Loading…
Provenance of rhizobial symbionts is similar for invasive and noninvasive acacias introduced to California
Abstract Plant–soil interactions can be important drivers of biological invasions. In particular, the symbiotic relationship between legumes and nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria (i.e. rhizobia) may be influential in invasion success. Legumes, including Australian acacias, have been introduced into nove...
Saved in:
Published in: | FEMS microbiology ecology 2022-11, Vol.98 (12) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-3985821c6f9c2aa70329aa292a8f575bd77520a0780ba73e69563276af48af353 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | FEMS microbiology ecology |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Klock, Metha M Urbina, Hector G Barrett, Luke G Thrall, Peter H Harms, Kyle E |
description | Abstract
Plant–soil interactions can be important drivers of biological invasions. In particular, the symbiotic relationship between legumes and nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria (i.e. rhizobia) may be influential in invasion success. Legumes, including Australian acacias, have been introduced into novel ranges around the world. Our goal was to examine the acacia–rhizobia symbiosis to determine whether cointroduction of non-native mutualists plays a role in invasiveness of introduced legumes. To determine whether acacias were introduced abroad concurrently with native symbionts, we selected four species introduced to California (two invasive and two noninvasive in the region) and identified rhizobial strains associating with each species in their native and novel ranges. We amplified three genes to examine phylogenetic placement (16S rRNA) and provenance (nifD and nodC) of rhizobia associating with acacias in California and Australia. We found that all Acacia species, regardless of invasive status, are associating with rhizobia of Australian origin in their introduced ranges, indicating that concurrent acacia–rhizobia introductions have occurred for all species tested. Our results suggest that cointroduction of rhizobial symbionts may be involved in the establishment of non-native acacias in their introduced ranges, but do not contribute to the differential invasiveness of Acacia species introduced abroad.
Acacia verticillata roots with nodules attached. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/femsec/fiac138 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738195562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/femsec/fiac138</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2823841772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-3985821c6f9c2aa70329aa292a8f575bd77520a0780ba73e69563276af48af353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLxDAUBeAgiuNr61ICbnQxTh5Nkyxl8AWCLnRdbtMEM7TJmLQD-uutzPjAjask8N1DuAehY0ouKNF85myXrZk5D4ZytYX2qJDFtNQF3f51n6D9nBeEUMELsosmvOS65KLYQ4vHFFc2QDAWR4fTi3-PtYcW57eu9jH0GfuMs-98Cwm7mLAPK8h-ZTGEBocYft4GjIfRhz7FZjC2wX3Ec2j9OBY8HKIdB222R5vzAD1fXz3Nb6f3Dzd388v7qeGU9VOulVCMmtJpwwAk4UwDMM1AOSFF3UgpGAEiFalBcltqUXImS3CFAscFP0Bn69xliq-DzX3V-Wxs20KwccgVk1xRLUTJRnr6hy7ikML4u4opxlVBpfxUF2tlUsw5WVctk-8gvVWUVJ8tVOsWqk0L48DJJnaoO9t886-1j-B8DeKw_C_sAyffk6U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2823841772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Provenance of rhizobial symbionts is similar for invasive and noninvasive acacias introduced to California</title><source>Oxford Open</source><creator>Klock, Metha M ; Urbina, Hector G ; Barrett, Luke G ; Thrall, Peter H ; Harms, Kyle E</creator><creatorcontrib>Klock, Metha M ; Urbina, Hector G ; Barrett, Luke G ; Thrall, Peter H ; Harms, Kyle E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Plant–soil interactions can be important drivers of biological invasions. In particular, the symbiotic relationship between legumes and nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria (i.e. rhizobia) may be influential in invasion success. Legumes, including Australian acacias, have been introduced into novel ranges around the world. Our goal was to examine the acacia–rhizobia symbiosis to determine whether cointroduction of non-native mutualists plays a role in invasiveness of introduced legumes. To determine whether acacias were introduced abroad concurrently with native symbionts, we selected four species introduced to California (two invasive and two noninvasive in the region) and identified rhizobial strains associating with each species in their native and novel ranges. We amplified three genes to examine phylogenetic placement (16S rRNA) and provenance (nifD and nodC) of rhizobia associating with acacias in California and Australia. We found that all Acacia species, regardless of invasive status, are associating with rhizobia of Australian origin in their introduced ranges, indicating that concurrent acacia–rhizobia introductions have occurred for all species tested. Our results suggest that cointroduction of rhizobial symbionts may be involved in the establishment of non-native acacias in their introduced ranges, but do not contribute to the differential invasiveness of Acacia species introduced abroad.
Acacia verticillata roots with nodules attached.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1574-6941</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0168-6496</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-6941</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiac138</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36396354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acacia ; Australia ; Bacteria ; California ; Ecology ; Fabaceae ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Invasiveness ; Legumes ; Microbiology ; Nitrogen fixation ; Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria ; Nitrogenation ; Phylogeny ; Provenance ; Rhizobium - genetics ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; rRNA 16S ; Soil ; Soil bacteria ; Soil microorganisms ; Soils ; Symbionts ; Symbiosis</subject><ispartof>FEMS microbiology ecology, 2022-11, Vol.98 (12)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-3985821c6f9c2aa70329aa292a8f575bd77520a0780ba73e69563276af48af353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4182-1396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1604,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiac138$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396354$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klock, Metha M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbina, Hector G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Luke G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thrall, Peter H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, Kyle E</creatorcontrib><title>Provenance of rhizobial symbionts is similar for invasive and noninvasive acacias introduced to California</title><title>FEMS microbiology ecology</title><addtitle>FEMS Microbiol Ecol</addtitle><description>Abstract
Plant–soil interactions can be important drivers of biological invasions. In particular, the symbiotic relationship between legumes and nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria (i.e. rhizobia) may be influential in invasion success. Legumes, including Australian acacias, have been introduced into novel ranges around the world. Our goal was to examine the acacia–rhizobia symbiosis to determine whether cointroduction of non-native mutualists plays a role in invasiveness of introduced legumes. To determine whether acacias were introduced abroad concurrently with native symbionts, we selected four species introduced to California (two invasive and two noninvasive in the region) and identified rhizobial strains associating with each species in their native and novel ranges. We amplified three genes to examine phylogenetic placement (16S rRNA) and provenance (nifD and nodC) of rhizobia associating with acacias in California and Australia. We found that all Acacia species, regardless of invasive status, are associating with rhizobia of Australian origin in their introduced ranges, indicating that concurrent acacia–rhizobia introductions have occurred for all species tested. Our results suggest that cointroduction of rhizobial symbionts may be involved in the establishment of non-native acacias in their introduced ranges, but do not contribute to the differential invasiveness of Acacia species introduced abroad.
Acacia verticillata roots with nodules attached.</description><subject>Acacia</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fabaceae</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Nitrogen fixation</subject><subject>Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria</subject><subject>Nitrogenation</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Provenance</subject><subject>Rhizobium - genetics</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil bacteria</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Symbionts</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><issn>1574-6941</issn><issn>0168-6496</issn><issn>1574-6941</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0UtLxDAUBeAgiuNr61ICbnQxTh5Nkyxl8AWCLnRdbtMEM7TJmLQD-uutzPjAjask8N1DuAehY0ouKNF85myXrZk5D4ZytYX2qJDFtNQF3f51n6D9nBeEUMELsosmvOS65KLYQ4vHFFc2QDAWR4fTi3-PtYcW57eu9jH0GfuMs-98Cwm7mLAPK8h-ZTGEBocYft4GjIfRhz7FZjC2wX3Ec2j9OBY8HKIdB222R5vzAD1fXz3Nb6f3Dzd388v7qeGU9VOulVCMmtJpwwAk4UwDMM1AOSFF3UgpGAEiFalBcltqUXImS3CFAscFP0Bn69xliq-DzX3V-Wxs20KwccgVk1xRLUTJRnr6hy7ikML4u4opxlVBpfxUF2tlUsw5WVctk-8gvVWUVJ8tVOsWqk0L48DJJnaoO9t886-1j-B8DeKw_C_sAyffk6U</recordid><startdate>20221126</startdate><enddate>20221126</enddate><creator>Klock, Metha M</creator><creator>Urbina, Hector G</creator><creator>Barrett, Luke G</creator><creator>Thrall, Peter H</creator><creator>Harms, Kyle E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-1396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221126</creationdate><title>Provenance of rhizobial symbionts is similar for invasive and noninvasive acacias introduced to California</title><author>Klock, Metha M ; Urbina, Hector G ; Barrett, Luke G ; Thrall, Peter H ; Harms, Kyle E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-3985821c6f9c2aa70329aa292a8f575bd77520a0780ba73e69563276af48af353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acacia</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fabaceae</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Nitrogen fixation</topic><topic>Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria</topic><topic>Nitrogenation</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Provenance</topic><topic>Rhizobium - genetics</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil bacteria</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Symbionts</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klock, Metha M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbina, Hector G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Luke G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thrall, Peter H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, Kyle E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>FEMS microbiology ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klock, Metha M</au><au>Urbina, Hector G</au><au>Barrett, Luke G</au><au>Thrall, Peter H</au><au>Harms, Kyle E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Provenance of rhizobial symbionts is similar for invasive and noninvasive acacias introduced to California</atitle><jtitle>FEMS microbiology ecology</jtitle><addtitle>FEMS Microbiol Ecol</addtitle><date>2022-11-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>12</issue><issn>1574-6941</issn><issn>0168-6496</issn><eissn>1574-6941</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Plant–soil interactions can be important drivers of biological invasions. In particular, the symbiotic relationship between legumes and nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria (i.e. rhizobia) may be influential in invasion success. Legumes, including Australian acacias, have been introduced into novel ranges around the world. Our goal was to examine the acacia–rhizobia symbiosis to determine whether cointroduction of non-native mutualists plays a role in invasiveness of introduced legumes. To determine whether acacias were introduced abroad concurrently with native symbionts, we selected four species introduced to California (two invasive and two noninvasive in the region) and identified rhizobial strains associating with each species in their native and novel ranges. We amplified three genes to examine phylogenetic placement (16S rRNA) and provenance (nifD and nodC) of rhizobia associating with acacias in California and Australia. We found that all Acacia species, regardless of invasive status, are associating with rhizobia of Australian origin in their introduced ranges, indicating that concurrent acacia–rhizobia introductions have occurred for all species tested. Our results suggest that cointroduction of rhizobial symbionts may be involved in the establishment of non-native acacias in their introduced ranges, but do not contribute to the differential invasiveness of Acacia species introduced abroad.
Acacia verticillata roots with nodules attached.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36396354</pmid><doi>10.1093/femsec/fiac138</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-1396</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1574-6941 |
ispartof | FEMS microbiology ecology, 2022-11, Vol.98 (12) |
issn | 1574-6941 0168-6496 1574-6941 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738195562 |
source | Oxford Open |
subjects | Acacia Australia Bacteria California Ecology Fabaceae Indigenous species Introduced species Invasive species Invasiveness Legumes Microbiology Nitrogen fixation Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria Nitrogenation Phylogeny Provenance Rhizobium - genetics RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics rRNA 16S Soil Soil bacteria Soil microorganisms Soils Symbionts Symbiosis |
title | Provenance of rhizobial symbionts is similar for invasive and noninvasive acacias introduced to California |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A40%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Provenance%20of%20rhizobial%20symbionts%20is%20similar%20for%20invasive%20and%20noninvasive%20acacias%20introduced%20to%20California&rft.jtitle=FEMS%20microbiology%20ecology&rft.au=Klock,%20Metha%20M&rft.date=2022-11-26&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=12&rft.issn=1574-6941&rft.eissn=1574-6941&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/femsec/fiac138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2823841772%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-3985821c6f9c2aa70329aa292a8f575bd77520a0780ba73e69563276af48af353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2823841772&rft_id=info:pmid/36396354&rft_oup_id=10.1093/femsec/fiac138&rfr_iscdi=true |