Loading…

Exploration of thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones as tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Design, synthesis, ADMET, docking, and antiproliferative evaluations

As dual EGFR and VEGFR‐2 inhibitors, 22 innovative thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones were modeled, constructed, and measured for their anticancer performance versus four human neoplasms HCT‐116, MCF‐7, A549, and HepG2. Molecular docking and MD simulation were performed to inspect the binding technique of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archiv der Pharmazie (Weinheim) 2023-03, Vol.356 (3), p.e2200465-n/a
Main Authors: Aziz, Nada A. A. M., George, Riham F., El‐Adl, Khaled, Mahmoud, Walaa R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3735-b23678d659dc673a2aba59d59f5ce7ab9d4aeef665ddc88ba261725e4692873c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3735-b23678d659dc673a2aba59d59f5ce7ab9d4aeef665ddc88ba261725e4692873c3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page e2200465
container_title Archiv der Pharmazie (Weinheim)
container_volume 356
creator Aziz, Nada A. A. M.
George, Riham F.
El‐Adl, Khaled
Mahmoud, Walaa R.
description As dual EGFR and VEGFR‐2 inhibitors, 22 innovative thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones were modeled, constructed, and measured for their anticancer performance versus four human neoplasms HCT‐116, MCF‐7, A549, and HepG2. Molecular docking and MD simulation were performed to inspect the binding technique of the proffered congeners with the EGFR and VEGFR‐2 receptors. Evidence realized thanks to the docking inquests was vastly consistent together with that detected through the biological screening. Structures 14a and 14g emerged as the most active compounds toward HCT116 (IC50 = 6.01 and 7.44 µM), MCF‐7 (IC50 = 5.77 and 7.23 µM), A549 (IC50 = 5.35 and 5.47 µM) and HepG2 (IC50 = 3.55 and 3.85 µM) tumefaction cells. Compounds 14a and 14g exhibited higher events than sorafenib (IC50 = 5.05, 5.58, 4.04, and 4.00 µM) against HepG2 instead subordinate incidents concerning A549, MCF‐7, and HCT116, parallelly. Nevertheless, these compounds signified weightier performance than erlotinib (IC50 = 13.91, 8.20, 5.49, 7.73, and µM), with respect to the four cell lines. Compounds having the best activity against the four cell lines, 12a–f, 13a–d, and 14a–g were chosen to appraise their in vitro VEGFR‐2 and EGFRT790M inhibiting activities. The best results were for compounds 14a and 14g compared to sorafenib and erlotinib, respectively, with IC50 values of 0.74 and 0.78 µM and 0.12 and 0.14 µM, respectively. Moreover, 13d, 14a, and 14g showed an adequate in silico calculated ADMET profile. The current investigation presents novel candidates for future optimization to construct mightier and eclectic binary VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M restrainers with higher antitumor effects. Twenty‐two new thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones were modeled, constructed, and measured for their activity against four human cancer cell lines: HCT‐116, MCF‐7, A549, and HepG2. Molecular docking and MD simulation were performed to study the binding modes of the new congeners with the EGFR and VEGFR‐2 receptors. Novel candidates were identified to construct better and binary VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M inhibitors with higher antitumor effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ardp.202200465
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738194324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2738194324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3735-b23678d659dc673a2aba59d59f5ce7ab9d4aeef665ddc88ba261725e4692873c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERacDW5bIEhsWydT_SdiNOgNFagVCZR058U3HJWNP7aR0WPEEiGfsk-DplCKxYWH7SvfzuUf3IPSSkhklhB3rYDYzRhgjRCj5BE2oZDQXtBRP0YRwJXPFOD9ERzFeEUI4YfIZOuRKEE6rcoJ-Lm83vQ96sN5h3-FhZfV331tjHdz9-MUykW6TmhCxjnjYBh9TC3-1TkfA1q1sYwcf4lu8gGgvXYbj1g2rVMcMzxfny4sMG98m_jLD2pl0BrsJaUQHu7E3gOFG9-O9g_gcHXS6j_Di4Z2iL--WFyen-dnH9x9O5md5ywsu84ZxVZRGycq0quCa6UanWladbKHQTWWEBuiUksa0ZdlopmjBJAhVsbLgLZ-iN3vd5OR6hDjUaxtb6HvtwI-xZgUvaSU4Ewl9_Q965cfgkrtElUSRQiQLUzTbU21aUAzQ1Ztg1zpsa0rqXVL1Lqn6Man04dWD7NiswTzif6JJQLUHvtketv-Rq-efF5_-iv8G4KCjbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2780607467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploration of thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones as tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Design, synthesis, ADMET, docking, and antiproliferative evaluations</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Aziz, Nada A. A. M. ; George, Riham F. ; El‐Adl, Khaled ; Mahmoud, Walaa R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Nada A. A. M. ; George, Riham F. ; El‐Adl, Khaled ; Mahmoud, Walaa R.</creatorcontrib><description>As dual EGFR and VEGFR‐2 inhibitors, 22 innovative thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones were modeled, constructed, and measured for their anticancer performance versus four human neoplasms HCT‐116, MCF‐7, A549, and HepG2. Molecular docking and MD simulation were performed to inspect the binding technique of the proffered congeners with the EGFR and VEGFR‐2 receptors. Evidence realized thanks to the docking inquests was vastly consistent together with that detected through the biological screening. Structures 14a and 14g emerged as the most active compounds toward HCT116 (IC50 = 6.01 and 7.44 µM), MCF‐7 (IC50 = 5.77 and 7.23 µM), A549 (IC50 = 5.35 and 5.47 µM) and HepG2 (IC50 = 3.55 and 3.85 µM) tumefaction cells. Compounds 14a and 14g exhibited higher events than sorafenib (IC50 = 5.05, 5.58, 4.04, and 4.00 µM) against HepG2 instead subordinate incidents concerning A549, MCF‐7, and HCT116, parallelly. Nevertheless, these compounds signified weightier performance than erlotinib (IC50 = 13.91, 8.20, 5.49, 7.73, and µM), with respect to the four cell lines. Compounds having the best activity against the four cell lines, 12a–f, 13a–d, and 14a–g were chosen to appraise their in vitro VEGFR‐2 and EGFRT790M inhibiting activities. The best results were for compounds 14a and 14g compared to sorafenib and erlotinib, respectively, with IC50 values of 0.74 and 0.78 µM and 0.12 and 0.14 µM, respectively. Moreover, 13d, 14a, and 14g showed an adequate in silico calculated ADMET profile. The current investigation presents novel candidates for future optimization to construct mightier and eclectic binary VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M restrainers with higher antitumor effects. Twenty‐two new thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones were modeled, constructed, and measured for their activity against four human cancer cell lines: HCT‐116, MCF‐7, A549, and HepG2. Molecular docking and MD simulation were performed to study the binding modes of the new congeners with the EGFR and VEGFR‐2 receptors. Novel candidates were identified to construct better and binary VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M inhibitors with higher antitumor effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0365-6233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-4184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ardp.202200465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36403198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - chemistry ; antiproliferative agents ; Cell Proliferation ; Drug Design ; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor ; dual inhibition of VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M ; ErbB Receptors - metabolism ; Erlotinib Hydrochloride - pharmacology ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; molecular docking ; Molecular Docking Simulation ; Molecular Structure ; Mutation ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors - chemistry ; Sorafenib - pharmacology ; Structure-Activity Relationship ; Thiazolidines - pharmacology ; thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones ; Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2</subject><ispartof>Archiv der Pharmazie (Weinheim), 2023-03, Vol.356 (3), p.e2200465-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 Deutsche Pharmazeutische Gesellschaft.</rights><rights>2023 Deutsche Pharmazeutische Gesellschaft</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3735-b23678d659dc673a2aba59d59f5ce7ab9d4aeef665ddc88ba261725e4692873c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3735-b23678d659dc673a2aba59d59f5ce7ab9d4aeef665ddc88ba261725e4692873c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8922-9770 ; 0000-0002-2493-1315 ; 0000-0002-1451-9159</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36403198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Nada A. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Riham F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Adl, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Walaa R.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploration of thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones as tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Design, synthesis, ADMET, docking, and antiproliferative evaluations</title><title>Archiv der Pharmazie (Weinheim)</title><addtitle>Arch Pharm (Weinheim)</addtitle><description>As dual EGFR and VEGFR‐2 inhibitors, 22 innovative thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones were modeled, constructed, and measured for their anticancer performance versus four human neoplasms HCT‐116, MCF‐7, A549, and HepG2. Molecular docking and MD simulation were performed to inspect the binding technique of the proffered congeners with the EGFR and VEGFR‐2 receptors. Evidence realized thanks to the docking inquests was vastly consistent together with that detected through the biological screening. Structures 14a and 14g emerged as the most active compounds toward HCT116 (IC50 = 6.01 and 7.44 µM), MCF‐7 (IC50 = 5.77 and 7.23 µM), A549 (IC50 = 5.35 and 5.47 µM) and HepG2 (IC50 = 3.55 and 3.85 µM) tumefaction cells. Compounds 14a and 14g exhibited higher events than sorafenib (IC50 = 5.05, 5.58, 4.04, and 4.00 µM) against HepG2 instead subordinate incidents concerning A549, MCF‐7, and HCT116, parallelly. Nevertheless, these compounds signified weightier performance than erlotinib (IC50 = 13.91, 8.20, 5.49, 7.73, and µM), with respect to the four cell lines. Compounds having the best activity against the four cell lines, 12a–f, 13a–d, and 14a–g were chosen to appraise their in vitro VEGFR‐2 and EGFRT790M inhibiting activities. The best results were for compounds 14a and 14g compared to sorafenib and erlotinib, respectively, with IC50 values of 0.74 and 0.78 µM and 0.12 and 0.14 µM, respectively. Moreover, 13d, 14a, and 14g showed an adequate in silico calculated ADMET profile. The current investigation presents novel candidates for future optimization to construct mightier and eclectic binary VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M restrainers with higher antitumor effects. Twenty‐two new thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones were modeled, constructed, and measured for their activity against four human cancer cell lines: HCT‐116, MCF‐7, A549, and HepG2. Molecular docking and MD simulation were performed to study the binding modes of the new congeners with the EGFR and VEGFR‐2 receptors. Novel candidates were identified to construct better and binary VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M inhibitors with higher antitumor effects.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>antiproliferative agents</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Drug Design</subject><subject>Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor</subject><subject>dual inhibition of VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M</subject><subject>ErbB Receptors - metabolism</subject><subject>Erlotinib Hydrochloride - pharmacology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms</subject><subject>molecular docking</subject><subject>Molecular Docking Simulation</subject><subject>Molecular Structure</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Protein Kinase Inhibitors - chemistry</subject><subject>Sorafenib - pharmacology</subject><subject>Structure-Activity Relationship</subject><subject>Thiazolidines - pharmacology</subject><subject>thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones</subject><subject>Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors</subject><subject>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2</subject><issn>0365-6233</issn><issn>1521-4184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERacDW5bIEhsWydT_SdiNOgNFagVCZR058U3HJWNP7aR0WPEEiGfsk-DplCKxYWH7SvfzuUf3IPSSkhklhB3rYDYzRhgjRCj5BE2oZDQXtBRP0YRwJXPFOD9ERzFeEUI4YfIZOuRKEE6rcoJ-Lm83vQ96sN5h3-FhZfV331tjHdz9-MUykW6TmhCxjnjYBh9TC3-1TkfA1q1sYwcf4lu8gGgvXYbj1g2rVMcMzxfny4sMG98m_jLD2pl0BrsJaUQHu7E3gOFG9-O9g_gcHXS6j_Di4Z2iL--WFyen-dnH9x9O5md5ywsu84ZxVZRGycq0quCa6UanWladbKHQTWWEBuiUksa0ZdlopmjBJAhVsbLgLZ-iN3vd5OR6hDjUaxtb6HvtwI-xZgUvaSU4Ewl9_Q965cfgkrtElUSRQiQLUzTbU21aUAzQ1Ztg1zpsa0rqXVL1Lqn6Man04dWD7NiswTzif6JJQLUHvtketv-Rq-efF5_-iv8G4KCjbg</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Aziz, Nada A. A. M.</creator><creator>George, Riham F.</creator><creator>El‐Adl, Khaled</creator><creator>Mahmoud, Walaa R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-9770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2493-1315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1451-9159</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Exploration of thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones as tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Design, synthesis, ADMET, docking, and antiproliferative evaluations</title><author>Aziz, Nada A. A. M. ; George, Riham F. ; El‐Adl, Khaled ; Mahmoud, Walaa R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3735-b23678d659dc673a2aba59d59f5ce7ab9d4aeef665ddc88ba261725e4692873c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>antiproliferative agents</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Drug Design</topic><topic>Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor</topic><topic>dual inhibition of VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M</topic><topic>ErbB Receptors - metabolism</topic><topic>Erlotinib Hydrochloride - pharmacology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms</topic><topic>molecular docking</topic><topic>Molecular Docking Simulation</topic><topic>Molecular Structure</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Protein Kinase Inhibitors - chemistry</topic><topic>Sorafenib - pharmacology</topic><topic>Structure-Activity Relationship</topic><topic>Thiazolidines - pharmacology</topic><topic>thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones</topic><topic>Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors</topic><topic>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Nada A. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Riham F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Adl, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Walaa R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archiv der Pharmazie (Weinheim)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aziz, Nada A. A. M.</au><au>George, Riham F.</au><au>El‐Adl, Khaled</au><au>Mahmoud, Walaa R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploration of thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones as tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Design, synthesis, ADMET, docking, and antiproliferative evaluations</atitle><jtitle>Archiv der Pharmazie (Weinheim)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pharm (Weinheim)</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>356</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e2200465</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2200465-n/a</pages><issn>0365-6233</issn><eissn>1521-4184</eissn><abstract>As dual EGFR and VEGFR‐2 inhibitors, 22 innovative thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones were modeled, constructed, and measured for their anticancer performance versus four human neoplasms HCT‐116, MCF‐7, A549, and HepG2. Molecular docking and MD simulation were performed to inspect the binding technique of the proffered congeners with the EGFR and VEGFR‐2 receptors. Evidence realized thanks to the docking inquests was vastly consistent together with that detected through the biological screening. Structures 14a and 14g emerged as the most active compounds toward HCT116 (IC50 = 6.01 and 7.44 µM), MCF‐7 (IC50 = 5.77 and 7.23 µM), A549 (IC50 = 5.35 and 5.47 µM) and HepG2 (IC50 = 3.55 and 3.85 µM) tumefaction cells. Compounds 14a and 14g exhibited higher events than sorafenib (IC50 = 5.05, 5.58, 4.04, and 4.00 µM) against HepG2 instead subordinate incidents concerning A549, MCF‐7, and HCT116, parallelly. Nevertheless, these compounds signified weightier performance than erlotinib (IC50 = 13.91, 8.20, 5.49, 7.73, and µM), with respect to the four cell lines. Compounds having the best activity against the four cell lines, 12a–f, 13a–d, and 14a–g were chosen to appraise their in vitro VEGFR‐2 and EGFRT790M inhibiting activities. The best results were for compounds 14a and 14g compared to sorafenib and erlotinib, respectively, with IC50 values of 0.74 and 0.78 µM and 0.12 and 0.14 µM, respectively. Moreover, 13d, 14a, and 14g showed an adequate in silico calculated ADMET profile. The current investigation presents novel candidates for future optimization to construct mightier and eclectic binary VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M restrainers with higher antitumor effects. Twenty‐two new thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones were modeled, constructed, and measured for their activity against four human cancer cell lines: HCT‐116, MCF‐7, A549, and HepG2. Molecular docking and MD simulation were performed to study the binding modes of the new congeners with the EGFR and VEGFR‐2 receptors. Novel candidates were identified to construct better and binary VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M inhibitors with higher antitumor effects.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36403198</pmid><doi>10.1002/ardp.202200465</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-9770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2493-1315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1451-9159</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0365-6233
ispartof Archiv der Pharmazie (Weinheim), 2023-03, Vol.356 (3), p.e2200465-n/a
issn 0365-6233
1521-4184
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738194324
source Wiley
subjects Antineoplastic Agents - chemistry
antiproliferative agents
Cell Proliferation
Drug Design
Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor
dual inhibition of VEGFR‐2/EGFRT790M
ErbB Receptors - metabolism
Erlotinib Hydrochloride - pharmacology
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
molecular docking
Molecular Docking Simulation
Molecular Structure
Mutation
Protein Kinase Inhibitors - chemistry
Sorafenib - pharmacology
Structure-Activity Relationship
Thiazolidines - pharmacology
thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2
title Exploration of thiazolidine‐2,4‐diones as tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Design, synthesis, ADMET, docking, and antiproliferative evaluations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploration%20of%20thiazolidine%E2%80%902,4%E2%80%90diones%20as%20tyrosine%20kinase%20inhibitors:%20Design,%20synthesis,%20ADMET,%20docking,%20and%20antiproliferative%20evaluations&rft.jtitle=Archiv%20der%20Pharmazie%20(Weinheim)&rft.au=Aziz,%20Nada%20A.%20A.%20M.&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=356&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e2200465&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2200465-n/a&rft.issn=0365-6233&rft.eissn=1521-4184&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ardp.202200465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2738194324%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3735-b23678d659dc673a2aba59d59f5ce7ab9d4aeef665ddc88ba261725e4692873c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2780607467&rft_id=info:pmid/36403198&rfr_iscdi=true