Worldwide snapshot of trauma team structure and training: an international survey

• Published in: European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2023-08, Vol.49 (4), p.1771-1781
• Main Authors: Bento, André, Ferreira, Luís, Yánez Benitez, Carlos, Koleda, Piotr, Fraga, Gustavo P., Kozera, Piotr, Baptista, Sérgio, Mesquita, Carlos, Alexandrino, Henrique
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Critical Care Medicine; Emergency medical care; Emergency Medicine; Hospitals; Intensive; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Multidisciplinary teams; Original Article; Polls & surveys; Social networks; Social sciences; Sports Medicine; Surgery; Surgical Orthopedics; Teaching; Teams; Teamwork; Trauma care; Traumatic Surgery
• ISSN: 1863-9933; 1863-9941
• DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02166-9

Introduction Trauma teams (TTs) are a key tool in trauma care, as they bring a multidisciplinary approach to the trauma patient, improving outcomes. Excellent teamwork (TW) requires not only individual skills but also training at non-technical skills (NTS). Although there is evidence supporting TTs, there is little information regarding how they are organized and trained. With this study, we intend to assess the reality of TTs all over the world, focusing on how they are organized and trained. Materials and methods We composed a 42-question sheet on Google Forms, in four different languages (English, Polish, Portuguese, and Spanish). The questions regarded the respondents’ background, and their respective hospitals’ trauma patient management, TT features and its training, NTS and TW. The survey was shared on social media, through the International Assessment Group of Online Surgical & Trauma Education community, and the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Statistical analysis was performed on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS ® ) version 27. Results We obtained 296 answers from 52 different countries, with 6 having at least 10 answers (Brazil, Portugal, Poland, Spain, Italy, and USA). While the majority of the respondents (97%) agreed that TTs can improve outcomes, only 61% have a TT in their hospital, with 69% of these being dedicated TTs. General surgery (76%), trauma surgery (68%), and anesthesia (66%) were the three most common specialties in the teams. Teams performed briefings and debriefings with a frequency of, at least, “often” in only 49% and 38%, respectively. Only 50% and 33% of the respondents stated that their hospital provided trauma management courses focusing on individual technical skills, and TT training courses, respectively. The Advanced Trauma Life Support (85%), the Definitive Surgical and Anesthetic Trauma Care (38%), and the European Trauma Course (31%) were the three trauma management courses of choice. Regarding TT training courses, the European Trauma Course (52%) and local/in-house (42%) courses were the most common ones. Most participants (93%) stated that NTS were highly important in trauma care. However, only 60% of the respondents had postgraduate training on NTS and TW, and only 24% had this type of training on an undergraduate level. Conclusion The number of TTs worldwide does not match their relevance in trauma care. Institutions are not providing enough trauma courses, particularly TT train