Loading…

Market exposure and human morality

According to evolutionary theories, markets may foster an internalized and universalist prosociality because it supports market-based cooperation. This paper uses the cultural folklore of 943 pre-industrial ethnolinguistic groups to show that a society’s degree of market interactions, proxied by the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature human behaviour 2023-01, Vol.7 (1), p.134-141
Main Author: Enke, Benjamin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-16bf522d56097ac09b1fd8fd539e7957dffaaede79a191985424b39ef8a714c53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-16bf522d56097ac09b1fd8fd539e7957dffaaede79a191985424b39ef8a714c53
container_end_page 141
container_issue 1
container_start_page 134
container_title Nature human behaviour
container_volume 7
creator Enke, Benjamin
description According to evolutionary theories, markets may foster an internalized and universalist prosociality because it supports market-based cooperation. This paper uses the cultural folklore of 943 pre-industrial ethnolinguistic groups to show that a society’s degree of market interactions, proxied by the presence of intercommunity trade and money, is associated with the cultural salience of (1) prosocial behaviour, (2) interpersonal trust, (3) universalist moral values and (4) moral emotions of guilt, shame and anger. To provide tentative evidence that a part of this correlation reflects a causal effect of market interactions, the analysis leverages both fine-grained geographic variation across neighbouring historical societies and plausibly exogenous variation in the presence of markets that arises through proximity to historical trade routes or the local degree of ecological diversity. The results suggest that the coevolutionary process involving markets and morality partly consists of economic markets shaping a moral system of a universalist and internalized prosociality. This paper uses historical folklore to show that a society’s degree of market interactions is strongly associated with the cultural salience of prosocial behaviour, interpersonal trust, universalist moral values, and emotions of guilt and shame.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41562-022-01480-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2739066170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2770187646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-16bf522d56097ac09b1fd8fd539e7957dffaaede79a191985424b39ef8a714c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EolXpC3BAEVy4BDxe4yOqyiIVcYGz5SQ2tGQpdiK1b48hZREHDqMZab75bX0IHQO-AEyzy8CAC5JiEgtYhtPNHhoTqmRKqWT7v-YRmoawwhiDokxJcYhGVDAAyvgYnd4b_2q7xG7Wbei9TUxTJi99bZqkbr2plt32CB04UwU73fUJerqeP85u08XDzd3sapEWFPMuBZE7TkjJBVbSFFjl4MrMlZwqKxWXpXPG2DLOBhSojDPC8rhzmZHACk4n6HzIXfv2rbeh0_UyFLaqTGPbPmgiqcJCgMQRPfuDrtreN_F3kZIYMimYiBQZqMK3IXjr9Nova-O3GrD-kKgHiTpK1J8S9SYeneyi-7y25ffJl7II0AEIcdU8W__z9j-x7-7Metw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2770187646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Market exposure and human morality</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Enke, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Enke, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>According to evolutionary theories, markets may foster an internalized and universalist prosociality because it supports market-based cooperation. This paper uses the cultural folklore of 943 pre-industrial ethnolinguistic groups to show that a society’s degree of market interactions, proxied by the presence of intercommunity trade and money, is associated with the cultural salience of (1) prosocial behaviour, (2) interpersonal trust, (3) universalist moral values and (4) moral emotions of guilt, shame and anger. To provide tentative evidence that a part of this correlation reflects a causal effect of market interactions, the analysis leverages both fine-grained geographic variation across neighbouring historical societies and plausibly exogenous variation in the presence of markets that arises through proximity to historical trade routes or the local degree of ecological diversity. The results suggest that the coevolutionary process involving markets and morality partly consists of economic markets shaping a moral system of a universalist and internalized prosociality. This paper uses historical folklore to show that a society’s degree of market interactions is strongly associated with the cultural salience of prosocial behaviour, interpersonal trust, universalist moral values, and emotions of guilt and shame.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2397-3374</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2397-3374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01480-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36411345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>4014/159 ; 4014/477/2811 ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cooperation ; Emotions ; Ethnolinguistic groups ; Evolutionary theories ; Experimental Psychology ; Folklore ; Guilt ; Humans ; Internalization ; Interpersonal Relations ; Life Sciences ; Markets ; Microeconomics ; Money ; Morality ; Morals ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Neurosciences ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Prosocial behavior ; Proximity ; Shame</subject><ispartof>Nature human behaviour, 2023-01, Vol.7 (1), p.134-141</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-16bf522d56097ac09b1fd8fd539e7957dffaaede79a191985424b39ef8a714c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-16bf522d56097ac09b1fd8fd539e7957dffaaede79a191985424b39ef8a714c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7400-3293</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2770187646?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,21394,27924,27925,33223,33611,33612,43733</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36411345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Enke, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Market exposure and human morality</title><title>Nature human behaviour</title><addtitle>Nat Hum Behav</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Hum Behav</addtitle><description>According to evolutionary theories, markets may foster an internalized and universalist prosociality because it supports market-based cooperation. This paper uses the cultural folklore of 943 pre-industrial ethnolinguistic groups to show that a society’s degree of market interactions, proxied by the presence of intercommunity trade and money, is associated with the cultural salience of (1) prosocial behaviour, (2) interpersonal trust, (3) universalist moral values and (4) moral emotions of guilt, shame and anger. To provide tentative evidence that a part of this correlation reflects a causal effect of market interactions, the analysis leverages both fine-grained geographic variation across neighbouring historical societies and plausibly exogenous variation in the presence of markets that arises through proximity to historical trade routes or the local degree of ecological diversity. The results suggest that the coevolutionary process involving markets and morality partly consists of economic markets shaping a moral system of a universalist and internalized prosociality. This paper uses historical folklore to show that a society’s degree of market interactions is strongly associated with the cultural salience of prosocial behaviour, interpersonal trust, universalist moral values, and emotions of guilt and shame.</description><subject>4014/159</subject><subject>4014/477/2811</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Ethnolinguistic groups</subject><subject>Evolutionary theories</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Folklore</subject><subject>Guilt</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internalization</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Prosocial behavior</subject><subject>Proximity</subject><subject>Shame</subject><issn>2397-3374</issn><issn>2397-3374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EolXpC3BAEVy4BDxe4yOqyiIVcYGz5SQ2tGQpdiK1b48hZREHDqMZab75bX0IHQO-AEyzy8CAC5JiEgtYhtPNHhoTqmRKqWT7v-YRmoawwhiDokxJcYhGVDAAyvgYnd4b_2q7xG7Wbei9TUxTJi99bZqkbr2plt32CB04UwU73fUJerqeP85u08XDzd3sapEWFPMuBZE7TkjJBVbSFFjl4MrMlZwqKxWXpXPG2DLOBhSojDPC8rhzmZHACk4n6HzIXfv2rbeh0_UyFLaqTGPbPmgiqcJCgMQRPfuDrtreN_F3kZIYMimYiBQZqMK3IXjr9Nova-O3GrD-kKgHiTpK1J8S9SYeneyi-7y25ffJl7II0AEIcdU8W__z9j-x7-7Metw</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Enke, Benjamin</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-3293</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Market exposure and human morality</title><author>Enke, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-16bf522d56097ac09b1fd8fd539e7957dffaaede79a191985424b39ef8a714c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>4014/159</topic><topic>4014/477/2811</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Ethnolinguistic groups</topic><topic>Evolutionary theories</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Folklore</topic><topic>Guilt</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internalization</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Prosocial behavior</topic><topic>Proximity</topic><topic>Shame</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Enke, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature human behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Enke, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Market exposure and human morality</atitle><jtitle>Nature human behaviour</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hum Behav</stitle><addtitle>Nat Hum Behav</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>134-141</pages><issn>2397-3374</issn><eissn>2397-3374</eissn><abstract>According to evolutionary theories, markets may foster an internalized and universalist prosociality because it supports market-based cooperation. This paper uses the cultural folklore of 943 pre-industrial ethnolinguistic groups to show that a society’s degree of market interactions, proxied by the presence of intercommunity trade and money, is associated with the cultural salience of (1) prosocial behaviour, (2) interpersonal trust, (3) universalist moral values and (4) moral emotions of guilt, shame and anger. To provide tentative evidence that a part of this correlation reflects a causal effect of market interactions, the analysis leverages both fine-grained geographic variation across neighbouring historical societies and plausibly exogenous variation in the presence of markets that arises through proximity to historical trade routes or the local degree of ecological diversity. The results suggest that the coevolutionary process involving markets and morality partly consists of economic markets shaping a moral system of a universalist and internalized prosociality. This paper uses historical folklore to show that a society’s degree of market interactions is strongly associated with the cultural salience of prosocial behaviour, interpersonal trust, universalist moral values, and emotions of guilt and shame.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>36411345</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41562-022-01480-x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-3293</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2397-3374
ispartof Nature human behaviour, 2023-01, Vol.7 (1), p.134-141
issn 2397-3374
2397-3374
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2739066170
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection
subjects 4014/159
4014/477/2811
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cooperation
Emotions
Ethnolinguistic groups
Evolutionary theories
Experimental Psychology
Folklore
Guilt
Humans
Internalization
Interpersonal Relations
Life Sciences
Markets
Microeconomics
Money
Morality
Morals
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Neurosciences
Personality and Social Psychology
Prosocial behavior
Proximity
Shame
title Market exposure and human morality
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A12%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Market%20exposure%20and%20human%20morality&rft.jtitle=Nature%20human%20behaviour&rft.au=Enke,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=134-141&rft.issn=2397-3374&rft.eissn=2397-3374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41562-022-01480-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2770187646%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-16bf522d56097ac09b1fd8fd539e7957dffaaede79a191985424b39ef8a714c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2770187646&rft_id=info:pmid/36411345&rfr_iscdi=true