f41d9ecce9cb6b1c81c31bfc2ae0850a46f5aa63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5156-0057 ; 0000-0002-6607-274X ; 0000-0003-0686-1998</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36371931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burlinson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davillas, Apostolos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Cherry</creatorcontrib><title>Pay (for it) as you go: Prepaid energy meters and the heat-or-eat dilemma</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>The “heat-or-eat” dilemma, a trade-off typically between food consumption and heating, may elevate public health concerns during the 2022 energy-price crisis. Our paper contributes to the literature by exploring the role of domestic energy prepayment meters (PPMs) in the heat-or-eat dilemma, focusing on the association between PPM use and fruit and vegetable consumption. Using a representative sample of 24,811 individuals residing in Great Britain (January 2019–May 2021), we find robust evidence of lower fruit and vegetable consumption amongst individuals using PPMs, compared to those using post-payment energy bill payment methods. On average, our point estimates suggest that individuals using a PPM consume 2.7 fewer portions of fruit and vegetables per week. Our findings hold when bounding analysis is employed to account for omitted variable bias. Using a suite of IV approaches to further alleviate endogeneity concerns we found that our ordinary least squares results are consistent as opposed to IV models. Further robustness analyses highlight the deleterious impact of PPMs on people's healthy eating habits relevant to the consumption of enough fruit and vegetables. Our results suggest that targeted support for PPM users may have beneficial effects on people's fruit and vegetable consumption patterns. •This paper explores the role of prepayment meters (PPMs) in the heat-or-eat dilemma.•We focus on fruit and vegetable consumption, a crucial element of healthy diets.•Negative associations between PPMs and fruit and vegetable consumption are observed.•OLS estimates show PPM users eat fewer potions of fruit and vegetables (2.7/week).•Bounding and instrumental variable analyses suggest the OLS results are consistent.</description><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Fruit</subject><subject>Fruit and vegetables</subject><subject>Healthy diets</subject><subject>Heat-or-eat</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pay-as-you-go</subject><subject>Prepayment meters</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PwjAYxxujEUS_gvaIh2FftnXzRogvJCRy0HPTtU-hhFFsh8m-vSMDr57-h-f_kueH0AMlE0po_rSZRK-jdjWYCSOMTSjN0rK4QENaCJ5kPBWXaEiYEEmZ8XyAbmLcEEIoKfg1GvCcC1pyOkTzpWrx2PqAXfOIVcStP-CVf8bLAHvlDIYdhFWLa2ggRKx2BjdrwGtQTeJD0gk2bgt1rW7RlVXbCHcnHaGv15fP2Xuy-Hibz6aLRPOMNElqiKU5A02sFRnjhSgMcFbmNqWmBK2h1FVeUV1QzWllNVNAioyoNLeZUjkfoXHfuw_--wCxkbWLGrZbtQN_iJKJ7juS8qzorKK36uBjDGDlPrhahVZSIo8c5Ub-cZRHjrLn2CXvTyOH6ng7587gOsO0N0D36o-DILsW2GkwLoBupPHu35FfvoCHGQ</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Burlinson, Andrew</creator><creator>Davillas, Apostolos</creator><creator>Law, Cherry</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5156-0057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6607-274X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-1998</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Pay (for it) as you go: Prepaid energy meters and the heat-or-eat dilemma</title><author>Burlinson, Andrew ; Davillas, Apostolos ; Law, Cherry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-4d0f162ec0ff7523878de3296f41d9ecce9cb6b1c81c31bfc2ae0850a46f5aa63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Fruit</topic><topic>Fruit and vegetables</topic><topic>Healthy diets</topic><topic>Heat-or-eat</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pay-as-you-go</topic><topic>Prepayment meters</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burlinson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davillas, Apostolos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Cherry</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burlinson, Andrew</au><au>Davillas, Apostolos</au><au>Law, Cherry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pay (for it) as you go: Prepaid energy meters and the heat-or-eat dilemma</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>315</volume><spage>115498</spage><epage>115498</epage><pages>115498-115498</pages><artnum>115498</artnum><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>The “heat-or-eat” dilemma, a trade-off typically between food consumption and heating, may elevate public health concerns during the 2022 energy-price crisis. Our paper contributes to the literature by exploring the role of domestic energy prepayment meters (PPMs) in the heat-or-eat dilemma, focusing on the association between PPM use and fruit and vegetable consumption. Using a representative sample of 24,811 individuals residing in Great Britain (January 2019–May 2021), we find robust evidence of lower fruit and vegetable consumption amongst individuals using PPMs, compared to those using post-payment energy bill payment methods. On average, our point estimates suggest that individuals using a PPM consume 2.7 fewer portions of fruit and vegetables per week. Our findings hold when bounding analysis is employed to account for omitted variable bias. Using a suite of IV approaches to further alleviate endogeneity concerns we found that our ordinary least squares results are consistent as opposed to IV models. Further robustness analyses highlight the deleterious impact of PPMs on people's healthy eating habits relevant to the consumption of enough fruit and vegetables. Our results suggest that targeted support for PPM users may have beneficial effects on people's fruit and vegetable consumption patterns. •This paper explores the role of prepayment meters (PPMs) in the heat-or-eat dilemma.•We focus on fruit and vegetable consumption, a crucial element of healthy diets.•Negative associations between PPMs and fruit and vegetable consumption are observed.•OLS estimates show PPM users eat fewer potions of fruit and vegetables (2.7/week).•Bounding and instrumental variable analyses suggest the OLS results are consistent.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36371931</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115498</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5156-0057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6607-274X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-1998</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 2022-12, Vol.315, p.115498-115498, Article 115498
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2736304358
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Diet
Feeding Behavior
Fruit
Fruit and vegetables
Healthy diets
Heat-or-eat
Hot Temperature
Humans
Pay-as-you-go
Prepayment meters
United Kingdom
Vegetables
title Pay (for it) as you go: Prepaid energy meters and the heat-or-eat dilemma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T02%3A31%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pay%20(for%20it)%20as%20you%20go:%20Prepaid%20energy%20meters%20and%20the%20heat-or-eat%20dilemma&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Burlinson,%20Andrew&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=315&rft.spage=115498&rft.epage=115498&rft.pages=115498-115498&rft.artnum=115498&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115498&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2736304358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-4d0f162ec0ff7523878de3296f41d9ecce9cb6b1c81c31bfc2ae0850a46f5aa63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736304358&rft_id=info:pmid/36371931&rfr_iscdi=true